-
International Wound Journal May 2022This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese...
This study aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with chronic wounds were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A randomised-effects model was applied to pool results according to the types of wounds or ulcers. Among 12 included studies, ozone was implemented by topical application (ozone gas bath, ozonated oil, ozone water flushing) and systematic applications including autologous blood immunomodulation and rectal insufflation. The results indicated compared with standard control therapy for diabetic foot ulcers, ozone therapy regardless of monotherapy or combined control treatment markedly accelerated the improvement of the wound area(standardised mean difference(SMD) = 66.54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [46.18,86.90], P < .00001) and reduced the amputation rate (risk ration (RR) = 0.36, 95% CI = [0.24,0.54], P < .00001). But there is no improvement in the proportion of participants with completely healed wounds and length of hospital stay. No adverse events associated with ozone treatment have been reported. And the efficacy of ozone therapy for other wound types is still uncertain because of no sufficient studies. More high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of ozone therapy for chronic wounds or ulcers.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Diabetic Foot; Humans; Ozone; Ulcer; Wound Healing
PubMed: 34612569
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13687 -
Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex... Jan 2022We provide a comprehensive and updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between air pollution exposure and depression, searching PubMed, Embase,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We provide a comprehensive and updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between air pollution exposure and depression, searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Sciences for relevant articles published up to May 2021, and eventually including 39 studies. Meta-analyses were performed separately according to pollutant type [particulate matter with diameter ≤10 μm (PM) and ≤2.5 μm (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO), sulfur dioxide (SO), ozone (O), and carbon monoxide (CO)] and exposure duration [short- (<30 days) and long-term (≥30 days)]. Test for homogeneity based on Cochran's Q and I statistics were calculated and the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) random effect model was applied. We assessed overall quality of pooled estimates, influence of single studies on the meta-analytic estimates, sources of between-study heterogeneity, and publication bias. We observed an increased risk of depression associated with long-term exposure to PM (relative risk: 1.074, 95% confidence interval: 1.021-1.129) and NO (1.037, 1.011-1.064), and with short-term exposure to PM (1.009, 1.006-1.012), PM (1.009, 1.007-1.011), NO (1.022, 1.012-1.033), SO (1.024, 1.010-1.037), O (1.011, 0.997-1.026), and CO (1.062, 1.020-1.105). The publication bias affecting half of the investigated associations and the high heterogeneity characterizing most of the meta-analytic estimates partly prevent to draw very firm conclusions. On the other hand, the coherence of all the estimates after excluding single studies in the sensitivity analysis supports the soundness of our results. This especially applies to the association between PM and depression, strengthened by the absence of heterogeneity and of relevant publication bias in both long- and short-term exposure studies. Should further investigations be designed, they should involve large sample sizes, well-defined diagnostic criteria for depression, and thorough control of potential confounding factors. Finally, studies dedicated to the comprehension of the mechanisms underlying the association between air pollution and depression remain necessary.
Topics: Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Depression; Environmental Exposure; Humans; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter
PubMed: 34600062
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118245 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Mar 2015To review the evidence for the short term association between air pollution and stroke. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To review the evidence for the short term association between air pollution and stroke.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Embase, Global Health, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science searched to January 2014 with no language restrictions.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies investigating the short term associations (up to lag of seven days) between daily increases in gaseous pollutants (carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone) and particulate matter (<2.5 µm or <10 µm diameter (PM2.5 and PM10)), and admission to hospital for stroke or mortality.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Admission to hospital and mortality from stroke.
RESULTS
From 2748 articles, 238 were reviewed in depth with 103 satisfying our inclusion criteria and 94 contributing to our meta-estimates. This provided a total of 6.2 million events across 28 countries. Admission to hospital for stroke or mortality from stroke was associated with an increase in concentrations of carbon monoxide (relative risk 1.015 per 1 ppm, 95% confidence interval 1.004 to 1.026), sulphur dioxide (1.019 per 10 ppb, 1.011 to 1.027), and nitrogen dioxide (1.014 per 10 ppb, 1.009 to 1.019). Increases in PM2.5 and PM10 concentration were also associated with admission and mortality (1.011 per 10 μg/m(3) (1.011 to 1.012) and 1.003 per 10 µg/m(3) (1.002 to 1.004), respectively). The weakest association was seen with ozone (1.001 per 10 ppb, 1.000 to 1.002). Strongest associations were observed on the day of exposure with more persistent effects observed for PM(2·5).
CONCLUSION
Gaseous and particulate air pollutants have a marked and close temporal association with admissions to hospital for stroke or mortality from stroke. Public and environmental health policies to reduce air pollution could reduce the burden of stroke.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO-CRD42014009225.
Topics: Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Environmental Exposure; Humans; Particulate Matter; Patient Admission; Risk Factors; Stroke
PubMed: 25810496
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1295 -
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease : JAD 2019Both air pollution and dementia are current and growing global issues. There are plausible links between exposure to specific air pollutants and dementia.
BACKGROUND
Both air pollution and dementia are current and growing global issues. There are plausible links between exposure to specific air pollutants and dementia.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the evidence base with respect to the relationship between air pollution and later cognitive decline and dementia.
METHODS
Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO® were searched from their inception to September 2018, for publications reporting on longitudinal studies of exposure to air pollution and incident dementia or cognitive decline in adults. Studies reporting on exposure to tobacco smoke including passive smoking or on occupational exposure to pollutants were excluded. Using standard Cochrane methodology, two readers identified relevant abstracts, read full text publications, and extracted data into structured tables from relevant papers, as defined by inclusion and exclusion criteria. Papers were also assessed for validity. CRD42018094299Results:From 3,720 records, 13 papers were found to be relevant, with studies from the USA, Canada, Taiwan, Sweden, and the UK. Study follow-up ranged from one to 15 years. Pollutants examined included particulate matter ≤2.5 μ (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone. Studies varied in their methodology, population selection, assessment of exposure to pollution, and method of cognitive testing. Greater exposure to PM2.5, NO2/NOx, and CO were all associated with increased risk of dementia. The evidence for air pollutant exposure and cognitive decline was more equivocal.
CONCLUSION
Evidence is emerging that greater exposure to airborne pollutants is associated with increased risk of dementia.
Topics: Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Cognitive Dysfunction; Dementia; Environmental Exposure; Humans; Particulate Matter
PubMed: 30775976
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180631 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Apr 2023To investigate the role of air pollutants in risk of dementia, considering differences by study factors that could influence findings. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the role of air pollutants in risk of dementia, considering differences by study factors that could influence findings.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Psycinfo, and OVID Medline from database inception through July 2022.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Studies that included adults (≥18 years), a longitudinal follow-up, considered US Environmental Protection Agency criteria air pollutants and proxies of traffic pollution, averaged exposure over a year or more, and reported associations between ambient pollutants and clinical dementia. Two authors independently extracted data using a predefined data extraction form and assessed risk of bias using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. A meta-analysis with Knapp-Hartung standard errors was done when at least three studies for a given pollutant used comparable approaches.
RESULTS
2080 records identified 51 studies for inclusion. Most studies were at high risk of bias, although in many cases bias was towards the null. 14 studies could be meta-analysed for particulate matter <2.5 µm in diameter (PM). The overall hazard ratio per 2 μg/m PM was 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.09). The hazard ratio among seven studies that used active case ascertainment was 1.42 (1.00 to 2.02) and among seven studies that used passive case ascertainment was 1.03 (0.98 to 1.07). The overall hazard ratio per 10 μg/m nitrogen dioxide was 1.02 ((0.98 to 1.06); nine studies) and per 10 μg/m nitrogen oxide was 1.05 ((0.98 to 1.13); five studies). Ozone had no clear association with dementia (hazard ratio per 5 μg/m was 1.00 (0.98 to 1.05); four studies).
CONCLUSION
PM might be a risk factor for dementia, as well as nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen oxide, although with more limited data. The meta-analysed hazard ratios are subject to limitations that require interpretation with caution. Outcome ascertainment approaches differ across studies and each exposure assessment approach likely is only a proxy for causally relevant exposure in relation to clinical dementia outcomes. Studies that evaluate critical periods of exposure and pollutants other than PM, and studies that actively assess all participants for outcomes are needed. Nonetheless, our results can provide current best estimates for use in burden of disease and regulatory setting efforts.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42021277083.
Topics: Humans; Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Dementia; Environmental Exposure
PubMed: 37019461
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071620 -
JAMA Network Open Jun 2020Knowledge of whether serious adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with increasingly widespread effects of climate change in the US would be crucial for the...
IMPORTANCE
Knowledge of whether serious adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with increasingly widespread effects of climate change in the US would be crucial for the obstetrical medical community and for women and families across the country.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5), ozone, and heat, and the association of these factors with preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
This systematic review involved a comprehensive search for primary literature in Cochrane Library, Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov website, and MEDLINE. Qualifying primary research studies included human participants in US populations that were published in English between January 1, 2007, and April 30, 2019. Included articles analyzed the associations between air pollutants or heat and obstetrical outcomes. Comparative observational cohort studies and cross-sectional studies with comparators were included, without minimum sample size. Additional articles found through reference review were also considered. Articles analyzing other obstetrical outcomes, non-US populations, and reviews were excluded. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility. The Arskey and O'Malley scoping review framework was used. Data extraction was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.
FINDINGS
Of the 1851 articles identified, 68 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 32 798 152 births were analyzed, with a mean (SD) of 565 485 (783 278) births per study. A total of 57 studies (48 of 58 [84%] on air pollutants; 9 of 10 [90%] on heat) showed a significant association of air pollutant and heat exposure with birth outcomes. Positive associations were found across all US geographic regions. Exposure to PM2.5 or ozone was associated with increased risk of preterm birth in 19 of 24 studies (79%) and low birth weight in 25 of 29 studies (86%). The subpopulations at highest risk were persons with asthma and minority groups, especially black mothers. Accurate comparisons of risk were limited by differences in study design, exposure measurement, population demographics, and seasonality.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This review suggests that increasingly common environmental exposures exacerbated by climate change are significantly associated with serious adverse pregnancy outcomes across the US.
Topics: Air Pollution; Female; Hot Temperature; Humans; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Maternal Exposure; Observational Studies as Topic; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Stillbirth; United States
PubMed: 32556259
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8243 -
Environment International Sep 2020Air pollution is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Short-term exposure (from one hour to days) to selected air pollutants has been associated with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Short-term exposure to particulate matter (PM and PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO), and ozone (O) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Air pollution is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Short-term exposure (from one hour to days) to selected air pollutants has been associated with human mortality. This systematic review was conducted to analyse the evidence on the effects of short-term exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters less or equal than 10 and 2.5 µm (PM PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO), and ozone (O), on all-cause mortality, and PM and PM on cardiovascular, respiratory, and cerebrovascular mortality.
METHODS
We included studies on human populations exposed to outdoor air pollution from any source, excluding occupational exposures. Relative risks (RRs) per 10 µg/m increase in air pollutants concentrations were used as the effect estimates. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using 80% prediction intervals. Risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies was analysed using a new domain-based assessment tool, developed by a working group convened by the World Health Organization and designed specifically to evaluate RoB within eligible air pollution studies included in systematic reviews. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses by age, sex, continent, study design, single or multicity studies, time lag, and RoB. The certainty of evidence was assessed for each exposure-outcome combination. The protocol for this review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018087749).
RESULTS
We included 196 articles in quantitative analysis. All combinations of pollutants and all-cause and cause-specific mortality were positively associated in the main analysis, and in a wide range of sensitivity analyses. The only exception was NO, but when considering a 1-hour maximum exposure. We found positive associations between pollutants and all-cause mortality for PM (RR: 1.0041; 95% CI: 1.0034-1.0049), PM (RR: 1.0065; 95% CI: 1.0044-1.0086), NO (24-hour average) (RR: 1.0072; 95% CI: 1.0059-1.0085), and O (RR: 1.0043; 95% CI: 1.0034-1.0052). PM and PM were also positively associated with cardiovascular, respiratory, and cerebrovascular mortality. We found some degree of heterogeneity between studies in three exposure-outcome combinations, and this heterogeneity could not be explained after subgroup analysis. RoB was low or moderate in the majority of articles. The certainty of evidence was judged as high in 10 out of 11 combinations, and moderate in one combination.
CONCLUSIONS
This study found evidence of a positive association between short-term exposure to PM, PM, NO, and O and all-cause mortality, and between PM and PM and cardiovascular, respiratory and cerebrovascular mortality. These results were robust through several sensitivity analyses. In general, the level of evidence was high, meaning that we can be confident in the associations found in this study.
Topics: Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Cause of Death; Environmental Exposure; Humans; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Time Factors
PubMed: 32590284
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105876 -
Acta Reumatologica Portuguesa 2018Low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation is common in the general population, with evident repercussion in quality of life and a significant economic burden....
BACKGROUND
Low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation is common in the general population, with evident repercussion in quality of life and a significant economic burden. Patients refractory to conservative treatment seek additional treatment and minimally invasive interventions were proposed as valid options. Ozone therapy has been suggested as an alternative due to its potential analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ozone therapy for low back pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic search was performed in Pubmed and Scopus, followed by a three-step selection process. Data was processed by 2 independent reviewers and information was gathered based in pre-defined variables. Only articles performed in humans; original and English written; on treatment with ozone; comparing the result of ozone therapy (experimental group) with another non-ozone intervention (control group); and on patients with lumbar pain and disc hernia, were included.
RESULTS
From 439 references retrieved after duplicates removal, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and 7 studies were included in the final revision. One article compared treatment with ozone versus placebo, one ozone and global postural re-education versus global postural re-education alone, two the combination of ozone with steroid versus steroid alone, two ozone versus steroid and one ozone versus micro-discectomy. All but the study comparing ozone application with micro-discectomy, showed similar or better results in the experimental group. Only three studies evaluated the presence of side effects. In two papers no complication was reported, and in the other, a low percentage of adverse effects was observed, not significantly different between the two study groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Only a small number of poor quality studies on ozone effect in low back pain and disc herniation were available for inclusion in our review. Nevertheless, these reported an improvement in pain and functional scores with its application. Complications, mostly minor, but potentially serious are underreported. Additional studies with adequate and consistent methodologies are needed before the role of ozone can be established in the management of low back pain.
Topics: Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Ozone; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30414366
DOI: No ID Found -
European Review For Medical and... Mar 2021Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe drug-related side effect mostly seen in the maxillofacial region of patients under current or previous...
OBJECTIVE
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe drug-related side effect mostly seen in the maxillofacial region of patients under current or previous treatment with antiresorptive and/or angiogenic agents. There is a wide range of treatment options explained in literature for the management of this condition, from conservative treatments to surgical procedures of various levels of invasiveness, which are sometimes supplemented with adjunctive therapies. The present systematic review aimed at evaluating the treatment options of MRONJ in terms of successful outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched. The search was limited to clinical studies involving human subjects with at least 3 cases. There was no other limitation for language, publication date, and study design for the articles to be included. A hand search of the bibliographies of identified articles was also performed. The evaluation criterion was an improvement in the healing of the treated site after treatment procedures.
RESULTS
After evaluation of the full text of the articles, 118 articles were selected for evaluation (15 platelet concentrates, 4 teriparatide, 10 laser therapy, 3 hyperbaric oxygen, 2 ozone applications, 9 conservative protocols, and 75 surgical interventions articles). The evaluated articles reported positive improvements in healing/staging of the osteonecrosis sites.
CONCLUSIONS
Due to the low evidence level and the limited sample size of the studies included, the results of this review must be cautiously interpreted. However, they can be suggestive for evaluating the possible benefits of these treatment options in MRONJ management. Further prospective comparative studies with a large sample size are urgently needed to confirm the results.
Topics: Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Humans; Laser Therapy
PubMed: 33829453
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202103_25430 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Apr 2023Ozone is a naturally occurring unstable compound with three oxygen atoms that generally transforms into an oxygen molecule, releasing one oxygen atom. This feature has... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Ozone is a naturally occurring unstable compound with three oxygen atoms that generally transforms into an oxygen molecule, releasing one oxygen atom. This feature has been exploited in dentistry for numerous applications, including for periodontal diseases and peri-implantitis.
METHODS
This review was performed in relation to the PRISMA flow chart and was annotated in the PROSPERO register. PICO questions were used as research questions. The risk of bias in the non-randomized clinical trials was appraised using the ROBINS-I tool.
RESULTS
An electronic search found a total of 1073 records, in particular, 842 from MEDLINE/PubMed, 13 from Bio Med Central, 160 from Scopus, 1 from the Cochrane library databases, and 57 from the PROSPERO register. A total of 17 studies were included in the present systematic review. Information regarding the characteristics of the periodontal clinical and radiographic parameters for gaseous ozone, ozonate water, ozonate oil, and ozone gel, including clinical attachment loss (CAL) probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and marginal bone levels (MBL), were obtained.
CONCLUSIONS
The studies included in this systematic review show different results regarding the ozone in periodontal treatment in association with or without SRP.
PubMed: 37109032
DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040646