-
Computational and Mathematical Methods... 2022The disease burden and incidence of placenta accreta are increasing worldwide. The morbidity and mortality associated with undiagnosed placenta accreta are both high,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The disease burden and incidence of placenta accreta are increasing worldwide. The morbidity and mortality associated with undiagnosed placenta accreta are both high, highlighting the important of early diagnosis and intervention. In recent years, increasing studies are exploring the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for placenta accreta. Compared with traditional ultrasound, MRI has the advantages of high-resolution, multiangle imaging, and less influence by amniotic fluid and intestinal gas. However, the reported diagnostic accuracy among studies was inconsistent. Therefore, this study is aimed at exploring the diagnostic value of MRI for placenta accreta by systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
Relevant literature were systematically searched in PubMed, Ovid, Embase, ScienceDirect database, CNKI, and Wanfang database by using medical subject headings and relevant diagnostic terminologies such as sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, receiver-operating characteristic curve, and area under the curve. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and area under the curve of the included literature were analyzed using stata 17.0 software. Publication bias of the included studies was assessed by Deek's funnel plot. Cochrane statistics and statistics were used to test the heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 10 primary publications, comprising 4 retrospective studies and 6 prospective studies, were included in this meta-analysis. The gestational weeks of pregnant women ranged from 32 to 35 weeks, and the sample size ranged from 37 cases to 575 cases. Only 4 studies used the blind method in the process of clinical diagnosis by MRI. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and area of curve under summary receiver-operating characteristic for the diagnosis of placenta accreta by MRI were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68-0.87), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88.-0.93), respectively. The combined positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and diagnostic score were 4.17 (95% CI, 2.62-6.66), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.09-0.29), 26.61 (95% CI, 10.22-69.28), and 3.28 (95% CI, 2.32-4.24), respectively. No publication bias was noted.
CONCLUSION
Diagnosis of placenta accreta by MRI has good accuracy and predictive value that warrants clinical promotion.
Topics: Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 36060665
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2751559 -
BioMed Research International 2022This is the first meta-analysis that assessed the association between maternal smoking and the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), so this study was aimed at... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This is the first meta-analysis that assessed the association between maternal smoking and the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), so this study was aimed at investigating the association between maternal smoking and PAS based on observational studies. PAS is defined as a severe obstetric complication due to the abnormal invasion of the chorionic villi into the myometrium and uterine serosa.
METHODS
We searched electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar until January 2022. The results were reported using a random effect model. The chi-square test and the statistic were used to assess heterogeneity. Egger's and Begg's tests were used to examine the probability of publication bias. All statistical analyses were performed at a significance level of 0.05 using Stata software, version 11.
RESULTS
Based on the random effect model, the estimated OR of the risk of PAS associated with smoking was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.41; = 4.7%). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on study design, and the result showed that the association between smoking and PAS among cohort studies was significant 1.35 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.55; = 0.0%).
CONCLUSION
Our results suggested that maternal smoking is a risk factor for the PAS. There was no heterogeneity among studies that reported an association between smoking and the PAS. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to measure study quality.
Topics: Chi-Square Distribution; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Smoking
PubMed: 35860796
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2399888 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Apr 2022To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the performance of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the performance of the two modalities in the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
METHODS
This was a systematic review conducted following the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews guideline. A literature search was performed in five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PMC, The Cochrane Library and BVS-Bireme between 27 July and 4 August 2020. The search was updated on 18 August 2021. We included observational studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy in women with risk factors for PAS who had undergone both ultrasound and MRI examinations, published in English between 2011 and 2021. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Forest plots for sensitivity and specificity with 95% CIs and receiver-operating-characteristics curves for ultrasound and MRI were constructed.
RESULTS
The literature search identified 266 studies. After reviewing the titles and abstracts of the articles, 51 were selected for full-text review and 17 studies including 1301 women with MRI and ultrasound data available were selected for the meta-analysis. The study population included 457 cases with PAS diagnosed using the gold standard method (intraoperative or histopathological analysis). The overall quality of the evaluated studies was considered satisfactory according to QUADAS-2. The meta-analysis revealed a sensitivity of 0.833 (95% CI, 0.776-0.878) and specificity of 0.834 (95% CI, 0.746-0.897) for ultrasound. For MRI, sensitivity was 0.838 (95% CI, 0.786-0.879) and specificity was 0.831 (95% CI, 0.770-0.878). There was no statistically significant difference between the two modalities. The Cochran's Q values indicated a high level of heterogeneity of sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and MRI across studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound and MRI have similar accuracy in the diagnosis of PAS. These results suggest that, in a setting with a high prevalence of risk factors, the choice of imaging modality for initial screening for PAS should depend on the availability of equipment and the examiner's expertise. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 35041250
DOI: 10.1002/uog.24861 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... May 2018Accurate prenatal diagnosis of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) is fundamental because it significantly reduces maternal morbidities. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Accurate prenatal diagnosis of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) is fundamental because it significantly reduces maternal morbidities.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane databases were searched. The primary aim of the present review was to elucidate the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in recognizing the severity of AIP, defined as the depth and topography of invasion. The secondary aim was to ascertain the strength of association between each MRI sign and the depth of placental invasion and to test their individual predictive accuracy in detecting such invasion. Inclusion criteria were studies on women who had prenatal MRI for ultrasound suspicion or the presence of clinical risk factors for AIP. Estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated using the hierarchical summary receiver characteristics curve model, and individual data random-effect logistic regression was used to calculate OR.
RESULTS
Twenty studies (1080 pregnancies undergoing MRI mainly for the ultrasound suspicion of AIP) were included. MRI showed a sensitivity of 94.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.8-99.9], 100% (95% CI 75.3-100) and 86.5% (95% CI 74.2-94.4) for detection of placenta accreta, increta and percreta, respectively; the corresponding values for specificity were 98.8% (95% CI 70.7-100), 97.3% (95% CI 93.3-99.3), 96.8% (95% CI 93.5-98.7). MRI identified 100% of cases with S1 and 100% of those with S2 invasion confirmed at surgery. Among the different MRI signs, intra-placental dark bands showed the best sensitivity for the detection of placenta accreta, increta and percreta; as well as abnormal intra-placental vascularity, uterine bulging was associated with a higher risk of increta and percreta, exophitic mass and bladder tenting with placenta percreta.
CONCLUSION
Prenatal MRI has an excellent diagnostic accuracy in identifying the depth and the topography of placental invasion. However, these findings come mainly from studies in which MRI was performed as a secondary imaging tool in women already screened for AIP on ultrasound and might not reflect its actual diagnostic performance in detecting the severity of these disorders.
Topics: Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Placenta Diseases; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 29136274
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13258 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Nov 2013The accuracy of prospective sonographic prenatal detection of invasive placentation is unclear. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The accuracy of prospective sonographic prenatal detection of invasive placentation is unclear. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the performance of ultrasound in at-risk women for prenatal identification of invasive placentation.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched using the search terms 'placenta accreta', 'placenta increta', 'placenta percreta', 'ultrasound', 'magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)', 'invasive placenta' and 'infiltrative placenta'. Two authors independently abstracted data from the articles. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and their 95% CIs for each study were calculated. Forest plots and summary receiver-operating characteristics curves were produced. Between-study heterogeneity was explored both graphically and statistically. The MOOSE (meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines were followed.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies involving 3707 pregnancies at risk for invasive placentation were included. The overall performance of ultrasound for the antenatal detection of invasive placentation was as follows: sensitivity, 90.72 (95% CI, 87.2-93.6)%; specificity, 96.94 (95% CI, 96.3-97.5)%; LR+, 11.01 (95% CI, 6.1-20.0); LR-, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.23); and DOR, 98.59 (95% CI, 48.8-199.0). Among the different ultrasound signs, color Doppler had the best predictive accuracy (sensitivity, 90.74 (95% CI, 85.2-94.7)%; specificity, 87.68 (95% CI, 84.6-90.4)%; LR+, 7.77 (95% CI, 3.3-18.4); LR-, 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-0.29); and DOR, 69.02 (95% CI, 22.8-208.9)).
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound has a high accuracy for prenatal diagnosis of disorders of invasive placentation in high-risk women. The use of color Doppler improves the test performance.
Topics: Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 23943408
DOI: 10.1002/uog.13194 -
Scientific Reports Aug 2021This study aimed to review the obstetric complications during subsequent pregnancies after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by exploring... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This study aimed to review the obstetric complications during subsequent pregnancies after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by exploring the relationship between prior UAE and obstetric complications through a meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic literature review through March 31, 2021, using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines and determined the effect of prior UAE for PPH on the rate of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), PPH, placenta previa, hysterectomy, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and preterm birth (PTB). Twenty-three retrospective studies (2003-2021) met the inclusion criteria. They included 483 pregnancies with prior UAE and 320,703 pregnancies without prior UAE. The cumulative results of all women with prior UAE indicated that the rates of obstetric complications PAS, hysterectomy, and PPH were 16.3% (34/208), 6.5% (28/432), and 24.0% (115/480), respectively. According to the patient background-matched analysis based on the presence of prior PPH, women with prior UAE were associated with higher rates of PAS (odds ratio [OR] 20.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.27-132.41) and PPH (OR 5.32, 95% CI 1.40-20.16) but not with higher rates of hysterectomy (OR 8.93, 95% CI 0.43-187.06), placenta previa (OR 2.31, 95% CI 0.35-15.22), FGR (OR 7.22, 95% CI 0.28-188.69), or PTB (OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.74-12.14), compared with those who did not undergo prior UAE. Prior UAE for PPH may be a significant risk factor for PAS and PPH during subsequent pregnancies. Therefore, at the time of delivery, clinicians should be more attentive to PAS and PPH when women have undergone prior UAE. Since the number of women included in the patient background-matched study was limited, further investigations are warranted to confirm the results of this study.
Topics: Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Humans; Hysterectomy; Particle Size; Placenta Accreta; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Publication Bias; Risk; Uterine Artery Embolization
PubMed: 34413380
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96273-z -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Jun 2021To elucidate the risk factors, histopathological correlations and diagnostic accuracy of prenatal imaging in pregnancies complicated by posterior placenta accreta... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To elucidate the risk factors, histopathological correlations and diagnostic accuracy of prenatal imaging in pregnancies complicated by posterior placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for studies reporting on women with posterior PAS. Inclusion criteria were women with posterior PAS confirmed either at surgery or on histopathological analysis. The outcomes explored were risk factors for posterior PAS, histopathological correlation and the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting posterior PAS. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS
Twenty studies were included. Placenta previa was present in 92.8% (107/114; 17 studies) of pregnancies complicated by posterior PAS, while 76.1% (53/88; 11 studies) of women had had prior uterine surgery, mainly a Cesarean section (CS) or curettage and 82.5% (66/77; 10 studies) were multiparous. When considering histopathological analysis in women affected by posterior PAS, 77.5% (34/44; 11 studies) had placenta accreta, 19.5% (8/44; 11 studies) had placenta increta and 9.3% (2/44; 11 studies) had placenta percreta. Of the cases of posterior PAS disorder, 52.4% (31/63; 12 studies) were detected prenatally on ultrasound, while 46.7% (32/63; 12 studies) were diagnosed only at birth. When exploring the distribution of the classic ultrasound signs of PAS, placental lacunae were present in 39.0% (12/30; seven studies), loss of the clear zone in 41.1% (13/30; seven studies) and bladder-wall interruption in 16.6% (4/30; seven studies) of women, while none of the included cases showed hypervascularization at the bladder-wall interface. When assessing the role of MRI in detecting posterior PAS, 73.5% (26/32; 11 studies) of cases were detected on prenatal MRI, while 26.5% (6/32; 11 studies) were discovered only at the time of CS.
CONCLUSIONS
Placenta previa, prior uterine surgery and multiparity represent the most commonly reported risk factors for posterior PAS. Ultrasound had a very low diagnostic accuracy in detecting these disorders prenatally. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 32840934
DOI: 10.1002/uog.22183 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is widely performed in women with intrauterine adhesions. Small observational studies have reported the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, but... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is widely performed in women with intrauterine adhesions. Small observational studies have reported the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, but studies with larger sample sizes are few. The aim of this study is to evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
METHODS
We conducted a literature search in July 2022 using the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, and finally, 32 studies (N = 3812) were included. We did a meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of placenta-related disorders, including placenta previa, placental abruption, placenta accreta, placenta increta, and retained placenta. We also included other obstetric and neonatal outcomes like postpartum hemorrhage, ectopic pregnancy, oligohydramnios, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, and intrauterine growth restriction. The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in studies with a control group, but otherwise as prevalence (%) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
The overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 58.97% and 45.56%, respectively. The prevalence of placenta previa differed in pregnant women who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with those who did not (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.28-8.36). In studies without a comparative group, the pooled rate of placenta accreta was 7% (95% CI, 4-11) in 20 studies; placenta increta was 1% (95% CI, 0-4) in 5 studies; a retained placenta was 11% (95% CI, 5-24) in 5 studies; postpartum hemorrhage was 12% (95% CI, 8-18) in 12 studies; ectopic pregnancy was 1% (95% CI, 0-2) in 13 studies; oligohydramnios was 3% (95% CI, 1-6) in 3 studies; intrauterine growth restriction was 3% (95% CI, 1-8) in 3 studies; gestational hypertension was 5% (95% CI, 2-11) in 4 studies; and diabetes mellitus was 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in 3 studies.
DISCUSSION
Due to the paucity of good quality comparative data, the question of whether there is an increased prevalence of obstetric and neonatal complications in women after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with the general population remains unanswered. The findings from this review will provide a basis for more well-designed studies in the future.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=364021, identifier [CRD42022364021].
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Placenta Previa; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Placenta, Retained; Oligohydramnios; Placenta; Pregnancy, Ectopic
PubMed: 37033233
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1126740 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Apr 2023To determine, by expert consensus through a modified Delphi process, the role of standardized and new ultrasound signs in the prenatal evaluation of patients at high...
OBJECTIVE
To determine, by expert consensus through a modified Delphi process, the role of standardized and new ultrasound signs in the prenatal evaluation of patients at high risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
METHODS
A systematic review of articles providing information on ultrasound imaging signs or markers associated with PAS was performed before the development of questionnaires for the first round of the Delphi process. Only peer-reviewed original research studies in the English language describing one or more new ultrasound sign(s) for the prenatal evaluation of PAS were included. A three-round consensus-building Delphi method was then conducted under the guidance of a steering group, which included nine experts who invited an international panel of experts in obstetric ultrasound imaging in the evaluation of patients at high risk for PAS. Consensus was defined as agreement of ≥ 70% between participants.
RESULTS
The systematic review identified 15 articles describing eight new ultrasound signs for the prenatal evaluation of PAS. A total of 35 external experts were approached, of whom 31 agreed and participated in the first round. Thirty external experts (97%) and seven experts from the steering group completed all three Delphi rounds. A consensus was reached that a prior history of at least one Cesarean delivery, myomectomy or PAS should be an indication for detailed PAS ultrasound assessment. The panelists also reached a consensus that seven of the 11 conventional signs of PAS should be included in the examination of high-risk patients and the routine mid-gestation scan report: (1) loss of the 'clear zone', (2) myometrial thinning, (3) bladder-wall interruption, (4) placental bulge, (5) uterovesical hypervascularity, (6) placental lacunae and (7) bridging vessels. A consensus was not reached for any of the eight new signs identified by the systematic review. With respect to other ultrasound features that are not specific to PAS but increase the probability of PAS at birth, the panelists reached a consensus for the finding of anterior placenta previa or placenta previa with cervical involvement. The experts were also asked to determine which PAS signs should be quantified and consensus was reached only for the quantification of placental lacunae using an existing score. For predicting surgical outcome in patients with a high probability of PAS at delivery, a consensus was obtained for loss of the clear zone, bladder-wall interruption, presence of placental lacunae and presence of placenta previa involving the cervix.
CONCLUSIONS
We have confirmed the continued importance of seven established standardized ultrasound signs of PAS, highlighted the role of transvaginal ultrasound in evaluating the placental position and anatomy of the cervix, and identified new ultrasound signs that may become useful in the future prenatal evaluation and management of patients at high risk for PAS at birth. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Delphi Technique; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36609827
DOI: 10.1002/uog.26155 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Nov 2021: Since spontaneous uterine rupture in the mid-trimester is rare, maternal and fetal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to... (Review)
Review
: Since spontaneous uterine rupture in the mid-trimester is rare, maternal and fetal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the maternal and fetal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies after prior mid-trimester uterine rupture. : A systematic review using PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus until 30 September 2021, was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The studies that clarified the maternal and fetal outcomes after prior mid-trimester uterine rupture and our case ( = 1) were included in the analysis. : Among the eligible cases, there were five women with eight subsequent pregnancies after prior mid-trimester uterine rupture. The timing of prior mid-trimester uterine rupture ranged from 15 to 26 weeks of gestation. The gestational age at delivery in subsequent pregnancies was 23-38 gestational weeks. Among the included cases ( = 8), those involving prior mid-trimester uterine rupture appeared to be associated with an increased prevalence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) ( = 3, 37.5%) compared with those involving term uterine rupture published in the literature; moreover, one case exhibited recurrent uterine rupture at 23 weeks of gestation (12.5%). No maternal deaths have been reported in subsequent pregnancies following prior mid-trimester uterine rupture. Fetal outcomes were feasible, except for one pregnancy with recurrent mid-trimester uterine rupture at 23 weeks of gestation, whose fetus was alive complicated by cerebral palsy. : Our findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of the possibility of PAS and possible uterine rupture in pregnancies after prior mid-trimester uterine rupture. Further case studies are warranted to assess maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies following prior mid-trimester prior uterine rupture.
Topics: Female; Fetus; Gestational Age; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy; Uterine Rupture
PubMed: 34946239
DOI: 10.3390/medicina57121294