-
Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical... Aug 2010Among women with unexplained infertility, 28% to 55% of patients with galactorrhea are normoprolactinemic. Bromocriptine, a common treatment for infertile women with...
Effectiveness of bromocriptine monotherapy or combination treatment with clomiphene for infertility in women with galactorrhea and normal prolactin: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Among women with unexplained infertility, 28% to 55% of patients with galactorrhea are normoprolactinemic. Bromocriptine, a common treatment for infertile women with hyperprolactinemia, has been used in the treatment of unexplained subfertility in women with galactorrhea and normal prolactin; however, its effectiveness and safety profile have never been determined.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness and safety profile of bromocriptine monotherapy or as an adjunct to clomiphene citrate in women with galactorrhea and normal prolactin levels.
METHODS
We conducted a search of the Cochrane Subfertility Review Group specialized register of controlled trials (March 2010), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2010), MEDLINE (1950-March 2010), EMBASE (1980-March 2010), and the China Biological Medicine Database (inception to March 2010) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the following terms: controlled, randomized, blinded, clinical trials, humans, galactorrhea, prolactin, bromocriptine, infertility, and subfertility. Additionally, reference lists of identified articles were searched for relevant articles.
RESULTS
Of the 8 studies identified, 5 were excluded after full-text review for the following reasons: lack of a placebo group (2); difference in cointerventions (1); difference in end points (1); and systematic review (1). Therefore, 3 RCTs were included in this review. Bromocriptine administered in combination with clomiphene was found to be associated with a higher accumulative pregnancy rate compared with clomiphene monotherapy (fixed odds ratio [OR], 5.33; 95% CI, 2.62-10.88), and a lower miscarriage rate (fixed OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.76). Only 1 trial reported live birth as an outcome, and multiple pregnancy rates were poorly reported. Patient-reported adverse effects were mentioned in the studies, but reports were often incomplete.
CONCLUSIONS
This review suggests the effectiveness of bromocriptine with clomiphene for infertility in women with galactorrhea and normal prolactin levels. Further RCTs of adequate power and of high methodologic quality are required to confirm these findings.
PubMed: 24688144
DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2010.08.001 -
Frontiers in Microbiology 2014Toxoplasma gondii is the causal agent of toxoplasmosis in which one third of the world's population has been infected. In pregnant women, it may cause abortion and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Toxoplasma gondii is the causal agent of toxoplasmosis in which one third of the world's population has been infected. In pregnant women, it may cause abortion and severe damage to the fetal central nervous system. During pregnancy, the prevalence of toxoplasmosis increases throughout the second and third quarter of gestation, simultaneously progesterone and 17β-estradiol also increase. Thus, it has been suggested that these hormones can aggravate or reduce parasite reproduction. The aim of this study was reviewing the relationship between hormones and infection caused by T. gondii in several experimental animal models and humans, focused mainly on: (a) congenital transmission, (b) parasite reproduction, (c) strain virulence, (d) levels of hormone in host induced by T. gondii infection, and (e) participation of hormone receptors in T. gondii infection. Are the hormones specific modulators of T. gondii infection? A systematic review methodology was used to consult several databases (Pub Med, Lilacs, Medline, Science direct, Scielo, Ebsco, Sprinker, Wiley, and Google Scholar) dated from September, 2013 to March, 2014.
RESULTS
Thirty studies were included; eight studies in humans and 22 in animals and cell cultures. In the human studies, the most studied hormones were testosterone, progesterone, prolactin, and 17β-estradiol. Type I (RH and BK) and Type II (Prugniaud, SC, ME49, T45, P78, and T38) were the most frequent experimental strains.
CONCLUSIONS
Thirty-five years have passed since the first studies regarding T. gondii infection and its relationship with hormones. This systematic review suggests that hormones modulate T. gondii infection in different animal models. However, given that data were not comparable, further studies are required to determine the mechanism of hormone action in the T. gondii infectious process.
PubMed: 25346725
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00503 -
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Dec 2020This systematic review and random-effect model, network meta-analysis of the phase 3 trials in Japan assessed the efficacy and safety profile of lurasidone compared with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
AIM
This systematic review and random-effect model, network meta-analysis of the phase 3 trials in Japan assessed the efficacy and safety profile of lurasidone compared with olanzapine and quetiapine extended-release (QUE-XR) for the treatment of bipolar depression.
METHODS
The study included double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials in Japan that included patients with bipolar depression. Outcomes included response rate (primary), remission rate (secondary), improvement of Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score, discontinuation rates, and incidence of individual adverse events.
RESULTS
Three studies were included (n = 1223). Lurasidone and olanzapine but not QUE-XR were superior to placebo in response rate [risk ratio (95% credible interval): lurasidone = 0.78 (0.66, 0.92); olanzapine = 0.84 (0.71, 0.99); QUE-XR = 0.87 (0.73, 1.03)]. Lurasidone, olanzapine and QUE-XR were superior to placebo in remission rate [lurasidone = 0.90 (0.83, 0.98); olanzapine = 0.87 (0.77, 0.99); QUE-XR = 0.84 (0.73, 0.98)] and the improvement of MADRS total score. There were not differences in discontinuation rates between each antipsychotic and placebo. Compared with placebo, lurasidone was higher incidence of akathisia, and increased body weight and blood prolactin level; olanzapine was higher incidence of somnolence and ≥7% weight gain, and increased body weight, blood total cholesterol level, blood LDL cholesterol level, and blood triglyceride levels; QUE-XR was higher incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, somnolence, dry mouth, constipation and ≥7% weight gain, and increased body weight, blood total cholesterol level, blood LDL cholesterol level, and blood triglyceride levels.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggested although the efficacy of three SGAs was similar, there were the differences in the safety profile among the SGAs.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Japan; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Network Meta-Analysis; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32902200
DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12137 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2003Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, is used in the treatment of mania both as monotherapy and combined with other medicines. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, is used in the treatment of mania both as monotherapy and combined with other medicines.
OBJECTIVES
To review the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine in the treatment of mania
SEARCH STRATEGY
The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Register (CCDANCTR), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials comparing olanzapine with placebo or other drug in acute manic or mixed episodes.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently extracted data from trial reports
MAIN RESULTS
Six trials (1422 participants) were included in the review. There was a high rate of failure to complete treatment on all treatments which may have biased the estimates of relative efficacy. Olanzapine was superior to placebo at reducing manic symptoms as monotherapy (Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) - weighted mean difference (WMD): -5.94, 95% CI -9.09 to -2.80) and in combination with lithium/valproate (YMRS) (WMD -4.01, 95% confidence interval -6.06 to -1.96). Olanzapine monotherapy was superior at reducing psychotic symptoms (PANSS positive symptoms subscale WMD: -3.54, 95% CI -5.28 to -1.80). Olanzapine was superior to divalproex at reducing manic symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.29, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.08). Olanzapine did not lead to a statistically higher rate of clinical response than haloperidol (RR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.38). Fewer patients discontinued treatment on olanzapine than placebo (RR: 0.62, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.80). Olanzapine caused greater weight gain than placebo (WMD 1.91Kg, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.53) and somnolence (RR: 2.13 95% CI 1.62 to 2.79) but not more depressive symptoms (RR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.40) or movement disorder (WMD: -0.33, 95% CI -0.74 to 0.09). Olanzapine caused more prolactin elevation than placebo (RR: 4.35 95%CI 1.77 to 10.70). Olanzapine caused greater weight gain (WMD: 1.54, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.05); somnolence (RR: 1.80 95% CI 1.32 to 2.46) and movement disorders (SAS - WMD: 0.72 95% CI 0.11 to 1.33) than divalproex but less nausea ( RR: 0.36 95% CI 0.20 to 0.65). Olanzapine caused more weight gain than haloperidol (RR: 3.59, 95% CI 1.49 to 8.64) but less movement disorder (EPS RR: 0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.24).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Olanzapine is an effective treatment for mania and may be more efficacious than divalproex, though leads to more weight gain. Clinicians should consider both the relative efficacy and the different incidence of specific adverse effects of available drugs.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Olanzapine; Pirenzepine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Failure
PubMed: 12918000
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004040 -
Seizure Feb 2016Video electroencephalography (vEEG) is the gold-standard method for diagnosing psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), but such assessment is expensive, unavailable in... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Video electroencephalography (vEEG) is the gold-standard method for diagnosing psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), but such assessment is expensive, unavailable in many centers, requires prolonged hospitalization, and many times is unable to capture an actual seizure episode. This paper systematically reviews other non-vEEG candidate biomarkers that may facilitate both diagnosis and study of PNES as differentiated from epileptic seizures (ES).
METHODS
PubMed database was searched to identify articles between 1980 and 2015 (inclusion: adult PNES population with or without controls, English language; exclusion: review articles, meta-analyses, single case reports).
RESULTS
A total of 49 studies were examined, including neuroimaging, autonomic nervous system, prolactin, other (non-prolactin) hormonal, enzyme, and miscellaneous marker studies. Functional MRI studies have shown PNES is hyperlinked with dissociation and emotional dysregulation centers in the brain, although conflicting findings are seen across studies and none used psychiatric comparators. Heart rate variability suggests increased vagal tone in PNES when compared to ES. Prolactin is elevated in ES but not PNES, although shows low diagnostic sensitivity. Postictal cortisol and creatine kinase are nonspecific. Other miscellaneous biomarkers (neuron specific enolase, brain derived neurotropic factor, ghrelin, leptin, leukocytosis) showed no conclusive evidence of utility. Many studies are limited by lack of psychiatric comparators, size, and other methodological issues.
CONCLUSION
No single biomarker successfully differentiates PNES from ES; in fact, PNES is only diagnosed via the negation of ES. Clinical assessment and rigorous investigation of psychosocial variables specific to PNES remain critical, and subtyping of PNES is warranted. Future investigational and clinical imperatives are discussed.
Topics: Biomarkers; Conversion Disorder; Electroencephalography; Humans; Psychophysiologic Disorders; Seizures; Video Recording
PubMed: 26774202
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.12.011 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2010In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ('atypical') antipsychotic drugs have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ('atypical') antipsychotic drugs have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. It is not clear how the effects of the various second generation antipsychotic drugs differ.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effects of quetiapine compared with other second generation antipsychotic drugs for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychosis.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (April 2007), inspected references of all identified studies, and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies, drug approval agencies and authors of trials for additional information.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised control trials comparing oral quetiapine with oral forms of amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone or zotepine in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychosis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a random-effects model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a random-effects model.
MAIN RESULTS
The review currently includes 21 randomised control trials (RCTs) with 4101 participants. These trials provided data on four comparisons - quetiapine versus clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone or ziprasidone.A major limitation to all findings is the high number of participants leaving studies prematurely (57.6%) and the substantial risk of biases in studies. Efficacy data favoured olanzapine and risperidone compared with quetiapine (PANSS total score versus olanzapine:10 RCTs, n=1449, WMD 3.66 CI 1.93 to 5.39; versus risperidone: 9 RCTs, n=1953, WMD 3.09 CI 1.01 to 5.16), but clinical meaning is unclear. There were no clear mental state differences when quetiapine was compared with clozapine or ziprasidone.Compared with olanzapine, quetiapine produced slightly fewer movement disorders (6 RCTs, n=1090, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.49 CI 0.3 to 0.79, NNH 25 CI 14 to 100) and less weight gain (7 RCTs, n=1173, WMD -2.81 CI -4.38 to -1.24) and glucose elevation, but more QTc prolongation (3 RCTs, n=643, WMD 4.81 CI 0.34 to 9.28). Compared with risperidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer movement disorders (6 RCTs, n=1715, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.5 CI 0.3 to 0.86, NNH 20 CI 10 to 100), less prolactin increase (6 RCTs, n=1731, WMD -35.28 CI -44.36 to -26.19) and some related adverse effects, but more cholesterol increase (5 RCTs, n=1433, WMD 8.61 CI 4.66 to 12.56). Compared with ziprasidone, quetiapine induced slightly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects (1 RCT, n=522, RR use of antiparkinson medication 0.43 CI 0.2 to 0.93, NNH not estimable) and prolactin increase. On the other hand quetiapine was more sedating and led to more weight gain (2 RCTs, n=754, RR 2.22 CI 1.35 to 3.63, NNH 13 CI 8 to 33) and cholesterol increase than ziprasidone.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Best available evidence from trials suggests that most people who start quetiapine stop taking it within a few weeks. Comparisons with amisulpride, aripiprazole, sertindole and zotepine do not exist. Most data that has been reported within existing comparisons are of very limited value because of assumptions and biases within them. There is much scope for further research into the effects of this widely used drug.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Medication Adherence; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles
PubMed: 20091600
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006625.pub2 -
Evidence Report/technology Assessment Nov 2010The purpose of this report is to systematically examine the possible causal mechanism(s) that may explain the association between alcohol (ethanol) consumption and the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this report is to systematically examine the possible causal mechanism(s) that may explain the association between alcohol (ethanol) consumption and the risk of developing breast and colorectal cancers.
DATA SOURCES
We searched 11 external databases, including PubMed® and Embase, for studies on possible mechanisms. These searches used Medical Subject Headings and free text words to identify relevant evidence.
REVIEW METHODS
Two reviewers independently screened search results, selected studies to be included, and reviewed each trial for inclusion. We manually examined the bibliographies of included studies, scanned the content of new issues of selected journals, and reviewed relevant gray literature for potential additional articles.
RESULTS
Breast Cancer. Five human and 15 animal studies identified in our searches point to a connection between alcohol intake and changes in important metabolic pathways that when altered may increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Alterations in blood hormone levels, especially elevated estrogen-related hormones, have been reported in humans. Several cell line studies suggest that the estrogen receptor pathways may be altered by ethanol. Increased estrogen levels may increase the risk of breast cancer through increases in cell proliferation and alterations in estrogen receptors. Human studies have also suggested a connection with prolactin and with biomarkers of oxidative stress. Of 15 animal studies, six reported increased mammary tumorigenesis (four administered a co-carcinogen and two did not). Other animal studies reported conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde in mammary tissue as having a significant effect on the progression of tumor development. Fifteen cell line studies suggested the following mechanisms: Increased hormonal receptor levels. Increased cell proliferation. A direct stimulatory effect. DNA adduct formation. Increase cyclic adenosine monophosphate (camp). Change in potassium channels. Modulation of gene expression. Colorectal Cancer. One human tissue study, 19 animal studies (of which 12 administered a co-carcinogen and seven did not), and 10 cell line studies indicate that ethanol and acetaldehyde may alter metabolic pathways and cell structures that increase the risk of developing colon cancer. Exposure of human colonic biopsies to acetaldehyde suggests that acetaldehyde disrupts epithelial tight junctions. Among 19 animal studies the mechanisms considered included: Mucosal damage after ethanol consumption. Increased degradation of folate. Stimulation of rectal carcinogenesis. Increased cell proliferation. Increased effect of carcinogens. Ten cell line studies suggested: Folate uptake modulation. Tumor necrosis factor modulation. Inflammation and cell death. DNA adduct formation. Cell differentiation. Modulation of gene expression. One study used a combination of animal and cell line and suggested intestinal cell proliferation and disruption of cellular signals as possible mechanisms.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on our systematic review of the literature, many potential mechanisms by which alcohol may influence the development of breast or colorectal cancers have been explored but the exact connection or connections remain unclear. The evidence points in several directions but the importance of any one mechanism is not apparent at this time.
Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Animals; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Proliferation; Colorectal Neoplasms; Estrogens; Ethanol; Female; Humans; Male; Mammary Neoplasms, Animal; Oxidative Stress; Prolactin; Receptors, Estrogen; Risk
PubMed: 23126574
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Psychiatry Nov 2015Psychotropic medications are frequently used to treat challenging behaviour in children with intellectual disabilities, despite a lack of evidence for their efficacy.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Psychotropic medications are frequently used to treat challenging behaviour in children with intellectual disabilities, despite a lack of evidence for their efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviour among children with intellectual disabilities.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched and supplemented with a hand search of reference lists and trial registries. Randomised controlled trials of pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviour among children with intellectual disabilities were included. Data were analysed using meta-analysis or described narratively if meta-analysis was not possible. For quality assessment, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were used.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies including 912 participants met inclusion criteria. Antipsychotic medication reduced challenging behaviour among children with intellectual disabilities in the short-term (SMD = -1.09, p < 0.001 for risperidone; SMD = -0.64, p <0.001 for aripiprazole). However, there were significant side-effects including elevated prolactin levels (SMD = 3.22, p < 0.001) and weight gain (SMD = 0.82, p < 0.001). Evidence was inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of anticonvulsants and antioxidants for reducing challenging behaviour. The quality of all evidence was low and there were no long term follow up studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Antipsychotic medications appear to be effective for reducing challenging behaviour in the short-term among children with intellectual disabilities, but they carry a risk of significant side effects. Findings from this review must be interpreted with caution as studies were typically of low quality and most outcomes were based on a small number of studies. Further long-term, high-quality research is needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of psychotropic medication for reducing challenging behaviour.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Antioxidants; Antipsychotic Agents; Child; Child Behavior Disorders; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Male; Patient Safety; Patient Satisfaction; Prolactin; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Weight Gain; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
PubMed: 26611280
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0688-2 -
Schizophrenia Bulletin Mar 2014Atypical antipsychotic medications have been the first line of treatment for adolescents with psychosis in the past couple of decades. Till the late 90s, there were very... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Atypical antipsychotic medications have been the first line of treatment for adolescents with psychosis in the past couple of decades. Till the late 90s, there were very few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of adolescents with psychosis, although a fifth of schizophrenia starts during adolescence. Most of the treatment guidelines for adolescents with psychosis were derived from data on adults. In the past 10 years, there has been increasing number of studies on adolescents with psychosis. The current paper summarizes the findings of trials on adolescents with psychosis in 4 groups: (a) atypical antipsychotic medications vs placebo, (b) atypical antipsychotic medication vs typical antipsychotic medications, (c) one atypical antipsychotic medication vs another atypical antipsychotic medication, and (d) Low dose vs standard dose of atypical antipsychotic medication. We included 13 RCTs, with a total of 1112 participants. Although our review suggest that atypical antipsychotic medications are as effective as typical antipsychotic medications as regards clinical efficacy, atypical antipsychotic medications have a preferred side effect profile and lesser drop-out rate from trials. Obviously, this is extremely important as treatment adherence is key to successful remission of psychotic symptoms and also in some case prevent relapse of illness. Treatment with olanzapine, risperidone, and clozapine is often associated with weight gain. Aripiprazole is not associated with increased prolactin or with dyslipidemia. Adolescents may respond better to standard-dose as opposed to lower dose risperidone, but for aripiprazole and ziprasidone, lower doses may be equally effective. Future trial should be longer term and have uniform ways of reporting side effects.
Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Psychotic Disorders; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia
PubMed: 24361758
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbt196 -
Cureus Sep 2021In formerly healthy females, acute heart failure (HF) of an unknown cause that develops during the last weeks of gestation or in the first months after childbirth is... (Review)
Review
In formerly healthy females, acute heart failure (HF) of an unknown cause that develops during the last weeks of gestation or in the first months after childbirth is known as peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). This study aimed to establish the therapeutic value of combining bromocriptine with conventional HF treatment on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), death, thromboembolic events, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction recurrence in subsequent pregnancies in PPCM women, and newborn children's outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to find clinical studies that described the utility of bromocriptine in addition to conventional HF treatment compared to conventional HF treatment only in the management of acute PPCM. Four databases comprising records from July 10, 2001, to July 10, 2021, were analyzed, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. We discovered 4,717 potentially eligible records across all the databases. According to our eligibility criteria, we included six studies consisting of 263 patients in this review. Bromocriptine combined with conventional HF therapy led to an 11.37% increase in LVEF (mean difference: 11.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.55-13.19; p-value = 0.001) after six months compared to conventional HF treatment only. Notably, bromocriptine combined with conventional HF treatment reduced mortality associated with PPCM, and no thromboembolism events were recorded in the 263 patients. PPCM is a severe condition affecting women globally. In this study, the combination of bromocriptine with conventional HF treatment enhanced the LVEF of women with acute PPCM and their clinical outcomes.
PubMed: 34603902
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18248