-
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Sep 2022Classic photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective, but painful, treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). Daylight PDT with simultaneous activation of protoporphyrin IX... (Review)
Review
Classic photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective, but painful, treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). Daylight PDT with simultaneous activation of protoporphyrin IX during its formation is almost painless and as effective. Recent studies suggest that this gentle simultaneous activation can be performed indoors by replacing daylight with a suitable light source. We aimed to systematically review efficacy and tolerability of indoor gentle PDT of AKs using various light sources. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for clinical studies of treatment efficacy or adverse events. Indoor gentle PDT consists of application of methyl aminolevulinate or 5-aminolevulinic acid on the skin prior to long time illumination, starting no later than one hour after application. Fifteen studies met the selection criteria, enrolling 518 patients with more than 5,000 AKs undergoing indoor gentle PDT. The studies mainly included thin AKs comprised of 8 uncontrolled studies and 7 randomized controlled trials (RCT) of which 3 were designed as non-inferiority RCTs. Results from both controlled and uncontrolled trials indicated good treatment tolerability with very low pain scores like those of daylight PDT. Reduction of AK lesions 3 months after indoor gentle PDT in RCTs ranged from 52% to 79%, which is comparable to classic and daylight PDT. All 3 non-inferiority RCTs reported that indoor gentle PDT was non-inferior in terms of efficacy to classic PDT. The included studies used varying treatment protocols with different pretreatments, incubation time, light sources, and irradiation time. No standard protocol for indoor gentle PDT exists yet.
Topics: Aminolevulinic Acid; Humans; Keratosis, Actinic; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Sunlight; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35421601
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102858 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Apr 2024This study aimed to assess the influence of methylene blue (MB)-mediated adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) when compared to conventional mechanical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy of methylene blue-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on clinical and radiographic outcomes among patients with periodontal diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess the influence of methylene blue (MB)-mediated adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) when compared to conventional mechanical debridement (MD) alone on periodontal clinical and radiographic outcomes among periodontitis patients.
METHODS
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were incorporated by conducting an electronic search in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed for articles published in English up to August 2023 to address the following focused question based on the PICO format: "Whether the application of MB-mediated aPDT as an adjunctive to MD (Intervention) leads to improved periodontal clinical and/or radiographic outcomes (Outcome) among participants with and without periodontal diseases (Population) as compared to MD alone (Conparison)". The risk of bias (RoB) of the included studies was assessed using the modified Jadad scale. A meta-analysis was conducted, and it included the presentation of the standard mean difference (SMD) along with a 95 % confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
In total, 11 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvements in periodontal plaque index (SMD: -0.72 % [95 % CI: -0.99 % to -0.45 %]; p<0.00001), probing depth (SMD: -0.38 % [95 % CI: -0.57 % to -0.19 %; p<0.00001), and bleeding on probing (SMD: -0.44 % [95 % CI: -0.68 % to -0.20 %]; p = 0.0003) scores at the final follow-up visit after the application of MB-mediated aPDT in comparison with MD alone. Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference was observed in periodontal clinical attachment level values (SMD: -0.01 % [95 % CI: -0.21 % to 0.19 %]; p = 0.95) between the control group and the experimental group. Six studies achieved a low RoB, five were rated as having medium RoB, while no study received a high RoB.
CONCLUSION
MB-mediated aPDT, when used as an adjunct to conventional MD contributes to the improvement of periodontal clinical outcomes including PI, PD, and BOP in patients with periodontitis.
Topics: Methylene Blue; Humans; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Periodontal Diseases
PubMed: 38316339
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104000 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Jun 2024Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is the primary treatment for progressive keratoconus which has a significant impact on vision and quality of life. Our study aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is the primary treatment for progressive keratoconus which has a significant impact on vision and quality of life. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of epithelium-on versus epithelium-off CXL to treat keratoconus.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. We included studies that compared standard epithelium-off with epithelium-on CXL. The primary outcome measures were changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax), and the secondary outcomes were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and adverse events. A meta-analysis was performed on the primary and secondary outcomes based on the weighted mean differences between baseline to 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS
The search retrieved 887 publications with 27 included in the systematic review. A total of 1622 eyes (1399 patients; age 25.51 ± 4.02 years) were included in comparisons of epithelium-off to epithelium-on CXL in keratoconus. Epithelium-off CXL treated 800 eyes and epithelium-on CXL for 822 eyes. At 12-month follow-up, CDVA and Kmax showed no significant difference between the epithelium-off and epithelium-on CXL. The secondary outcomes showed that UDVA was better in epithelium-off CXL (- 0.11D, 95% CI - 0.12, - 0.1; p < 0.001) and there was more thinning in CCT in epithelium-off CXL (- 3.23 μm, 95% CI - 4.64, - 1.81; p <0.001).
CONCLUSION
Epithelium-off and epithelium-on CXL were both effective to treat progressive keratoconus. Further research is needed to compare the long-term outcomes and safety of both CXL protocols for adaptation into clinical practice.
Topics: Keratoconus; Humans; Cross-Linking Reagents; Collagen; Photosensitizing Agents; Epithelium, Corneal; Photochemotherapy; Visual Acuity; Riboflavin; Ultraviolet Rays; Corneal Topography; Corneal Stroma
PubMed: 37938377
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06287-8 -
Indian Journal of Dermatology,... 2021Xeroderma pigmentosum is a rare hereditary autosomal recessive genodermatosis. At present, there are many treatment options for xeroderma pigmentosum, covering...
Xeroderma pigmentosum is a rare hereditary autosomal recessive genodermatosis. At present, there are many treatment options for xeroderma pigmentosum, covering medical/procedural, surgical and combined modalities. However, the quality of these interventions has not been assessed. Our study aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature regarding the treatment of xeroderma pigmentosum. Multiple medical databases were accessed with the Medical Subject Headings terms; "xeroderma pigmentosum," "therapeutics" and "surgical procedures, operative" from January 2000 to April 2019, including articles published in Portuguese, Spanish and English (PROSPERO-CRD42018114858). Two hundred and ninety-eight studies were found in the databases researched, of which, after applying the inclusion criteria, only 33 studies remained. The 33 complete articles were read by three of the authors, having been found: 16 reported medical/procedural and 17 reported surgical treatments. Only one clinical study presented a good level of evidence (EL: 2): a randomized clinical trial using a T4 endonuclease V (T4N5) liposome lotion which reduced the development of skin lesions in patients with xeroderma pigmentosum. Amongst surgical modalities, all studies presented low evidence level (EL: 4). Three illustrative cases are also presented, to emphasize the multiple number of times that surgical modalities may be required in these patients. The therapeutic modalities, both clinical and surgical, for xeroderma pigmentosum presented a low level of scientific evidence which did not allow meta-analysis. More therapeutic studies, both clinical and surgical, with better scientific evidence are needed.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Dermatologic Surgical Procedures; Fluorouracil; Humans; Imiquimod; Ointments; Photochemotherapy; Skin Neoplasms; Xeroderma Pigmentosum
PubMed: 33769755
DOI: 10.25259/IJDVL_431_19 -
Biomolecules Nov 2017The aim of this systematic review was to investigate whether antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as either a primary mode of treatment or an adjunct to... (Review)
Review
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate whether antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as either a primary mode of treatment or an adjunct to non-surgical treatment was more effective than scaling and root planing (SRP) alone in treating chronic periodontitis in terms of clinical attachment level (CAL) gain and probing depth (PD) reduction. The focused question was developed using the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) format, and two authors independently searched the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases for relevant studies from January 2008 to December 2016. Twenty studies included in this systematic review were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of aPDT compared to placebo, no intervention, or non-surgical treatment in an adult population. Basic study characteristics, photosensitizing agents and wavelengths used in aPDT, frequency of aPDT application, effect of aPDT on clinical parameters, antimicrobial effect of aPDT in chronic periodontitis, effect of immunological parameters following aPDT and patient-based outcome measures were collected from the studies. Although there was a wide range of heterogeneity in the included studied, they all indicated that aPDT has the potential to be an effective adjunct in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. Long-term, multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed before aPDT can be recommended as an effective treatment modality.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Chronic Periodontitis; Dental Scaling; Humans; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Root Planing
PubMed: 29186805
DOI: 10.3390/biom7040079 -
Acta Ophthalmologica Feb 2022Approximately twenty per cent of Von Hippel-Lindau patients with retinal haemangioblastomas (RH) suffer from visual impairment. Various treatment options are available...
IMPORTANCE
Approximately twenty per cent of Von Hippel-Lindau patients with retinal haemangioblastomas (RH) suffer from visual impairment. Various treatment options are available for peripheral RH. However, management of peripheral RH is complex due to multifocality and bilaterality.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize published evidence on efficacy and safety of different interventions for peripheral RH and to provide treatment recommendations for specialists.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
Comprehensive searches were performed using Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar database on 4 March 2020. English publications that described outcomes related to efficacy or complications in at least two patients with peripheral RH were included. Efficacy and safety were estimated by complete tumour eradication rate, pretherapeutic and treatment-related complication rate. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to calculate the risk estimate of complications between treatment options.
FINDINGS
Twenty-seven articles were included in this review describing nine different treatment options for peripheral RH: laser photocoagulation (n = 230), cryotherapy (n = 50), plaque radiotherapy (n = 27), vitreoretinal surgery (n = 88), photodynamic therapy (PDT; n = 14), transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT; n = 10), external beam radiotherapy (n = 3), systemic treatment (n = 7) and intravitreal anti-VEGF (n = 2). Complete tumour eradication was achieved in 86.7% (95% CI: 83.5-89.9%) of all eyes. For the different treatments, this was after laser photocoagulation 89.9% (86.1-93.7%), cryotherapy 70.2% (57.0-83.4%), plaque radiotherapy 96.3% (89.1-100.0%), vitreoretinal surgery (100.0%), PDT 64.3% (38.3-90.3%) and TTT 80.0% (53.8-100.0%). No complete tumour eradication was achieved after systemic therapy, external beam radiotherapy or intravitreal anti-VEGF. Photodynamic therapy and vitreoretinal surgery showed the highest complication rate after treatment compared to the other treatments (OR 10.5 [95% CI: 2.9-38.4]) and (OR 5.9 [95% CI: 3.4-9.9]), respectively. Cases that had pretherapeutic complications showed a higher treatment-related complication rate (OR 14.8 [95% CI: 7.3-30.0]) than cases without complications before treatment.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings suggest that laser photocoagulation is the safest and most effective treatment method for peripheral RH up to 1.5 mm in diameter. Vitreoretinal surgery has the highest success rate for complete tumour eradication and may be the most suitable treatment option in the presence of pretherapeutic complications and for larger tumours.
Topics: Hemangioblastoma; Humans; Laser Coagulation; Photochemotherapy; Retinal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33834636
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14865 -
JAMA Dermatology Sep 2021Multiple interventions are available for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). However, most randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses focus on short-term efficacy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Multiple interventions are available for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). However, most randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses focus on short-term efficacy outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate and synthesize the long-term efficacy (≥12 months) of interventions for AK from parallel-arm randomized clinical trials.
DATA SOURCES
Searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Central were conducted from inception until April 6, 2020. The reference lists of the included studies and pertinent trial registers were hand searched. The study was completed February 27, 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Two reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of 2741 records. Finally, 17 published reports (original studies and follow-up reports) referring to 15 independent randomized clinical trials with an overall sample size of 4252 patients were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently extracted data on study, patient, and intervention characteristics. Network meta-analysis (NMA) of each outcome was conducted with a frequentist approach. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidance for NMA was used to assess the certainty of evidence. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials was used to evaluate the methodologic quality.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Participant complete clearance, participant partial clearance, and lesion-specific clearance were the outcomes, with each assessed at least 12 months after the end of treatment.
RESULTS
Data from 15 independent randomized clinical trials including 4252 patients were extracted and synthesized. Ten studies were included in an NMA for the outcome of participant complete clearance, with photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinate (ALA-PDT) showing the most favorable risk ratio (RR) compared with placebo (RR, 8.06; 95% CI, 2.07-31.37; GRADE, moderate), followed by imiquimod, 5% (RR, 5.98; 95% CI, 2.26-15.84; GRADE, very low), photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) (RR, 5.95; 95% CI, 1.21-29.41; GRADE, low), and cryosurgery (RR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.36-16.66; GRADE, very low). Similarly, ALA-PDT had the highest RR in the NMA for lesion-specific clearance (RR, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.49-10.33; GRADE, moderate). No NMA was possible for participant partial clearance owing to poor reporting of this outcome.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This systematic review and network meta-analysis found that therapy including ALA-PDT, imiquimod, 5%, MAL-PDT, and cryosurgery was associated with significant long-term efficacy in the NMA. This study provides data for a possible use in an evidence-based framework for selecting interventions with sustained lesion clearance.
Topics: Cryosurgery; Humans; Imiquimod; Keratosis, Actinic; Network Meta-Analysis; Photochemotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34347015
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2779 -
Photodermatology, Photoimmunology &... Jan 2023To perform a systematic review of available literature regarding the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and ALA derivative photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of...
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of available literature regarding the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and ALA derivative photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and provide recommendations on its use.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed of all published studies up to September 1, 2019 from nine databases, including PubMed, that evaluated PDT in the treatment of HS. For each study, quality of evidence and risk of bias was evaluated. Recommendations from the body of evidence were created based on Strength of Recommendation and Taxonomy (SORT) criteria.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. The majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Blue light PDT with 20% ALA and red light PDT with 16% methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) demonstrated some benefit based on a small number of poor-quality studies with a high risk of bias (Grade C, level III evidence). The most promising results were for 1%-5% ALA with intralesional diode, with good to complete response in 78%-94% of anatomic sites treated (Grade B, level II evidence).
LIMITATIONS
The majority of studies contained high levels of bias, with significant heterogeneity between studies. Conclusions are limited by small samples sizes, lack of randomized controlled trials, and differing protocols.
CONCLUSION
Further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of 20% ALA with blue light and MAL with red light. Intralesional diode PDT shows the most promise and warrants further investigation in larger, randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Humans; Photochemotherapy; Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Aminolevulinic Acid; Light; Treatment Outcome; Photosensitizing Agents
PubMed: 35713108
DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12812 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Sep 2004To assess the effects of treatments for basal cell carcinoma. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of treatments for basal cell carcinoma.
METHODS
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
Recurrence of basal cell carcinoma at three years or beyond, assessed clinically.
STUDIES REVIEWED
Randomised controlled trials of interventions for histologically confirmed basal cell carcinoma (published and unpublished material; no language restrictions).
RESULTS
25 studies were identified, covering seven therapeutic categories. Only one study of surgical excision versus radiotherapy contained primary outcome data, which showed significantly more persistent tumours and recurrences in the radiotherapy group compared with surgery (odds ratio 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.67). One study compared cryotherapy with surgery, with inconclusive results at one year. In a comparison of radiotherapy with cryotherapy, significantly more recurrences occurred at one year in the cryotherapy group. Preliminary studies suggest a short term success rate of 87-88% for imiquimod cream in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma, although this cream has not been compared with surgery. No consistent evidence was found for the other treatment modalities.
CONCLUSIONS
Little good quality research has been done on the treatments used for the most common cancer in humans. Most trials have included only people with basal cell carcinoma occurring at low risk sites. Only one trial measured recurrence at four years; recurrence rates at one year should be interpreted with caution. Surgery and radiotherapy seem to be the most effective treatments; surgery showed the lowest failure rates. Other treatments might have some use but need to be compared with surgery.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Cryotherapy; Humans; Photochemotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 15364703
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38219.515266.AE -
Acta Ophthalmologica Mar 2009Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin has been used less comprehensively in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and specifically of... (Review)
Review
Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review of efficacy, safety, treatment modifications and pharmacoeconomic properties.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin has been used less comprehensively in the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and specifically of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), since the advent of antiangiogenic therapies. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in PDT as an adjunct to these and other agents in the treatment of neovascular AMD. In light of this new development and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency's (EMEA) recent labelling decision to rescind approval for the use of PDT in occult CNV lesions, the present systematic review was undertaken to revisit the evidence supporting its clinical application. Photodynamic therapy provided the first pharmacological treatment for patients suffering from subfoveal CNV, the major cause of severe vision loss in AMD. Key clinical trials evaluating efficacy and safety have examined patients with all lesion subtypes, with the primary labelled indication (i.e. lesions containing a classic component of > or = 50% ) deriving from the results of the Treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study. The subsequent TAP Study Group post hoc categorization of lesions as predominantly classic is open to question, however, as it appears that the overall efficacy in this group only may have reflected the especially strong response in 100% classic lesions. Based on a subgroup analysis of the Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy Study, the indication for PDT subsequently was expanded in some jurisdictions, including that of the EMEA, to include occult lesions with no classic component. However, the subsequent Visudyne in Occult Study found no benefit in 100% occult lesions, resulting in the EMEA rescinding its approval for this indication.
Topics: Choroidal Neovascularization; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Humans; Macular Degeneration; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins; Treatment Outcome; Verteporfin
PubMed: 18577193
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01218.x