-
Cureus Jan 2024Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is underdiagnosed and has recently surfaced as one of the leading triggers of severe pulmonary hypertension. This... (Review)
Review
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is underdiagnosed and has recently surfaced as one of the leading triggers of severe pulmonary hypertension. This disease process is described by structural changes of pulmonary arteries such as fibrous stenosis, complete obliteration, or the presence of a resistant intraluminal thrombus, resulting in increased pulmonary resistance and eventually progressing to right-sided heart failure. Hence, this study aims to describe the current treatments for CTEPH and their efficacy in hemodynamic improvement and prevention of recurring thromboembolic episodes in patients. This systematic review promptly follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. On February 13, 2022, our team searched through the following databases: PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. The following keywords were used across all databases: CTEPH AND Pulmonary Endarterectomy (PEA), CTEPH AND Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty (BPA), and CTEPH AND Medical Therapy OR Anticoagulation therapy. Twenty-nine thousand eighty-nine articles on current management techniques (PEA, Balloon angioplasty, anticoagulants) were selected, analyzed, and reviewed with each other. We found 19 articles concerning PEA, 15 concerning BPA, and six regarding anticoagulants. Most papers showed high success rates and promising evidence of PEA and anticoagulants as a post-operative regimen. BPA was the least preferred but is still reputable in patients unfit for invasive techniques. CTEPH is a condition presenting with either fibrous stenosis, complete obliteration of the artery, or a clogged thrombus. Recent studies have shown three techniques that physicians have used to treat CTEPH: balloon-pulmonary angioplasty, PEA, and medical management with anticoagulants. PEA followed by anticoagulants is preferred to balloon pulmonary angioplasties. CTEPH is an ongoing topic in research; as it continues to be researched, we hope to see more management techniques available.
PubMed: 38435894
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53336 -
Cardiology Research Apr 2018The mortality rate of post-infarction cardiogenic shock (CS) was 80.0-90.0%. Recent studies show a significant reduction of hospital mortality to approximately 50.0%. CS... (Review)
Review
The mortality rate of post-infarction cardiogenic shock (CS) was 80.0-90.0%. Recent studies show a significant reduction of hospital mortality to approximately 50.0%. CS is defined as systemic tissue hypoperfusion resulting from systolic and/or diastolic heart dysfunction, the main cause of which is acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The main predictors are biological markers such as troponin, CKMB and lactate. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis is performed in order to present and correlate the main literary findings on CS and its evolution with possible changes in biomarkers such as troponin, lactate and CKMB. After criteria of literary search with the use of the mesh terms: cardiogenic shock; acute myocardial infarction; biomarkers; troponin; CKMB; lactate; clinical trials and use of the bouleanos "and" between the mesh terms and "or" among the historical findings. In the main databases such as Pubmed, Medline, Bireme, EBSCO, Scielo, etc., a total of 96 papers that were submitted to the eligibility analysis were collated and, after that, 41 studies were selected, following the rules of systematic review - PRISMA (Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes-http://www.prisma-statement.org/). Some risk factors for its development in AMI are advanced age, female gender, anterior wall infarction, diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, previous history of infarction and angina. The CS associated with AMI depends on its extent and its complications, being the main ones: mitral regurgitation, rupture of the interventricular septum and rupture of the free wall of the left ventricule. The diagnosis is based on the clinical manifestations, such as mental confusion, oliguria, hypotension, tachycardia, fine pulse, sweating, and cold extremities; in hemodynamic aspects: systolic blood pressure was < 90.0 mm Hg or 30 mm Hg below baseline, pulmonary capillary pressure was > 18.0 mm Hg and cardiac index was < 2.2 L/min/m. Laboratory and imaging exams should be requested to evaluate the possible etiology of CS, its systemic repercussions and comorbidities. The treatment aims at the rapid reestablishment of the blood flow in the affected artery, to improve the patient's prognosis. The biomarkers dosage in the daily clinical practice of the different cardiological centers can facilitate the diagnosis and the conduction of the dubious cases and the best evaluation of the degree of myocardial suffering after CS.
PubMed: 29755623
DOI: 10.14740/cr715w -
Mycopathologia Feb 2022Literature on COVID-19-associated pulmonary mucormycosis (CAPM) is sparse. Pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm (PAP) is an uncommon complication of pulmonary mucormycosis...
Literature on COVID-19-associated pulmonary mucormycosis (CAPM) is sparse. Pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm (PAP) is an uncommon complication of pulmonary mucormycosis (PM), and rarely reported in CAPM. Herein, we report five cases of CAPM with PAP managed at our center and perform a systematic review of the literature. We diagnosed PM in those with clinico-radiological suspicion and confirmed it by microbiology or histopathology. We encountered five cases of CAPM with PAP (size ranged from 1 × 0.8 cm to ~ 4.9 × 4.8 cm). All subjects had diabetes and were aged 55-62 years (75% men). In two cases, COVID-19 and mucormycosis were diagnosed simultaneously, while in three others, COVID-19 preceded PM. One subject who underwent surgery survived, while all others died (80% mortality). From our systematic review, we identified one additional case of CAPM with PAP in a transplant recipient. CAPM with PAP is rare with high mortality. Early diagnosis and multimodality management are imperative to improve outcomes.
Topics: Aneurysm, False; COVID-19; Female; Humans; Male; Mucormycosis; Pulmonary Artery; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34936060
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-021-00610-9 -
The Journal of Thoracic and... Dec 2018Mortality in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is believed to be principally due to the subgroup of PEs that are massive. Systemic thrombolysis is the therapeutic mainstay...
OBJECTIVES
Mortality in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is believed to be principally due to the subgroup of PEs that are massive. Systemic thrombolysis is the therapeutic mainstay for acute massive PE, despite evidence suggesting limited survival benefits. Both catheter-based therapies (CBT) and surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SE) are well-accepted alternatives to treat acute PE. However, the comparative effectiveness of these approaches is difficult to study. We conducted a systematic review of CBT and SE for acute PE.
METHODS
The PubMed database was queried for CBT- and SE-related publications between January 1998 and June 2017. A minimum of 10 patients undergoing intervention(s) was required for inclusion, and studies must not have excluded patients with massive PE. End points examined included hospital mortality, and additionally for CBT, procedural success rate.
RESULTS
A total of 75 studies (41 of CBT, 34 of SE) were identified, with 1650 patients undergoing CBT and 1101 undergoing SE. Patients undergoing SE were more critically ill than those undergoing CBT (massive PE, 545 out of 975 [55.9%] for SE vs 742 out of 1553 [47.8%] for CBT). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was required in 217 out of 1015 patients undergoing SE (21.4%) versus 38 out of 983 patients undergoing CBT (4.0%). The hospital mortality of SE was 14.0%, versus 5.6% for CBT, in the entire patient group. However, the hospital mortality of SE in patients with pre-SE CPR was 46.3%, whereas it was 6.8% in those patients without pre-SE CPR. Although CPR was associated with an increased risk of mortality both for CBT and SE, it accounted for all of the mortality effect on SE (the adjusted odds ratio for CPR in a random effects model with treatment considered was 9.79 (95% confidence interval, 4.98-19.17; P < .0001). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality for SE relative to CBT was 1.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-2.32; P = .84). Moreover, CBT was associated with a procedural failure rate of 8.3%.
CONCLUSIONS
Both CBT and SE were associated with satisfactory published outcomes. SE is associated with greater absolute postprocedure mortality than CBT, but has been undertaken in more critically ill populations. The markedly higher incidence of CPR in SE accounts for the differential mortality between the patients undergoing SE and those undergoing CBT. Decision making with respect to best therapy must take into account potential needs for periprocedure artificial mechanical right ventricle and lung support, institutional experience and outcomes, anticipated therapeutic efficacy and benefit, and approach-specific risks.
Topics: Catheterization; Embolectomy; Hemodynamics; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Circulation; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30005883
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.085 -
International Heart Journal Jul 2016Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease that imposes a significant burden on patients. Although multiple treatment options for PAH are available, head-to-head... (Review)
Review
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease that imposes a significant burden on patients. Although multiple treatment options for PAH are available, head-to-head comparisons are difficult to conduct. Network meta-analysis (NMA) can be a useful alternative for direct comparison to estimate the relative effectiveness of multiple treatments. The objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and NMA to evaluate the relative effectiveness among oral PAH medications.Data collection was performed by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Ichushi-Web. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing at least 1 of the following 3 outcome measurements; 6-minute walk distance test (6MWD), WHO functional class (WHOFC), and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) were included (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016557). Outcomes were evaluated by estimating the differences in the mean change from baseline or by estimating the odds ratios. Analyses were performed using WinBUGS 1.4.3.Seven double-blind RCTs were eligible. NMA results showed similar improvements in 6MWD for all medications assessed. Bosentan and sildenafil caused a statistically significant improvement in WHOFC compared to other medications.The relative effectiveness of oral PAH medications could be compared using NMA, which suggested the superiority of bosentan and sildenafil in the improvement of WHOFC.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antihypertensive Agents; Bosentan; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sildenafil Citrate; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 27385603
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.15-459 -
Metabolites Sep 2022The coronavirus 2019 pandemic has affected many healthcare systems worldwide. While acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been well-documented in COVID-19,... (Review)
Review
The coronavirus 2019 pandemic has affected many healthcare systems worldwide. While acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been well-documented in COVID-19, there are several cardiovascular complications, such as myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and pulmonary embolism, leading to disability and death. The link between COVID-19 and increasing thrombogenicity potentially occurs due to numerous different metabolic mechanisms, ranging from endothelial damage for direct virus infection, associated excessive formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), pathogenic activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), direct myocardial injury, and ischemia induced by respiratory failure, all of which have measurable biomarkers. A search was performed by interrogating three databases (MEDLINE; MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, and EMBASE). Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT), prospective series, meta-analyses, and unmatched observational studies were evaluated for the processing of the algorithm and treatment of thromboembolic disease and cardiac thrombotic complications related to COVID-19 during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Studies out with the SARS-Cov-2 infection period and case reports were excluded. A total of 58 studies were included in this analysis. The role of the acute inflammatory response in the propagation of the systemic inflammatory sequelae of the disease plays a major part in determining thromboembolic disease and cardiac thrombotic complication in COVID-19. Some of the mechanisms of activation of these pathways, alongside the involved biomarkers noted in previous studies, are highlighted. Inflammatory response led to thromboembolic disease and cardiac thrombotic complications in COVID-19. NETs play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the inflammatory response. Despite moving into the endemic phase of the disease in most countries, thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 remain an entity that substantially impacts the health care system, with long-term effects that remain uncertain. Continuous monitoring and research are required.
PubMed: 36295791
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12100889 -
Neurology Dec 2015To compare the outcomes between endovascular and medical management of acute ischemic stroke in recent randomized controlled trials (RCT). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare the outcomes between endovascular and medical management of acute ischemic stroke in recent randomized controlled trials (RCT).
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed, and multicenter, prospective RCTs published from January 1, 2013, to May 1, 2015, directly comparing endovascular therapy to medical management for patients with acute ischemic stroke were included. Meta-analyses of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and mortality at 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) for endovascular therapy and medical management were performed.
RESULTS
Eight multicenter, prospective RCTs (Interventional Management of Stroke [IMS] III, Local Versus Systemic Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke [SYNTHESIS] Expansion, Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy [MR RESCUE], Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands [MR CLEAN], Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness [ESCAPE], Extending the Time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits-Intra-Arterial [EXTEND-IA], Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment [SWIFT PRIME], and Endovascular Revascularization With Solitaire Device Versus Best Medical Therapy in Anterior Circulation Stroke Within 8 Hours [REVASCAT]) comprising 2,423 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data demonstrated functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days in favor of endovascular therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71; p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis of the 6 trials with large vessel occlusion (LVO) criteria also demonstrated functional independence at 90 days in favor of endovascular therapy (OR = 2.23; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis of the 5 trials that primarily utilized stent retriever devices (≥70%) in the intervention arm demonstrated functional independence at 90 days in favor of endovascular therapy (OR = 2.39; p < 0.00001). No difference was found for mortality at 90 days and sICH between endovascular therapy and medical management in all analyses and subgroup analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that endovascular intervention combined with medical management, including IV tissue plasminogen activator for eligible patients, improves the outcomes of appropriately selected patients with acute ischemic stroke in the setting of LVO.
Topics: Brain Ischemia; Disease Management; Endovascular Procedures; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator
PubMed: 26537058
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002176 -
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) Jul 2022The aim of this study was to investigate the features of partial anomalous left pulmonary artery (PALPA) and differences between cases with posterior versus anterior a... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to investigate the features of partial anomalous left pulmonary artery (PALPA) and differences between cases with posterior versus anterior a nomalous vessels in relation to the tracheobronchial tree. We hypothesized that statistical significance was dependent on the course of the anomalous vessel due to airway compression in the posterior type. This study included cases obtained from the literature ( = 33) and an institution teaching file ( = 2). Information collected: age, sex, medical history, additional anomalies, anomalous vessel course, and respiratory symptoms. Data were analyzed with independent samples -test and Fisher's exact test. PALPAs were more commonly anterior than posterior. Mean age: 5.3 years (SD = 12.4) for anterior and 6.8 years (SD = 18.5) for posterior ( = 0.77). Respiratory symptoms: 20% of anterior and 60% of posterior cases ( = 0.032). Tracheobronchial anomalies: 35% of anterior and 60% of posterior cases ( = 0.182). Non-cardiac and non-tracheobronchial anomalies: 30% of anterior and 47% of posterior cases ( = 0.511). Kabuki syndrome: 25% of anterior and 6.7% of posterior cases ( = 0.207). In conclusion, respiratory symptoms were the only significant difference between anterior and posterior PALPA types.
Topics: Abnormalities, Multiple; Child, Preschool; Heart Defects, Congenital; Humans; Pulmonary Artery; Vascular Malformations; Vestibular Diseases
PubMed: 36006061
DOI: 10.3390/tomography8040163 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022This study seeks to evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) in pulmonary hypertension.
OBJECTIVE
This study seeks to evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) in pulmonary hypertension.
METHOD
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to obtain the relevant English literature, and the retrieval time until June 2022. The quality of the included studies is evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. The quality of the included studies was assessed, followed by a meta-analysis, analyze heterogeneity, summarize sensitivity and specificity, draw the comprehensive subject working characteristics (sROC) curve, calculate the area under the curve and conduct subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis to find the source of the heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 12 articles were included, all with pulmonary artery diameter/liter aortic diameter >1 or 1 as the diagnostic criteria for pulmonary hypertension, and a total of 1,959 patients were included. Deek's funnel plot analysis suggests that there is no significant publication bias ( = 0.102). The combined sensitivity was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.579, 0.719), combined specificity was 0.830 (95% CI: 0.796, 0.880), positive likelihood ratio was 3.837 (95% CI: 3.215, 4.579), negative likelihood ratio was 0.419 (95% CI: 0.346, 0.507), diagnostic odds ratio was 9.157 (95% CI: 6.748, 12.427) and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.87).
CONCLUSION
The CT examination of pulmonary artery diameter/aortic artery hypertension is worthy of clinical application.
PubMed: 36277788
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.966257 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vasodilators in pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. We searched electronic...
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vasodilators in pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. We searched electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to May 2020, and conducted a subgroup analysis for pulmonary vasodilators or underlying disease. Fifteen studies with 719 pediatric PH patients were included in the meta-analysis. Adverse events did not differ ( = 0.11, = 15%) between the pulmonary vasodilators group and the control group, neither in the subgroups. In total, compared with the control group treatment, pulmonary vasodilators significantly decreased the mortality ( = 0.002), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP, = 0.02), and mechanical ventilation duration ( = 0.03), also improved the oxygenation index (OI, = 0.01). In the persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) subgroup, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) significantly reduced mortality ( = 0.03), OI ( = 0.007) and mechanical ventilation duration ( = 0.004). Administration of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) improved OI ( = 0.04) and mechanical ventilation duration ( < 0.00001) in PPHN. We also found that in the pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PPAH) subgroup, mPAP was pronouncedly declined with ERAs ( = 0.006). Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP, < 0.0001) and pulmonary arterial/aortic pressure (PA/AO, < 0.00001) were significantly relieved with PDE5i, partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO) was improved with prostacyclin in postoperative PH (POPH) subgroup ( = 0.001). Compared with the control group, pulmonary vasodilators could significantly decrease PA/AO pressure ( < 0.00001) and OI ( < 0.00001) in the short-term (duration <7 days) follow-up subgroup, improve mPAP ( = 0.03) and PaO ( = 0.01) in the mid-term (7-30 days) follow-up subgroup, also decrease mortality, mPAP ( = 0.0001), PA/AO pressure ( = 0.0007), duration of mechanical ventilation ( = 0.004), and ICU stay ( < 0.00001) in the long-term follow subgroup (>30 days). Pulmonary vasodilators decrease the mortality in pediatric PH patients, improve the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, reduce the mechanical ventilation duration.
PubMed: 33967811
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.668902