-
Journal of Parkinson's Disease 2023Multiple observational studies have yielded controversial results regarding the association between Parkinson's disease (PD) and periodontitis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Multiple observational studies have yielded controversial results regarding the association between Parkinson's disease (PD) and periodontitis.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to ascertain their bidirectional relationship.
METHODS
A literature search for relevant studies was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 19, 2022. Effect sizes (ES) with 95% confidence intervals were pooled under the random-effects model. Then, leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and contour-enhanced funnel plot were applied to assess the stability of the results.
RESULTS
A total of 34 studies and 24 studies were included for systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis, respectively. Pooled ES indicated that periodontitis was not significantly associated with PD risk (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.45, n = 3; OR = 1.94, 95% CI 0.55-6.90, n = 7), while the Mendelian randomization study revealed no association between PD and periodontitis risk (coefficient [B] = -0.0001, standard error = 0.0001, p = 0.19). Furthermore, PD patients exhibited higher levels of periodontal pocket depth (SMD = 1.10, 95% CI 0.53-1.67), clinical attachment level (SMD = 1.40, 95% CI 0.55-2.26), plaque index (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI 0.22-1.39), and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 score (SMD = 0.91, 95% CI 0.33-1.49) compared to healthy controls.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis identified no bidirectional association between PD risk and periodontitis risk, though the prevalence of periodontitis and poorer oral status was higher in PD patients.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Periodontitis; Prevalence
PubMed: 37899063
DOI: 10.3233/JPD-230059 -
Oral Diseases Jan 2022The present study aimed to summarize and update the evidence regarding the association between periodontitis and psoriasis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The present study aimed to summarize and update the evidence regarding the association between periodontitis and psoriasis.
METHODS
The present systematic review was conducted under the guidelines of Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was recorded in the PROSPERO database, under registration number CRD42017063799. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched up to March 2020. Case-control or cohort studies assessing the association between periodontitis and psoriasis were identified. Quantitative synthesis was conducted with meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies (11 case-control and two cohort studies) assessing the association between periodontitis and psoriasis were included. Of these 13 articles, 9 showed the prevalence of periodontitis or psoriasis. Therefore, meta-analyses were conducted with data retrieved from the nine studies included. Pooled effect estimate for nine studies showed that patients with periodontitis associated with a higher risk of psoriasis with a pooled OR of 2.87 (95% CI, 1.75-4.69).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review demonstrated a positive association between periodontitis and psoriasis; however, a causal relationship cannot be established. Due to the weak evidence, caution should be taken when interpreting the results regarding periodontal parameters. Well-designed prospective studies are necessary to evaluate interactions between both diseases.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Humans; Periodontitis; Prospective Studies; Psoriasis
PubMed: 32852860
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13617 -
Journal of the European Academy of... May 2017The association between periodontitis and systemic diseases has been increasingly recognized. However, the data on the association between periodontitis and psoriasis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The association between periodontitis and systemic diseases has been increasingly recognized. However, the data on the association between periodontitis and psoriasis are still limited.
OBJECTIVES
To summarize all available data on the association between periodontitis and the risk of psoriasis.
METHODS
Two investigators independently searched published studies indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to July 2016 using a search strategy that included terms for psoriasis and periodontitis. Studies were included if the following criteria were met: (i) case-control or cohort study comparing the risk of psoriasis in subjects with and without periodontitis; (ii) subjects without periodontitis were used as comparators in cohort studies while participants without psoriasis were used as controls in case-control studies; and (iii) effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were provided. Point estimates and standard errors from each study were extracted and combined together using the generic inverse variance technique described by DerSimonian and Laird.
RESULTS
Two cohort studies and three case-control studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratio of psoriasis in patients with periodontitis versus comparators was 1.55 (95% CI, 1.35-1.77). The statistical heterogeneity was insignificant with an I of 18%. Subgroup analysis according to study design revealed a significantly higher risk among patients with periodontitis with a pooled RR of 1.50 (95% CI, 1.37-1.64) for cohort studies and a pooled RR of 2.33 (95% CI, 1.51-3.60) for case-control studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with periodontitis have a significantly elevated risk of psoriasis.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Humans; Periodontitis; Psoriasis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27862342
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14051 -
Clinical Oral Implants Research Mar 2018This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges. (Review)
Review
AIMS
This review aimed at investigating the effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration (GBR) outcomes at peri-implant sites and edentulous ridges.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers using four databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles up to February 2017. Articles were included if they were human clinical trials or case series reporting outcomes of GBR procedures with and without membrane exposure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) between the two groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.
RESULTS
Overall, eight articles were included in the quantitative analysis. The WMD of the horizontal bone gain at edentulous ridges was -76.24% (95% CI = -137.52% to -14.97%, p = .01) between sites with membrane exposure and without exposure. In addition, the WMD of the dehiscence reduction at peri-implant sites was -27.27% (95% CI of -45.87% to -8.68%, p = .004). Both analyses showed significantly favorable outcomes at the sites without membrane exposure.
CONCLUSION
Based on the findings of this study, membrane exposure after GBR procedures has a significant detrimental influence on the outcome of bone augmentation. For the edentulous ridges, the sites without membrane exposure achieved 74% more horizontal bone gain than the sites with exposure. For peri-implant dehiscence defects, the sites without membrane exposure had 27% more defect reduction than the sites with exposure.
Topics: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation; Bone Regeneration; Bone Transplantation; Databases, Factual; Dental Implantation, Endosseous; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal; Humans; Membranes, Artificial; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Mouth, Edentulous; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 29368353
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13121 -
Journal of Periodontology Dec 2013Whether a minimal width of keratinized mucosa (KM) is required to maintain peri-implant tissue health has been a topic of interest. This systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Whether a minimal width of keratinized mucosa (KM) is required to maintain peri-implant tissue health has been a topic of interest. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of KM on various peri-implant health-related parameters.
METHODS
An electronic search of five databases (from 1965 to October 2012) and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were performed. Human cross-sectional or longitudinal studies with data on the relationship between the amount of KM around dental implants and various peri-implant parameters, with a follow-up period of at least 6 months, were included.
RESULTS
Eleven studies, seven cross-sectional and four longitudinal, were included. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and confidence interval (CI) were calculated with meta-analyses for each clinical parameter. The results showed statistically significant differences in plaque index (PI) and modified PI (WMD = -0.27, 95% CI = -0.43 to -0.11), modified gingival index (mGI) (WMD = -0.48, 95% CI = -0.70 to -0.27), mucosal recession (MR) (WMD = -0.60 mm, 95% CI = -0.85 to -0.36 mm), and attachment loss (AL) (WMD = -0.35 mm, 95% CI = -0.65 mm to -0.06 mm), all favoring implants with wide KM. However, comparisons of other parameters (bleeding on probing, modified bleeding index, GI, probing depth, and radiographic bone loss) did not reach statistically significant differences. The result of heterogeneity test showed only one parameter (AL, P value for the χ(2) test = 0.30 and I(2) test = 18%) had a low degree of heterogeneity among analyzed studies; meta-analyses of other parameters presented moderate-to-high degree of heterogeneity. Limitations of the present review include limited number of selected studies (n = 11), existence of heterogeneity and publication bias, and only English-written articles searched.
CONCLUSION
Based on current available evidence, a lack of adequate KM around endosseous dental implants is associated with more plaque accumulation, tissue inflammation, MR, and AL.
Topics: Alveolar Bone Loss; Dental Implants; Dental Plaque Index; Gingiva; Gingival Recession; Humans; Keratins; Periodontal Attachment Loss; Periodontal Index; Stomatitis
PubMed: 23451989
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.120688 -
Maternal and Child Health Journal Dec 2022A conflicting body of evidence suggests localized periodontal inflammation spreads systemically during pregnancy inducing adverse pregnancy outcomes. This systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
A conflicting body of evidence suggests localized periodontal inflammation spreads systemically during pregnancy inducing adverse pregnancy outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to specifically evaluate the relationship between periodontitis and preeclampsia.
METHODS
Electronic searches were carried out in Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Lilacs, Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trial Register, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar with no restrictions on the year of publication. We identified and selected observational case-control and cohort studies that analyzed the association between periodontal disease and preeclampsia. This meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA checklist and MOOSE checklist. Pooled odds ratios, mean difference, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random effect model. Heterogeneity was tested with Cochran's Q statistic.
RESULTS
Thirty studies including six cohort- and twenty-four case-control studies were selected. Periodontitis was significantly associated with increased risk for preeclampsia (OR 3.18, 95% CI 2.26 - 4.48, p < 0.00001), especially in a subgroup analysis including cohort studies (OR 4.19, 95% CI 2.23 - 7.87, p < 0.00001). The association was even stronger in a subgroup analysis with lower-middle-income countries (OR 6.70, 95% CI 2.61 - 17.19, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
Periodontitis appears as a significant risk factor for preeclampsia, which might be even more pronounced in lower-middle-income countries. Future studies to investigate if maternal amelioration of periodontitis prevents preeclampsia might be warranted.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pre-Eclampsia; Periodontitis; Pregnancy Outcome; Periodontal Diseases; Odds Ratio
PubMed: 36209308
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03556-6 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022A previous 2014 meta-analysis reported a positive association between obesity and periodontitis. It was considered necessary to update the recently published papers and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
A previous 2014 meta-analysis reported a positive association between obesity and periodontitis. It was considered necessary to update the recently published papers and to analyse subgroups on important clinical variables that could affect the association between obesity and periodontitis. Therefore, we updated the latest studies and attempted to derive more refined results.
METHODS
All observational studies were eligible for inclusion. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to qualitatively evaluate the risk of bias. Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients aged 18-34, 35-54, and 55+ years and the countries (European countries, USA, Brazil, Japan, Korea, and other Asian countries).
RESULTS
Thirty-seven full-text articles were included. Obesity conferred increased odds of periodontal disease with an odds ratio (1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.75). In the subgroup analysis by age, the odds ratio was the highest in the 18-34 years group (2.21, 95% CI: 1.26-3.89). In the subgroup analysis by country, European countries had the highest odds ratio (2.46, 95% CI: 1.11-5.46).
CONCLUSION
Despite the differences in degree, a positive association between obesity and periodontitis was found regardless of country or age. Therefore, medical professionals should try to prevent periodontitis by controlling patient weights, and more studies should be conducted to determine the association between obesity and oral health.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022301343.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Periodontitis; Obesity; Odds Ratio; Body Weight; Brazil
PubMed: 36353241
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.999455 -
Ciencia & Saude Coletiva Jun 2014The scope of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the studies on the association between obesity and periodontitis. The methods applied included a literature... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The scope of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the studies on the association between obesity and periodontitis. The methods applied included a literature search strategy and selection of studies using inclusion and exclusion in accordance with the criteria for characteristics of the studies and meta-analysis. The research was conducted in the PubMed, Embase and Lilacs databases through 2010. Selected papers were on studies on humans investigating whether or not obesity is a risk factor for periodontitis. Of the 822 studies identified, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The risk of periodontitis was associated with obesity (or had a tendency for this) in 25 studies, though it was not associated in 6 studies. The meta-analysis showed a significant association with obesity and periodontitis (OR = 1.30 [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.25 - 1.35]) and with mean Body Mass Index (BMI) and periodontal disease (mean difference = 2.75). Obesity was associated with periodontitis, however the risk factors that aggravate these diseases should be better clarified to elucidate the direction of this association. Working with paired samples and avoiding confusion factors may contribute to homogeneity between the studies.
Topics: Humans; Obesity; Periodontitis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 24897477
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232014196.13482013 -
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2022In this review, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of interventions used for the treatment of endo-perio lesions (EPL). (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In this review, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of interventions used for the treatment of endo-perio lesions (EPL).
METHODS
A systematic scoping review of clinical trials was developed.
RESULTS
Seven clinical trials were studied. In at least one study group of six of the seven evaluated trials, endodontic and periodontal treatments were performed simultaneously. All trials showed improvement in probing depth in the studied groups; nevertheless, the experimental groups of five studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in this parameter. An increase in clinical attachment level was also reported ( < 0.05). Most trials reported an increase in the filling of the bone defect following therapy ( < 0.05). Mechanical periodontal therapy implemented simultaneously with endodontic therapy demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of concurrent EPL without communication. Endodontic treatment and immediate periodontal surgery did not affect the result of the management of combined EPL with apical communication. The use of diode laser, the management of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and titanium-prepared PRF, and the implementation of bone grafts plus endodontic treatment with mineral-trioxide or gutta-percha seems to be an adequate strategy in patients with EPL.
CONCLUSIONS
The treatment of EPL using simultaneous endodontic and periodontal therapies seems to be an acceptable treatment alternative.
Topics: Humans; Gutta-Percha; Titanium; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36294232
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013649 -
Journal of Clinical Periodontology Mar 2021Systematic reviews have established the short-term improvements of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared to conventional surgical treatment in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Medium- and long-term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies.
BACKGROUND
Systematic reviews have established the short-term improvements of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared to conventional surgical treatment in intrabony defects. However, a hierarchy of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures regarding the medium- to long-term results of treatment does not exist.
AIM
To systematically assess the literature to answer the focused question "In periodontitis patients with intrabony defects, what are the medium- and long-term benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared with open flap debridement (OFD), in terms of clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters and tooth retention?".
MATERIAL & METHODS
Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), reporting on clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures ≥3 years post-operatively, were systematically assessed. Clinical [residual probing pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, tooth loss] and radiographic [residual defect depth (RDD), bone gain (RBL)] outcome parameters were assessed. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed where possible.
RESULTS
Thirty RCTs, presenting data 3 to 20 years after treatment with grafting, GTR, EMD, as monotherapies, combinations thereof, and/or adjunctive use of blood-derived growth factor constructs or with OFD only, were included. NMA based on 21 RCTs showed that OFD was clearly the least efficacious treatment; regenerative/reconstructive treatments resulted in significantly shallower residual PD in 4 out 8 comparisons [range of mean differences (MD): -2.37 to -0.60 mm] and larger CAL gain in 6 out 8 comparisons (range of MD: 1.26 to 2.66 mm), and combination approaches appeared as the most efficacious. Tooth loss after regenerative/reconstructive treatment was less frequent (0.4%) compared to OFD (2.8%), but the evidence was sparse. There were only sparse radiographic data not allowing any relevant comparisons.
CONCLUSION
Periodontal regenerative/reconstructive therapy in intrabony defects results, in general, in shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain compared with OFD, translating in high rates of tooth survival, on a medium (3-5 years) to long-term basis (5-20 years). Combination approaches appear, in general, more efficacious compared to monotherapy in terms of shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain. A clear hierarchy could, however, not be established due to limited evidence.
Topics: Alveolar Bone Loss; Bone Transplantation; Dental Enamel Proteins; Follow-Up Studies; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Periodontal Attachment Loss; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33289191
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13409