-
Cancer Treatment Reviews Mar 2017It is assumed that DNA methylation plays a key role in both tumour development and therapy resistance. Demethylating agents have been shown to be effective in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
It is assumed that DNA methylation plays a key role in both tumour development and therapy resistance. Demethylating agents have been shown to be effective in the treatment of haematological malignancies. Based on encouraging preclinical results, demethylating agents may also be effective in solid tumours. This systematic review summarizes the evidence of the effect of demethylating agents on clinical response, methylation and the immune system in solid tumours.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search from 1949 to December 2016, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies which evaluated treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, guadecitabine, hydralazine, procaine, MG98 and/or zebularine in patients with solid tumours were included. Data on clinical response, effects on methylation and immune response were extracted.
RESULTS
Fifty-eight studies were included: in 13 studies complete responses (CR) were observed, 35 studies showed partial responses (PR), 47 studies stable disease (SD) and all studies except two showed progressive disease (PD). Effects on global methylation were observed in 11/15 studies and demethylation/re-expression of tumour specific genes was seen in 15/17 studies. No clear correlation between (de)methylation and clinical response was observed. In 14 studies immune-related responses were reported, such as re-expression of cancer-testis antigens and upregulation of interferon genes.
CONCLUSION
Demethylating agents are able to improve clinical outcome and alter methylation status in patients with solid tumours. Although beneficial effect has been shown in individual patients, overall response is limited. Further research on biomarker predicting therapy efficacy is indicated, particularly in earlier stage and highly methylated tumours.
Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Azacitidine; Cytidine; DNA Methylation; Decitabine; Humans; Hydralazine; Immune System; Methylation; Neoplasms; Procaine; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28189913
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.01.004 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Apr 2018To compare the effects of the four most commonly used preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantations. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To compare the effects of the four most commonly used preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantations.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases up to January 31, 2017. The inclusion criteria were comparative, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for deceased donor liver (DDL) allografts with adult and pediatric donors using the gold standard University of Wisconsin (UW) solution or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK), Celsior (CS) and Institut Georges Lopez (IGL-1) solutions. Fifteen RCTs (1830 livers) were included; the primary outcomes were primary non-function (PNF) and one-year post-transplant graft survival (OGS-1).
RESULTS
All trials were homogenous with respect to donor and recipient characteristics. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of PNF with the use of UW, HTK, CS and IGL-1 (RR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.01-0.03, = 0.356). Comparing OGS-1 also failed to reveal any difference between UW, HTK, CS and IGL-1 (RR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.80-0.80, = 0.369). Two trials demonstrated higher PNF levels for UW in comparison with the HTK group, and individual studies described higher rates of biliary complications where HTK and CS were used compared to the UW and IGL-1 solutions. However, the meta-analysis of the data did not prove a statistically significant difference: the UW, CS, HTK and IGL-1 solutions were associated with nearly equivalent outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Alternative solutions for UW yield the same degree of safety and effectiveness for the preservation of DDLs, but further well-designed clinical trials are warranted.
Topics: Adenosine; Allopurinol; Disaccharides; Electrolytes; Glucose; Glutamates; Glutathione; Graft Survival; Histidine; Humans; Insulin; Liver Transplantation; Mannitol; Odds Ratio; Organ Preservation; Organ Preservation Solutions; Potassium Chloride; Primary Graft Dysfunction; Procaine; Raffinose; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29713134
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1812 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2019Congenital syphilis continues to be a substantial public health problem in many parts of the world. Since the first use of penicillin for the treatment of syphilis in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Congenital syphilis continues to be a substantial public health problem in many parts of the world. Since the first use of penicillin for the treatment of syphilis in 1943, which was a notable early success, it has remained the preferred and standard treatment including for congenital syphilis. However, the treatment of congenital syphilis is largely based on clinical experience and there is extremely limited evidence on the optimal dose or duration of administration of penicillin or the use of other antibiotics.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic treatment for newborns with confirmed, highly probable and possible congenital syphilis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane STI Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science to 23 May 2018. We also handsearched conference proceedings, contacted trial authors and reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotic treatment (any concentration, frequency, duration and route) with no intervention or any other antibiotic treatment for neonates with confirmed, highly probable or possible congenital syphilis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
All review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. We resolved any disagreements through consensus. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
Two RCTs (191 participants) met our inclusion criteria and none of these trials was funded by the industry. One trial (22 participants) compared benzathine penicillin with no intervention for infants with possible congenital syphilis. Low-quality evidence suggested that benzathine penicillin administration may not have decreased the rate of neonatal death due to any cause (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 11.70), and showed a possible reduction into the proportion of neonates with clinical manifestations of congenital syphilis (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.09). Penicillin administration increased the serological cure at the third month (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.27). These results should be taken with caution, because the trial was stopped early because there were four cases with clinical congenital syphilis in the no treatment group and none in the treatment group. Interim analysis suggested this difference was significant. This study did not report neonatal death due to congenital syphilis or the frequency of serious or minor adverse events after therapy. We downgraded the quality of evidence because of imprecision and risk of bias.One trial (169 participants) compared benzathine penicillin versus procaine benzylpenicillin. High- and moderate-quality evidence suggested that there were probably no differences between benzathine penicillin and procaine benzylpenicillin for the outcomes: absence of clinical manifestations of congenital syphilis (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.03) and serological cure (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.03). There were no cases of neonatal death due congenital syphilis; all 152 babies who followed up survived. This study did not report on the frequency of serious or minor adverse events after therapy. We downgraded the quality of evidence because of serious risk of bias.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
At present, the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic treatment for newborns with confirmed, highly probable or possible congenital syphilis is sparse, implying that we are uncertain about the estimated effect. One trial compared benzathine penicillin with no intervention for infants with possible congenital syphilis. Low-quality evidence suggested penicillin administration possibly reduce the proportion of neonates with clinical manifestations of congenital syphilis, penicillin administration increased the serological cure at the third month. These findings support the clinical use of penicillin in neonates with confirmed, highly probable or possible congenital syphilis. High- and moderate-quality evidence suggests that there are probably no differences between benzathine penicillin and procaine benzylpenicillin administration for the outcomes of absence of clinical manifestations of syphilis or serological cure.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Infant; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Penicillin G Benzathine; Penicillin G Procaine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Syphilis, Congenital
PubMed: 30776081
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012071.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2005Lidocaine, mexiletine, tocainide, and flecainide are local anesthetics which give an analgesic effect when administered orally or parenterally. Early reports described... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Lidocaine, mexiletine, tocainide, and flecainide are local anesthetics which give an analgesic effect when administered orally or parenterally. Early reports described the use of intravenous lidocaine or procaine to relieve cancer and postoperative pain (Keats 1951; Gilbert 1951; De Clive-Lowe 1958; Bartlett 1961). Interest reappeared decades later when patient series and clinical trials reported that parenteral lidocaine and its oral analogs tocainide, mexiletine, and flecainide relieved neuropathic pain in some patients (Boas 1982; Lindblom 1984; Petersen 1986; Dunlop 1988; Bach 1990; Awerbuch 1990). With the recent publication of clinical trials with high quality standards, we have reviewed the use of systemic lidocaine and its oral analogs in neuropathic pain to update our knowledge, to measure their benefit and harm, and to better define their role in therapy.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate pain relief and adverse effect rates between systemic local anesthetic-type drugs and other control interventions.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched MEDLINE (1966 through 15 May 2004), EMBASE (January 1980 to December 2002), Cancer Lit (through 15 December 2002), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2nd Quarter, 2004), System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE), and LILACS, from January 1966 through March 2001. We also hand searched conference proceedings, textbooks, original articles and reviews.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included trials with random allocation, that were double blinded, with a parallel or crossover design. The control intervention was a placebo or an analgesic drug for neuropathic pain from any cause.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We collected efficacy and safety data from all published and unpublished trials. We calculated combined effect sizes using continuous and binary data for pain relief and adverse effects as primary and secondary outcome measurements, respectively.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirty-two controlled clinical trials met the selection criteria; two were duplicate articles. The treatment drugs were intravenous lidocaine (16 trials), mexiletine (12 trials), lidocaine plus mexiletine sequentially (one trial), and tocainide (one trial). Twenty-one trials were crossover studies, and nine were parallel. Lidocaine and mexiletine were superior to placebo [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -11; 95% CI: -15 to -7; P <0.00001], and limited data showed no difference in efficacy (WMD = -0.6; 95% CI: -7 to 6), or adverse effects versus carbamazepine, amantadine, gabapentin or morphine. In these trials, systemic local anesthetics were safe, with no deaths or life-threatening toxicities. Sensitivity analysis identified data distribution in three trials as a probable source of heterogeneity. There was no publication bias.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Lidocaine and oral analogs were safe drugs in controlled clinical trials for neuropathic pain, were better than placebo, and were as effective as other analgesics. Future trials should enroll specific diseases and test novel lidocaine analogs with better toxicity profiles. More emphasis is necessary on outcomes measuring patient satisfaction to assess if statistically significant pain relief is clinically meaningful.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Local; Flecainide; Humans; Lidocaine; Mexiletine; Nervous System Diseases; Pain; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tocainide
PubMed: 16235318
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003345.pub2 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jun 2018The aim of this work was to determine the best preservation solutions for allografts for liver transplantation by quantitative network meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
The aim of this work was to determine the best preservation solutions for allografts for liver transplantation by quantitative network meta-analysis.
METHODS
Global electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. Seven pieces of parametric data were extracted from included studies for pooled estimation. A consistency model was used for direct and indirect comparisons. The cumulative probability P value was utilized to rank the solutions. A node-splitting model was utilized for testing the consistency of final data. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.
RESULTS
Eleven 2-arm trials including 1319 patients and 5 different solutions were finally included. HTK (Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate) solution exhibited the best efficacy for decreasing the primary dysfunction rate, biliary complications and ICU-stay time (probability P = 0.43, 0.45 and 0.58, respectively). Celsior solution significantly decreased the rate of rejection and early retransplantation (probability P = 0.73 and 0.38, respectively), and enhanced patient and graft survival (probability P = 0.90 and 0.98, respectively) more than did other solutions. Overall, the quality of evidence was rated high or moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
We suggested that HTK solution may offer the best safety during the perioperative period. However, Celsior solution led to better graft tolerance and exhibited greater benefit for long-term outcomes. And our conclusions still need to be further validated.
Topics: Allografts; Disaccharides; Electrolytes; Glucose; Glutamates; Glutathione; Graft Survival; Histidine; Humans; Liver; Liver Transplantation; Mannitol; Network Meta-Analysis; Organ Preservation; Organ Preservation Solutions; Potassium Chloride; Procaine
PubMed: 29684666
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.024 -
Danish Medical Journal Mar 2018During conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) there is no active perfusion of the pulmonary circulation and the mechanical ventilation is ceased leaving the lungs... (Review)
Review
During conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) there is no active perfusion of the pulmonary circulation and the mechanical ventilation is ceased leaving the lungs exposed to warm ischemia. Pulmonary dysfunction is seen in varying degrees after major surgery, but more severe in cardiac surgery patients probably due to the effects of CPB. The evidence for effect and safety are limited, but active pulmonary artery perfusion during CPB could be beneficial for the patients' postoperative oxygenation. Our aim was in a randomised clinical trial to assess primarily the effect of pulmonary artery perfusion during CPB on postoperative oxygenation in patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), secondarily to assess other possible benefits and harms. Furthermore, we wanted in a systematic review with meta-analyses of all randomised clinical trials to investigate the pooled effects of pulmonary artery perfusion during CPB. We planned and conducted a randomised, partly blinded, clinical trial assigning cardiac surgery patients diagnosed with COPD to receive pulmonary artery perfusion with oxygenated blood or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution compared to no pulmonary perfusion during CPB. The primary outcome was the oxygenation index measured during and after surgery. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, serious adverse events, days alive outside the intensive care unit and outside the hospital, 30- and 90-days mortality. Secondly, we conducted a systematic review of randomised clinical trials comparing benefits and harms of using pulmonary artery perfusion versus no pulmonary perfusion during CPB pooling results in meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (TSA). Of the 90 randomised patients 89 were included in analysis of the primary outcome, the inverse oxygenation index, measured at a single time point 21 hours after CPB start and longitudinally 1, 3, 5, 7, and 21 hours after CPB start. At 21 hours, patients randomised to pulmonary artery perfusion with oxygenated blood had a higher inverse oxygenation index compared to patients randomised to no pulmonary perfusion during CPB (mean difference (MD) 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05 to 1.83; P=0.04). The inverse oxygenation index was also significantly higher at 21 hours after CPB start (MD 0.99; CI, 0.29 to 1.69; P=0.007), and longitudinally (P=0.009), for patients receiving pulmonary artery perfusion with oxygenated blood compared to pulmonary artery perfusion with HTK solution. This corresponds to a PaO difference of 23 mmHg with a median FiO of 0.32. We found no additional significant differences for the remaining comparisons of the inverse oxygenation index neither for any of the secondary outcomes. The systematic review identified 4 trials with a total of 210 patients. In meta-analyses pulmonary artery perfusion with blood versus no pulmonary perfusion during CPB was not associated with relative risk of death (1.7; 95% CI, 0.4 to 6.9; 210 patients in three trials with high and one trial with low risk of bias), serious adverse events (1.2; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.8; 180 patients in two trials with high and one trial with low risk of bias) or intubation time (-0.4 hours; 95% CI, -1.1 to 0.4; 176 patients in three trials with high and one trial with low risk of bias). TSA on mortality, serious adverse events, and PaO/FiO ratio showed that required information sizes have not been reached, but pulmonary artery perfusion with blood was associated with a higher PaO/FiO ratio (27.8 mmHg; 95% CI, 5.7 to 50.0 mmHg; 119 patients in two trials with high and one trial with low risk of bias). TSA on intubation time showed that the boundary for lack of superiority (futility) was crossed refuting a shorten intubation time of 1.5 hours or more. Our trial provided additional knowledge about the use of pulmonary artery perfusion during CPB in cardiac surgery patients with COPD, and improved oxygenation for patients receiving pulmonary artery perfusion with oxygenated blood. Pulmonary artery perfusion with HTK solution did not result in an improved oxygenation. In line with this, the systematic review including data from additional trials showed a possible association between pulmonary artery perfusion with blood and improved oxygenation, but no significant associations with mortality, serious adverse events or intubation time. However, all data are too sparse to be conclusive.
Topics: Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Glucose; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Lung; Mannitol; Perfusion; Potassium Chloride; Procaine; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Circulation; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Gas Exchange; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29510817
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery May 2022Surgical procedures in the heart requires protection of the heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardioplegia is the primary myocardial protective method in use.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Surgical procedures in the heart requires protection of the heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardioplegia is the primary myocardial protective method in use. Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution is an intracellular cardioplegic solution that was initially used to preserve organs for transplantation.
METHODS
A systematic electronic search was conducted in July 2021, in four databases; PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials. The results were screened and the eligible trials were identified. Thereafter, the relevant data were extracted and pooled as mean difference or risk ratio, and 95% confidence interval in an inverse variance method using RevMan software.
RESULTS
This review included 12 trials (n = 1327). HTK solution has resulted significantly in shorter intensive care unit stay (MD = - 0.09; 95% CI [- 0.15, - 0.03], p = 0.006), and shorter hospital stay (MD = - 0.51; 95% CI [- 0.71, - 0.31], p < 0.00001). Moreover, the patients who received the HTK solution had significantly lower levels of creatine kinase (after 4-7 h (MD = - 157.52; 95% CI [- 272.31, - 42.19], p = 0.007), and 24 h (MD = - 136.62; 95% CI [- 267.20, - 6.05], p = 0.04)), as well as creatine kinase muscle brain band (after 44-48 h (MD = - 3.35; 95% CI [- 5.69, - 1.02], p = 0.005)).
CONCLUSION
HTK solution had the same efficacy and safety as other cardioplegic solutions in most of the clinical parameters. Furthermore, the solution showed superiority in fastening the recovery and protecting the myocardium at the biochemical level. HTK solution provides longer myocardial protection; therefore, it limits surgical interruption. HTK solution can be used as an alternative to the currently used cardioplegic solutions.
Topics: Cardioplegic Solutions; Creatine Kinase; Glucose; Heart Arrest, Induced; Humans; Mannitol; Myocardium; Potassium Chloride; Procaine
PubMed: 35642063
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01891-x -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2006Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children under five years of age in developing countries. When... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children under five years of age in developing countries. When hospitalisation is required, the usual practice includes administering parenteral antibiotics if a bacterial infection is suspected. This has disadvantages as it causes pain and discomfort to the children, which may lead to treatment refusal or reduced compliance. It is also associated with needle-related complications. In some settings this equipment is in short supply or unavailable necessitating transfer of the child, which increases risks and healthcare costs.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the equivalence in effectiveness and safety of oral antibiotic compared to parenteral antibiotic therapies in the treatment of severe pneumonia in children between three months and five years of age.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005); MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2005); EMBASE (January 1990 to July 2005) and LILACS (February 2005).
SELECTION CRITERIA
The review included published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing any oral antibiotic therapy with any parenteral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of severe pneumonia in children from three months to five years of age.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The search yielded more than 1300 titles. Only three studies met all criteria for eligibility. One of the identified trials is yet to publish its results. We did not perform a meta-analysis because of clinical heterogeneity of therapies compared in the included trials.
MAIN RESULTS
Campbell 1988 compared oral co-trimoxazole versus intramuscular procaine penicillin followed by oral ampicillin in 134 children. At the seventh day of follow up, treatment failure occurred in 6/66 (9.1%) in the oral co-trimoxazole group and 7/68 (10.2%) in the combined-treatment group. The risk difference was -0.01% (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.11 to 0.09). The APPIS Group 2004 evaluated 1702 patients comparing oral amoxicillin versus intravenous penicillin for two days followed by oral amoxicillin. After 48 hours, treatment failure occurred in 161/845 (19%) in the amoxicillin group and 167/857 (19%) in the parenteral penicillin group. The risk difference was -0.4% (95% CI -4.2 to 3.3). The authors reported similar recovery in both groups at 5 and 14 days.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Oral therapy appears to be an effective and safe alternative to parenteral antibiotics in hospitalised children with severe pneumonia who do not have any serious signs or symptoms.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Injections, Intramuscular; Penicillin G Procaine; Pneumonia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
PubMed: 16625618
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004979.pub2 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Nov 2023The use of low-dose local anesthetics (LAs) has significantly transformed patient care by providing rapid and effective relief of pain and other clinical conditions... (Review)
Review
The use of low-dose local anesthetics (LAs) has significantly transformed patient care by providing rapid and effective relief of pain and other clinical conditions while minimizing recovery time. This study aims to identify and describe the existing scientific evidence on the therapeutic use of low-dose LAs in various conditions and to identify gaps in the current literature in order to prioritize future research. This systematic scoping review adhered to the methodological guidelines outlined in the Arksey and O'Malley framework, which includes five distinct stages. Of the 129 studies included, 37.98% ( = 49) were clinical trials, 55.03% ( = 71) were observational studies, and 6.97% ( = 9) were systematic reviews. The most commonly reported indication for the use of low-dose LAs was chronic pain management (72.86%), followed by acute pain management (13.17%). Additionally, non-pain-related indications were also identified (13.95%). Overall, the administration of low-dose, short-acting LAs demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of pain management and reduction in anxiety and depression scales, thereby having a positive impact on the patients' quality of life. This review represents the first systematic scoping review regarding the therapeutic role of LAs. To substantiate the reported positive effects on efficacy and safety, further rigorous research comprising larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and long-term outcome monitoring is imperative.
PubMed: 38068272
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237221 -
Journal of Autoimmunity Feb 2024The term Hoigné's syndrome denotes a mimicker of anaphylaxis, which occurs immediately after the parenteral administration of a drug and is likely caused by... (Review)
Review
The term Hoigné's syndrome denotes a mimicker of anaphylaxis, which occurs immediately after the parenteral administration of a drug and is likely caused by non-thrombotic pulmonary and systemic drug micro-embolization. It has so far been documented uniquely in case reports and small case series. Because this condition has never been systematically evaluated, we performed a structured literature review (pre-registered as CRD42023392962). The search was carried out in Excerpta Medica, National Library of Medicine, and Google Scholar. Cases with features consistent with anaphylaxis, urticaria, angioedema, asthma, syncope, anxiety, or panic attack triggered by needle phobia, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity were excluded. For the final analysis, we retained reports published between 1951 and 2021, which presented 247 patients with Hoigné's syndrome: 37 children and 211 adults with a male: female ratio of 2.1 : 1.0. The patients presented within 1 min after parenteral administration of a drug (intramuscular penicillin in 90 % of the cases) with chest discomfort, shortness of breath, fear of death, psychomotor agitation, and auditory or visual hallucinations and impairment. Recovery occurred within 30 min. The diagnosis of Hoigné's syndrome was also established in five patients 66-91 years of age with pre-existing cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, who suddenly died after the administration of penicillin despite not exhibiting the aforementioned symptoms. It was therefore speculated that pulmonary drug micro-embolization induced a lethal cardiovascular compromise in these individuals. Histologic investigations supporting this hypothesis were performed in only one case. The diagnosis of Hoigné's pulmonary drug micro-embolization was established also in five patients with pre-existing cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, who suddenly died after the administration of penicillin despite not exhibiting the afore mentioned symptoms. Histologic investigations supporting this hypothesis were performed in only one case. In conclusion, Hoigné's syndrome is an uncommon non-immune-mediated reaction. This report seeks to promote broader awareness and knowledge regarding this alarming mimicker of anaphylaxis. Diagnosis relies solely on clinical evaluation.
Topics: United States; Adult; Child; Humans; Male; Female; Penicillin G Procaine; Anaphylaxis; Penicillins; Hallucinations; Syndrome; Lung Diseases
PubMed: 38194789
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103164