-
Research and Reports in Urology 2021GreenLight laser™ photovaporization of the prostate (GLL-PVP) has become a valid alternative to traditional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men... (Review)
Review
GreenLight laser™ photovaporization of the prostate (GLL-PVP) has become a valid alternative to traditional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in men requiring surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We aimed to review systematically the safety and efficacy of studies comparing GLL PVP and TURP in the medium-term. A comprehensive literature search was performed. Twelve studies were identified for meta-analysis. Meta-analyses showed a longer postoperative catheterization time (risk ratio (RR): 1.12, 95% CI:1.09-1.14, p<0.00001) and length of stay (RR: 1.16, 95% CI:1.12-1.19, p<0.00001) in the TURP group; higher risk of transfusion in the TURP group (RR: 6.51, 95% CI: 2,90-14,64 p<0.00001); no difference in the risk of urinary tract infections (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.18, p=0.30) and transient re-catheterization (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.76-1.60, p=0.60). Regarding reoperation rate, no difference was found in term of postoperative urethral stricture (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.73-1.75, p=0.59) and bladder neck contracture (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.31-1.40, p=0.28). A significantly higher incidence in reoperation for persistent/regrowth adenoma was present in the GLLL-PVP (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-0.99, p=0.05). Data at 2-year follow-up showed significant better post-voiding residual (PVR) (MD: -1.42, 95% CI: -2.01, -0.82, p<0.00001) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (MD: -0.35, 95% CI: -0.50, -0.20, p<0.00001) after TURP. No difference was found in the mean PVR at 2 years after TURP, in the mean maximum flow rate (Qmax) (MD: 0.30, 95% CI: -0.02-0.61, p=0.06) and quality of life QoL score (MD: 0.05, 95% CI: -0.02-0.42, p=0.13). At 5-year follow-up, data showed better IPSS (MD: -1.70, 95% CI: -2.45,-0.95, p<0.00001), QoL scores (MD: -0.35, 95% CI: -0.69, -0.02, p=0.04) and Qmax (MD: 3.29, 95% CI: 0.19-6.38, p=0.04) after TURP. Data of PVR showed no significant difference (MD: -11.54, 95% CI: -29.55-6.46, p=0.21). In conclusion, our analysis shows that GLL-PVP is a safer and more efficacious procedure than standard TURP in the early and medium-term. However, in the long term period GLL-PVP showed a higher incidence of reoperation rate due to incomplete vaporization/regrowth of prostatic adenoma.
PubMed: 34295844
DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S277482 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2013Any form of screening aims to reduce disease-specific and overall mortality, and to improve a person's future quality of life. Screening for prostate cancer has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Any form of screening aims to reduce disease-specific and overall mortality, and to improve a person's future quality of life. Screening for prostate cancer has generated considerable debate within the medical and broader community, as demonstrated by the varying recommendations made by medical organizations and governed by national policies. To better inform individual patient decision-making and health policy decisions, we need to consider the entire body of data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on prostate cancer screening summarised in a systematic review. In 2006, our Cochrane review identified insufficient evidence to either support or refute the use of routine mass, selective, or opportunistic screening for prostate cancer. An update of the review in 2010 included three additional trials. Meta-analysis of the five studies included in the 2010 review concluded that screening did not significantly reduce prostate cancer-specific mortality. In the past two years, several updates to studies included in the 2010 review have been published thereby providing the rationale for this update of the 2010 systematic review.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether screening for prostate cancer reduces prostate cancer-specific mortality or all-cause mortality and to assess its impact on quality of life and adverse events.
SEARCH METHODS
An updated search of electronic databases (PROSTATE register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, and the NHS EED) was performed, in addition to handsearching of specific journals and bibliographies, in an effort to identify both published and unpublished trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All RCTs of screening versus no screening for prostate cancer were eligible for inclusion in this review.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The original search (2006) identified 99 potentially relevant articles that were selected for full-text review. From these citations, two RCTs were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The search for the 2010 version of the review identified a further 106 potentially relevant articles, from which three new RCTs were included in the review. A total of 31 articles were retrieved for full-text examination based on the updated search in 2012. Updated data on three studies were included in this review. Data from the trials were independently extracted by two authors.
MAIN RESULTS
Five RCTs with a total of 341,342 participants were included in this review. All involved prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, with or without digital rectal examination (DRE), though the interval and threshold for further evaluation varied across trials. The age of participants ranged from 45 to 80 years and duration of follow-up from 7 to 20 years. Our meta-analysis of the five included studies indicated no statistically significant difference in prostate cancer-specific mortality between men randomised to the screening and control groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.17). The methodological quality of three of the studies was assessed as posing a high risk of bias. The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the US Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial were assessed as posing a low risk of bias, but provided contradicting results. The ERSPC study reported a significant reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95), whilst the PLCO study concluded no significant benefit (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.54). The ERSPC was the only study of the five included in this review that reported a significant reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality, in a pre-specified subgroup of men aged 55 to 69 years of age. Sensitivity analysis for overall risk of bias indicated no significant difference in prostate cancer-specific mortality when referring to the meta analysis of only the ERSPC and PLCO trial data (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.30). Subgroup analyses indicated that prostate cancer-specific mortality was not affected by the age at which participants were screened. Meta-analysis of four studies investigating all-cause mortality did not determine any significant differences between men randomised to screening or control (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.03). A diagnosis of prostate cancer was significantly greater in men randomised to screening compared to those randomised to control (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.65). Localised prostate cancer was more commonly diagnosed in men randomised to screening (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.70), whilst the proportion of men diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer was significantly lower in the screening group compared to the men serving as controls (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.87). Screening resulted in a range of harms that can be considered minor to major in severity and duration. Common minor harms from screening include bleeding, bruising and short-term anxiety. Common major harms include overdiagnosis and overtreatment, including infection, blood loss requiring transfusion, pneumonia, erectile dysfunction, and incontinence. Harms of screening included false-positive results for the PSA test and overdiagnosis (up to 50% in the ERSPC study). Adverse events associated with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies included infection, bleeding and pain. No deaths were attributed to any biopsy procedure. None of the studies provided detailed assessment of the effect of screening on quality of life or provided a comprehensive assessment of resource utilization associated with screening (although preliminary analyses were reported).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Prostate cancer screening did not significantly decrease prostate cancer-specific mortality in a combined meta-analysis of five RCTs. Only one study (ERSPC) reported a 21% significant reduction of prostate cancer-specific mortality in a pre-specified subgroup of men aged 55 to 69 years. Pooled data currently demonstrates no significant reduction in prostate cancer-specific and overall mortality. Harms associated with PSA-based screening and subsequent diagnostic evaluations are frequent, and moderate in severity. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment are common and are associated with treatment-related harms. Men should be informed of this and the demonstrated adverse effects when they are deciding whether or not to undertake screening for prostate cancer. Any reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality may take up to 10 years to accrue; therefore, men who have a life expectancy less than 10 to 15 years should be informed that screening for prostate cancer is unlikely to be beneficial. No studies examined the independent role of screening by DRE.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy, Fine-Needle; Digital Rectal Examination; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration; Humans; Male; Mass Screening; Middle Aged; Prostate; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 23440794
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3 -
Journal of Medical Internet Research Aug 2023The internet is a primary source of health information for patients, supplementing physician care. Google Trends (GT), a popular tool, allows the exploration of public... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The internet is a primary source of health information for patients, supplementing physician care. Google Trends (GT), a popular tool, allows the exploration of public interest in health-related phenomena. Despite the growing volume of GT studies, none have focused explicitly on oncology, creating a need for a systematic review to bridge this gap.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to systematically characterize studies related to oncology using GT to describe its utilities and biases.
METHODS
We included all studies that used GT to analyze Google searches related to malignancies. We excluded studies written in languages other than English. The search was performed using the PubMed engine on August 1, 2022. We used the following search input: "Google trends" AND ("oncology" OR "cancer" or "malignancy" OR "tumor" OR "lymphoma" OR "multiple myeloma" OR "leukemia"). We analyzed sources of bias that included using search terms instead of topics, lack of confrontation of GT statistics with real-world data, and absence of sensitivity analysis. We performed descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
A total of 85 articles were included. The first study using GT for oncology research was published in 2013, and since then, the number of publications has increased annually. The studies were categorized as follows: 22% (19/85) were related to prophylaxis, 20% (17/85) pertained to awareness events, 11% (9/85) were celebrity-related, 13% (11/85) were related to COVID-19, and 47% (40/85) fell into other categories. The most frequently analyzed cancers were breast (n=28), prostate (n=26), lung (n=18), and colorectal cancers (n=18). We discovered that of the 85 studies, 17 (20%) acknowledged using GT topics instead of search terms, 79 (93%) disclosed all search input details necessary for replicating their results, and 34 (40%) compared GT statistics with real-world data. The most prevalent methods for analyzing the GT data were correlation analysis (55/85, 65%) and peak analysis (43/85, 51%). The authors of only 11% (9/85) of the studies performed a sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
The number of studies related to oncology using GT data has increased annually. The studies included in this systematic review demonstrate a variety of concerning topics, search strategies, and statistical methodologies. The most frequently analyzed cancers were breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, skin, and cervical cancers, potentially reflecting their prevalence in the population or public interest. Although most researchers provided reproducible search inputs, only one-fifth used GT topics instead of search terms, and many studies lacked a sensitivity analysis. Scientists using GT for medical research should ensure the quality of studies by providing a transparent search strategy to reproduce results, preferring to use topics over search terms, and performing robust statistical calculations coupled with sensitivity analysis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Bias; Biomedical Research; COVID-19; Internet; Search Engine; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37540544
DOI: 10.2196/47582 -
Advances in Radiation Oncology 2023A consensus has not been reached regarding the treatment and outcomes of prostate cancer (PCa) in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). This systematic review aims to... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
A consensus has not been reached regarding the treatment and outcomes of prostate cancer (PCa) in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence on the management of PCa with radiation therapy (RT) in PLWHA diagnosed with PCa.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Searches were conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases during September 2021 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Articles reporting on outcomes of PLWHA treated for PCa with definitive RT were sought for inclusion.
RESULTS
A total of 9 studies with 187 patients with HIV who received diagnoses of PCa met inclusion criteria. The duration of HIV infection to PCa diagnosis ranged from 8.5 to 18.6 years with 69% to 100% of patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy at the time of diagnosis. Patients' prostate-specific antigen levels ranged from 8 to 82 ng/mL. The majority of patients (59%) were treated with external beam RT, followed by brachytherapy (20.5%). The 4- or 5-year biochemical failure-free rate was reported to be between 87% and 97% in 3 studies, and 2 studies reported an 84% to 97% 5-year cancer-specific survival. Using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria, 3 studies reported toxicities and grade 3 toxicity was observed in only 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
RT is efficacious and well tolerated in PLWHA as supported by the comparable biochemical control, clinical outcome, and mortality to the general population as well as by the mild reports of radiotoxicity. There is mixed evidence regarding the effect of RT on CD4 count and viral load, and further studies are needed to better understand this relationship. These findings support the use of definitive RT in PLWHA with PCa.
PubMed: 36299566
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101074 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2022We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting functional and oncologic outcomes of combining whole-gland high-intensity focused...
Whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and transurethral resection of the prostate in the patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting functional and oncologic outcomes of combining whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (HIFU) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until June 30, 2022. The ROBINS-I tool scale was used to evaluate quality of eligible studies. Biochemical failure was defined according to the criteria used in each raw study. The presence of any cancer on follow-up biopsy was classified as "positive biopsy". Patients able to penetrate their partner without pharmacologic support were rated potent. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate functional outcomes using R project.
RESULTS
A total of 1861 patients in 15 eligible studies were included. All studies were identified as moderate or high quality. There were 1388 (74.6%) patients with low-risk or intermediate-risk PCa in 15 studies and 473 (25.4%) patients with high-risk PCa in 12 studies. The mean PSA nadir postoperatively ranged from 0.20 to 1.90 ng/mL within average time of 1.9-12 months. Biochemical failure rates in all 15 studies ranged from 6.3% to 34% within average time of 1.9-60 months. Eleven studies reported the rates of positive biopsy ranged from 3% to 29.7% within average time of 3-12 months postoperatively. Based on the results of single-arm meta-analysis, the pooled rates of any degree urinary incontinence, acute urinary retention, urinary tract infections, and urethral stricture were 9.4% (95% CI: 6.1%-12.6%), 0.9% (95% CI: 0%-2%), 2.6% (95% CI: 0.8%-4.3%), and 4.3% (95% CI: 1.4%-7.1%), respectively. The pooled rate of being potent after procedure in previously potent patients was 43.6% (95% CI: 27.3%-59.8%). The sensitivity analysis revealed all the pooled results was relatively reliable. Egger's tests for the pooled results of acute urinary retention ( = 0.0651) and potency ( = 0.6749) both did not show significant publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
It appears that the combination treatment of whole-gland HIFU and TURP could be applied for PCa patients. It might have potential advantages of decreasing catheterization time and improving urinary status. Prospective and comparative studies are needed to validate our findings.
PubMed: 36313706
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.988490 -
Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2023Aspergillosis localized to the kidneys and the urinary tract is uncommon. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review to evaluate risk factors and clinical outcomes... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Aspergillosis localized to the kidneys and the urinary tract is uncommon. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review to evaluate risk factors and clinical outcomes of patients with isolated renal and genito-urinary tract aspergillosis.
METHODS
We systematically searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, African Journal Online, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library, covering the period from inception to August 2023 using the key terms 'renal' OR 'kidney*' OR 'prostate' OR 'urinary bladder' OR 'urinary tract*AND 'aspergillosis' OR 'aspergillus' OR 'aspergilloma' OR 'mycetoma'. We included single case reports or case series. Review articles, guidelines, meta-analyses, animal studies, protocols, and cases of genitourinary and /or renal aspergillosis occurring as a part of disseminated disease were excluded.
RESULTS
We identified 91 renal and urinary aspergillosis cases extracted from 76 publications spanning 1925-2023. Among the participants, 79 (86.8%) were male, with a median age of 46 years. Predominantly, presentations consisted of isolated renal infections (74 instances, 81.3%), followed by prostate (5 cases, 5.5%), and bladder (7 cases, 7.7%) involvement. (42.9%), (9.9%), and (1.1% each) were isolated. Underlying risk factors included diabetes mellitus (29.7%), HIV (12.1%), haematological malignancies (11%), and liver cirrhosis (8.8%), while common symptoms encompassed flank pain (36.3%), fever (33%), and lower urinary tract symptoms (20.9%). An autopsy was conducted in 8.8% of cases. Diagnostic work-up involved histopathology (70.5%), renal CT scans and urine microscopy and culture (52.6% each), and abdominal ultrasound (17.9%). Treatments included amphotericin B (34 cases, 37.4%) and azole-based regimens (29 cases, 31.9%). Nephrectomy was performed in 16 of 78 renal cases (20.5%). All-cause mortality was 24.4% (19 cases). No significant mortality rate difference was observed among antifungal regimens ( = 0.739) or nephrectomy status ( = 0.8).
CONCLUSION
Renal and urinary aspergillosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in immunocompromised and people with diabetes mellitus. While varied treatment strategies were observed, mortality rates showed no significant differences based on treatments or nephrectomy status. Further research is needed to refine diagnostics, optimize treatments, and enhance awareness among clinicians for early detection and management.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42023430959.
PubMed: 38130371
DOI: 10.1177/17562872231218621 -
Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2023Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate is a new, minimally invasive technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with promising effectiveness and safety... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) of the prostate is a new, minimally invasive technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with promising effectiveness and safety outcomes. This systematic review aims to provide an update of existing literature.
METHODS
A literature review was performed in Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov from January 2000 up to April 2023. Data extraction and risk of bias were performed independently by three authors.
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies were included, among which 9 were observational, 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 animal study, while 2 of them were comparative (1 with prostatic artery embolization and 1 with transurethral resection of the prostate). Functional outcomes were improved in the majority of studies both for objective (maximum flow rate and post-void residual) and subjective outcomes (improvement of International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life). Complication rates ranged between 1.9% and 2.3% for hematuria, 3.7% and 36.3% for dysuria, 1.9% and 19% for acute urinary retention, 0.6% and 9.1% for orchitis/urinary tract infections, and 0.6% and 4.8% for prostatic abscess formation. Regarding sexual function, >95% of patients retained their ejaculation while erectile function was maintained or improved.
CONCLUSION
TPLA of the prostate is an innovative, minimally invasive technique for managing patients with BPH. Existing studies indicate an effective technique in reducing International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life scores, post-void residual reduction, and increase in Qmax, albeit the measured improvements in terms of Qmax are not equal to transurethral resection of the prostate. Although sexual function is maintained, the mean catheterization time is 7 days, and no long-term data are available for most patients.
PubMed: 37745187
DOI: 10.1177/17562872231198634 -
Journal of the American College of... Apr 2020To identify and characterize patient-centered outcomes (PCOs) relating to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MRI-guided biopsy as diagnostic tests for possible prostate...
OBJECTIVE
To identify and characterize patient-centered outcomes (PCOs) relating to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MRI-guided biopsy as diagnostic tests for possible prostate cancer.
METHODS
Medline via OVID, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for relevant articles. Hand searching of reference lists and snowballing techniques were performed. Studies of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy that measured any PCO were included. There were no restrictions placed on year of publication, language, or country for study inclusion. All database search hits were screened independently by two reviewers, and data were extracted using a standardized form.
RESULTS
Overall, 2,762 database search hits were screened based on title and abstract. Of these, 222 full-text articles were assessed, and 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 2,192 participants featured in the included studies, all of which were conducted in high-income countries. Nineteen different PCOs were measured, with a median of four PCOs per study (range 1-11). Urethral bleeding, pain, and urinary tract infection were the most common outcomes measured. In the four studies that compared mpMRI or MRI-guided biopsy to transrectal ultrasound biopsy, most adverse outcomes occurred less frequently in MRI-related tests. These four studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias.
DISCUSSION
PCOs measured in studies of mpMRI or MRI-guided biopsy thus far have mostly been physical outcomes, with some evidence that MRI tests are associated with less frequent adverse outcomes compared with transrectal ultrasound biopsy. There was very little evidence for the effect of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy on emotional, cognitive, social, or behavioral outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Patient-Centered Care; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 31541653
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.08.031 -
Medicine Oct 2020We systematically evaluated the evidences on oncological and functional outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as the primary treatment for localized... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
We systematically evaluated the evidences on oncological and functional outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as the primary treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODS
A systematic review was used Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from the inception of each database. The review analyzed the oncological and functional outcomes of HIFU in the treatment of PCa. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for quantity analysis incidence of complications.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven articles were included for analysis with a total of 7393 patients. Eighteen studies investigated the whole-gland HIFU, and the duration of follow-up ranged from 2 to 168 months. After whole-gland HIFU, the mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir was found to be 0.4 to 1.95 ng/mL and the mean time to PSA nadir was 2.4 to 5.4 months. The rate of positive biopsy after HIFU was 4.5% to 91.1%. Meta-analysis revealed the incidences of urinary incontinence, impotence, urinary obstruction, retention, and infection was 10%, 44%, 15%, 11%, 7%, respectively. Nine studies investigated partial-gland HIFU, and the duration of follow-up was 1 to 131 months. After partial-gland HIFU, the mean PSA nadir was 1.9 to 2.7 ng/mL and the mean time to PSA nadir 5.7 to 7.3 months. The rate of positive biopsy after HIFU in the treatment area was 14% to 37.5%. Meta-analysis revealed the incidences of urinary incontinence, impotence, urinary obstruction, retention, and infection was 2%, 21%, 2%, 9%, 11%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Early evidence suggested the partial-gland HIFU was safer than whole-gland HIFU, and they had similar oncological outcomes. More prospective randomized controlled trials of whole-gland and partial-gland HIFU for PCa was needed.
Topics: High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation; Humans; Male; Postoperative Complications; Prostatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33031318
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022610