-
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Jun 2022New-onset movement disorders have been frequently reported in association with the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs). The frequency of specific motor manifestations... (Review)
Review
New-onset movement disorders have been frequently reported in association with the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs). The frequency of specific motor manifestations and the spectrum of their semiology for various ASMs have not been well characterized. We carried out a systematic review of literature and conducted a search on CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus from inception to April 2021. We compiled the data for all currently available ASMs using the conventional terminology of movement disorders. Among 5123 manuscripts identified by the search, 437 met the inclusion criteria. The largest number of reports of abnormal movements were in association with phenobarbital, valproic acid, lacosamide, and perampanel, and predominantly included tremor and ataxia. The majority of attempted interventions for all agents were discontinuation of the offending drug or dose reduction which led to the resolution of symptoms in most patients. Familiarity with the movement disorder phenomenology previously encountered in relation with specific ASMs facilitates early recognition of adverse effects and timely institution of targeted interventions.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Humans; Lacosamide; Movement Disorders; Phenobarbital; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 35483204
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108693 -
Canadian Family Physician Medecin de... Apr 2006Increasing numbers of pregnant patients are treated with valproic acid, not just for epilepsy, but also for psychiatric conditions. Are there teratogenic risks other... (Review)
Review
QUESTION
Increasing numbers of pregnant patients are treated with valproic acid, not just for epilepsy, but also for psychiatric conditions. Are there teratogenic risks other than the risk of spina bifida?
ANSWER
It has now become evident that valproic acid might cause more than just neural tube defects (NTDs). In a systematic review of all cohort studies intended to answer this question, higher rates of major malformations (and not just NTDs) were found in most studies. The calculated relative risk was 2.59 when compared with other antiepileptic drugs and was 3.77 when compared with risk in the general population. There is compelling evidence that the risk is dose dependent. The risks appear to begin increasing at doses of 600 mg/d and to become more prominent at doses above 1000 mg/d.
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Anticonvulsants; Antimanic Agents; Developmental Disabilities; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 16639967
DOI: No ID Found -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology May 2018Population pharmacokinetics is an essential tool that helps guide individualized dosing regimens. The aims of this systematic review are to provide knowledge concerning...
AIMS
Population pharmacokinetics is an essential tool that helps guide individualized dosing regimens. The aims of this systematic review are to provide knowledge concerning population pharmacokinetics of valproic acid (VPA) and to identify factors influencing VPA pharmacokinetic variability.
METHODS
PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception to June, 2017. Relevant articles from reference lists were also included. All population pharmacokinetic studies of VPA conducted in humans and that employed a nonlinear mixed effect modelling approach were included in this review.
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies were included in this review. Most studies characterized VPA pharmacokinetics as a one-compartment model. Three studies reported a two-compartment model. Body weight, dose and age were significant predictors for VPA volume of distribution (V ). The estimated V for one-compartment models ranged from 8.4 to 23.3 l. For two-compartment models, peripheral volumes of distribution ranged from 4.08 to 42.1 l. Frequently reported significant predictors for VPA clearance (CL ) included body weight, VPA dose, concomitant medications, gender and age. The estimated CL ranged from 0.206 to 1.154 l h and the inter-individual variability ranged from 13.40 to 35.90%. Two studies reported population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of VPA in patients with epilepsy. Seventeen studies evaluated the performance of their final models.
CONCLUSIONS
Significant predictors influencing VPA pharmacokinetics as well as model methodologies are highlighted in this review. For clinical application, CL could be predicted using body weight, VPA dose, concomitant medications, gender or age. For future research, there is a knowledge gap regarding population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of VPA in a population other than epileptic patients.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Humans; Models, Biological; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 29328514
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13510 -
Seizure Mar 2016Warnings of L-carnitine induced seizures are recorded on product monographs and pharmacy databases, without any referenced literature. This medication can potentially... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Warnings of L-carnitine induced seizures are recorded on product monographs and pharmacy databases, without any referenced literature. This medication can potentially improve the hospital course in those patients with valproic acid (VPA) induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy, but may be withheld because of this warning. The goal was to perform an extensive systematic review of the literature to document the incidence of levocarnitine (L-carnitine) induced seizures in those patients on VPA therapy.
METHODS
Articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, clinicaltrials.gov (inception to June 2015), and reference lists of relevant articles were searched. The strength of evidence was to be adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology by two independent reviewers.
RESULTS
We failed to identify a single study implicating L-carnitine supplementation leading to seizures in any patient on VPA therapy. This contradicts all quoted, but unsubstantiated, concerns on product monographs and pharmacy databases related to seizure induction/propagation with L-carnitine supplementation.
CONCLUSION
There is no literature available to support claims of L-carnitine induced seizures during supplementation in patients on VPA therapy for seizures. This contradicts quoted, but not referenced, concerns on the product monograph. In patients suffering from hypocarnitinemia or hyperammonemic encephalopathy while on VPA, L-carnitine supplementation can be considered knowing there is no data to support seizure propagation or induction with administration of this supplement.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carnitine; Databases, Factual; Humans; Seizures; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 26889779
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.01.020 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2017Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in people with JME. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 12, 2015.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of JME.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update, on 21 February 2017 we searched Cochrane Epilepsy's Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate monotherapy versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders or experiencing adverse events (AEs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies with 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate versus valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS or seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEDs associated with topiramate as moderate-to-severe, while we ranked 59% of AEDs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Since the last version of this review we found no new studies. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but there were no more benefits of efficacy in topiramate compared with valproate. In the future, well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Fructose; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult
PubMed: 28434203
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010008.pub3 -
Seizure Oct 2021We systematically reviewed the existing literature on the cosmetic adverse effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in order to depict a clear picture of these unwanted... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
We systematically reviewed the existing literature on the cosmetic adverse effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in order to depict a clear picture of these unwanted side effects of ASMs with a particular attention to hair loss, hirsutism, acne, and gingival hyperplasia.
METHODS
This systematic review was prepared according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Scopus, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar from the inception to 25 March, 2021 were systematically searched. These key words (title/abstract) were used: "hair loss" OR "hirsutism" OR "acne" OR "gingival hyperplasia" AND "seizure" OR "epilepsy" OR "anriseizure" OR "antiepileptic". The exclusion criteria included: non-original studies, articles not in English, and animal studies.
RESULTS
The primary search yielded 3938 studies; 127 studies were related to the topic and were included in the current systematic review. The most robust evidence on cosmetic adverse effects of ASMs were related to phenytoin (causing gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism, and acne) and valproate (causing hair loss and hirsutism); however, many other ASMs were also implicated in causing these cosmetic adverse effects.
CONCLUSION
Antiseizure medications may be associated with various cosmetic adverse effects. Phenytoin and valproate are the most notorious ASMs in this regard; but, other ASMs have also been implicated in causing hair loss, hirsutism, acne, and gingival hyperplasia. Physicians should pay more attention to these significant adverse effects that may affect a patient's facial attractiveness, quality of life, and emotional state.
Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Phenytoin; Quality of Life; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 34052629
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.05.010 -
Annals of Translational Medicine May 2021Valproic acid (VPA) is a common antiepileptic drug used to treat both generalized and partial epilepsy. Although there is increasing evidence to suggest that gene...
BACKGROUND
Valproic acid (VPA) is a common antiepileptic drug used to treat both generalized and partial epilepsy. Although there is increasing evidence to suggest that gene polymorphisms are associated with interindividual variability of VPA metabolism, the results are debatable. Therefore, in the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the correlation between gene polymorphisms and adjusted plasma VPA concentration.
METHODS
The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to obtain relevant studies. Eligible articles were reviewed, and data extraction was performed. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and mean differences (MDs) to assess the strength of the relationship of gene polymorphisms with adjusted plasma VPA concentration.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 6 studies involving 847 patients with epilepsy. The pooled analysis showed that the A1075C (AA AC) polymorphism was related to the adjusted plasma concentration of VPA (P=0.02, I= 82%). Additionally, the AC phenotype statistically significantly increased the adjusted plasma VPA concentration in children compared with the mixed age subgroup (P=0.04, I= 48%). A similar association was observed between the AC phenotype for Asians (P<0.00001, I=0%) but not for Caucasians (P=0.34, I=87%).
DISCUSSION
Age might be a crucial covariate influencing the dosage-adjusted VPA concentration in patients with epilepsy. A reduced VPA dosage may be recommendable for children, particularly Asian children, who are A1075C AC carriers. Further studies could provide high-quality evidence to confirm the correlation between VPA pharmacokinetics and A1075C polymorphisms.
PubMed: 34164480
DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-1459 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2018Valproic acid (VPA) has been approved for the treatment of seizure disorders. It is also commonly used in psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia spectrum...
Valproic acid (VPA) has been approved for the treatment of seizure disorders. It is also commonly used in psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia spectrum disorders. With increasing administration, reports of intoxications are more frequently reported. The most common findings of VPA intoxication are central nervous system depression, respiratory depression, hypotension, metabolic acidosis, and elevated lactate, among others. We describe a case report of VPA intoxication with hemodiafiltration (HDF) as extracorporeal treatment (ECTR) for removal of VPA. This treatment modality has only rarely been reported in the current literature. In addition, we performed an updated systematic literature review (SLR) of additional cases on the topic ranging from December 1st, 2014 to April 20th, 2018. We searched MEDLINE and Web of Science for relevant references. In the presented case, VPA intoxication occurred in a 46-year-old female patient after oral ingestion of 56 g of VPA. In addition to vasopressors and endotracheal intubation, we administered L-Carnitine (L-Car) and performed hemodiafiltration treatment. After intravenous therapy with L-Car and simultaneous HDF sessions, we observed full recovery without neurological sequelae. The SLR identified 8 additional articles reporting favorable outcomes with extracorporeal treatments in most cases. HDF and other extracorporeal procedures are safe and effective therapeutic options in patients with VPA intoxication. The choice of ECTR modality mainly depends on local experience and the setting. In the present case, ingestion of 56 g was successfully treated with HDF. These findings are in line with several other case reports describing positive outcomes. Extracorporeal treatment, including HDF, should be considered early in the management of VPA intoxication. Supporting evidence is emerging, but it is of limited quality.
PubMed: 30148132
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00224 -
The Canadian Journal of Hospital... 2022Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency with potential for substantial mortality and morbidity. Parenteral benzodiazepine is the established first-line... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency with potential for substantial mortality and morbidity. Parenteral benzodiazepine is the established first-line treatment but fails to control SE in about one-third of patients. Levetiracetam may be used for SE that is refractory to benzodiazepine therapy.
OBJECTIVE
To examine, by means of a systematic review, the role of IV levetiracetam for the treatment of SE in adults.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were searched, from inception to August 18, 2020.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION
Included in this review were prospective randomized controlled trials comparing levetiracetam with another antiepileptic drug, given with or after a benzodiazepine, in adult patients with SE. The primary outcome was cessation of SE. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Characteristics of the included studies were reported using descriptive statistics.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Five studies compared IV levetiracetam with valproic acid, phenytoin (or its prodrug fosphenytoin), or both. All 5 studies found no statistically significant differences in efficacy or safety end points. There were numerically more cases of hypotension and respiratory failure with phenytoin, and more cases of psychiatric adverse effects (e.g., post-ictal psychosis) with levetiracetam.
CONCLUSIONS
Available evidence suggests that levetiracetam is as effective as valproic acid or phenytoin for the cessation of SE in adults. Other factors should therefore dictate the choice of antiepileptic drug for patients with SE, such as adverse effect profile, logistics of administration, drug cost, inclusion on hospital formularies, and drug availability.
PubMed: 34987263
DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.v75i1.3254 -
Neuro-oncology Mar 2023This systematic review provides updated insights, from the published literature in the past 5 years, based on the 2017 European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO)...
BACKGROUND
This systematic review provides updated insights, from the published literature in the past 5 years, based on the 2017 European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with malignant brain tumors. It provides an overview of palliative care options, including during the end-of-life phase for patients with malignant brain tumors.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted from 2016 to 2021 focusing on four main topics: (1) symptom management, (2) caregiver needs, (3) early palliative care, and (4) care in the end-of-life phase. An international panel of palliative care experts in neuro-oncology synthesized the literature and reported the most relevant updates. A total of 140 articles were included.
RESULTS
New insights include that: Hippocampal avoidance and stereotactic radiosurgery results in a lower risk of neurocognitive decline in patients with brain metastases; levetiracetam is more efficacious in reducing seizures than valproic acid as first-line monotherapy antiseizure drug (ASD) in glioma patients; lacosamide and perampanel seem well-tolerated and efficacious add-on ASDs; and a comprehensive framework of palliative and supportive care for high-grade glioma patients and their caregivers was proposed. No pharmacological agents have been shown in randomized controlled trials to significantly improve fatigue or neurocognition.
CONCLUSIONS
Since the 2017 EANO palliative care guidelines, new insights have been reported regarding symptom management and end-of-life care, however, most recommendations remain unchanged. Early palliative care interventions are essential to define goals of care and minimize symptom burden in a timely fashion. Interventional studies that address pain, fatigue, and psychiatric symptoms as well as (the timing of) early palliative care are urgently needed.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Terminal Care; Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Death; Fatigue
PubMed: 36271873
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac216