-
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) May 2023Studies have shown that people with diabetes have a high risk of osteoporosis and fractures. The effect of diabetic medications on bone disease cannot be ignored. This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Studies have shown that people with diabetes have a high risk of osteoporosis and fractures. The effect of diabetic medications on bone disease cannot be ignored. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of two types of glucose-lowering drugs, metformin and thiazolidinediones (TZD), on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in patients with diabetes mellitus.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis were prospectively registered on PROSPERO, and the registration number is CRD42022320884. Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify clinical trials comparing the effects of metformin and thiazolidinediones on bone metabolism in patients with diabetes. The literature was screened by inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two assessors independently assessed the quality of the identified studies and extracted relevant data.
RESULTS
Seven studies involving 1656 patients were finally included. Our results showed that the metformin group had a 2.77% (SMD = 2.77, 95%CI [2.11, 3.43]; < 0.00001) higher bone mineral density (BMD) than the thiazolidinedione group until 52 weeks; however, between 52 and 76 weeks, the metformin group had a 0.83% (SMD = -0.83, 95%CI: [-3.56, -0.45]; = 0.01) lower BMD. The C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) were decreased by 18.46% (MD = -18.46, 95%CI: [-27.98, -8.94], = 0.0001) and 9.94% (MD = -9.94, 95%CI: [-16.92, -2.96], = 0.005) in the metformin group compared with the TZD group.
Topics: Humans; Metformin; Osteoporosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Bone Density; Thiazolidinediones
PubMed: 37241136
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050904 -
BMJ Open Jun 2023Metformin is associated with osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. This study aims to investigate the impacts of metformin therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Metformin is associated with osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. This study aims to investigate the impacts of metformin therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
METHODS
Searches were carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception to 26 September 2022. Two review authors assessed trial eligibility in accordance with established inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB V.2.0). Data analysis was conducted with Stata Statistical Software V.16.0 and Review Manager Software V.5.3.
RESULTS
A total of 15 studies with 3394 participants were identified for the present meta-analysis. Our pooled results indicated that metformin had no statistically significant effects on BMD at lumbar spine (SMD=-0.05, 95% CI=0.19 to 0.09, p=0.47, participants=810; studies=7), at femoral (MD=-0.01 g/cm, 95% CI=-0.04 to 0.01 g/cm, p=0.25, participants=601; studies=3) and at hip (MD=0.01 g/cm, 95% CI=0.02 to 0.03 g/cm, p=0.56, participants=634; studies=4). Metformin did not lead to significant change in osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin and bone alkaline phosphatase. Metformin induced decreases in N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (MD=-6.09 µg/L, 95% CI=9.38 to -2.81 µg/L, p=0.0003, participants=2316; studies=7) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (MD=-55.80 ng/L, 95% CI=97.33 to -14.26 ng/L, p=0.008, participants=2325; studies=7).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis indicated that metformin had no significant effect on BMD. Metformin decreased some bone turnover markers as N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen. But the outcomes should be interpreted with caution due to several limitations.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density; Metformin; Lumbar Vertebrae; Bone Remodeling
PubMed: 37355276
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072904 -
EClinicalMedicine Mar 2024Childhood obesity is a pressing health crisis of epidemic proportions. Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective weight loss solution however its role in the paediatric...
BACKGROUND
Childhood obesity is a pressing health crisis of epidemic proportions. Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective weight loss solution however its role in the paediatric population is contentious owing to the paucity of weight specific and generalised health outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of paediatric BS on bone health.
METHODS
This prospectively registered systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023432035) was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (1946-1928 September 2023), EMBASE (1947-1928 September 2023) via the Ovid platform, and the Cochrane Review Library to identify scientific publications reporting bone outcome measures in patients under the age of 18 years who underwent BS. Meta-analysis was undertaken on post-operative weight and bone parameters in paediatric patients following BS. Outcomes were reported as weighted or standardized mean difference with 95 percent confidence intervals. Subgroup analysis by intervention, quality scoring and risk of bias were assessed.
FINDINGS
Twelve studies with 681 patients across 5 countries (mean age 17 ± 0.57 years) were included. The quality of included studies was rated as high and there was substantial between-study heterogeneity for most factors included in the meta-analysis ( from 0% to 99.1%). Patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 216), sleeve gastrectomy (SG, n = 257), gastric band (n = 184) or intragastric balloon placement (n = 24). BS was associated with significant weight reduction, body mass index (BMI) -12.7 kg/m (95% CI -14.5 to -10.9, p < 0.001), with RYGB being most effective, BMI -16.58 kg/m (95% CI -19.6 to -13.6, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent SG or RYGB had significantly lower lumbar bone mineral density, -0.96 g/cm (95% CI -0.1 to -0.03, p < 0.001), Z score, -1.132 (95% CI -1.8 to -0.45, p < 0.001) and subtotal body bone mineral density, -0.7 g/cm (95% CI -1.2 to -0.2, p < 0.001) following surgery. This was accompanied with higher markers of bone resorption, C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen 0.22 ng/ml (95% CI 0.12-0.32, p < 0.001) and osteocalcin, 10.83 ng/ml (95% CI 6.01-15.67, p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in calcium levels following BS, -3.78 mg/dl (95% CI -6.1 to -1.5, p < 0.001) but no difference in 25-hydroxyvitamin D, phosphate, bone alkaline phosphatase, procollagen type 1 N propeptide or parathyroid hormone.
INTERPRETATION
BS effectively reduces weight in paediatric patients, but RYGB and SG may have adverse effects on bone health in the medium term. It is crucial to monitor and support bone health through appropriate nutritional supplementation and judicious follow-up. Long-term data is needed to fully understand the clinical implications of these findings on bone outcomes.
FUNDING
Medical Research Council (MRC), United Kingdom.
PubMed: 38333369
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102462 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022Hepatic fibrosis is a health challenge due to the absence of satisfactory therapy, especially at the cirrhosis stage. Dahuang Zhechong pill (DHZCP)-based therapy is...
BACKGROUND
Hepatic fibrosis is a health challenge due to the absence of satisfactory therapy, especially at the cirrhosis stage. Dahuang Zhechong pill (DHZCP)-based therapy is reportedly a successful treatment for hepatic fibrosis and is even beneficial for the treatment of cirrhosis. Hence, a systematic review and clinical evidence assessment of DHZCP-based therapy should be performed, and clinical recommendations based on its efficacy for the treatment of hepatic fibrosis should be generated. With respect to potential indicators, the comparative value of the hepatic function, spleen thickness, and portal vein internal diameter should be evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, the Excerpta Medica Database, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, the WanFang Database, the Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database were searched to identify clinical trials. Three subgroup analyses were performed based on the stage of disease, medication use, and the course of treatment. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS
A total of 18 studies including 1,494 patients were evaluated. The DHZCP-based therapy was effective in reducing the plasma levels of hyaluronic acid, and laminin, procollagen III, and IV collagen were also reduced irrespective of the hepatitis stage or the presence of hepatic cirrhosis. Abnormalities in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, and total bilirubin were reversed. A 6-month course of treatment was the most beneficial DHZCP-based therapy regimen. Alanine aminotransferase improvement was more obvious in patients with cirrhosis, and alanine aminotransferase was reduced significantly in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. With respect to pharmacological mechanisms, DHZCP-based therapy could inhibit hepatic stellate cell growth and activation, reduce inflammation, and prevent extracellular matrix formation. Hepatic portal hypertension and splenomegaly were ameliorated significantly in the DHZCP-based therapy group.
CONCLUSION
Dahuang Zhechong pill-based therapy has demonstrated efficacy as a treatment for hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. A 6-month course of treatment is the recommended option for DHZCP-based therapy in clinical practice. The combination of DHZCP-based therapy and entecavir is a favorable treatment for hepatic cirrhosis.
PubMed: 36314011
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.920062 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jun 2019This study seeks to evaluate the long-term effects of pharmacologic therapy on the bone markers and bone mineral density of transgender patients and to provide a basis... (Review)
Review
This study seeks to evaluate the long-term effects of pharmacologic therapy on the bone markers and bone mineral density of transgender patients and to provide a basis for understanding its potential implications on therapies involving implant procedures. Following the referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and well-defined PICOT (Problem/Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) questionnaires, a literature search was completed for articles in English language, with more than a 3 year follow-up reporting the long-term effects of the cross-sex pharmacotherapy on the bones of adult transgender patients. Transgender demographics, time under treatment, and treatment received were recorded. In addition, bone marker levels (calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin), bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers (Serum Procollagen type I N-Terminal pro-peptide (PINP), and Serum Collagen type I crosslinked C-telopeptide (CTX)) before and after the treatment were also recorded. The considerable variability between studies did not allow a meta-analysis. All the studies were completed in European countries. Transwomen (921 men to female) were more frequent than transmen (719 female to male). Transwomen's treatments were based in antiandrogens, estrogens, new drugs, and sex reassignment surgery, meanwhile transmen's surgeries were based in the administration of several forms of testosterone and sex reassignment. Calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin levels remained stable. PINP increased in transwomen and transmen meanwhile, CTX showed contradictory values in transwomen and transmen. Finally, reduced BMD was observed in transwomen patients receiving long-term cross-sex pharmacotherapy. Considering the limitations of this systematic review, it was concluded that long-term cross-sex pharmacotherapy for transwomen and transmen transgender patients does not alter the calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin levels, and will slightly increase the bone formation in both transwomen and transmen patients. Furthermore, long-term pharmacotherapy reduces the BMD in transwomen patients.
PubMed: 31159456
DOI: 10.3390/jcm8060784 -
PloS One 2015Lifespan and the proportion of older people in the population are increasing, with far reaching consequences for the social, political and economic landscape. Unless... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Lifespan and the proportion of older people in the population are increasing, with far reaching consequences for the social, political and economic landscape. Unless accompanied by an increase in health span, increases in age-related diseases will increase the burden on health care resources. Intervention studies to enhance healthy ageing need appropriate outcome measures, such as blood-borne biomarkers, which are easily obtainable, cost-effective, and widely accepted. To date there have been no systematic reviews of blood-borne biomarkers of mortality.
AIM
To conduct a systematic review to identify available blood-borne biomarkers of mortality that can be used to predict healthy ageing post-retirement.
METHODS
Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched. We included prospective cohort studies with a minimum of two years follow up and data available for participants with a mean age of 50 to 75 years at baseline.
RESULTS
From a total of 11,555 studies identified in initial searches, 23 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Fifty-one blood borne biomarkers potentially predictive of mortality risk were identified. In total, 20 biomarkers were associated with mortality risk. Meta-analyses of mortality risk showed significant associations with C-reactive protein (Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality 1.42, p<0.001; Cancer-mortality 1.62, p<0.009; CVD-mortality 1.31, p = 0.033), N Terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality 1.43, p<0.001; CHD-mortality 1.58, p<0.001; CVD-mortality 1.67, p<0.001) and white blood cell count (Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality 1.36, p = 0.001). There was also evidence that brain natriuretic peptide, cholesterol fractions, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fibrinogen, granulocytes, homocysteine, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, neutrophils, osteoprotegerin, procollagen type III aminoterminal peptide, serum uric acid, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 and tumour necrosis factor receptor II may predict mortality risk. There was equivocal evidence for the utility of 14 biomarkers and no association with mortality risk for CD40 ligand, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, ferritin, haemoglobin, interleukin-12, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, matrix metalloproteinase 9, myelopereoxidase, P-selectin, receptor activator of nuclear factor KappaB ligand, sex hormone binding globulin, testosterone, transferrin, and thyroid stimulating hormone and thyroxine.
CONCLUSIONS
Twenty biomarkers should be prioritised as potential predictors of mortality in future studies. More studies using standardised protocols and reporting methods, and which focus on mortality rather than risk of disease or health status as an outcome, are needed.
Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Longevity; MEDLINE; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms
PubMed: 26039142
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127550 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Oct 2022Postmenopausal women are one of the most vulnerable groups to osteoporosis. Romosozumab is a newly monoclonal drug that inhibits the activity of sclerostin. Since it has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Postmenopausal women are one of the most vulnerable groups to osteoporosis. Romosozumab is a newly monoclonal drug that inhibits the activity of sclerostin. Since it has been on the market for only 3 years, there is a lack of systematic analysis on postmenopausal women and the efficacy is not clear. In this study, we compared randomized controlled trials to assess the effects of blosozumab versus placebo in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
METHODS
This meta-analysis has been registered in the PROSPERO registry (number CRD42020145839). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalKey, and Embase databases were searched from inception date to July 01, 2021. We used the keywords "osteoporosis", "decreased bone mass", and "blosozumab" to retrieve studies on the relationship between blosozumab and osteoporosis in each database. The inclusion criteria were: (I) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the treatment of osteoporosis with blosozumab and a placebo or without treatment, (II) studies on postmenopausal women aged over 50 years, and (III) studies providing bone mineral density data. The quality of all randomized controlled trials included in this study was independently assessed by two researchers according to the Cochrane risk manual and was divided into high, medium and low quality. The main results analyzed were bone mineral density (BMD) and T-score. Our results mainly include BMD and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), and osteocalcin (OC).
RESULTS
Three RCTs with 105 patients were selected from 157 retrieved articles. Due to high heterogeneity [BMD: Tau2=2.79; Chi2=11.70, degrees of freedom (df) =1 (P=0.0006); I2=91%], we could not perform statistical analysis of BMD. The results of BMD were then evaluated systematically. Three RCT studies were included in the evaluation. Compared with that of the placebo, blosozumab increased levels of the BMD biomarker osteocalcin [mean deviation (MD) 12.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8.18, 16.91; P<0.00001]. None of the 3 RCTs presented a risk of bias during the meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
The results suggested that blosozumab could be used as a target drug to improve BMD in postmenopausal women. This will provide a reference for the clinical treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Osteocalcin; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Postmenopause; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36367007
DOI: 10.21037/apm-22-998 -
Complementary Therapies in Medicine May 2022To determine whole body vibration influence on human bone density and bone biomarkers. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To determine whole body vibration influence on human bone density and bone biomarkers.
METHODS
We identified studies in Medline, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, SPORTDiscus, Embase and Cochrane from inception to November 2021. Human randomized controlled trials involving commercially available whole body vibration platforms were included. Outcomes included bone density mean difference and serum concentrations of biomarkers (Procollagen type 1 N-terminal Propeptides, Osteocalcin, Bone specific alkaline phosphatase, and C-terminal Telopeptide of type 1 collagen). Random effects model (Hedges' g effect-size metric and 95% confidence-intervals) compared whole body vibration effect on bone density and bone biomarkers. Moderator analyses assessed health status, age, menopausal status, vibration type, vibration frequency, and study duration influence.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis of 30 studies revealed bone density improvement after whole body vibration (Hedges' g = 0.11; p = 0.05; 95% CI = 0.00, 0.22). Whole body vibration improved bone density in healthy (Hedges' g = 0.10; p = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.02, 0.17) and postmenopausal women (Hedges' g = 0.09; p = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.18). Bone density also increased following side-alternating whole body vibration intervention (Hedges' g = 0.21; p = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.04, 0.37). Whole body vibration had no significant effect on either bone formation biomarkers (Hedges' g = 0.22; p = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.05, 0.40) or bone resorption biomarkers (Hedges' g = 0.03; p = 0.74; 95% CI = -0.17, 0.23).
CONCLUSION
Whole body vibration may be clinically useful as non-pharmacological/adjunct therapy to mitigate osteoporosis risk in healthy postmenopausal females. Additional studies are needed to determine the underlying mechanisms.
Topics: Bone Density; Female; Humans; Physical Therapy Modalities; Vibration
PubMed: 35093509
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102811 -
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine... Jun 2023To evaluate the efficacy and safety of activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis in terms of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for managing renal fibrosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis of Traditional Chinese Medicine for managing renal fibrosis in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis in terms of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for managing renal fibrosis (RF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
METHODS
We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from eight databases.
RESULTS
Sixteen eligible studies with 1,356 participants were included in this study. Compared to treatment with Western Medicine (WM) alone, the combined treatment with activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis in terms of TCM (ARTCM) and WM to manage RF in patients with CKD significantly ameliorated type Ⅳ collagen (CⅣ) (: 2.17, 95% : 3.01 to 1.34), type Ⅲ procollagen (PCⅢ) (: 1.08, 95% : 1.64 to 0.53), laminin (LN) (: 1.28, 95% : 1.65 to 0.90), transforming growth factor β 1 (TGFβ1) (: 0.65, 95% : 1.18 to 0.12), serum creatinine (Scr) (: 1.36, 95% : 1.85 to 0.87), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (: 1.51, 95% : 2.59 to 0.43), and 24 h urine protein (24hUpro) (: 1.23; 95% : 1.96 to 0.50). The level of hyaluronic acid (HA) was similar in both types of treatment (: 0.74, 95% : 1.91 to 0.44). The subgroup analysis showed that the duration of 8 weeks might affect the concentration of C-Ⅳ, PC-Ⅲ, and LN (<0.05). The effectiveness of the longer duration to C-Ⅳ, PC-Ⅲ, and LN was not certain. However, the result should be interpreted in care. The safety of the treatment using ARTCM and WM could not be evaluated because a few studies had reported adverse effects. The results of the Metaanalysis were not stable enough. There was publication bias for the reports on Scr ( 0.001), C-Ⅳ ( 0.001), PC-Ⅲ ( 0.026), and LN ( 0.030) and no publication bias for the reports on BUN ( 0.293). The quality of evidence varied from low to very low.
CONCLUSIONS
The combined treatment using ARTCM and WM to manage RF in patients with CKD has some advantages over treatment with WM alone. Highquality RCTs need to be conducted for the strong support.
Topics: Humans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Phytotherapy; Fibrosis
PubMed: 37147744
DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20230308.003 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Nov 2022Both denosumab and bisphosphonates have been demonstrated effective for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. However, evidence-based medicine is still lacking to prove... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Both denosumab and bisphosphonates have been demonstrated effective for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. However, evidence-based medicine is still lacking to prove the clinical results between denosumab and bisphosphonates. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety between denosumab and oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis through evidence-based medicine.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library databases were searched up to June 2022 for randomized controlled trials that compared denosumab and oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. The following outcomes were extracted for comparison: percentage change in bone mineral density from baseline at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and ultra-distal radius; percentage change from baseline in serum concentration of bone turnover markers; and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.
RESULTS
Four randomized controlled trials involving 714 patients were included. The pooled results showed that denosumab was superior to bisphosphonates in improving bone mineral density in lumbar spine (mean difference (MD) 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.30; P < 0.001) and ultra-distal radius (MD 0.87; 95% CI 0.29-1.45; P = 0.003), and in suppressing C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (MD -34.83; 95% CI -67.37--2.28; P = 0.04) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (MD -14.29; 95% CI -23.65- -4.94; P = 0.003) at 12 months. No significant differences were found in percentage change in total hip or femoral neck bone mineral density at 12 months, or in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or osteoporosis-related fracture.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with bisphosphonates, denosumab is superior in improving bone mineral density in lumbar spine and ultra-distal radius for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Further studies are needed to prove the efficacy of denosumab.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density; Denosumab; Diphosphonates; Glucocorticoids; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36447169
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05997-0