-
Medicine Sep 2017The maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) perform as new prognostic factors, but the outcomes of the published articles were inconclusive. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the prognostic value of SUVmax, MTV, and TLG of PET/CT in patients with NPC.
METHODS
Relevant English articles were searched in PubMed and EMBASE. The data of patients and the survival outcomes were extracted. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were accounted to assess the prognostic value of the SUVmax, MTV, and TLG.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis combined 10 primary studies including 941 patients with NPC. The combined HRs (95% confidence interval [CI] of higher SUVmax, higher MTV, and higher TLG for event-free survival were 2.33 (95% CI, 1.39-3.91, P = .001), 2.51 (95% CI, 1.61-3.91, P < .0001), and 2.74 (95% CI, 1.91-3.93, P < .00001), respectively. Regarding overall survival, the combined HRs were 2.50 (95%CI, 1.65-3.78, P < .0001) with higher SUVmax, 3.30 (95% CI, 1.92-5.69, P < .0001) with higher MTV and 3.18 (95% CI, 1.70-5.96, P = .0003) with higher TLG.
CONCLUSION
SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were significant prognostic predictors in patients with NPC. And the results suggested that higher SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were associated with worse prognosis.
Topics: Carcinoma; Glycolysis; Humans; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prognosis; Tumor Burden
PubMed: 28906411
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008084 -
Cancer Cell International 2019The mammalian homologs of Lin-28, Lin28 (also called Lin28A) and Lin28B, are promising cancer biomarkers. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic...
BACKGROUND
The mammalian homologs of Lin-28, Lin28 (also called Lin28A) and Lin28B, are promising cancer biomarkers. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic values of Lin28A and Lin28B in multiple human malignancies.
METHODS
Systematic searches of the PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were used to identify relevant studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), or progression-free survival (PFS) were respectively calculated.
RESULTS
3772 Lin28A-associated patients and 1730 Lin28B-related cases were ultimately enrolled in this meta-analysis. The elevated expression level of Lin28A was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 1.60, P < 0.001) and poor RFS/DFS/PFS (HR = 1.62, P < 0.001) in patients with malignancies. Lin28B overexpression significantly correlated with unfavorable OS (HR = 1.72, P < 0.001) and RFS/DFS/PFS (HR = 2.35, P < 0.001) of human malignancies.
CONCLUSIONS
Lin28A and Lin28B possess significant prognostic values in various human malignancies. Overexpression of Lin28A or Lin28B suggests poor prognosis for cancer patients.
PubMed: 30976203
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-019-0788-z -
Genetic Epidemiology Jul 2016Risk of cancer is determined by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Although the study of gene-environment interactions (G×E) has been an active... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Risk of cancer is determined by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Although the study of gene-environment interactions (G×E) has been an active area of research, little is reported about the known findings in the literature.
METHODS
To examine the state of the science in G×E research in cancer, we performed a systematic review of published literature using gene-environment or pharmacogenomic flags from two curated databases of genetic association studies, the Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) literature finder and Cancer Genome-Wide Association and Meta Analyses Database (CancerGAMAdb), from January 1, 2001, to January 31, 2011. A supplemental search using HuGE was conducted for articles published from February 1, 2011, to April 11, 2013. A 25% sample of the supplemental publications was reviewed.
RESULTS
A total of 3,019 articles were identified in the original search. From these articles, 243 articles were determined to be relevant based on inclusion criteria (more than 3,500 interactions). From the supplemental search (1,400 articles identified), 29 additional relevant articles (1,370 interactions) were included. The majority of publications in both searches examined G×E in colon, rectal, or colorectal; breast; or lung cancer. Specific interactions examined most frequently included environmental factors categorized as energy balance (e.g., body mass index, diet), exogenous (e.g., oral contraceptives) and endogenous hormones (e.g., menopausal status), chemical environment (e.g., grilled meats), and lifestyle (e.g., smoking, alcohol intake). In both searches, the majority of interactions examined were using loci from candidate genes studies and none of the studies were genome-wide interaction studies (GEWIS). The most commonly reported measure was the interaction P-value, of which a sizable number of P-values were considered statistically significant (i.e., <0.05). In addition, the magnitude of interactions reported was modest.
CONCLUSION
Observations of published literature suggest that opportunity exists for increased sample size in G×E research, including GWAS-identified loci in G×E studies, exploring more GWAS approaches in G×E such as GEWIS, and improving the reporting of G×E findings.
Topics: Environmental Exposure; Gene-Environment Interaction; Genome, Human; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Life Style; Neoplasms; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
PubMed: 27061572
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21967 -
International Journal of Molecular... Sep 2022The aim of our meta-analysis is to analyze data available in the literature regarding a possible prognostic value of the albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) in prostate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of our meta-analysis is to analyze data available in the literature regarding a possible prognostic value of the albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. We distinguished our analysis in terms of PC staging, histologic aggressiveness, and risk of progression after treatments. A literature search process was performed (“prostatic cancer”, “albumin”, “globulin”, “albumin to globulin ratio”) following the PRISMA guidelines. In our meta-analysis, the pooled Event Rate (ER) estimate for each group of interest was calculated using a random effect model. Cases were distinguished in Low and High AGR groups based on an optimal cut-off value defined at ROC analysis. Four clinical trials were enclosed (sample size range from 214 to 6041 cases). The pooled Risk Difference for a non-organ confined PC between High AGR and Low AGR cases was −0.05 (95%CI: −0.12−0.01) with a very low rate of heterogeneity (I2 < 0.15%; p = 0.43) among studies (test of group differences p = 0.21). In non-metastatic PC cases, the pooled Risk Difference for biochemical progression (BCP) between High AGR and Low AGR cases was −0.05 (95%CI: −0.12−0.01) (I2 = 0.01%; p = 0.69) (test of group differences p = 0.12). In metastatic PC cases, AGR showed an independent significant (p < 0.01) predictive value either in terms of progression free survival (PFS) (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.642 (0.430−0.957)) or cancer specific survival (CSS) (OR: 0.412 (0.259−0.654)). Our meta-analysis showed homogeneous results supporting no significant predictive values for AGR in terms of staging, grading and biochemical progression in non-metastatic PC.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Globulins; Humans; Male; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Serum Albumin
PubMed: 36232828
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911501 -
Frontiers in Public Health 2022The association between environmental and socioeconomic risk factors and the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still inconclusive. A meta-analysis was... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The association between environmental and socioeconomic risk factors and the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still inconclusive. A meta-analysis was conducted to address this issue.
METHODS
We systematically searched the databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar and collected the related risk factors of HCC before March 6, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed on the odds ratio (OR) value and 95% CI of the correlation between environmental and socioeconomic factors and HCC. Begg's rank correlation test, Egger's linear regression test, and the funnel plot were employed for identification of the publication bias.
RESULTS
Out of 42 studies, a total of 57,892 participants were included. Environmental and socioeconomic risk factors including ever educated (illiteracy); race (Black, Hispanic, and Asian); medium and low incomes; occupations (farmer and labor); passive smoking; place of residence (rural); blood aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) adduct level; exposure of pesticide, etc., were statistically increased with the occurrence of HCC ( < 0.05) and OR values and 95% CIs were 1.37 (1.00, 1.89), 2.42 (1.10-5.31), 1.90 (0.87-4.17), 5.36 (0.72-40.14), 1.48 (1.11, 1.96), 1.74 (1.00-3.03), 1.49 (1.06-2.08), 1.52 (1.07-2.18), 1.43 (0.27, 7.51), 1.46 (1.09, 1.96), 2.58 (1.67-3.97), and 1.52 (0.95-2.42), respectively. We found 6-9, 9-12, and ≥12 years of education that statistically reduced the risk of the occurrence of HCC ( < 0.05) and OR values and 95% CIs were 0.70 (0.58, 0.86), 0.52 (0.40, 0.68), and 0.37 (0.23, 0.59), respectively. No significant associations ( > 0.05) were observed between race (Hispanic and Asian), passive smoking, marital status, place of birth, place of residence, and HCC. In stratified analysis, exposure of pesticide was statistically significant ( < 0.05), while race of black was on the contrary.
CONCLUSION
Environmental and socioeconomic risk factors have great impacts on the incidence rate of HCC. Improving national education and income levels can significantly reduce the risk of HCC.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42020151710.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Pesticides; Risk Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Tobacco Smoke Pollution
PubMed: 35252078
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.741490 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2002Snoezelen, multi-sensory stimulation, provides sensory stimuli to stimulate the primary senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste and smell, through the use of lighting... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Snoezelen, multi-sensory stimulation, provides sensory stimuli to stimulate the primary senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste and smell, through the use of lighting effects, tactile surfaces, meditative music and the odour of relaxing essential oils (Pinkney 1997). The clinical application of snoezelen has been extended from the field of learning disability to dementia care over the past decade. The rationale for its use lies in providing a sensory environment that places fewer demands on intellectual abilities but capitalizes on the residual sensorimotor abilities of people with dementia (e.g. Buettner 1999, Hope 1998). Practitioners are keen to use snoezelen in dementia care, and some encouraging results have been documented in the area of promoting adaptive behaviours (e.g. Baker, Long 1992, Spaull 1998). However, the clinical application of snoezelen often varies in form, nature, principles and procedures. Such variations not only make examination of the therapeutic values of Snoezelen difficult, but also impede the clinical development of snoezelen in dementia care. A systematic review of evidence for the efficacy of snoezelen in the care of people with dementia is therefore needed to inform future clinical applications and research directions.
OBJECTIVES
This review aims to examine the clinical efficacy of snoezelen for older people with dementia.
SEARCH STRATEGY
"Snoezelen", "multi-sensory", "dement*", "Alzheimer*", "randomized control/single control/double control" were used as keywords to search seven electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, PsyLIT). The list of trials was compared with those identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All RCTs in which Snoezelen or multi-sensory programmes were used as an intervention for people with dementia were included in the review. Trial data included in the review were restricted to those involving people aged over 60 years suffering from any type of dementia, except one subject of Baker's study was aged below 60 years.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Only two RCTs fulfill the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from these two inclusion studies. Quantitative synthesis of the comparable data from the two trials was performed.
MAIN RESULTS
Two trials were included. Both Baker (and Kragt examined the short-term values of snoezelen on the behaviours of people with dementia. Although the pooled results were insignificant, the trend was in the direction of favouring treatment (hence a negative value of the SMD). The standardized mean difference (SMD) was -1.22, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (-4.08, 1.64). Kragt's result, weighted 47%, was significant in favour of treatment, with a SMD of -2.77 and a 95% CI (-4.24, -1.29). During the snoezelen session, Kragt's subjects presented significantly fewer apathetic behaviours (t=-8.22, p<0.01), fewer restless behaviours (t=-3.00, p=0.01), fewer repetitive behaviours (t=-.822, p<0.01), and fewer disturbances (t=-4.91, p<0.01). Baker's result was slightly not in favour of the treatment, with a SMD of 0.16 and a 95% CI (-0.41, 0.73). The control subjects touched objects/equipment more appropriately within the activity sessions than the subjects who participated in snoezelen sessions (F(1,47)=5.96, p=.001). Kragt did not examine the carryover and long-term effects of snoezelen, so only Baker's results were analysed. Baker used the Behavioural and Mood Disturbance scale (BMD), the REHAB, the CAPE and MMSE to assess patients mood, behaviour and cognition after (but not immediately after) four treatment sessions and eight treatment sessions. Some assessments were carried at home, some at day hospital. There were many subscores and mostly there were no differences between treatment and control. The following significant differences were found with benefit in favour of snoezelen compared with control after four sessions: apathy ezelen compared with control after four sessions: apathy score of the BRS (CAPE) (MD -3.00, 95%CIs -5.87 to -0.13, P=0.04), after eight sessions: mood score of the BRS (CAPE) (MD -2.60, 95%CIs -4.92 to -0.28, P=0.03), total score of the BRS (CAPE) (MD -6.92, 95%CIs -13.13 to -0.7, P=0.03), speech skills of the REHAB (MD 1.46, 95%CIs 0.01 to 2.82, P=0.03), psychomotor subscore of the cognitive assessment scale of CAPE (MD -3.12, 95%CIs -5.31 to -0.93, P<0.01).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Two trials were reviewed. Although both studies examined the short-term values of snoezelen on people with dementia, it is not feasible to draw a firm conclusion at this stage, for two main reasons. Firstly, very limited data were available for analysis, thus limiting data inference and generalization. Secondly, different methodology and control conditions were adopted in the two trials. Such variations not only require a careful interpretation of results but also make the comparison of results across studies less valid. Hence, there is an urgent need for more systematic and scientific research studies to examine the clinical value of snoezelen for people with dementia. To our knowledge, there are four RCTs currently in progress. It is hoped that the data and results of these trials will enrich the systematic review of snoezelen for dementia in the next update.
Topics: Aged; Complementary Therapies; Dementia; Humans; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sensory Art Therapies
PubMed: 12519587
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003152 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2023Ultrasound elastography is gaining attention for its diagnostic potential across various medical fields, and its physical properties make it valuable in modern clinical... (Review)
Review
Ultrasound elastography is gaining attention for its diagnostic potential across various medical fields, and its physical properties make it valuable in modern clinical medicine. However, its specific attributes, especially in the context of recent medical advancements, remain relatively unexplored. This study aimed to identify instrument-specific characteristics and applications of real-time ultrasound elastography, shear wave elastography, and strain elastography, particularly within gastroenterology. Following PRISMA guidelines, the study examined elastography articles on databases like PubMed, resulting in 78 included articles. Data on patient demographics, organ involvement, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were extracted. Statistical analysis involved SPSS version 21, with significance set at < 0.05. The majority of patients were male (50.50%), with a mean age of 42.73 ± 4.41 years. Shear wave elastography was the most prevalent technique (48.7%), and liver investigations were predominant in gastroenterology (34.6%). Gastrointestinal applications showed higher sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values ( < 0.05) but lower specificity ( < 0.05). Real-time ultrasound elastography exhibited increased specificity, accuracy, and predictive values ( < 0.05). Ultrasound elastography appears more accurate and effective in gastroenterological settings. Nonetheless, its performance depends on instrument-specific and operator-dependent factors. While promising, further studies are necessary to ascertain optimal utilization in both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal conditions.
PubMed: 37958199
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213302 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2022Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are the most commonly used bariatric procedures. There is an increasing awareness about a... (Review)
Review
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are the most commonly used bariatric procedures. There is an increasing awareness about a comorbidity-based indication for bariatric surgery regardless of weight (metabolic surgery). The best operation to mitigate obesity-associated comorbidities is a matter of controversy. This review is aimed at comparing LRYGB and LSG for the treatment of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemias, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for articles comparing these two commonly used bariatric approaches. We identified 2,457 studies, 1,468 of which stood after the removal of duplications; from them, 81 full texts were screened and only 16 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. LRYGB was equal weight to LSG for diabetes (-value = 0.10, odd ratio, 1.24, 95% CI, 0.96-1.61, for heterogeneity = 30%, -value for heterogeneity, 0.14), and OSA (-value = 0.38, odd ratio, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.47-1.33, for heterogeneity = 0.0%, -value for heterogeneity, 0.98). However, LRYGB was superior to LSG regarding hypertension (-value = 0.009, odd ratio, 1.55, 95% CI, 1.20-2.0, for heterogeneity = 0.0%, -value for heterogeneity, 0.59), dyslipidemia (odd ratio, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.15-4.16, -value for overall effect, 0.02), and GERD (-value = 0.003, odd ratio, 3.16, 95% CI, 1.48-6.76). LRYGB was superior to LSG for gastroesophageal reflux, hypertension, and dyslipidemia remission. While the two procedures were equal regarding diabetes and obstructive sleep, further reviews comparing LSG, and one anastomosis gastric bypass are recommended.
PubMed: 36532129
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.953804 -
Journal of the American Heart... Nov 2015Endothelial dysfunction plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular disease progression, and is associated with adverse events. The purpose of this systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Endothelial dysfunction plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular disease progression, and is associated with adverse events. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the prognostic magnitude of noninvasive peripheral endothelial function tests, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and reactive hyperemia--peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) for future cardiovascular events.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Clinical studies reporting the predictive value of FMD or RH-PAT for cardiovascular events were identified. Two authors selected studies and extracted data independently. Pooled effects were calculated as risk ratio (RR) for continuous value of FMD and natural logarithm of RH-PAT index (Ln_RHI) using random-effects models. Thirty-five FMD studies of 17 280 participants and 6 RH-PAT studies of 1602 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Both endothelial function tests significantly predicted cardiovascular events (adjusted relative risk [95% CI]: 1% increase in FMD 0.88 [0.84-0.91], P<0.001, 0.1 increase in Ln_RHI 0.79 [0.71-0.87], P<0.001). There was significant heterogeneity in the magnitude of the association across studies. The magnitude of the prognostic value in cardiovascular disease subjects was comparable between these 2 methods; a 1 SD worsening in endothelial function was associated with doubled cardiovascular risk.
CONCLUSIONS
Noninvasive peripheral endothelial function tests, FMD and RH-PAT, significantly predicted cardiovascular events, with similar prognostic magnitude. Further research is required to determine whether the prognostic values of these 2 methods are independent of each other and whether an endothelial function-guided strategy can provide benefit in improving cardiovascular outcomes.
Topics: Brachial Artery; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chi-Square Distribution; Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular; Endothelium, Vascular; Fingers; Humans; Hyperemia; Manometry; Odds Ratio; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Regional Blood Flow; Risk Factors; Vasodilation
PubMed: 26567372
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002270 -
Cancer Cell International Feb 2022Present work systematically reviewed relevant literature based on 18F-FDG PET parameters and conducted a meta-analysis to examine the prognostic value of maximal... (Review)
Review
Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumour volume, and total lesion glycolysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Present work systematically reviewed relevant literature based on 18F-FDG PET parameters and conducted a meta-analysis to examine the prognostic value of maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax), total lesional glycolysis (TLG), and metabolic tumour volume (MTV) in the prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).
METHODS
The relevant literature published in English were searched on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. We also evaluated the significance of SUVmax, TLG, and MTV in prognosis prediction using pooled hazard ratios (HRs).
RESULTS
The current study comprised 12 primary studies with a total of 1307 MPM cases. According to our results, the pooled HR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of increased SUVmax for overall survival (OS) was 1.30 (95% CI 1.13-1.49, P = 0.000), whereas the increased TLG was 1.81(95% CI 1.25-2.61, P = 0.089). The increased MTV was not significantly related to OS (1.14 [95% CI 0.87-1.50, P = 0.18]).However, study design-stratified subgroup analysis suggested that differences in OS of retrospective and prospective subgroups were statistically significant, and no significant heterogeneity among different studies was observed.
CONCLUSION
Based on the findings from the present work, PET/CT can significantly affect the prognosis prediction in MPM cases. Also, the increased SUVmax and TLG values predict an increased risk of mortality.
PubMed: 35114996
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-022-02482-5