-
Transplant Immunology Dec 2023Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation relies on two principles: (i) removal of antibodies from a blood group; and (ii) inhibition of reappearance of blood group antibodies by intensifying the induction and maintenance of immunosuppression. This systematic review aimed to analyze the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation.
METHODS
Databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline were searched. Search duration was from the database establishment to December 2022. A thorough search was performed for relevant studies investigating the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation. Two investigators independently extracted literature information and assessed the quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity test was performed using Cochrane's Q and chi-squared tests. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.1).
RESULTS
The search for relevant literature in the five electronic databases yielded 1238 articles. Of the 1238 articles, only 15 were included. Meta-analysis of outcomes from five studies showed a survival rate of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 0.97, P < 0.001) after ≥3 years, while outcomes from 12 studies revealed a short-term patient survival rate of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.96, P = 0.75). In contrast, long- and short-term graft survival rates were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.96, P < 0.001) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, P < 0.001), respectively. Incidence rates of infectious, surgical, and medical complications were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.41, P < 0.001), 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.25, P < 0.001), and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66, P < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Good long- and short-term patient outcomes and graft survival rates were observed after ABO-I kidney transplantation. Similarly, the safety of performing kidney transplantations from living donors with ABO-I blood groups was established by the results of the current meta-analysis. Therefore, ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantations should be encouraged to reduce the time recipients spend on waiting lists and supplement the existing paired-exchange donor program.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Transplantation; ABO Blood-Group System; Living Donors; Quality of Life; Renal Dialysis; Blood Group Incompatibility; Antibodies; Graft Survival; Graft Rejection
PubMed: 37648033
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101921 -
PloS One 2020Existing systematic reviews of Rh immunoprophylaxis include only data from randomized controlled trials, have dated searches, and some do not report on all domains of...
BACKGROUND
Existing systematic reviews of Rh immunoprophylaxis include only data from randomized controlled trials, have dated searches, and some do not report on all domains of risk of bias or evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Our objective was to perform an updated review, by including new trials, any comparative observational studies, and assessing the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE framework.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from 2000 to November 26, 2019. Relevant websites and bibliographies of systematic reviews and guidelines were searched for studies published before 2000. Outcomes of interest were sensitization and adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane tool and ROBINS-I. The certainty of the evidence was performed using the GRADE framework.
RESULTS
Thirteen randomized trials and eight comparative cohort studies were identified, evaluating 12 comparisons. Although there is some evidence of beneficial treatment effects (e.g., at 6-months postpartum, fewer women who received RhIg at delivery compared to no RhIg became sensitized [70 fewer sensitized women per 1,000 (95%CI: 67 to 71 fewer); I2 = 73%]), due to very low certainty of the evidence, the magnitude of the treatment effect may be overestimated. The certainty of the evidence was very low for most outcomes often due to high risk of bias (e.g., randomization method, allocation concealment, selective reporting) and imprecision (i.e., few events and small sample sizes). There is limited evidence on prophylaxis for invasive fetal procedures (e.g. amniocentesis) in the comparative literature, and few studies reported adverse events.
CONCLUSION
Serious risk of bias and low to very low certainty of the evidence is found in existing RCTs and comparative observational studies addressing optimal effectiveness of Rh immunoprophylaxis. Guideline development committees should exercise caution when assessing the strength of the recommendations that inform and influence clinical practice in this area.
Topics: Female; GRADE Approach; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Postnatal Care; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rh Isoimmunization; Rh-Hr Blood-Group System
PubMed: 32913362
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238844 -
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal... Jan 2003To assess the effectiveness of high dose intravenous immunoglobulin (HDIVIG) in reducing the need for exchange transfusion in neonates with proven haemolytic disease due... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of high dose intravenous immunoglobulin (HDIVIG) in reducing the need for exchange transfusion in neonates with proven haemolytic disease due to Rh and/or ABO incompatibility. To assess the effectiveness of HDIVIG in reducing the duration of phototherapy and hospital stay.
DESIGN
Systematic review of randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing HDIVIG and phototherapy with phototherapy alone in neonates with Rh and/or ABO incompatibility.
RESULTS
Significantly fewer infants required exchange transfusion in the HDIVIG group (relative risk (RR) 0.28 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.47); number needed to treat 2.7 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.8)). Also hospital stay and duration of phototherapy were significantly reduced.
CONCLUSION
HDIVIG is an effective treatment.
Topics: Blood Transfusion; Erythroblastosis, Fetal; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Infant, Newborn; Length of Stay; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 12496219
DOI: 10.1136/fn.88.1.f6 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2018Exchange transfusion and phototherapy have traditionally been used to treat jaundice and avoid the associated neurological complications. Because of the risks and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Exchange transfusion and phototherapy have traditionally been used to treat jaundice and avoid the associated neurological complications. Because of the risks and burdens of exchange transfusion, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been suggested as an alternative therapy for alloimmune hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) to reduce the need for exchange transfusion.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect and complications of IVIg in newborn infants with alloimmune HDN on the need for and number of exchange transfusions.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed electronic searches of CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Academic Search Premier, and the trial registers ClinicalTrials.gov and controlled-trials.com in May 2017. We also searched reference lists of included and excluded trials and relevant reviews for further relevant studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered all randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of IVIg in the treatment of alloimmune HDN. Trials must have used predefined criteria for the use of IVIg and exchange transfusion therapy to be included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used the standard methods of Cochrane and its Neonatal Review Group. We assessed studies for inclusion and two review authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. We discussed any differences of opinion to reach consensus. We contacted investigators for additional or missing information. We calculated risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) for categorical outcomes. We calculated mean difference (MD) for continuous variables. We used GRADE criteria to assess the risk of bias for major outcomes and to summarize the level of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
Nine studies with 658 infants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Term and preterm infants with Rh or ABO (or both) incompatibility were included. The use of exchange transfusion decreased significantly in the immunoglobulin treated group (typical RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.49; typical RD -0.22, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.16; NNTB 5). The mean number of exchange transfusions per infant was also significantly lower in the immunoglobulin treated group (MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.17). However, sensitivity analysis by risk of bias showed that in the only two studies in which the treatment was masked by use of a placebo and outcome assessment was blinded, the results differed; there was no difference in the need for exchange transfusions (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.98) or number of exchange transfusions (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.10). Two studies assessed long-term outcomes and found no cases of kernicterus, deafness or cerebral palsy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although overall results show a significant reduction in the need for exchange transfusion in infants treated with IVIg, the applicability of the results is limited because of low to very low quality of evidence. Furthermore, the two studies at lowest risk of bias show no benefit of IVIg in reducing the need for and number of exchange transfusions. Based on these results, we have insufficient confidence in the effect estimate for benefit of IVIg to make even a weak recommendation for the use of IVIg for the treatment of alloimmune HDN. Further studies are needed before the use of IVIg for the treatment of alloimmune HDN can be recommended, and should include blinding of the intervention by use of a placebo as well as sufficient sample size to assess the potential for serious adverse effects.
Topics: Anemia, Hemolytic; Anemia, Neonatal; Blood Transfusion; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Infant, Newborn; Jaundice, Neonatal; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29551014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003313.pub2 -
Translational Pediatrics Jun 2022Hyperbilirubinemia is the most common cause of neonatal hospitalization and, although it generally has a good prognosis, a significant percentage of neonatal patients...
BACKGROUND
Hyperbilirubinemia is the most common cause of neonatal hospitalization and, although it generally has a good prognosis, a significant percentage of neonatal patients maintain a high bilirubin level, which can lead to severe complications, including lifelong disability such as growth retardation, encephalopathy, autism and hearing impairment. The study of risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia has been controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the risk factors of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia using a meta-analysis.
METHODS
Relevant English and Chinese studies that discussed risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were retrieved from the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and China Science Digital Library (CSDL). The literature took newborns as the research object, set up a control group, and observed the relationship between exposure factors and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The combined effect size was expressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Chi-square test was used to test heterogeneity of the studies, and if it existed, subgroup analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity, and the random-effects model was selected for the combined analysis. The fixed-effects model was chosen for the combined analysis if there was no heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plot.
RESULTS
Risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were exclusive breastfeeding (BF: OR =1.74, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.12, Z=5.43, P<0.00001); glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD: OR =1.62, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.81, Z=8.39, P<0.00001); maternal-fetal ABO blood group incompatibility (OR =1.64, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.89, Z=6.75, P<0.00001); and preterm birth (PTB: OR =1.31, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.47, Z=4.60, P<0.00001); there was no heterogeneity or publication bias among the studies (BF: χ=5.34, P=0.25, I=25%; G6PD: χ=4.40, P=0.49, I=0%; ABO: χ=1.91, P=0.75, I=0%; PTB: χ=0.81, P=0.67, I=0%).
CONCLUSIONS
Exclusive breastfeeding, G6PD deficiency, ABO incompatibility and premature birth were confirmed as risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pregnant women with risk factors should be monitored more closely and clinical intervention should be given in a timely manner.
PubMed: 35800274
DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-229 -
PloS One 2015Available evidence suggests that low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear the greatest burden of severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia characterized by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Available evidence suggests that low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear the greatest burden of severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia characterized by disproportionately high rates of morbidity, mortality and neurodevelopmental disorders compared to high-income countries. We set out to identify the risk factors that contribute to the burden of severe hyperbilirubinemia in the most developmentally disadvantaged LMICs to highlight areas for action and further research.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), WHO Library Database (WHOLIS), African Index Medicus (AIM), African Journals Online (AJOL), LILACS, and IndMed for reports published between January 1990 and June 2014. We included only studies that controlled for the effects of confounding variables in determining maternal and infant risk factors for severe hyperbilirubinemia. We conducted meta-analysis of the eligible studies and computed the summary risk estimates with random effects models.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies with 1,951 subjects and 32,208 controls from India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Nepal and Egypt were identified and analyzed. The pooled data showed that primiparity (OR, 1.59; 95% CI:1.26-2.00), delivery outside public hospitals (OR, 6.42; 95% CI:1.76-23.36), ABO incompatibility (OR, 4.01; 95% CI:2.44-6.61), Rhesus hemolytic disease (OR, 20.63; 95% CI:3.95-107.65), G6PD deficiency (OR, 8.01; 95% CI:2.09-30.69), UGT1A1 polymorphisms (OR, 4.92; 95% CI:1.30-18.62), low gestational age (OR, 1.71; 95% CI:1.40-2.11), underweight/weight loss (OR, 6.26; 95% CI:1.23-31.86), sepsis (OR, 9.15; 95% CI:2.78-30.10) and high transcutaneous/total serum bilirubin levels (OR, 1.46; 95% CI:1.10-1.92) placed infants at increased risk of severe hyperbilirubinemia or bilirubin induced neurologic dysfunctions. Low social class was not associated with an increased risk of severe hyperbilirubinemia.
CONCLUSIONS
Infants at risk of severe hyperbilirubinemia in LMICs are associated with maternal and neonatal factors that can be effectively addressed by available interventions to curtail the disease burden prevailing in the affected countries.
Topics: Developing Countries; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Odds Ratio; Publication Bias; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Socioeconomic Factors
PubMed: 25675342
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117229 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2015During pregnancy, a Rhesus negative (Rh-negative) woman may develop antibodies when her fetus is Rhesus positive (Rh-positive). These antibodies may harm Rh-positive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
During pregnancy, a Rhesus negative (Rh-negative) woman may develop antibodies when her fetus is Rhesus positive (Rh-positive). These antibodies may harm Rh-positive babies.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin on the incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation when given to Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials in Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies given anti-D after 28 weeks of pregnancy, compared with no treatment, placebo or a different regimen of anti-D.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
We included two trials involving over 4500 women, comparing anti-D prophylaxis with no anti-D during pregnancy in this review. Overall, the trials were judged to be at moderate to high risk of bias. The quality of the evidence for pre-specified outcomes was also assessed using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.In regards to primary review outcomes, there did not appear to be a clear difference in the risks of immunisation when women who received anti-D at 28 and 34 weeks' gestation were compared with women who were not given antenatal anti-D: risk ratio (RR) for incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation during pregnancy was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 1.17, two trials, 3902 women; GRADE: low quality evidence); at birth of a Rh-positive infant the RR was 0.42 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.17, two trials, 2297 women); and within 12 months after birth of a Rh-positive infant the average RR was 0.39 (95% CI 0.10 to 1.62, two trials, 2048 women; Tau²: 0.47; I²: 39%; GRADE: low quality evidence). Neither of the trials reported on incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation in subsequent pregnancies.Considering secondary outcomes, in one trial, women receiving anti-D during pregnancy were shown to be less likely to register a positive Kleihauer test (which detects fetal cells in maternal blood) in pregnancy (at 32 to 25 weeks) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88; 1884 women; GRADE: low quality evidence) and at the birth of a Rh-positive infant (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.79; 1189 women; GRADE: low quality evidence). No clear differences were seen for neonatal jaundice (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.30; 1882 infants; GRADE: very low quality evidence). Neither of the trials reported on adverse effects associated with anti-D treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Existing studies do not provide conclusive evidence that the use of anti-D during pregnancy benefits either mother or baby in terms of incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation during the pregnancy or postpartum, or the incidence of neonatal morbidity (jaundice) (low to very low quality evidence). However women receiving anti-D may be less likely to register a positive Kleihauer test in pregnancy and at the birth of a Rh-positive infant (low quality evidence). Fewer women who receive anti-D during pregnancy may have Rhesus D antibodies in a subsequent pregnancy, with benefits for the baby, however this needs to be tested in studies of robust design.
Topics: Female; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rh Isoimmunization; Rho(D) Immune Globulin
PubMed: 26334436
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000020.pub3 -
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Jul 2022The aim of this review was to systematically review the outcome of routine anti-D administration among unsensitised rhesus (RhD)-negative individuals who have an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
The aim of this review was to systematically review the outcome of routine anti-D administration among unsensitised rhesus (RhD)-negative individuals who have an abortion. This review is registered with Prospero.
METHODS
A search for all published and ongoing studies, without restrictions on language or publication status, was performed using the following databases from their inception: EBM Reviews Ovid - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid (Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily), Embase.com, Popline and Google Scholar. Study types included: randomised controlled trials, controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies from 1971 onwards. The population included women who undergo an abortion (induced, incomplete, spontaneous or septic abortion), medical or surgical <12 weeks, and isoimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy. The primary outcomes were: (1) development of a positive Kleihauer-Betke test and (2) development of Rh alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy.
RESULTS
A total of 2652 studies were screened with 105 accessed for full-text review. Two studies have been included with high bias appreciated. Both studies found few women to be sensitised in forming antibodies after an abortion. The limited studies available and heterogeneity prevent the conduction of a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Rh immunoglobulin has well-documented safety. However, it is not without risks and costs, is a possible barrier to delivering efficient services, and may have limited availability in some countries. The evidence base and quality of studies are currently limited. There is unclear benefit from the recommendation for Rh testing and immunoglobulin administration in early pregnancy. More research is needed as clinical practice guidelines are varied, based on expert opinions and moving away from testing and administration at time of abortion.
IMPLICATIONS
There is limited evidence surrounding medical benefit of Rh testing and immunoglobulin administration in early pregnancy. Further research is needed to define alloimmunisation and immunoglobulin benefit to update standards of care. Additionally, other factors should be considered in forming clinical policies and guidelines such as costs, feasibility and impact on access to care for patients.
Topics: Abortion, Induced; Abortion, Spontaneous; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Rh Isoimmunization
PubMed: 34819315
DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201225 -
PloS One Jan 2011ABO-incompatible live transplantation (ILT) is not occasionally performed due to a relative high risk of graft failure. Knowledge of both graft and patient survival rate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
ABO-incompatible live transplantation (ILT) is not occasionally performed due to a relative high risk of graft failure. Knowledge of both graft and patient survival rate after ILT is essential for donor selection and therapeutic strategy. We systematically reviewed studies containing outcomes after ILT compared to that after ABO-compatible liver transplantation (CLT).
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
We carried out a comprehensive search strategy on MEDLINE (1966-July 2010), EMBASE (1980-July 2010), Biosis Preview (1969-July 2010), Science Citation Index (1981-July 2010), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library, issue 7, 2010) and the National Institute of Health (July 2010). Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of each study and abstracted outcome data. Fourteen eligible studies were included which came from various medical centers all over the world. Meta-analysis results showed that no significantly statistical difference was found in pediatric graft survival rate, pediatric and adult patient survival rate between ILT and CLT group. In adult subgroup, the graft survival rate after ILT was significantly lower than that after CLT. The value of totally pooled OR was 0.64 (0.55, 0.74), 0.92 (0.62, 1.38) for graft survival rate and patient survival rate respectively. The whole complication incidence (including acute rejection and biliary complication) after ILT was higher than that after CLT, as the value of totally pooled OR was 3.02 (1.33, 6.85). Similarly, in acute rejection subgroup, the value of OR was 2.02 (1.01, 4.02). However, it was 4.08 (0.90, 18.51) in biliary complication subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
In our view, pediatric ILT has not been a contraindication anymore due to a similar graft and patient survival rate between ILT and CLT group. Though adult graft survival rate is not so satisfactory, ILT is undoubtedly life-saving under exigent condition. Most studies included in our analysis are observational researches. Larger scale of researches and Randomized-Control Studies are still needed.
Topics: ABO Blood-Group System; Adult; Age Factors; Blood Group Incompatibility; Child; Graft Survival; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21283553
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016521 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000The development of Rh immunisation and its prophylactic use since the 1970s has meant that severe Rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunisation is now rarely seen. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The development of Rh immunisation and its prophylactic use since the 1970s has meant that severe Rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunisation is now rarely seen.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of giving anti-D to Rhesus negative women, with no anti-D antibodies, who had given birth to a Rhesus positive infant.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE (from 1966 to January 1999) and reference lists of relevant articles. Date of last search of Cochrane Controlled Trials Register: January 1999.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials in Rhesus negative women without antibodies who were given anti-D immunoglobulin postpartum compared with no treatment or placebo.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Assessments of inclusion criteria, trial quality and data extraction were done by each author independently. Initial analyses included all trials. Other analyses assessed the effect of trial quality, ABO compatibility and dose.
MAIN RESULTS
Six eligible trials compared postpartum anti-D prophylaxis with no treatment or placebo. The trials involved over 10,000 women, but trial quality varied. Anti-D lowered the incidence of RhD alloimmunisation six months after birth (relative risk 0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.06), and in a subsequent pregnancy (relative risk 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0. 07 to 0.23). These benefits were seen regardless of the ABO status of the mother and baby and when anti-D was given within 72 hours of birth. Higher doses (up to 200 micro grams) were more effective than lower doses (up to 50 micro grams) in preventing RhD alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Anti-D, given within 72 hours after childbirth, reduces the risk of RhD alloimmunisation in Rhesus negative women who have given birth to a Rhesus positive infant. However the evidence on the optimal dose is limited.
Topics: Female; Humans; Postpartum Period; Rh Isoimmunization; Rho(D) Immune Globulin
PubMed: 10796089
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000021