-
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Nov 2010Evidence-based dentistry is a critical evaluation, awareness of the available evidence to improve decision making about the care of individual patients and/or... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
UNLABELLED
Evidence-based dentistry is a critical evaluation, awareness of the available evidence to improve decision making about the care of individual patients and/or communities.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically analyze the available scientific literature on clinical and radiographic results of two materials used in pulpotomy in primary teeth: formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
It was identified relevant publications through a search of electronic databases such as MEDLINE (Ovid) and The Cochrane Library. To be included in the review, studies had to define the material used in child patients with pulp exposure by caries or tooth-alveolar trauma.
RESULTS
Of the 21 articles obtained in the initial phase of the review, only 19 were available in full text and of these only met the requirements for inclusion 6 items, which were confronted, analyzed and discussed later.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical evidence available showed significant differences regarding the use of a material or another. In addition to the findings of clinical follow--radiographic and taking into account the potential toxicity of formocresol suggest the use of mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy of primary teeth.
Topics: Aluminum Compounds; Calcium Compounds; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; Formocresols; Humans; Oxides; Pulpotomy; Silicates; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 20526246
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e942 -
Iranian Endodontic Journal 2008There are various studies looking at the effects of formocresol (FC) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) on pulpotomy of primary molars. This is a systematic review of...
INTRODUCTION
There are various studies looking at the effects of formocresol (FC) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) on pulpotomy of primary molars. This is a systematic review of literature comparing the success rates of MTA and FC in pulpotomy of primary molars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study list was obtained using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Science Citation Index, Iran Medex, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and also some hand searches contains through dental journals approved by the Iranian Ministry of Health. Papers which met the inclusion were accepted. The quality of studies for the meta-analysis was assessed by a series of validity criteria according to Jadad's scale. Eight qualified studies met the criteria. Terms of clinical outcomes and radiographic findings were evaluated in all studies to assess clinical success and root resorption. Fixed model was applied to aggregate the data of homogenous studies. A random effect model was carried out for measuring the effect size of heterogeneous studies.
RESULTS
The overall clinical and radiographic success rates based on the data suggested that MTA was superior to FC (P=0.004) with the Odds Ratio=3.535 and 95% confidence interval (1.494-8.369).
CONCLUSION
Primary molars pulpotomy with MTA have better clinical and radiographic success rates than FC. (Iranian Endodontic Journal 2008;3:45-9).
PubMed: 24146670
DOI: No ID Found -
F1000Research 2018: Early childhood caries is a serious public health problem. When caries extend to involve the pulp, various forms of pulp treatment are tried to stimulate tooth repair.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
: Early childhood caries is a serious public health problem. When caries extend to involve the pulp, various forms of pulp treatment are tried to stimulate tooth repair. Although pulpotomy is the treatment of choice for vital primary tooth pulp exposure but there is a trend among many dentists to perform pulpectomies in vital primary incisors. This study aimed to assess the effect of pulpotomy and pulpecomy in treatment of carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors. We searched Pubmed and Cochrane library databases up to March, 2018, OpenGrey for grey literature and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials. Randomized controlled trials were included and assessed with Cochrane risk of bias tool . Primary outcomes were clinical failure and radiological failure. The effect sizes were calculated as risk ratios with 95%CI using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Four trials were identified for qualitative assessment, only three trials were included in meta-analysis after exclusion of one trial due to its high risk of bias. The pooled results of the longest follow up period for clinical failure showed no statistically significant difference between pulpotomy and pulpectomy. The relative risk (RR) was e 2.69, 95% CI 0.76 to 9.58 for clinical failure. For radiographic failure, the sensitivity analysis showed RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.83 with a higher risk for radiographic failure in pulpectomy. The evidence was limited by the small number of trials included in the meta-analysis. Both pulpotomy and pulpectomy can be used successfully in the treatment of vital pulp exposure in primary incisors. Further high quality studies comparing between pulpotomy and pulpectomy in primary incisors with longer follow up period till exfoliation time are needed.
Topics: Dental Caries; Humans; Incisor; Pulpectomy; Pulpotomy; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 31249668
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.16142.3 -
Singapore Dental Journal Dec 2013This systematic review assesses the effect of methods commonly used to manage the pulp in cases of deep caries lesions, and the extent the pulp chamber remains... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review assesses the effect of methods commonly used to manage the pulp in cases of deep caries lesions, and the extent the pulp chamber remains uninfected and does not cause pulpal or periapical inflammatory lesions and associated tooth-ache over time.
STUDY DESIGN
An electronic literature search included the databases PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Reviews from January 1950 to March 2013. In addition, hand searches were carried out. Two reviewers independently evaluated abstracts and full-text articles. An article was read in full if at least one of the two reviewers considered the abstract potentially relevant. Altogether, 161 articles were read in full text. Of these, 24 studies fulfilled established inclusion criteria. Based on studies of at least moderate quality, the quality of evidence of each procedure was rated in four levels according to GRADE.
RESULTS
No study reached the high quality level. Twelve were of moderate quality. The overall evidence was insufficient to assess which of indirect pulp capping, stepwise excavation, direct excavation and pulp capping/partial pulpotomy, pulpotomy or pulpectomy is the most effective treatment approach for teeth with deep caries.
CONCLUSIONS
Because of the lack of good studies it is not possible to determine whether an injured pulp by deep caries can be maintained or whether it should be removed and replaced with a root canal filling. Both randomized studies and prospective observational studies are needed to investigate whether a pulp exposed to deep caries is best treated by measures intended to preserve it or by pulpectomy and root filling.
Topics: Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment; Dental Caries; Dental Pulp; Dental Pulp Capping; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pulp Capping and Pulpectomy Agents; Pulpotomy; Root Caries
PubMed: 24360260
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdj.2013.11.001 -
Frontiers in Oral Health 2023Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) or symptomatic apical periodontitis (SAP) are two painful conditions often warranting emergency treatment. The most common... (Review)
Review
Pain after emergency treatments of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis in the permanent dentition: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) or symptomatic apical periodontitis (SAP) are two painful conditions often warranting emergency treatment. The most common emergency treatments supported by evidence are pulpotomy and pulpectomy and are normally performed under time-constrained circumstances. However, there is no strong evidence of which treatment suggested in literature a clinician can use to reduce endodontic pain effectively. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to investigate the present knowledge on postoperative pain related to the two types of emergency treatments available for treating SIP and SAP.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials investigating postoperative pain after emergency treatments (pulpotomy and/or pulpectomy) on permanent dentition with signs and symptoms of SIP and/or SAP were searched in three major databases from 1978 until 2022. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's tool.
RESULTS
Only five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The included studies indicated that pulpotomy and pulpectomy are both suitable treatment options for SAP and SIP, as they provide sufficient alleviation of pain in permanent dentition. However, inconsistent results were found between the included trials on which emergency treatment is more effective in reducing pain. Cochrane's tool revealed that the studies had a low risk of bias. Limitations found in the design of the included randomized control trials decreased the level of evidence. None of the included studies accounted for essential confounding variables, such as factors affecting pain (including the psychological aspects). Moreover, possible non-odontogenic pain was not assessed, and therefore, it was not excluded; hence, affecting the internal validity of the studies.
CONCLUSION
There are controversies within the available randomized control trials on which treatment is most effective in reducing emergency pain. This could be due to some weaknesses in the design of the clinical trials. Thus, further well-designed studies are warranted to draw conclusions on which emergency treatment is more effective in reducing pain.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42023422282).
PubMed: 37920592
DOI: 10.3389/froh.2023.1147884 -
Cureus Jul 2022The major focus of this systematic review is to assess how effective partial pulpotomy is in managing carious vital pulp exposures in permanent posterior teeth. An... (Review)
Review
The major focus of this systematic review is to assess how effective partial pulpotomy is in managing carious vital pulp exposures in permanent posterior teeth. An electronic search for studies published between January 2011 and December 2021 was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria were followed during the search process. We selected human randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the success rate of partial pulpotomy for the treatment of cariously exposed vital permanent posterior teeth and the success rate of decayed exposed vital human permanent posterior dentition managed with a partial pulpotomy. Exclusively, randomized clinical trial papers were considered for assessment. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was applied to assess the risk of bias. Four papers were selected for the final analysis from the 321 identified during the initial search. Our results showed that after six, 12, and 24 months of follow-up, the success rate was 94%, 93%, and 90%, respectively. The preoperative pulp state was the only significant predictive factor. Teeth with the presumptive diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis had the worse outcome. The treatment outcome was not influenced by the final restoration, pulp capping agent, apex closure, or patient age. Finally, the available data indicated that partial pulpotomy showed a high success rate in treating cariously exposed permanent posterior teeth for up to 24 months. When assessing the effectiveness of a partial pulpotomy, six months of maintenance is deemed adequate. To enhance treatment success, additional clinical and radiological measures are needed.
PubMed: 35936176
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26573 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2016There is a range of treatment options for the management of the pulp in extensively decayed teeth. These include direct and indirect pulp capping, pulpotomy or... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is a range of treatment options for the management of the pulp in extensively decayed teeth. These include direct and indirect pulp capping, pulpotomy or pulpectomy. If the tooth is symptomatic or if there are periapical bone changes, then endodontic treatment is required. However, if the tooth is asymptomatic but the caries is extensive, there is no consensus as to the best method of management. In addition, there has been a recent move towards using alternative materials and methods such as the direct or indirect placement of bonding agents and mineral trioxide aggregate.Most studies have investigated the management of asymptomatic carious teeth with or without an exposed dental pulp using various capping materials (e.g. calcium hydroxide, Ledermix, Triodent, Biorex, etc.). However, there is no long term data regarding the outcome of management of asymptomatic, carious teeth according to different regimens.
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of techniques used to treat asymptomatic carious teeth and maintain pulp vitality.
SEARCH METHODS
Electronic searches of the following databases were undertaken: The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (March 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to week 4, February 2006), EMBASE (1974 to 13 March 2006), National Research Register (March 2006), Science Citation Index - SCISEARCH (1981 to March 2006). Detailed search strategies were developed for each database. Handsearching and screening of reference lists were undertaken. There was no restriction with regard to language of publication.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Studies included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Asymptomatic vital permanent teeth with extensive caries were included. Studies were those which compared techniques to maintain pulp vitality. Outcome measures included clinical success and adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were independently extracted by three review authors. Authors were contacted for details of randomisation and withdrawals and a quality assessment was carried out. The Cochrane Collaboration's statistical guidelines were followed.
MAIN RESULTS
Only four RCTs were identified. Interventions examined included: Ledermix, glycerrhetinic acid/antibiotic mix, zinc oxide eugenol, calcium hydroxide, Cavitec, Life, Dycal, potassium nitrate, dimethyl isosorbide, and polycarboxylate cement. Only one study showed a statistically significant finding; potassium nitrate/dimethyl isosorbide/polycarboxylate cement resulted in fewer clinical symptoms than potassium nitrate/polycarboxylate cement or polycarboxylate cement alone when used as a capping material for carious pulps.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
It was disappointing that there were so few studies which could be considered as being suitable for inclusion in this review. The findings from this review do not suggest that there should be any significant change from accepted conventional practice procedures when the pulp of the carious tooth is considered. Further well designed RCTs are needed to investigate the potential of contemporary materials which may be suitable when used in the management of carious teeth. It is recognised that it is difficult to establish the 'ideal' clinical study when ethical approval for new materials must be sought and strict attention to case selection, study protocol and interpretation of data is considered. It is also not easy to recruit sufficient numbers of patients meeting the necessary criteria.
Topics: Adult; Dental Caries; Dental Pulp; Dental Pulp Diseases; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 27892627
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004484.pub3 -
Journal of Clinical and Experimental... Jul 2022This review and meta-analysis investigates the outcome of direct pulp capping in teeth diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This review and meta-analysis investigates the outcome of direct pulp capping in teeth diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This systematic review includes experimental and descriptive clinical studies according to the PRISMA criteria, using PubMed and Scopus as database. We have included studies that performed direct pulp capping on human permanent teeth previously diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis and that carried out a subsequent follow-up. The outcome of interest was the clinical success of direct pulp capping.
RESULTS
A total of four studies met the inclusion criteria for this review, however only three of these could be included in the meta-analysis. These three studies represent a total sample of 62 teeth with irreversible pulpitis treated with direct pulp capping that showed an overall success rate of 0.953 (CI=0.900-1.005; <0.001; I²=0). Additionally, the success rates of vital pulp therapies were compared, all of them being greater than 75%; and the success rates of the materials used were analyzed, giving values above 80% in all cases. The risk of bias of the included articles was established using the ROBINS-I tool, showing that two of the articles had a moderate risk of bias and the remaining two had a very high risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of this review, direct pulp capping should be clinically included as a successful technique for the treatment of irreversible pulpitis. However, a larger number of studies with more rigorous methodologies are necessary to confirm the efficacy of this technique. Irreversible pulpitis, direct pulp capping (DPC), vital pulp therapy (VPT), indirect pulp capping (IPC), partial pulpotomy, total pulpotomy.
PubMed: 35912026
DOI: 10.4317/jced.59668 -
Journal of Endodontics Apr 2022Crown fracture with pulp involvement and concomitant complications is a traumatic injury that may have several clinical considerations for dentists and patients. The aim... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Crown fracture with pulp involvement and concomitant complications is a traumatic injury that may have several clinical considerations for dentists and patients. The aim of the present study was to appraise existing scientific evidence on factors related to pulp survival after complicated crown fracture following vital pulp therapy.
METHODS
An electronic search was performed on 8 sources of published and unpublished literature, as of August 18, 2021. Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies were included, involving patients undergoing treatment in teeth (mature or immature), with vital pulp, after complicated crown fracture. Risk of bias of included studies was examined and assessed through RoB 2.0 or the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool, conditional on study design. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, where applicable, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
RESULTS
Of the 506 initial articles, 24 were eligible for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis, and 7 ultimately contributed to meta-analyses. Based on synthesized evidence, in teeth treated with pulpotomy, there was no difference in successful clinical/radiographic outcome denoting pulp survival, when either bioceramic material versus CaOH (2 studies, Risk Ratio [RR] = 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.16; P = .09; I = 0.0%), or mineral trioxide aggregate versus CaOH (2 studies, RR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.76-1.16; P = .56; I = 0.0%). For different pulp management procedures, in pooled immature and mature teeth samples, there was no evidence that pulpotomy performed better than pulp capping with either CaOH or mineral trioxide aggregate (5 studies/6 comparisons, RR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.71-1.58; P = .77; I = 74.8%). Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials ranged from raising some concerns to low, whereas nonrandomized studies were recorded as serious to critical risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The quality of the evidence was very low to moderate. The need for more carefully designed clinical trials in the field is profound, to inform high-quality clinical decision making.
Topics: Crowns; Dental Pulp Capping; Dental Pulp Exposure; Humans; Pulpotomy; Tooth Fractures
PubMed: 35090933
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.01.013 -
Translational Pediatrics Jul 2022[This retracts the article DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-68.].
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-68.].
PubMed: 35958007
DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-260