-
European Review For Medical and... Jun 2017Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease, and in recent years has become a major public health problem. The hallmark of OA is cartilage destruction with... (Review)
Review
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease, and in recent years has become a major public health problem. The hallmark of OA is cartilage destruction with local commitment of subchondral bone and the synovial membrane. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are transcriptional factors and key regulators of the cellular response to hypoxia. To date, three members of the human HIF-α protein family have been described: HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and HIF-3α. HIF-1α plays an essential role in the articular cartilage (a hypoxic tissue), as it has a protective effect in the maintenance of the articular cartilage matrix, HIF-2α has a harmful effect on the articular cartilage matrix, and HIF-3α acts as a negative regulator of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Due to the recent growing interest in the role of HIFs in rheumatic diseases, we focused this review on the potential role of these key regulators in articular cartilage maintenance as the central axis in OA development.
Topics: Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Cartilage, Articular; Cell Hypoxia; Chondrocytes; Humans; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit; Osteoarthritis
PubMed: 28682438
DOI: No ID Found -
The Bone & Joint Journal Jan 2018α-defensin is a biomarker which has been described as having a high degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Current meta-analyses... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
α-defensin is a biomarker which has been described as having a high degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Current meta-analyses are based on the α-defensin laboratory-based immunoassay rather than the quick on-table lateral flow test kit. This study is the first meta-analysis to compare the accuracy of the α-defensin laboratory-based immunoassay and the lateral flow test kit for the diagnosis of PJI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria were all clinical studies where the diagnosis of PJI was uncertain. All studies selected used the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) or modified MSIS criteria. Two independent reviewers reviewed the studies and extracted data. A meta-analysis of results was carried out: pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, heterogeneity and areas under curves are reported.
RESULTS
Ten studies (759 patients) were included. Of these, seven studies (640 patients) evaluated the laboratory-based α-defensin immunoassay and three (119 patients) the lateral flow test. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the qualitative α-defensin laboratory immunoassay was 0.953 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 0.984) and 0.965 (95% CI 0.943 to 0.979) respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 34.86 (95% CI 19.34 to 62.85) and 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.11). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the lateral flow test were 0.774 (95% CI 0.637 to 0.870) and 0.913 (95% CI 0.828 to 0.958), respectively. The pooled PLR and NLR were 8.675 (95% CI 4.229 to 17.794) and 0.248 (95% CI 0.147 to 0.418), respectively.
CONCLUSION
The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the lateral flow test were lower than those of the α-defensin laboratory-based immunoassay test. Hence, care must be taken with interpretation of the lateral flow test when relying on its results for the intra-operative diagnosis of PJI. Cite this article: 2018;100-B:66-72.
Topics: Biomarkers; Humans; Immunoassay; Joint Prosthesis; Prosthesis Failure; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; Reoperation; Sensitivity and Specificity; Synovial Fluid; alpha-Defensins
PubMed: 29305453
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0630.R1 -
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Aug 2022Multiple biochemical biomarkers have been previously investigated for the diagnosis, prognosis and response to treatment of articular cartilage damage, including... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Multiple biochemical biomarkers have been previously investigated for the diagnosis, prognosis and response to treatment of articular cartilage damage, including osteoarthritis (OA). Synovial fluid (SF) biomarker measurement is a potential method to predict treatment response and effectiveness. However, the significance of different biomarkers and their correlation to clinical outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review evaluated current SF biomarkers used in investigation of cartilage degeneration or regeneration in the knee joint and correlated these biomarkers with clinical outcomes following cartilage repair or regeneration interventions.
METHOD
PubMed, Institute of Science Index, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases were searched. Studies evaluating SF biomarkers and clinical outcomes following cartilage repair intervention were included. Two researchers independently performed data extraction and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Score 2 (QUADAS-2) analysis. Biomarker inclusion, change following intervention and correlation with clinical outcome was compared.
RESULTS
9 studies were included. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. There was significant variation in sampling and analysis. 33 biomarkers were evaluated in addition to microRNA and catabolic/anabolic ratios. Five studies reported on correlation of biomarkers with six biomarkers significantly correlated with clinical outcomes following intervention. However, correlation was only demonstrated in isolated studies.
CONCLUSION
This review demonstrates significant difficulties in drawing conclusions regarding the importance of SF biomarkers based on the available literature. Improved standardisation for collection and analysis of SF samples is required. Future publications should also focus on clinical outcome scores and seek to correlate biomarkers with progression to further understand the significance of identified markers in a clinical context.
REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42022304298. Study protocol available on PROSPERO website.
Topics: Biomarkers; Cartilage, Articular; Humans; Knee Joint; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Synovial Fluid
PubMed: 35618204
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.05.007 -
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Oct 2013In 2010, in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, we published a comprehensive systematic review applying the consensus BIPED criteria (Burden of Disease, Investigative,... (Review)
Review
In 2010, in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, we published a comprehensive systematic review applying the consensus BIPED criteria (Burden of Disease, Investigative, Prognostic, Efficacy of Intervention and Diagnostic) criteria on serum and urinary biochemical markers for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) using publications that were available at that time. It appeared that none of the biochemical markers at that time were sufficiently discriminating to allow diagnosis and prognosis of OA in individual or limited numbers of patients, nor performed so consistently that they could function as primary outcome parameters in clinical trials. Also at present, almost 3 years later, this ultimate goal has not been reached (yet). Frankly, it might be questioned whether we are making the most adequate steps ahead and maybe we have to take a step back to reconsider our approaches. Some reflections are made and discussed: A critical review of molecular metabolism in OA and validation of currently investigated marker molecules in this may be vital and may lead to new and better markers. Creating cohorts in which synovial fluid (SF) is obtained in a systematic way, together with serum and urine, may also bring the field a further step ahead. Thirdly, better understanding of different phenotypes (subtypes) of OA may facilitate identification and validation of biochemical markers. Finally, the systems biology approach as discussed in the last years OA in review on biomarkers, although very complex, might provide steps forward. Looking ahead, we are optimistic but realistic in our expectations, we believe that the field can be brought forward by critically and cautiously reconsidering our approaches, and making changes forward, one step at a time.
Topics: Biomarkers; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Genetic Markers; Humans; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Prognosis; Specimen Handling; Synovial Fluid
PubMed: 23954702
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.08.012 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Dec 2019Synovial fluid proteins had been applied as diagnostic biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in recent research papers. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Synovial fluid proteins had been applied as diagnostic biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in recent research papers. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to estimate the diagnostic efficiency of synovial fluid α-defensin and leukocyte esterase (LE) for PJI.
METHODS
We conducted our systematic review by searching the keywords in online databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Elsevier, Springer, and Web of Science from the time of database inception to October 2018. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who have undergone knee, hip, or shoulder joint replacements; α-defensin or leukocyte esterase (LE strip) of synovial fluid was detected as the biomarker for PJI diagnosis; and Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) or utilizing a combination of clinical data was considered as the gold standard. Diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary of receiver operating characteristics curve (AUSROC) were calculated for the included studies to evaluate the synovial fluid α-defensin and LE for PJI diagnosis.
RESULTS
After full-text review, 28 studies were qualified for this systematic review, 16 studies used α-defensin and the other 12 were conducted using LE strip. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of LE strip were 87% (95% CI 84-90%), 96% (95% CI 95-97%), and 170.09 (95% CI 97.63-296.32), respectively, while the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of α-defensin were 87% (95% CI 83-90%), 97% (95% CI 96-98%), and 158.18 (95% CI 74.26-336.91), respectively. The AUSROC for LE strip and α-defensin were 0.9818 and 0.9685, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Both LE strip and α-defensin of synovial fluid provide rapid and convenient diagnosis for PJI. Sensitivity of α-defensin and LE strip are the same, while both these two methods have high specificity in clinical practice.
Topics: Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Knee Prosthesis; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Reproducibility of Results; Shoulder Prosthesis; Synovial Fluid; alpha-Defensins
PubMed: 31856885
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1395-3 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Aug 2023Aim of this systematic review was to determine if bone marrow-derived cell-based injectable therapies induce disease-modifying effects in joints affected by... (Review)
Review
Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models. A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 2: bone marrow-derived cell-based injectable therapies.
PURPOSE
Aim of this systematic review was to determine if bone marrow-derived cell-based injectable therapies induce disease-modifying effects in joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA) in animal models.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed on three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase) according to PRISMA guidelines. A synthesis of the results was performed investigating disease-modifying effects in preclinical animal studies comparing injectable bone marrow-derived products with OA controls or other products, different formulations or injection intervals, and the combination with other products. The risk of bias was assessed according to the SYRCLE's tool.
RESULTS
Fifty-three studies were included (1819 animals) with an increasing publication trend over time. Expanded cells were used in 48 studies, point-of-care products in 3 studies, and both approaches were investigated in 2 studies. Among the 47 studies presenting results on the disease-modifying effects, 40 studies (85%) reported better results with bone marrow-derived products compared to OA controls, with positive findings evident in 14 out of 20 studies (70%) in macroscopic assessment, in 30 out of 41 studies (73%) in histological assessment, and in 10 out of 13 studies (77%) in immunohistochemical evaluations. Clinical evaluations showed positive results in 7 studies out of 9 (78%), positive imaging results in 11 studies out of 17 (65%), and positive biomarker results in 5 studies out of 10 (50%). While 36 out of 46 studies (78%) reported positive results at the cartilage level, only 3 out of 10 studies (30%) could detect positive changes at the synovial level. The risk of bias was low in 42% of items, unclear in 50%, and high in 8%.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review of preclinical studies demonstrated that intra-articular injections of bone marrow-derived products can induce disease-modifying effects in the treatment of OA, slowing down the progression of cartilage damage with benefits at macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical levels. Positive results have been also observed in terms of clinical and imaging findings, as well as in the modulation of inflammatory and cartilage biomarkers, while poor effects have been described on the synovial membrane. These findings are important to understand the potential of bone marrow-derived products and to guide further research to optimise their use in the clinical practice.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
II.
Topics: Animals; Bone Marrow; Osteoarthritis; Synovial Membrane; Disease Models, Animal; Injections, Intra-Articular; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Osteoarthritis, Knee
PubMed: 36823238
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07320-3 -
Evidence Report/technology Assessment Sep 2007Systematic review of outcomes of three treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee: intra-articular viscosupplementation; oral glucosamine, chondroitin or the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Systematic review of outcomes of three treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee: intra-articular viscosupplementation; oral glucosamine, chondroitin or the combination; and arthroscopic lavage or debridement.
DATA SOURCES
We abstracted data from: 42 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of viscosupplementation, all but one synthesized among six meta-analyses; 21 RCTs of glucosamine/chondroitin, 16 synthesized among 6 meta-analyses; and 23 articles on arthroscopy. The search included foreign-language studies and relevant conference proceedings.
REVIEW METHODS
The review methods were defined prospectively in a written protocol. We sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and RCTs published in full or in abstract. Where randomized trials were few, we sought other study designs. We independently assessed the quality of all primary studies.
RESULTS
Viscosupplementation trials generally report positive effects on pain and function scores compared to placebo, but the evidence on clinical benefit is uncertain, due to variable trial quality, potential publication bias, and unclear clinical significance of the changes reported. The Glucosamine/Chondroitin Arthritis Intervention Trial (GAIT), a large (n=1,583), high-quality, National Institutes of Health-funded, multicenter RCT showed no significant difference compared to placebo. Glucosamine sulfate has been reported to be more effective than glucosamine hydrochloride, which was used in GAIT, but the evidence is not sufficient to draw conclusions. Clinical studies of glucosamine effect on glucose metabolism are short term, or if longer (e.g., 3 years), excluded patients with metabolic disorders. The best available evidence for arthroscopy, a single sham-controlled RCT (n=180), showed that arthroscopic lavage with or without debridement was equivalent to placebo. The main limitations of this trial are the use of a single surgeon and enrollment of patients at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center. No studies reported separately on patients with secondary OA of the knee. The only comparative study was an underpowered, poor-quality trial comparing viscosupplementation to arthroscopy with debridement.
CONCLUSIONS
Osteoarthritis of the knee is a common condition. The three interventions reviewed in this report are widely used in the treatment of OA of the knee, yet the best available evidence does not clearly demonstrate clinical benefit. Uncertainty regarding clinical benefit can be resolved only by rigorous, multicenter RCTs. In addition, given the public health impact of OA of the knee, research on new approaches to prevention and treatment should be given high priority.
Topics: Aged; Arthroscopy; Chondroitin; Debridement; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucosamine; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Injections, Intra-Articular; Knee; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain; Synovial Fluid; Therapeutic Irrigation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 18088162
DOI: No ID Found -
Musculoskeletal Surgery Jun 2024Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) is a proliferative disease arising from the synovial membrane, mainly affects large joints such as the knee (almost 80% of... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) is a proliferative disease arising from the synovial membrane, mainly affects large joints such as the knee (almost 80% of total). Prostheses implanted in PVNS osteoarthritis show a higher revision rate when compared to primary osteoarthritis, due to the recurrence of disease and the overall surgical complications. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize and compare indications, clinical and functional outcomes, disease-related and surgical-related complications of total knee arthroplasty in PVNS osteoarthritis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed with a primary search on Medline through PubMed. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were used to edit the review. Screened studies had to provide preoperative diagnosis, previous treatments, main treatment, concomitant strategies, mean follow-up, outcomes and complications to be included in the review.
RESULTS
A total of 8 articles were finally included. Most of papers reported the use of non-constrained design implants, mainly posterior stabilized (PS) and in case of PVNS with extensive joint involvement implants with higher degree of constraint to obtain a fulfilling balancing. Recurrence of PVNS has been indicated as the major complication, followed by aseptic loosening of the implant and difficult post-operative course with an increased risk of stiffness.
CONCLUSION
Total knee arthroplasty represents a valid treatment for patients with PVNS end-stage osteoarthritis, with good clinical and functional results, even in longer follow-up. It would be advisable a multidisciplinary management and a meticulous rehabilitation and monitoring following the procedure, to reduce the emergence of recurrence and overall complications.
Topics: Humans; Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Treatment Outcome; Knee Prosthesis; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37338752
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-023-00793-y -
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage May 2021To examine and compare the accuracy of conventional radiography (CR) and musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
The diagnostic value of conventional radiography and musculoskeletal ultrasonography in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To examine and compare the accuracy of conventional radiography (CR) and musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals deposition disease (CPPD).
DESIGN
A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane), conference abstracts and reference lists was undertaken. Studies which evaluated the accuracy of CR and/or US in the diagnosis of CPPD, using synovial fluid analysis (SFA), histology or classification criteria as reference tests were included. Subgroup analyses by anatomic site and by reference test were performed.
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies were included. Using SFA/histology as reference test, CR and US showed an excellent (CR AUC = 0.889, 95%CI = 0.811-0.967) and an outstanding (US AUC = 0.954, 95%CI = 0.907-1.0) diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, US showed a higher sensitivity (0.85, 95%CI = 0.79-0.90 vs 0.47, 95%CI = 0.40-0.55) and only a little lower specificity (0.87, 95%CI = 0.83-0.91 vs 0.95, 95%CI = 0.92-0.97) than CR. A considerable heterogeneity between the studies was found, with adopted reference test being the main source of heterogeneity. In fact, subgroup analysis showed a significant change in the diagnostic accuracy of CR, but not of US, using Ryan and McCarty criteria or SFA/histology as reference test (CR: AUC = 0.956, 95%CI = 0.925-1.0 vs AUC = 0.889, 95%CI = 0.828-0.950, respectively, p < 0.01) (US: AUC = 0.922, 95%CI = 0.842-1.0 vs AUC = 0.957, 95%CI = 0.865-1.0, respectively, p = 0.08) CONCLUSIONS: Although US is more sensitive and a little less specific than CR for identifying CPP crystals, both these two techniques showed a great diagnostic accuracy and should be regarded as complementary to each other in the diagnostic work-up of patients with CPPD.
Topics: Calcium Pyrophosphate; Chondrocalcinosis; Fascia; Humans; Joints; Ligaments, Articular; Muscle, Skeletal; Radiography; Sensitivity and Specificity; Synovial Fluid; Tendons; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 33577959
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.01.007 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Dec 2022Synovial tissue research has become widely developed in several rheumatology centres, however, large discrepancies exist in the way synovial tissue is handled and, more...
BACKGROUND
Synovial tissue research has become widely developed in several rheumatology centres, however, large discrepancies exist in the way synovial tissue is handled and, more specifically, how data pertaining to biopsy procedure, quality check and experimental results are reported in the literature. This heterogeneity hampers the progress of research in this rapidly expanding field. In that context, under the umbrella of European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, we aimed at proposing points to consider (PtC) for minimal reporting requirements in synovial tissue research.
METHODS
Twenty-five members from 10 countries across Europe and USA met virtually to define the key areas needing evaluation and formulating the research questions to inform a systematic literature review (SLR). The results were presented during a second virtual meeting where PtC were formulated and agreed.
RESULTS
Study design, biopsy procedures, tissue handling, tissue quality control and tissue outcomes (imaging, DNA/RNA analysis and disaggregation) were identified as important aspects for the quality of synovial tissue research. The SLR interrogated four databases, retrieved 7654 abstracts and included 26 manuscripts. Three OPs and nine PtC were formulated covering the following areas: description of biopsy procedure, overarching clinical design, patient characteristics, tissue handling and processing, quality control, histopathology, transcriptomic analyses and single-cell technologies.
CONCLUSIONS
These PtC provide guidance on how research involving synovial tissue should be reported to ensure a better evaluation of results by readers, reviewers and the broader scientific community. We anticipate that these PtC will enable the field to progress in a robust and transparent manner over the coming years.
Topics: Humans; Rheumatology; Synovial Membrane; Biopsy; Europe
PubMed: 35210263
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221875