-
PloS One 2013The necessity of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for vancomycin is controversial. The objective of the current review was to evaluate the available evidence for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
The necessity of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for vancomycin is controversial. The objective of the current review was to evaluate the available evidence for the necessity of TDM in patients given vancomycin to treat Gram-positive infections.
METHODS
Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences, the Cochrane Library and two Chinese literature databases (CNKI, CBM) were searched. Randomized controlled studies and observational studies that compared the clinical outcomes of TDM groups vs. non-TDM groups were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. The primary outcome was clinical efficacy of therapy. Secondary outcomes included vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity, duration of vancomycin therapy, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed effect method (FEM). Odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated for categorical and continuous outcomes, respectively.
RESULTS
One randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with non-TDM groups, TDM groups had significantly higher rates of clinical efficacy (OR = 2.62, 95%CI 1.34-5.11 P = 0.005) and decreased rates of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.25, 95%CI 0.13-0.48 P<0.0001). Subgroup analyses showed that TDM group had significantly higher rates of clinical efficacy in both cohort studies subgroup (OR = 3.04, 95%CI 1.34-6.90) and in Asian population subgroup (OR = 3.04, 95%CI 1.34-6.90). TDM group had significantly decreased rates of nephrotoxicity in all subgroup. There was no significant difference in duration of vancomycin therapy (WMD = -0.40, 95%CI -2.83-2.02 P = 0.74) or length of stay (WMD = -1.01, 95%CI -7.51-5.49 P = 0.76) between TDM and non-TDM groups. Subgroup analyses showed there were no differences in duration of vancomycin therapy. Only one study reported mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS
Studies to date show that TDM significantly increases the rate of clinical efficacy and decreases the rate of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with vancomycin.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Databases, Bibliographic; Drug Monitoring; Female; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Nephrotic Syndrome; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin
PubMed: 24204764
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077169 -
Journal of Global Antimicrobial... Dec 2020Vancomycin combined with β-lactams (Combo therapy) has been encouraged in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of vancomycin combined with β-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections.
OBJECTIVE
Vancomycin combined with β-lactams (Combo therapy) has been encouraged in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in recent years, but its efficacy and safety have not been systematically evaluated. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy and safety of Combo therapy in patients with MRSA BSIs.
METHODS
Relevant articles reporting on the clinical or microbiology outcomes of Combo treatment in adult patients with MRSA bacteraemia throughout November 2019 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Summary odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated using a fixed- or random-effects model.
RESULTS
Six articles (806 patients) consisting of one RCT and five retrospective cohort studies were included in this study. The pooled data showed that Combo therapy could significantly reduce the risk of microbiological failure (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83, I 40%, P = 0.005) and persistent bacteraemia (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.77, I 13%, P = 0.002), as well as shorten the duration of bacteraemia (MD = -1.06, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.60, I 0%, P < 0.00001). In addition, it did not significantly increase the incidence of nephrotoxicity (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.64-2.13, I 0%, P = 0.61). However, no significant difference was detected between the groups regarding 28/30-day mortality, MRSA-related mortality, bacteraemia relapse or length of hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrate that Combo therapy clears the pathogenic bacteria of MRSA bacteraemia but does not improve the clinical prognosis. As the sample size was small and most of the studies were retrospective cohort studies with substantial heterogeneity, there is a need for further studies encompassing large-scale multicentre RCTs to validate our results.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Retrospective Studies; Staphylococcal Infections; Vancomycin; beta-Lactams
PubMed: 33045437
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.09.024 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2014Limited therapeutic options exist for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia; the most commonly used are daptomycin and linezolid. We... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Limited therapeutic options exist for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia; the most commonly used are daptomycin and linezolid. We attempted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of those two agents. Studies comparing daptomycin to linezolid treatment for VRE bacteremia, published until August 2012, were identified from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. All comparative studies on patients older than 18 years of age that provided mortality data were considered eligible for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Τhe primary outcome of the meta-analysis was 30-day all-cause mortality. Ten retrospective studies including 967 patients were identified. Patients treated with daptomycin had significantly higher 30-day all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 2.40) and infection-related mortality (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.42 to 9.20) rates than patients treated with linezolid. When data from all 10 studies were combined, overall mortality was also significantly increased among patients treated with daptomycin (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.89). These findings were confirmed when odds ratios adjusted for potential confounders were pooled. Relapse rates among patients treated with daptomycin were also higher (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.94 to 6.72), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Adverse event rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Notwithstanding the absence of randomized prospective data, available evidence suggests that mortality rates may be higher with daptomycin than with linezolid among patients treated for VRE bacteremia.
Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Daptomycin; Drug Combinations; Enterococcus; Humans; Linezolid; Middle Aged; Oxazolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin; Vancomycin Resistance
PubMed: 24247127
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01289-13 -
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology... Jun 2016Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic whose use may be limited by adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Although vancomycin toxic effects are known, there are limited data...
BACKGROUND
Vancomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic whose use may be limited by adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Although vancomycin toxic effects are known, there are limited data on vancomycin hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs).
OBJECTIVE
To understand the most commonly reported vancomycin HSRs through systematic case review.
METHODS
We performed a literature search for English-language case reports and series from 1982 through 2015 (last search July 31, 2015) on Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed. The search included the subject heading vancomycin with the subheading adverse effects and separate text searches for vancomycin with a list of specified HSRs. References of identified articles were reviewed to find additional articles. Clinical data were collected and summarized.
RESULTS
Of 201 identified articles, 84 were screened and 57 fully assessed; these 57 articles contained 71 vancomycin HSR cases that were included in analysis. Vancomycin HSRs were immediate (anaphylaxis, n = 7) and nonimmediate (n = 64). Nonimmediate HSRs included linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD, n = 34), drug rash eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome (n = 16), acute interstitial nephritis (AIN, n = 8), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN, n = 6). Median times of vancomycin therapy before HSR onset was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4-10 days) for LABD, 9 days (IQR, 9-22 days) for SJS/TEN, 21 days (IQR, 17-28 days) for DRESS syndrome, and 26 days (IQR, 7-29 days) for AIN. Overall, 11 patients (16%) died, and 4 (6%) had deaths attributed to the HSR.
CONCLUSION
Vancomycin causes a variety of HSRs; the most commonly identified were nonimmediate HSRs, with LABD being most frequent. We observed a high frequency of HSR mortality. Further data are needed to understand the frequency and severity of vancomycin HSRs.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anaphylaxis; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Male; Middle Aged; Nephritis, Interstitial; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Vancomycin; Young Adult
PubMed: 27156746
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.03.030 -
Infection and Drug Resistance 2018Vancomycin prescribing requires individualized dosing and monitoring to ensure efficacy, limit toxicity, and minimize resistance. Although there are nationally endorsed... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Vancomycin prescribing requires individualized dosing and monitoring to ensure efficacy, limit toxicity, and minimize resistance. Although there are nationally endorsed guidelines from several countries addressing the complexities of vancomycin dosing and monitoring, there is limited consideration of how to implement these recommendations effectively.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of multiple databases to identify relevant comparative studies describing the impact of interventions of educational meetings, implementation of guidelines, and dissemination of educational material on vancomycin dosing, monitoring, and nephrotoxicity. Effect size was assessed using ORs and pooled data analyzed using forest plots to provide overall effect measures.
RESULTS
Six studies were included. All studies included educational meetings. Two studies used implementation of guidance, educational meetings, and dissemination of educational materials, one used guidance and educational meetings, one educational meetings and dissemination of educational materials, and two used educational meetings solely. Effect sizes for individual studies were more likely to be significant for multifaceted interventions. In meta-analysis, the overall effect of interventions on outcome measures of vancomycin dosing was OR 2.50 (95% CI 1.29-4.84); < 0.01. A higher proportion of sampling at steady-state concentration was seen following intervention (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.26-3.02; <0.01). Interventions had no effect on appropriate timing of trough sample (OR 2.02, 95% CI 0.72-5.72; =0.18), attaining target concentration in patients (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.49-4.63; =0.48, or nephrotoxicity (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42-1.34; =0.33).
CONCLUSION
Multifaceted interventions are effective overall in improving the complex task of dosing vancomycin, as well as some vancomycin-monitoring outcome measures. However, the resulting impact of these interventions on efficacy and toxicity requires further investigation. These findings may be helpful to those charged with designing implementation strategies for vancomycin guidelines or complex prescribing processes in hospitals.
PubMed: 30464551
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S176519 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Feb 2023The aim was to quantify the relationship between pharmacist intervention and vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
The aim was to quantify the relationship between pharmacist intervention and vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury (AKI).
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched up to August 2020 for meta-analyses of cohort studies and/or randomized controlled trials. Studies that compared the incidence of AKI in patients between post- and prepharmacist intervention were investigated. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI. We also evaluated the influence of pharmacist intervention in risk factors of vancomycin-associated AKI.
RESULTS
The search strategy retrieved 1744 studies and 34 studies with 19 298 participants were included (22 published articles and 12 abstracts from conference proceedings). Compared with the preintervention group, the postintervention group patients had a significantly lower incidence of vancomycin-associated AKI: 7.3% for post- and 9.6% for preintervention (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.41, 0.67], P < .00001). The rate of attaining target concentration was significantly higher in the post- than preintervention group (OR 2.86, 95% CI [2.23, 3.67], P < .00001). The postintervention group significantly improved the percentage of serum creatinine laboratory tests than preintervention group (OR = 3.24, 95% CI 2.02, 5.19], P < .00001). Patients postintervention had markedly lower risk of mortality than preintervention patients (OR 0.47, 95% CI [0.31, 0.72], P = .0004).
CONCLUSION
Pharmacist intervention in vancomycin treatment significantly decreased the rate of vancomycin-associated AKI, while improving efficacy and reducing mortality. We speculate that this is because the pharmacist interventions optimized the rationality of vancomycin therapy, monitoring of vancomycin trough concentration and the monitoring of patients' renal function.
Topics: Humans; Vancomycin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Pharmacists; Retrospective Studies; Acute Kidney Injury; Creatinine
PubMed: 35285970
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15301 -
Journal of Global Antimicrobial... Dec 2020Epidemiological surveillance is one critical approach to estimate and fight the burden of antibiotic resistance (AR). Here we summarise the characteristics of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Epidemiological surveillance is one critical approach to estimate and fight the burden of antibiotic resistance (AR). Here we summarise the characteristics of surveillance systems devoted to the surveillance of AR worldwide and published in the literature.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature available on PubMed from January 2007 to July 2019 (12.5 years). The keywords ('surveillance system' OR 'laboratory-based surveillance' OR 'syndromic surveillance' OR 'sentinel surveillance' OR 'integrated surveillance' OR 'population-based surveillance') AND ('antibiotic resistance' OR 'antimicrobial resistance') were used. This research was completed with AR monitoring systems available on websites.
RESULTS
We identified 71 AR surveillance systems described by 90 publications from 35 countries, including 64 (90.1%) national and 7 (9.9%) multinational surveillance systems. Two regions accounted for ∼72% of systems: European region (37; 52.1%) and Region of the Americas (14; 19.7%). Fifty-three focused on AR surveillance in humans, 12 studied both humans and animals, and 6 focused only on animals. The two most common bacterial species reported were Staphylococcus aureus (42; 59.2%) and Escherichia coli (39; 54.9%). Of the 71 AR surveillance systems, 20 (28.2%) used prevalence as an indicator, 3 (4.2%) used incidence and 7 (9.9%) used both. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., S. aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and carbapenem-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were monitored.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results showed heterogeneous surveillance systems. A 'One Health' approach is needed to monitor AR, with reference to the WHO Global Action Plan.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Escherichia coli; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Staphylococcus aureus
PubMed: 33176216
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.10.009 -
Adolescent Health, Medicine and... 2018is responsible for 10% of hospital-acquired infections. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant (VRE) isolates in Iran using... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
is responsible for 10% of hospital-acquired infections. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant (VRE) isolates in Iran using a meta-analysis method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Iranian databases, including Magiran and IranDoc, and international databases, including PubMed and MedLib, were examined carefully, and a total of 20 articles published between 2000 and 2011 were extracted. The data were subjected to meta-analysis and random-effects models. In addition, heterogeneous studies were assessed using the index. Finally, the data were analyzed using R and STATA software.
RESULTS
The results showed that the strain of had been more common than in clinical infection (69% vs 28%). However, resistance to vancomycin was higher among strains of compared with strains of (33% vs 3%). The complete resistance, intermediate resistance, and sensitivity to vancomycin among isolates were 14% (95% CI: 11, 18), 14% (95% CI: 5, 23), and 74% (95% CI: 65, 83), respectively. The resistance patterns, depending on the sample type, did not show a significant difference. In addition, the resistance of isolated strains to vancomycin in outpatients was significantly higher than that in inpatients (16% vs 1%). Moreover, 80%-86% of resistant strains were genotype van A and 14%-20% of resistant strains were genotype van B.
CONCLUSION
The findings of the present review show that there is a high frequency of resistant in Iran. Therefore, consideration of the prevalence and frequency of subjected resistant strains can be helpful for decision makers to implement proper health policies in this direction.
PubMed: 30532606
DOI: 10.2147/AHMT.S180489 -
PloS One 2024In the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs), vancomycin stands as the prevalent therapeutic agent. Daptomycin... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
In the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs), vancomycin stands as the prevalent therapeutic agent. Daptomycin remains an alternative antibiotic to treat MRSA BSIs in cases where vancomycin proves ineffective. However, studies have conflicted on whether daptomycin is more effective than vancomycin among patients with MRSA BSI.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin for the prevention of mortality among adult patients with MRSA BSI.
METHODS
Systematic searches of databases were performed, including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) were used to assess the quality of individual observational and randomized control studies, respectively. Pooled odd ratios were calculated using random effects models.
RESULTS
Twenty studies were included based on a priori set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Daptomycin treatment was associated with non-significant lower mortality odds, compared to vancomycin treatment (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62, 1.06). Sub-analyses based on the time patients were switched from another anti-MRSA treatment to daptomycin demonstrated that switching to daptomycin within 3 or 5 days was significantly associated with 55% and 45% decreased odds of all-cause mortality, respectively. However, switching to daptomycin any time after five days of treatment was not significantly associated with lower odds of mortality. Stratified analysis based on vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) revealed that daptomycin treatment among patients infected with MRSA strains with MIC≥1 mg/L was significantly associated with 40% lower odds of mortality compared to vancomycin treatment.
CONCLUSION
Compared with vancomycin, an early switch from vancomycin to daptomycin was significantly associated with lower odds of mortality. In contrast, switching to daptomycin at any time only showed a trend towards reduced mortality, with a non-significant association. Therefore, the efficacy of early daptomycin use over vancomycin against mortality among MRSA BSIs patients may add evidence to the existing literature in support of switching to daptomycin early over remaining on vancomycin. More randomized and prospective studies are needed to assess this association.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Vancomycin; Daptomycin; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Staphylococcal Infections; Bacteremia; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Sepsis; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 38381737
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293423 -
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2022To systematically evaluate the relationships between vancomycin trough serum concentrations and clinical outcomes in children using meta-analysis. Several databases,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To systematically evaluate the relationships between vancomycin trough serum concentrations and clinical outcomes in children using meta-analysis. Several databases, including PubMed, Elsevier, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline, clinicaltrials.gov, the Cochrane Library, and three Chinese databases (Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and SINOMED), were comprehensively searched to obtain research articles on vancomycin use in children from inception through December 2021. All studies were screened and evaluated using the Cochrane systematic review method. Then, the feature information was extracted for meta-analysis. The evaluated results included clinical efficacy, vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, ototoxicity, mortality, and microbial clearance. A total of 35 studies involving 4820 children were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis showed that compared with children with vancomycin trough concentrations <10 μg/mL, those with vancomycin trough concentrations ≥10 μg/mL had a higher clinical efficacy rate [OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.84, = 0.004] and higher incidences of nephrotoxicity [OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.51 to 5.07, = 0.001], ototoxicity [OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.23, = 0.02] and microbial clearance [OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.53 to 3.64, = 0.0001]. All-cause mortality [OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.45 to 2.53, = 0.88] and hepatotoxicity [OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.53, = 0.57] were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that compared with children with vancomycin trough concentrations of 10 to 15 μg/mL, those with vancomycin trough concentrations >15 μg/mL had a higher incidence of nephrotoxicity [OR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.28 to 5.43, = 0.008], but there was no significant difference in clinical efficacy [OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.30 to 2.44, = 0.76]. A vancomycin trough concentration of 10 to 15 μg/mL can improve clinical efficacy in children. Additionally, avoidance of trough concentrations >15 μg/mL can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Child; Humans; Ototoxicity; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Vancomycin
PubMed: 35862741
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00138-22