-
Journal of Periodontology Dec 2015Evidence has shown some improved clinical outcomes and morbidity reduction with the use of lasers for non-surgical periodontal therapy due to ablation, vaporization,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Evidence has shown some improved clinical outcomes and morbidity reduction with the use of lasers for non-surgical periodontal therapy due to ablation, vaporization, hemostasis, and field sterilization. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare studies involving lasers as monotherapy or adjunctive to surgical periodontal treatment.
METHODS
Electronic and manual searches were conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases for articles written in English up to December 2014. Articles were included in this review if they reported outcomes of surgical periodontal therapy with and without the use of lasers. The primary outcome was probing depth (PD), and secondary outcomes were measured changes in clinical factors such as clinical attachment level (CAL) and gingival recession (GR). For the comparative studies included, the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each variable were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Eight and nine articles were included in the quantitative and qualitative analyses, respectively. Although low-to-moderate risk of bias was detected, high heterogeneity among studies was found. In flap surgery with or without laser treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in primary outcome. Similarly, in guided tissue regeneration (GTR)/enamel matrix derivative (EMD) with and without laser treatment, the WMD of PD was negligible; however, the GTR/EMD group showed better outcomes (P = 0.005) than the laser group. Regarding the secondary outcomes, in the flap surgery group, the WMD of CAL gain was 1.34 mm, and the WMD of GR was -0.24 mm; no significant difference was detected between groups. In GTR/EMD with and without laser treatment, the WMD of CAL gain was 0.10 mm and the WMD of recession was -0.18 mm; again, no significant difference was detected between groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The available evidence is insufficient to support the effectiveness of dental lasers as an adjunct to resective or regenerative surgical periodontal therapy. However, precautions must be exercised when interpreting the results of this study because of the small sample size and high heterogeneity among studies.
Topics: Alveolar Bone Loss; Bone Transplantation; Dental Enamel Proteins; Follow-Up Studies; Gingival Recession; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal; Humans; Oral Surgical Procedures; Periodontal Attachment Loss; Periodontal Pocket; Surgical Flaps; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26269936
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.150212 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Jun 2021To explore the evidence of periodontal manifestations and treatment modalities in patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To explore the evidence of periodontal manifestations and treatment modalities in patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed and the criteria for PRISMA and risk of bias assessment were applied. Human clinical studies (≥10 patients) presenting patients with LCH and periodontal findings were considered for inclusion.
RESULTS
From 298 titles identified, six case series with a total of 1278 patients suffering from LCH were included. In these studies, oral symptoms were reported in a frequency ranging from 10 to 100%. Overall, in 216 patients (17%), oral symptoms were observed. Out of these patients, 49-100% demonstrated periodontal symptoms. The most common oral findings were pain, swelling, tooth loss/mobility, and bone lesions. Specific periodontal findings comprised varying frequencies of gingival ulcerations, increased pocket depths, and gingival bleeding. Treatment measures constituted of surgical curettage of bone lesions, soft tissue excision and/or tooth extractions, radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, or a combination of these approaches. Healing without recurrence of oral lesions was reported in most of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS
The available evidence on periodontal manifestations in LCH patients is heterogeneous. Several oral and periodontal findings were reported and may occur as initial symptoms and/or at later stages of the disease.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The dentist should be aware of possible oral involvement of systemic diseases such as LCH, and these manifestations may mimic periodontal disease.
Topics: Gingivitis; Histiocytosis, Langerhans-Cell; Humans; Oral Ulcer; Pain; Periodontal Diseases
PubMed: 33751219
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03873-0 -
International Journal of Dental Hygiene Nov 2020To investigate the explicitness and variability of the definition of periodontal health in the current scientific literature. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the explicitness and variability of the definition of periodontal health in the current scientific literature.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The authors conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed and CENTRAL (2013-01/2019-05) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the guidelines of the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statement.
RESULTS
A total of 51 papers met the predefined inclusion criteria. Of these, 13 papers did not report any explicit definitions of periodontal health. Out of the 38 remaining articles, half of them used a reference to support their definition and half of them not. The studies published in periodontics-related journals or those that scored a low risk of bias for the methodical quality presented more explicit and valid definitions. Probing pocket depth was the most frequently used individual parameter for defining periodontal health. However, there were substantial variations in the methods of measurement and cut-off values.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the diversity of periodontal health definitions, a cross-study comparison is difficult. The results of this review may be useful in making others aware of the significance of standardizing the definition of a healthy periodontium.
Topics: Humans; Periodontics; Periodontium; Terminology as Topic
PubMed: 32330350
DOI: 10.1111/idh.12438 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2020Periodontitis and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are two major global health problems that are widely prevalent in the world, although the former is a common infection in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Periodontitis and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are two major global health problems that are widely prevalent in the world, although the former is a common infection in developing countries and the latter is a non-infectious but prevalent disease in developed countries. This study aims to provide an updated review on the existence and magnitude of the relationship between periodontal disease and the risk of MetS. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases for original studies assessing the association between periodontitis and MetS published before August 2019. We calculated the pooled crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) together with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to estimate the strength of this association. Subgroup analysis was performed by considering the diagnostic method or the country where the studies were performed. We identified 43 potentially eligible articles for this systematic review, including 32 cross-sectional studies, eight case-control studies, and three cohort studies. Among them, 39 articles presented enough information to be included in the meta-analysis. The pooled crude and adjusted ORs were 1.99 (95% CI: 1.75-2.25) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.31-1.61), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a consistent relation stratified by either the diagnostic method or the country where the studies were performed. The pooled OR was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.41-2.00) for Japan, 1.75 (95% CI: 1.31-2.34) for the USA, 1.81 (95% CI: 1.35-2.42) for Korea, and 2.29 (95% CI: 1.53-3.41) for China. Our results provide compelling evidence for the association between periodontitis and MetS. Patients with periodontal disease are a critical screening population for MetS. We also recommend that people exhibiting components of MetS should receive a periodontal check-up and pay attention to their oral health.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Periodontal Diseases; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32582028
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00336 -
BMC Oral Health Sep 2021A growing body of evidence suggests a role for oral bacteria in lung infections. This systematic review aimed to analyse the association between poor periodontal status...
BACKGROUND
A growing body of evidence suggests a role for oral bacteria in lung infections. This systematic review aimed to analyse the association between poor periodontal status and the frequency of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and Medline were searched for studies published until May 2020, with no language restriction. Studies reporting periodontal condition, or periodontal treatment outcomes, with data on the frequency of exacerbations of COPD, were identified. The primary outcome was the frequency of exacerbations and secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL) and hospitalisation. Quality and risk of bias assessment were carried out using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies, Robins-1 tool for non-randomised intervention studies and Cochrane risk of bias assessment (RoB-2) tool for randomised clinical trials. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality by two assessors independently.
RESULTS
Searches identified 532 records and 8 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were three clinical trials, one prospective cohort study, one case-control, and three cross-sectional studies. A narrative synthesis was performed. The data from intervention studies showed reduction in the frequency of exacerbations following periodontal treatment. Data from observational studies suggest association of worse plaque scores and fewer teeth with exacerbation, but not pocket depth or clinical attachment loss. Better periodontal health was also associated with reduced frequency of COPD exacerbations, hospitalisations and improved quality of life in COPD patients. Due to the high heterogeneity no meta-analysis was performed. The quality of some of the included studies was low and there was evidence of a high risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
The data supports possible association between poor periodontal health, the frequency of exacerbations, hospitalisation and quality of life in COPD patients. The evidence is of moderate to low certainty and is limited by high risk of bias suggesting the need for well-designed and adequately powered randomised controlled trials, to inform future research and clinical practice. The PROSPERO registration number CRD42020180328.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Disease Progression; Humans; Pneumonia; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life
PubMed: 34479518
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01757-z -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2016Occlusal interventions may be used in adults with periodontitis. At present there is little consensus regarding the indications and effectiveness of occlusal... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Occlusal interventions may be used in adults with periodontitis. At present there is little consensus regarding the indications and effectiveness of occlusal interventions in periodontal patients.
OBJECTIVES
To identify and analyse the evidence for the effect of occlusal interventions on adults who have periodontitis in relation to tooth loss, probing depths, clinical attachment level, adverse effects and patient-centred outcomes.
SEARCH METHODS
The search was last conducted in April 2008. We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 30th April 2008); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 1); MEDLINE (1966 to 30th April 2008); and EMBASE (1980 to 30th April 2008). There were no language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing occlusal interventions in patients with periodontitis with a follow up of at least 3 months.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Screening of eligible studies, assessment of the methodological quality of the trials and data extraction were conducted in duplicate and independently by two review authors. Any disagreements between the review authors were resolved by discussion. The main investigator of the included trial was contacted to obtain missing information. The Cochrane Collaboration statistical guidelines were to be followed for data synthesis.
MAIN RESULTS
Abstracts of 54 papers were identified by the search. One paper was eligible for inclusion. This paper studied the effect of occlusal adjustment against no occlusal adjustment in patients who were treated with non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy. Methodological quality assessment of the included paper revealed that randomisation of the patients into the treatment groups was adequate. Allocation concealment, masking of patients and clinicians were not reported and no response to author contact was received.Mean change in attachment level and mean pocket depth were reported in the included trial. Mean difference in clinical attachment level between occlusal intervention and control in the non-surgical group amounted to 0.38 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.72) favouring the occlusal intervention group and was statistically significant. In the surgical group the mean difference in clinical attachment level between occlusal intervention and control amounted to 0.40 mm (95% CI 0.05 to 0.75) favouring the occlusal intervention group and was also statistically significant. The difference in mean pocket depth reduction between the occlusal intervention and control in both the surgical and non-surgical groups was less than 0.1 mm and was not statistically significant. Tooth loss, patient-centred affects and adverse effects were not reported. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the inclusion of only one study.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is only one randomised trial that has addressed this question. The data from this study are inconclusive. We therefore conclude there is no evidence for or against the use of occlusal interventions in clinical practice. This question can only be addressed by adequately powered bias-protected randomised controlled trials.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Malocclusion; Occlusal Adjustment; Periodontitis
PubMed: 27893154
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004968.pub3 -
Journal of Clinical Periodontology Jun 2020To systemically review the available evidence on the clinical performance of osseous resective surgery (ORS) in the treatment of residual periodontal defects in terms of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
To systemically review the available evidence on the clinical performance of osseous resective surgery (ORS) in the treatment of residual periodontal defects in terms of pocket elimination and biological costs in patients with chronic periodontitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane) were searched up to January 2019. Clinical trials with a follow-up duration of at least 12 months after ORS with or without fibre retention technique were included. Quantitative synthesis was conducted with random-effect meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Overall, 1,765 studies were retrieved, of which 53 full-text articles were screened by two reviewers. Finally, a total of three RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Random-effect meta-analysis showed a weighted mean percentage of pocket elimination (final PD ≤ 4 mm) at 12 months of 98.3% (95% CI: 96.8; 99.7) with I of 26%. The weighted mean amount of resected bone was 0.87 mm (95% CI: 0.49; 1.25), and the weighted mean increase in gingival recession was 2.13 mm (95% CI: 1.49; 2.78) at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS
ORS represents an effective surgical approach for the elimination of residual periodontal pockets in the short to medium term. Additional randomized controlled clinical trials with data on pocket elimination are warranted.
Topics: Chronic Periodontitis; Gingival Recession; Humans; Periodontal Index; Periodontal Pocket
PubMed: 32145035
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13281 -
Virulence 2015Bacterial invasion of the periodontal tissues has been suggested as a relevant step in the etiopathogenesis of periodontal disease. However, its exact importance remains... (Review)
Review
Bacterial invasion of the periodontal tissues has been suggested as a relevant step in the etiopathogenesis of periodontal disease. However, its exact importance remains to be defined. The present systematic review assessed the scientific evidence concerning the relationship between the quality or quantity of periodontal microbiota in periodontal tissues and development of periodontal disease. The databases Medline-PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, ISI Web of Knowledge and SCOPUS were searched, up to January 2014. Studies that reported evaluation of periodontal pathogens invasion on human tissues were selected. The screening of 440 title/abstracts elected 26 papers for full-text reading. Twenty three papers were subsequently excluded because of insufficient data or a study protocol not related to the objectives of this systematic review. All included studies were case-control studies that evaluated intracellular or adherent bacteria to epithelial cells from periodontal pockets versus healthy sulci. Study protocols presented heterogeneity regarding case and control definitions and methodological approaches for microbial identification. No consistent significant differences were found related to the presence/absence or proportion of specific periopathogens across the studies, as only one study found statistically significant differences regarding the presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans (p = 0.043), T. forsythia (P < 0.001), P. intermedia (P < 0.001), C. ochracea (P < 0.001) and C. rectus (P = 0.003) in epithelial cells from periodontal pockets vs. healthy sulci. All studies reported a larger unspecific bacterial load in or on the epithelial cells taken from a diseased site compared to a healthy sulcus. The current available data is of low to moderate quality and inconsistent mainly due to study design, poor reporting and methodological diversity. As so, there is insufficient evidence to support or exclude the invasion by periodontal pathogens as a key step in the etiopathogenesis of periodontal disease. Further research is needed.
Topics: Bacteria; Case-Control Studies; Humans; Periodontal Diseases; Periodontal Pocket; Periodontium; Time Factors
PubMed: 25654367
DOI: 10.4161/21505594.2014.984566 -
Journal of Clinical Periodontology Oct 2022"Host modulatory therapy" (HMT) with ω-3 fatty acids aims at reducing inflammation. With HMT as an adjunct, a better result of periodontal therapy is expected. The aim... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
"Host modulatory therapy" (HMT) with ω-3 fatty acids aims at reducing inflammation. With HMT as an adjunct, a better result of periodontal therapy is expected. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) was to examine the additional effect of ω-3 fatty acids to non-surgical periodontal therapy (SRP) on the probing pocket depth (PPD) and the clinical attachment level (CAL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MEDLINE-PubMed and Cochrane-CENTRAL libraries were searched up to January 2021 for randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic periodontitis, treated with SRP/placebo as controls and SRP/ω-3 fatty acids as the test group.
RESULTS
The search identified 173 unique abstracts, and screening resulted in 10 eligible publications. Descriptive analysis showed a significant effect on the PPD and CAL in favour of the groups with ω-3 fatty acids in the majority of comparisons. MA revealed that adjunctive use of ω-3 fatty acids to SRP resulted in 0.39 mm more PPD reduction (95% CI: -0.58; -0.21) and 0.41 mm more CAL gain (95% CI: -0.63; -0.19) than SRP alone.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with periodontitis, dietary supplementation with ω-3 fatty acids as an adjunct to SRP is more effective in reducing the PPD and improving the CAL than SRP alone. If SRP is indicated, the use of ω-3 fatty acids can be considered for a moderate extra added effect on PPD reduction and CAL gain. The strength of this recommendation is moderate.
Topics: Chronic Periodontitis; Dental Scaling; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Humans; Root Planing
PubMed: 35713248
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13680 -
Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2021This review investigated whether the adjunctive use of antioxidants with periodontal therapy improves periodontal parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. A... (Review)
Review
This review investigated whether the adjunctive use of antioxidants with periodontal therapy improves periodontal parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. A systematic and extensive literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted before April 2021 was performed on the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed to quantitatively evaluate the clinical outcomes following periodontal therapy. After independent screening of 137 initial records, nine records from eight RCTs were included. The risk-of-bias assessment revealed that all RCTs had methodological weaknesses regarding selective bias, although other risk factors for bias were not evident. This meta-analysis of two RCTs showed that periodontal pocket depths were significantly reduced in the groups treated with combined non-surgical periodontal therapy and melatonin than in those treated with non-surgical periodontal therapy alone. The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the adjunctive use of melatonin, resveratrol, omega-3 fatty acids with cranberry juice, propolis, and aloe vera gel with periodontal therapy significantly improves periodontal disease parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes, and melatonin application combined with non-surgical periodontal therapy might significantly reduce periodontal pocket depth. However, there are still limited studies of melatonin in combination with non-surgical periodontal therapy in Type 2 diabetic patients, and more well-designed RCTs are required to be further investigated.
PubMed: 34439554
DOI: 10.3390/antiox10081304