-
Frontiers in Surgery 2020To investigate the effect of primary varicocele and related surgery in male infertility through meta-analysis. A systematic search of the literature was conducted...
To investigate the effect of primary varicocele and related surgery in male infertility through meta-analysis. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CNKI databases. The search was up to September 2019. Article selection proceeded according to the search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.2. A random-effects model was used to calculate the overall combined risk estimates. After screening 687 articles, 4 randomized controlled trials with 349 patients were included. One hundred seventy two patients were addressed in embolization/ligation, with 177 patient's observation treatment. The number of spontaneous pregnancies in the two groups was 41 and 40, respectively. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate between the operation group and the control group. RR = 1.05 [0.72, 1.54]. There is not enough evidence to explain the surgical treatment of varicocele can improve the natural fertility of the infertile couples, and there is still a need for most of prospective randomized controlled trials to verify the efficacy of varicocele surgery for treating of male infertility. We do not deny the importance of this operation, we just want to call on everyone to strictly grasp the indications of the operation, avoid ineffective medical expenses, and avoid unnecessary pain to patients.
PubMed: 33330606
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.586153 -
Arab Journal of Urology 2021To investigate the usage and the efficacy of vitamins as primary or adjuvant treatment in infertile men with varicocele.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the usage and the efficacy of vitamins as primary or adjuvant treatment in infertile men with varicocele.
METHODS
A systematic search in PubMed, the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library with the terms (varicocele) AND (vitamins) was performed. We searched for studies: a) reporting the administration of vitamins (individually or as part of a complex) in men with varicocele and infertility, b) primarily or adjuvant to invasive treatment, and c) reporting the impact on semen parameters and/or pregnancy rates. Exclusion criteria were animal, adolescent and non-English studies, grey literature and trials reporting abstracts only.
RESULTS
Seven studies were identified eligible for qualitative analysis. All studies were randomised except one (case series). Vitamins were administered dominantly as part of antioxidant complex and only two studies used vitamins (C and E, respectively) as sole agent. In two studies, vitamin monotherapy resulted in improvement in semen quality, but the effect on pregnancy rates is unknown. One study reported no efficacy of adjuvant multivitamin treatment after embolisation in terms of both semen quality and pregnancy rates. Finally, four studies reported a positive effect of vitamins on semen parameters after varicocelectomy, but the effect on pregnancy rates is conflicting; one study reported improved pregnancy rates with adjuvant treatment, two studies did not evaluate the pregnancy rates, and in one study the outcome was unclear due to missing data.
CONCLUSIONS
Vitamins have been used mostly as part of an antioxidant panel for the management of infertile men with varicocele. Most studies have found a positive impact on semen parameters in selected men with varicocele and infertility, as primary or adjuvant treatment. However, the clinical benefit of vitamins administration on pregnancy rate is under-evaluated and should be the target of future research.
PubMed: 34552778
DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1932124 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2021Varicoceles are associated with male subfertility; however, the mechanisms by which varicoceles affect fertility have yet to be satisfactorily explained. Several... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Varicoceles are associated with male subfertility; however, the mechanisms by which varicoceles affect fertility have yet to be satisfactorily explained. Several treatment options exist, including surgical or radiological treatment, however the safest and most efficient treatment remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of surgical and radiological treatment of varicoceles on live birth rate, adverse events, pregnancy rate, varicocele recurrence, and quality of life amongst couples where the adult male has a varicocele, and the female partner of childbearing age has no fertility problems.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases on 4 April 2020: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We also searched the trial registries and reference lists of articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) if they were relevant to the clinical question posed and compared different forms of surgical ligation, different forms of radiological treatments, surgical treatment compared to radiological treatment, or one of these aforementioned treatment forms compared to non-surgical methods, delayed treatment, or no treatment. We extracted data if the studies reported on live birth, adverse events, pregnancy, varicocele recurrence, and quality of life.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Screening of abstracts and full-text publications, alongside data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment, were done dually using the Covidence software. When we had sufficient data, we calculated random-effects (Mantel-Haenszel) meta-analyses; otherwise, we reported results narratively. We used the I statistic to analyse statistical heterogeneity. We planned to use funnel plots to assess publication bias in meta-analyses with at least 10 included studies. We dually rated the risk of bias of studies using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 1897 citations after de-duplicating the search results. We excluded 1773 during title and abstract screening. From the 113 new full texts assessed in addition to the 10 studies (11 references) included in the previous version of this review, we included 38 new studies, resulting in a total of 48 studies (59 references) in the review providing data for 5384 participants. Two studies (three references) are ongoing studies and two studies are awaiting classification. Treatment versus non-surgical, non-radiological, delayed, or no treatment Two studies comparing surgical or radiological treatment versus no treatment reported on live birth with differing directions of effect. As a result, we are uncertain whether surgical or radiological treatment improves live birth rates when compared to no treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 26.93; 2 RCTs, N = 204; I = 74%, very low-certainty evidence). Treatment may improve pregnancy rates compared to delayed or no treatment (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.26; 13 RCTs, N = 1193; I = 65%, low-certainty evidence). This suggests that couples with no or delayed treatment have a 21% chance of pregnancy, whilst the pregnancy rate after surgical or radiological treatment is between 22% and 48%. We identified no evidence on adverse events, varicocele recurrence, or quality of life for this comparison. Surgical versus radiological treatment We are uncertain about the effect of surgical versus radiological treatment on live birth and on the following adverse events: hydrocele formation, pain, epididymitis, haematoma, and suture granuloma. We are uncertain about the effect of surgical versus radiological treatment on pregnancy rate (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.70; 5 RCTs, N = 456, low-certainty evidence) and varicocele recurrence (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.08; 3 RCTs, N = 380, low-certainty evidence). We identified no evidence on quality of life for this comparison. Surgery versus other surgical treatment We identified 19 studies comparing microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment to any other surgical treatment. Microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment probably improves pregnancy rates slightly compared to other surgical treatments (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36; 12 RCTs, N = 1473, moderate-certainty evidence). This suggests that couples with microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment have a 10% to 14% chance of pregnancy after treatment, whilst the pregnancy rate in couples after other surgical treatments is 10%. This procedure also probably reduces the risk of varicocele recurrence (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29, 0.79; 14 RCTs, N = 1565, moderate-certainty evidence). This suggests that 0.4% to 1.1% of men undergoing microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment experience recurrent varicocele, whilst 1.4% of men undergoing other surgical treatments do. Results for the following adverse events were inconclusive: hydrocele formation, haematoma, abdominal distension, testicular atrophy, wound infection, scrotal pain, and oedema. We identified no evidence on live birth or quality of life for this comparison. Nine studies compared open inguinal surgical treatment to retroperitoneal surgical treatment. Due to small sample sizes and methodological limitations, we identified neither treatment type as superior or inferior to the other regarding adverse events, pregnancy rates, or varicocele recurrence. We identified no evidence on live birth or quality of life for this comparison. Radiological versus other radiological treatment One study compared two types of radiological treatment (sclerotherapy versus embolisation) and reported 13% varicocele recurrence in both groups. Due to the broad confidence interval, no valid conclusion could be drawn (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.16 to 6.20; 1 RCT, N = 30, very low-certainty evidence). We identified no evidence on live birth, adverse events, pregnancy, or quality of life for this comparison.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based on the limited evidence, it remains uncertain whether any treatment (surgical or radiological) compared to no treatment in subfertile men may be of benefit on live birth rates; however, treatment may improve the chances for pregnancy. The evidence was also insufficient to determine whether surgical treatment was superior to radiological treatment. However, microscopic subinguinal surgical treatment probably improves pregnancy rates and reduces the risk of varicocele recurrence compared to other surgical treatments. High-quality, head-to-head comparative RCTs focusing on live birth rate and also assessing adverse events and quality of life are warranted.
Topics: Bias; Confidence Intervals; Embolization, Therapeutic; Female; Humans; Infertility, Male; Live Birth; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Postoperative Complications; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Sclerotherapy; Sperm Count; Testicular Hydrocele; Varicocele
PubMed: 33890288
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000479.pub6 -
Asian Journal of Andrology 2023In this review, we tried to systematize all the evidence (from PubMed [MEDLINE], Scopus, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Embase, and Google Scholar) from 1993 to 2021 on the... (Review)
Review
In this review, we tried to systematize all the evidence (from PubMed [MEDLINE], Scopus, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Embase, and Google Scholar) from 1993 to 2021 on the predictors of microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy in male infertility treatment. Regarding the outcomes of varicocele repair, we considered semen improvement and pregnancy and analyzed them separately. Based on the 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence, we assigned a score to each trial that studied the role of the predictor. We systematized the studied predictors based on the total points, which were, in turn, calculated based on the number and quality of studies that confirmed or rejected the studied predictor as significant, into three levels of significance: predictors of high, moderate, and low clinical significance. Preoperative total motile sperm count (TMSC) coupled with sperm concentration can be a significant predictor of semen improvement and pregnancy after varicocelectomy. In addition, for semen improvement alone, scrotal Doppler ultrasound (DUS) parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI), and bilateral varicocelectomy are reliable predictors of microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Pregnancy; Infertility, Male; Microsurgery; Semen; Sperm Count; Sperm Motility; Varicocele
PubMed: 35381691
DOI: 10.4103/aja2021125 -
The World Journal of Men's Health Apr 2021It is widely accepted that oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathophysiology of male infertility and that antioxidants could have a significant role in the... (Review)
Review
It is widely accepted that oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathophysiology of male infertility and that antioxidants could have a significant role in the treatment of male infertility. The main objectives of this study are: 1) to systematically review the current evidence for the utility of antioxidants in the treatment of male infertility; and 2) propose evidence-based clinical guidelines for the use of antioxidants in the treatment of male infertility. A systematic review of the available clinical evidence was performed, with articles published on Scopus being manually screened. Data extracted included the type of antioxidant used, the clinical conditions under investigation, the evaluation of semen parameters and reproductive outcomes. The adherence to the Cambridge Quality Checklist, Cochrane Risk of Bias for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), CONSORT guidelines and JADAD score were analyzed for each included study. Further, we provided a Strength Weakness Opportunity Threat (SWOT) analysis to analyze the current and future value of antioxidants in male infertility. Of the 1,978 articles identified, 97 articles were included in the study. Of these, 52 (53.6%) were uncontrolled (open label), 12 (12.4%) unblinded RCTs, and 33 (34.0%) blinded RCTs, whereas 44 (45.4%) articles tested individual antioxidants, 31 (32.0%) a combination of several products in variable dosages, and 22 (22.6%) registered antioxidant products. Based on the published evidence, we 1) critically examined the necessity of additional double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, and 2) proposed updated evidence-based clinical guidelines for antioxidant therapy in male infertility. The current systematic review on antioxidants and male infertility clearly shows that antioxidant supplementation improves semen parameters. In addition, it provides the indications for antioxidant treatment in specific clinical conditions, including varicocele, unexplained and idiopathic male infertility, as well as in cases of altered semen quality.
PubMed: 33474843
DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.200196 -
Journal of Ultrasound Dec 2020Although often asymptomatic and detected incidentally, varicocele is a relatively common problem in patients who seek medical attention for infertility problems....
Although often asymptomatic and detected incidentally, varicocele is a relatively common problem in patients who seek medical attention for infertility problems. Ultrasound (US) is the imaging modality of choice for evaluation, but there is no consensus on the diagnostic criteria, classification, and examination technique. In view of this uncertainty, the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR-SPIWG) undertook a systematic review of the available literature on this topic, to use as the basis for evidence-based guidelines and recommendations. This paper provides the results of the systematic review on which guidelines were constructed.
Topics: Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Penis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Scrotum; Spermatogenesis; Ultrasonography; Varicocele
PubMed: 32720266
DOI: 10.1007/s40477-020-00509-z -
Archivio Italiano Di Urologia,... Oct 2020Varicocele has been found to impair the function of the epididymis resulting in subfertility whereas the varicocelectomy can resolve the phenomenon. L-carnitine is...
BACKGROUND
Varicocele has been found to impair the function of the epididymis resulting in subfertility whereas the varicocelectomy can resolve the phenomenon. L-carnitine is regarded as a biomarker for the function of the epididymis and has been found in reduced concentrations in infertile patients of various causes, including infertile men with varicocele. It seems that Lcarnitine and varicocele share clinical significance and the area of research looks promising.
OBJECTIVE
To identify the role of L-carnitine in the treatment of varicocele.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was performed in Pubmed/Medline with the terms (L-carnitine) and (varicocele) and (L-carnitine) and (varicocelectomy). Inclusion criteria were studies reported outcomes of L-carnitine administration alone or in duet, as primary or adjuvant treatment to varicocele. Exclusion criteria were non-English language and animal studies. Studies using L-carnitine as part of a panel of therapeutic agents were avoided.
RESULTS
Only four suitable studies were identified for discussion. In one randomized study, the combination of L-carnitine and cinnoxicam improved semen parameters in patients with non-high-grade varicocele compared to L-carnitine alone and had a favourable effect on pregnancy rates but the effect of grade is unknown. In another study, as an adjuvant treatment to varicocelectomy, L-carnitine showed no clear benefit. Finally, in comparison to surgery, the results are inconclusive; two studies showed some benefit might be expected in low-grade or subclinical varicocele, but surgery appears superior.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence regarding the role of L-carnitine as a primary or adjuvant treatment of varicocele is sparse. The pathophysiological significance of L-carnitine implicates a potential role of the molecule in the management of varicocele, but the evidence so far is controversial for any recommendations. L-carnitine might be taken into consideration in selected cases; however, further search is needed in order the optimal role of L-carnitine in infertile patients with varicocele to be clarified.
Topics: Carnitine; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male; Varicocele
PubMed: 33016059
DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2020.3.263 -
Archivio Italiano Di Urologia,... Sep 2022Varicocele is known to have impacts in infertility cases and sperm quality. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of microsurgical varicocelectomy on sperm DNA... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Microsurgical varicocelectomy effects on sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm parameters in infertile male patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of more recent evidence.
BACKGROUND
Varicocele is known to have impacts in infertility cases and sperm quality. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of microsurgical varicocelectomy on sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and sperm parameters.
METHODS
Open full English text articles from January 2017 to October 2021 were searched from online database including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar.
RESULTS
Systematic search resulted in 277 potential papers. After throughout paper analysis, 5 studies were included in this review. From all five analyzed studies, microsurgical varicocelectomy was statistically proven to reduce DNA fragmentation index by 5.46% (mean difference -5.46; 95% CI: -4.79, -6.13; p < 0.00001). Moreover, the procedure also significantly improved other sperm parameters (sperm concentration +8.23%, sperm motility +7.17%, sperm progressive motility +2.77%, sperm morphology +0.64%).
CONCLUSION
Microsurgical varicocelectomy significantly improves spermatogenesis as reflected by biomarkers of infertile men including semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF).
Topics: Biomarkers; DNA Fragmentation; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Microsurgery; Semen; Sperm Count; Sperm Motility; Spermatozoa; Varicocele
PubMed: 36165486
DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2022.3.360 -
The British Journal of Radiology Jul 2018The purpose of this study is to assess the current evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of the various embolic materials used in varicoceles embolization. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to assess the current evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of the various embolic materials used in varicoceles embolization.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Databases were searched for clinical studies that investigated the clinical outcomes of embolization treatment for the management of testicular varicoceles. Study methodological quality was analyzed.
RESULTS
23 retrospective and 7 prospective clinical studies were identified with a total of 3505 patients. Technical success rates appear to be above 90% for all embolic materials without any significant differences. In terms of recurrence rates, glue (N = 251) appeared to have the lowest and sclerosants alone (N = 728) the highest recurrence rates which were 4.2% (11-3.08%, SD: 5.9) and 11.03% (18.8-5.15%, SD: 6.06) within an average follow up (f/u) of 16.13 and 25.48 months respectively. Coils alone (N = 898) had an average recurrence rate of 9.1% (17.8-1.4%; SD: 5.79) and a mean f/u of 39.3 months. After an average of 12 months of f/u, the addition of sclerosants (N = 1628) as an adjunct to coils did not improve recurrence rates (8.44%, 16.5-5.1%; SD: 3.4). No differences were reported regarding the safety profile of the various embolic materials.
CONCLUSION
Despite the heterogeneity of the included studies, preliminary evidence supports the safe and effective use of the various embolic materials currently used for the management of varicoceles. At 1 year, glue appears to be the most effective in preventing recurrence with coils being the second most effective. The addition of sclerosants to the coil embolization did not appear to have an impact on recurrence rates. Further research is required to elucidate the cost-effectiveness of these approaches. Advances in knowledge: Varicocele embolization appears to be a safe and effective technique regardless of the embolic agent. Addition of a sclerosant agent to coil embolization does not appear to improve outcomes.
Topics: Biocompatible Materials; Embolization, Therapeutic; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Testicular Diseases; Treatment Outcome; Varicocele
PubMed: 29493263
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170445 -
Fertility and Sterility Mar 2019Infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia is treatable with the use of testicular sperm extraction and IVF. The optimal approach for sperm retrieval is...
Infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia is treatable with the use of testicular sperm extraction and IVF. The optimal approach for sperm retrieval is microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the literature pertaining to patient optimization before mTESE, mTESE technique, and post-mTESE testicular tissue processing. Preoperative patient optimization has been assessed in terms of adjuvant hormone therapy and varicocele repair. Limited data are available for adjuvant medical therapy, and although also limited, data for varicocele repair support increased sperm retrieval, pregnancy, and return of sperm to the ejaculate. Post-mTESE tissue processing has few comparative studies; however, most studies support the combination of mechanical mincing and use of type 4 collagenase for tissue disintegration along with pentoxifylline to assist in identifying motile and viable spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Topics: Azoospermia; Fertility; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Microdissection; Risk Factors; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Sperm Retrieval; Spermatogenesis; Testis; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male
PubMed: 30827516
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.003