-
BMJ Clinical Evidence Aug 2007Rheumatoid arthritis usually starts as a symmetrical polyarthritis, and its course is marked by flares and remissions. The aims of treatment are to relieve pain and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Rheumatoid arthritis usually starts as a symmetrical polyarthritis, and its course is marked by flares and remissions. The aims of treatment are to relieve pain and swelling, and to improve function. In addition, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) may reduce disease progression.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of drug treatments in people with rheumatoid arthritis who have not previously received any disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment? How do different drug treatments compare in people with rheumatoid arthritis who have either not responded to or are intolerant of first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to June 2005 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 62 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: adalimumab, anakinra, antimalarial drugs, azathioprine, ciclosporin, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, etanercept, infliximab plus methotrexate, leflunomide, methotrexate (alone; or plus sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine), oral gold, parenteral gold, penicillamine, sulfasalazine.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Methotrexate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 19454108
DOI: No ID Found -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Dec 2006D-Penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its ability to decrease hepatic copper and modulate the immune response. The results on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
D-Penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its ability to decrease hepatic copper and modulate the immune response. The results on effects of D--penicillamine in randomized-clinical trials of primary biliary cirrhosis patients are inconsistent.
AIM
To systematically evaluate the benefits and harms of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
METHODS
We have performed a systematic review with meta-analyses of randomized-clinical trials to evaluate the effects of D-penicillamine for primary biliary cirrhosis. The primary outcomes are mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. We analysed the data by fixed-effect and random-effect models.
RESULTS
Seven randomized trials including 706 patients were analysed. d-Penicillamine was without significant effects on mortality (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.82-1.43, P = 0.56), mortality or liver transplantation (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.74-1.68, P = 0.62), pruritus, liver complications, progression of liver histological stage and liver biochemical variables. D--Penicillamine significantly decreased serum alanine aminotransferase activity (weighted mean difference -45 IU/L, 95% CI: -75 to -15, P < 0.05) and led to significantly more adverse events (RR 4.18, 95% CI: 1.38-12.69, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION
D-Penicillamine did not appear to reduce the risk of mortality or morbidity, and led to more adverse events in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
Topics: Chelating Agents; Female; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 17206942
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03164.x -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022Pharmacological therapy is currently the main treatment method for patients with Wilson disease (WD). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the common...
Pharmacological therapy is currently the main treatment method for patients with Wilson disease (WD). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the common treatment regimens in these patients. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis by searching multiple databases for studies from inception to October 2021. Outcomes of interest were the improved rate and safety of d-penicillamine and zinc salts treatment in WD patients. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection and data extraction. Sixteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled improved rate for all included symptomatic WD patients was 78.0% (95% CI: 70.8%-85.2%). In symptomatic hepatic WD patients, there is no difference in the treatment efficiency of d-penicillamine and zinc salts (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.86%-1.12%; = 0.765). In neurological WD patients, the pooled improved rate of those who received d-penicillamine and zinc salts was 56.3% (95% CI: 37.5%-75.1%) and 80.2% (95% CI: 67.2%-93.2%), respectively. The incidence of adverse effects (RR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.20%-4.88%; = 0.014) and neurological deterioration (RR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.31%-2.93%; = 0.001) in all symptomatic WD patients treated with d-penicillamine was both higher than that of patients treated with zinc salts. Our analysis suggests that symptomatic WD patients treated with d-penicillamine have higher incidence of adverse effects and neurological deterioration than that of zinc salts. The therapeutic effectiveness of these two regimens does not seem to be significantly different, and these results must be interpreted with caution. : PROSPERO registration, identifier CRD 42021287126.
PubMed: 35370752
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.847436 -
Neurological Sciences : Official... Oct 2023Neurological deterioration, soon after anti-copper treatment initiation, is problematic in the management of Wilson's disease (WD) and yet reports in the literature are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Neurological deterioration, soon after anti-copper treatment initiation, is problematic in the management of Wilson's disease (WD) and yet reports in the literature are limited. The aim of our study was to systematically assess the data according to early neurological deteriorations in WD, its outcome and risk factors.
METHODS
Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of available data on early neurological deteriorations was performed by searching the PubMed database and reference lists. Random effects meta-analytic models summarized cases of neurological deterioration by disease phenotype.
RESULTS
Across the 32 included articles, 217 cases of early neurological deterioration occurred in 1512 WD patients (frequency 14.3%), most commonly in patients with neurological WD (21.8%; 167/763), rarely in hepatic disease (1.3%; 5/377), and with no cases among asymptomatic individuals. Most neurological deterioration occurred in patients treated with d-penicillamine (70.5%; 153/217), trientine (14.2%; 31/217) or zinc salts (6.9%; 15/217); the data did not allow to determine if that reflects how often treatments were chosen as first line therapy or if the risk of deterioration differed with therapy. Symptoms completely resolved in 24.2% of patients (31/128), resolved partially in 27.3% (35/128), did not improve in 39.8% (51/128), with 11 patients lost to follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
Given its occurrence in up to 21.8% of patients with neurological WD in this meta-analysis of small studies, there is a need for further investigations to distinguish the natural time course of WD from treatment-related early deterioration and to develop a standard definition for treatment-induced effects.
Topics: Humans; Hepatolenticular Degeneration; Penicillamine; Trientine; Copper; Nervous System Diseases
PubMed: 37311952
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06895-6 -
European Review For Medical and... Nov 2017Dry mouth (xerostomia), is a fairly common, well-researched condition, which is an indirect cause of oral malodour. This systematic literature review looked into another... (Review)
Review
Dry mouth (xerostomia), is a fairly common, well-researched condition, which is an indirect cause of oral malodour. This systematic literature review looked into another cause of bad breath: adverse drug reactions in the orofacial region causing halitosis. The study focused on extraoral halitosis, and its subdivisions, particularly blood borne halitosis in which malodourous compounds in the blood stream are carried to the lungs, passively diffused across the pulmonary alveolar membrane to enter the breath. An electronic search was conducted in various databases. Inclusion criteria were: editorials, case control studies, retrospective studies and randomized double-blind studies published in English between 1983 and March 2017. The search identified a total of 23 articles. According to these, drug-related halitosis may be caused by nine medications. Dimethyl sulfoxide, cysteamine and suplatast tosilate are metabolised to dimethyl sulfide, a malodourous compound that is stable in blood and is transported into the breath. Disulfiram is reduced to carbon disulfide, also a stable compound in blood. Nitric oxide reacts with foul-smelling volatile organosulfur compounds. The degradation of penicillamine raises the pH level, favouring the growth of gram-negative bacteria in the oral cavity producing halitosis. Chloral hydrate, phenothiazine, and paraldehyde could not be related to halitosis. The analysis showed that halitosis can be caused by medication but does not correlate to any specific disease or specific form of drug therapy. The pharmacological compounds identified as causes of halitosis are administered to treat a broad spectrum of diseases, or in therapeutic regimes.
Topics: Gram-Negative Bacteria; Halitosis; Humans; Hydrogen Sulfide; Penicillamine; Smell; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Sulfides
PubMed: 29164566
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Nephrology Mar 2024Cystinuria is a rare genetic kidney stone disease, with no cure. Current treatments involve lowering urinary cystine levels and increasing cystine solubility. This... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cystinuria is a rare genetic kidney stone disease, with no cure. Current treatments involve lowering urinary cystine levels and increasing cystine solubility. This systematic review evaluates the available literature regarding non-surgical interventions for cystinuria.
METHODS
Key electronic databases were searched for studies that described the clinical management of cystinuria with high diuresis, alkalinizing agents and thiol-based drugs that were published between 2000 and 2022. Observational studies were included if they contained clinical investigation with at least one previous or current episode of cystine stones, urine cystine levels > 250 mg/L and patients being managed with urinary dilution, alkalinizing agents or other pharmacological agents. All included studies were assessed for study design, patient characteristics and outcomes. A qualitative and critical analysis was performed whereby study quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Two authors performed the quality assessment and excluded the studies with a low MINORS score.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met the review inclusion and quality criteria. Of the fourteen studies, two reported treatment using alkalinizing agents, six reported treatment using thiol-based drugs, and six reported combination treatment using alkalinizing agents and thiol-based drugs. These studies indicated that first-line therapies, including high fluid intake and urinary alkalinization, increased urine volume to > 3 L/day and urinary pH > 7.0, and were associated with reduced urinary cystine levels and cystine stone formation. Second-line therapy with cystine-binding thiol drugs, such as tiopronin and D-penicillamine, reduced urinary cystine levels, cystine crystal volume and increased cystine solubility, resulting in decreased cystine stone formation and stone recurrence rate. Further, combined intervention with alkalinizing agents and thiol-based drugs synergistically reduced stone recurrence.
CONCLUSION
Cystinuria treatment may require a combined approach of high diuresis, alkalinization and pharmacological interventions with regular monitoring of urinary pH, cystine levels, cystine crystal volume and solubility. However, poor adherence to treatment is relatively frequent, hence the pressing urgency for improved therapies and treatments.
Topics: Cystinuria; Humans; Cystine; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Diuresis
PubMed: 37957454
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01795-6 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2012Arthritis remains a relatively infrequent complication of cystic fibrosis, but is a cause of significant morbidity when it does occur. Two distinct types of arthritis... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Arthritis remains a relatively infrequent complication of cystic fibrosis, but is a cause of significant morbidity when it does occur. Two distinct types of arthritis are described in cystic fibrosis: cystic fibrosis-related arthropathy and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy. Management of arthritis in people with cystic fibrosis is uncertain and complex because of the underlying disease and its treatment.
OBJECTIVES
To review the effectiveness and safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of arthritis related to cystic fibrosis in adults and children.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database handsearches of relevant journal and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of most recent search: 10 July 2012.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials which compared the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (e.g. methotrexate, gold, sulfasalazine, penicillamine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine and newer agents such as biologic disease modifying agents and monoclonal antibodies) with each other, with no treatment or with placebo for cystic fibrosis-related arthropathy or hypertrophic osteoarthropathy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
No relevant studies were identified.
MAIN RESULTS
No studies were included in this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although it is generally recognised that cystic fibrosis-related arthritis can be episodic and resolve spontaneously, treatment with analgesics and anti-inflammatory agents may be needed. But when episodic symptoms progress to persistent disease, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs may be needed to limit the course of the disease. It is disappointing that no randomised controlled trials to rigorously evaluate these drugs could be found. This systematic review has identified the need for a well-designed adequately powered randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of cystic fibrosis-related arthropathy and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy in adults and children with cystic fibrosis. However, given the infrequency of cystic fibrosis-related arthritis and the range of symptoms and severity, randomised controlled trials may not be feasible and well-designed non-randomised observational studies may be more appropriate. Studies should also better define the two conditions.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis; Cystic Fibrosis; Humans
PubMed: 22972107
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007336.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2004D-penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its hepatic copper decreasing and immunomodulatory potentials. The results from randomised... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
D-penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its hepatic copper decreasing and immunomodulatory potentials. The results from randomised clinical trials have been inconsistent.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the beneficial and harmful effects of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We identified trials through electronic searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (September 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2003), The Chinese Biomedical CD Database (January 1979 to August 2003), and LILACS (1982 to 2003); through manual searches of bibliographies; and by contacting authors of the trials and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised clinical trials comparing D-penicillamine with placebo/no intervention or other control intervention irrespective of language, year of publication, and publication status.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the trials and extracted data, validated by a third reviewer. The primary outcomes were 1) mortality and 2) a combination of those who died or underwent liver transplantation. We analysed dichotomous outcomes as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by a fixed effect model and a random effects model. We investigated sources of heterogeneity by subgroup analyses and tested the robustness of our findings by sensitivity analyses.
MAIN RESULTS
We included seven trials randomising 706 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. D-penicillamine compared with placebo/no intervention tended to increase mortality (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.64, fixed; RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.50, random). However, there was substantial heterogeneity. No significant differences were detected regarding the risks of mortality or liver transplantation, pruritus, liver complications, progression of liver histological stage, or the levels of liver biochemical variables (except alanine aminotransferase). D-penicillamine versus placebo/no intervention significantly increased the risk of adverse events (RR 3.11, 95% CI 2.33 to 4.16, fixed; RR 4.18, 95% CI 1.38 to 12.69, random).
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS
D-penicillamine did not appear to reduce the risk of mortality, but significantly increased the occurrences of adverse events in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We do not support the use of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
Topics: Chelating Agents; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Penicillamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 15495127
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004789.pub2 -
Cureus Jun 2023A systematic review was carried out on a rare dermatological condition affecting papillary dermal tissue fibers of the skin known as elastosis perforans serpiginosa... (Review)
Review
A systematic review was carried out on a rare dermatological condition affecting papillary dermal tissue fibers of the skin known as elastosis perforans serpiginosa (EPS). The aim of this review was to highlight this skin disease, its association with other medical conditions, and its management. The search was conducted by using the keywords "elastosis perforans serpiginosa" and "case reports" in the databases. A total of 10 case reports were analyzed and presented by the parameters like age, gender, chief complaints, and medical history. The most common causes of EPS were drug-induced and occurred along with the Wilson disease. The study concluded that as EPS is an uncommon disease with few instances, there is a need for further research to analyze randomized controlled trials that have been conducted in relation to the condition.
PubMed: 37448439
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40296 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2023Wilson's disease (WD) is a genetic disorder with copper accumulation in various tissues leading to related clinical symptoms (mainly hepatic and neuropsychiatric) which...
Wilson's disease (WD) is a genetic disorder with copper accumulation in various tissues leading to related clinical symptoms (mainly hepatic and neuropsychiatric) which can be in 85% of patients successfully treated with anti-copper agents. However, during WD treatment neurological deterioration may occur in several patients. D-penicillamine (DPA) is one of the most frequently used drugs in WD treatment. Despite its efficacy, DPA can produce many adverse drug reactions, which should be recognized early. We present the case of a 51-year-old man diagnosed with the hepatic form of WD and initially treated with DPA in whom after 15 months of treatment, diplopia and evening ptosis occurred. WD treatment non-compliance as well as overtreatment were excluded. Supported by neurological symptoms, a positive edrophonium test, and high serum levels of antibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChR-Abs), as well as low concentrations of antibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK-Abs), the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG), induced by DPA, was established. DPA was stopped; zinc sulfate for WD and pyridostigmine for MG symptoms were introduced. Diplopia and ptosis subsided after a few days, which supported our diagnosis. During a follow-up visit after 6 months, the patient did not present any MG symptoms. AChR-Abs level gradually decreased and MuSK-Abs were no longer detected. Pyridostigmine was stopped, and within 9 months of follow-up, the neurological symptoms of MG did not reoccur. The authors discussed the patient's neurological deterioration, performed a systematic review of DPA-induced MG in WD and concluded that MG is a rare and usually reversible complication of DPA treatment. DPA-induced MG generally occurs 2-12 months after treatment initiation and ocular symptoms predominate. Response to pyridostigmine treatment is good and MG symptoms usually reverse within one year after DPA treatment cessation. However, symptoms may persist in some cases where DPA treatment is only a trigger factor for MG occurrence.
PubMed: 37629572
DOI: 10.3390/life13081715