-
PloS One 2016S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B), a well-studied marker for neurologic injury, has been suggested as a candidate for predicting outcome after subarachnoid... (Review)
Review
S100 calcium binding protein B (S100B), a well-studied marker for neurologic injury, has been suggested as a candidate for predicting outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. We performed a pooled analysis summarizing the associations between S100B protein in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with radiographic vasospasm, delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND), delayed cerebral infarction, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) outcome. A literature search using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the EMBASE databases was performed to identify relevant studies published up to May 2015. The weighted Stouffer's Z method was used to perform a pooled analysis of outcome measures with greater than three studies. A total of 13 studies were included in this review. Higher serum S100B level was found to be associated with cerebral infarction as diagnosed by CT (padj = 3.1 x 10(-4)) and worse GOS outcome (padj = 5.5 x 10(-11)). There was no association found between serum and CSF S100B with radiographic vasospasm or DIND. S100B is a potential prognostic marker for aSAH outcome.
Topics: Biomarkers; Humans; Prognosis; S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
PubMed: 27007976
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151853 -
Cerebrovascular Diseases (Basel,... 2022Delayed cerebral ischemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Cilostazol, a selective inhibitor of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Delayed cerebral ischemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Cilostazol, a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 3, was reported to reduce cerebral vasospasm and improve outcomes. We aimed to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of cilostazol in aSAH.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library for articles published in English with the latest publishing time in August 2020. Articles reporting favorable outcome as the primary outcome and reporting severe angiographic vasospasm (aVS), symptomatic vasospasm (sVS), new cerebral infarction, or mortality as the secondary outcome were included in this review. Furthermore, we examined whether clinical outcomes were associated with the dosage of cilostazol (300 mg/day vs. 100-200 mg/day).
RESULTS
Data from 405 patients in 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 461 patients in 4 observational studies (OSs) were included. In RCT studies, cilostazol was associated with significant favorable outcomes at discharge or 1 month (risk ratio [RR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.97, p = 0.04) or 3 or 6 months (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28, p = 0.002). However, in OSs, no significant difference was indicated in favorable outcomes at discharge or 1 month (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.94-1.60, p = 0.14) nor 3 or 6 months (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.92-1.81, p = 0.14). The analyses found that cilostazol significantly reduced the incidences of severe aVS (RCT: RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-1.01, p = 0.05; OS: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.88, p = 0.007), sVS (RCT: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.70, p = 0.0002; OS: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.68, p = 0.001), and new cerebral infarction (RCT: RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.67, p = 0.0005; OS: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.64, p = 0.0002). However, no significant difference in mortality (RCT: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.23-3.21, p = 0.82; OS: RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02-1.24, p = 0.08) was found. In 3 OSs which reported different doses of cilostazol (300 mg/day vs. 100-200 mg/day) for aSAH, the 300-mg/day cilostazol groups showed decreased delayed cerebral infarction (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.81, p = 0.02) but no significant difference in shunt-dependent hydrocephalus (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.33-2.60, p = 0.88) or functional outcomes (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.74-1.75, p = 0.56) compared with the 100-200 mg/day cilostazol groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The meta-analyses suggest the credible efficacy and safety of cilostazol in treating aSAH. Furthermore, 300-mg/day cilostazol treatment appeared to be more effective than 100-200 mg/day treatment.
Topics: Cerebral Infarction; Cilostazol; Humans; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Treatment Outcome; Vasospasm, Intracranial
PubMed: 35288494
DOI: 10.1159/000518731 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2007Secondary ischaemia is a frequent cause of poor outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Its pathogenesis has been incompletely elucidated, but vasospasm... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Secondary ischaemia is a frequent cause of poor outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Its pathogenesis has been incompletely elucidated, but vasospasm probably is a contributing factor. Experimental studies have suggested that calcium antagonists can prevent or reverse vasospasm and have neuroprotective properties.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether calcium antagonists improve outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched April 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006) and EMBASE (1980 to March 2006). We handsearched two Russian journals (1990 to 2003), and contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies in 1995 and 1996.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials comparing calcium antagonists with control, or a second calcium antagonist (magnesium sulphate) versus control in addition to another calcium antagonist (nimodipine) in both the intervention and control groups.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. Trialists were contacted to obtain missing information.
MAIN RESULTS
Sixteen trials, involving 3361 patients, were included in the review; three of the studies were of magnesium sulphate in addition to nimodipine. Overall, calcium antagonists reduced the risk of poor outcome: the relative risk (RR) was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.92); the corresponding number of patients needed to treat was 19 (95% CI 1 to 51). For oral nimodipine alone the RR was 0.67 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.81), for other calcium antagonists or intravenous administration of nimodipine the results were not statistically significant. Calcium antagonists reduced the occurrence of secondary ischaemia and showed a favourable trend for case fatality. For magnesium in addition to standard treatment with nimodipine, the RR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.00) for a poor outcome and 0.66 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.96) for clinical signs of secondary ischaemia.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Calcium antagonists reduce the risk of poor outcome and secondary ischaemia after aneurysmal SAH. The results for 'poor outcome' depend largely on a single large trial of oral nimodipine; the evidence for other calcium antagonists is inconclusive. The evidence for nimodipine is not beyond all doubt, but given the potential benefits and modest risks of this treatment, oral nimodipine is currently indicated in patients with aneurysmal SAH. Intravenous administration of calcium antagonists cannot be recommended for routine practice on the basis of the present evidence. Magnesium sulphate is a promising agent but more evidence is needed before definite conclusions can be drawn.
Topics: Calcium Channel Blockers; Humans; Intracranial Aneurysm; Nimodipine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 17636626
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000277.pub3 -
Open Heart Jan 2023Coronary artery vasospasm is an abnormal spasm of coronary arteries that cause transient or complete occlusion without exertion. It causes stable angina to ACS. However,...
BACKGROUND
Coronary artery vasospasm is an abnormal spasm of coronary arteries that cause transient or complete occlusion without exertion. It causes stable angina to ACS. However, this can be prevented by calcium channel blockers (CCBs) which suppress Ca influx into the vascular muscle cells. Nevertheless, several CCBs adverse effects are harmful for these patients. Selecting the right CCBs would give the best clinical practice.
METHOD
The studies were obtained from four major medical databases by various keywords. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were implemented as adult >18 years, observational study, English language and drug of interest. Duplicates were eliminated, and the remaining studies were reviewed. Final full-texts assessment was conducted independently by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Revised Cochrane.
RESULTS
The search found 1378 articles. However, six studies were selected after implementing the study criteria. Diltiazem was found to decrease angina and increase quality of life until 12th week of treatment; however, some adverse effects include atrioventricular block and recurrent angina up till 4th week were found. Meanwhile, nifedipine was found to decrease vasospastic angina (VSA) by the fourth and eighth weeks of treatment. Nevertheless, it caused excessive drop in BP and increase heart rate by eighth week. In addition, slow-release preparation of both CCBs were found to increase efficacy and compliance. Lastly amlodipine was also found to decrease VSA by 17%±140% and 33% after 6 weeks, but further studies needed.
CONCLUSION
Diltiazem, nifedipine and amlodipine are potent in decreasing VSA, however, tailoring specific CCBs adverse reactions to patient condition and the drug preparation would be substantially beneficial for the outcome.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diltiazem; Coronary Vasospasm; Nifedipine; Calcium; Quality of Life; Amlodipine; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36634997
DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002179 -
Clinical Cardiology May 2022An early repolarization (ER) pattern is a risk factor for ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) caused by a coronary artery spasm.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
An early repolarization (ER) pattern is a risk factor for ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) caused by a coronary artery spasm. However, its detailed characteristics and prognostic value for VF remain unclear. Thus, we investigated the relationship between ER and VF in patients with VSA.
HYPOTHESIS
The ER pattern is associated with VF in patients with VSA.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies published between January 2011 and December 2020; 8 studies with 1761 patients were included in the final analysis.
RESULTS
The ER pattern significantly predicted adverse cardiovascular events (ACEs) and VF (odds ratio [OR] = 5.13, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 3.16-8.35, p < .00001 and OR = 5.20, 95% CI: 3.05-8.87, p < .00001). The presence of ER in the inferior leads increased the VF risk (OR = 7.80, 95% CI: 4.04-15.05, p < .00001), regardless of the J-point morphology or type of ST-segment elevation in the ER pattern. A horizontal/descending ST-segment elevation was significantly associated with VF in patients with or without an ER pattern during a coronary spasm (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.07-4.88, p = .03). However, obstructive coronary artery disease was unrelated to the ER pattern (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.27-2.53, p = .73).
CONCLUSIONS
An ER pattern is significantly associated with an increased risk of ACE in patients with VSA. An inferior ER pattern with horizontal/descending ST-segment elevation confers the highest risk for VF during VSA onset. Nevertheless, the ER pattern is not associated with obstructive coronary artery disease.
Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vasospasm; Electrocardiography; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Spasm; Ventricular Fibrillation
PubMed: 35253242
DOI: 10.1002/clc.23804 -
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva 2020To systematically review the current evidence on the efficacy of milrinone in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the current evidence on the efficacy of milrinone in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
METHODS
The Pubmed®, Cochrane and Embase databases were screened for articles published from April 2001 to February 2019. Two independent reviewers performed the methodological quality screening and data extraction of the studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were found to be relevant, and only one of these was a randomized control trial. Studies showed marked heterogeneity and weaknesses in key methodological criteria. Most patients presented with moderate to severe vasospasm. Angiography was the main method of diagnosing vasospasm. Intra-arterial administration of milrinone was performed in three studies, intravenous administration was performed in nine studies, and both routes of administration in six studies; the intrathecal route was used in two studies, the cisternal route in one study and endovascular administration in one study. The side effects of milrinone were described in six studies. Twenty-one studies indicated resolution of vasospasm.
CONCLUSION
The current evidence indicates that milrinone may have a role in treatment of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, only one randomized control trial was performed, with a low quality level. Our findings indicate the need for future randomized control trials with patient-centered outcomes to provide definitive recommendations.
Topics: Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Milrinone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Vasodilator Agents; Vasospasm, Intracranial
PubMed: 33470361
DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20200097 -
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy Oct 2010Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a cerebrovascular disorder associated with multifocal arterial constriction and dilation. RCVS is associated with... (Review)
Review
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a cerebrovascular disorder associated with multifocal arterial constriction and dilation. RCVS is associated with nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, pregnancy and exposure to certain drugs. The primary clinical manifestation is recurrent sudden-onset and severe (‘thunderclap’) headaches over 1–3 weeks, often accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia, confusion and blurred vision. The primary diagnostic dilemma is distinguishing RCVS from primary CNS arteritis. Diagnosis requires demonstration of the characteristic ‘string of beads’ on cerebral angiography with resolution within 1–3 months, although many patients will initially have normal vascular imaging. Many treatments have been reported to ameliorate the headaches of RCVS, but it is unclear whether they prevent hemorrhagic or ischemic complications.
Topics: Arteritis; Cerebral Angiography; Cerebral Arterial Diseases; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Headache Disorders, Primary; Humans; Pregnancy; Syndrome; Time Factors; Vasoconstriction; Vasospasm, Intracranial
PubMed: 20936928
DOI: 10.1586/erc.10.124 -
Journal of Epilepsy Research Dec 2020Seizures in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) have been described secondary to SAH, changes in cortical function, vasospasm and as a result of treatment... (Review)
Review
Seizures in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) have been described secondary to SAH, changes in cortical function, vasospasm and as a result of treatment effects. Seizures are one of the important clinical determinants in neurological outcome of aSAH. Various studies support the notion of less risk of future seizures in endovascular treatment as compared to the microsurgical clipping, yet there is no conclusive evidence in favour or against the seizure occurrence in aSAH patients after endovascular treatment as compared to the microsurgical treatment. To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of seizures after endovascular management (coiling) of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A literature search was performed in electronic database of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception to February 2020, using the terms Seizure, Intracranial aneurysms, embolization, with no constraints applied. Data were pooled using a random-effect model, results were abstracted as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI), and heterogeneity was reported as Chi-square. Five studies involving 3,077 patients were included in the meta-analysis. After endovascular management of aSAH, seizure risk was increased by a worse clinical severity (World Federation of Neurosurgery scale or Hunt and Hess) (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.69-4.16; <0.00001), severe vasospasm (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.67-2.92; <0.00001), cerebral infarction (OR, 5.19; 95% CI, 3.23-8.35; <0.00001), and cerebral edema (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.37-2.34; <0.0000). Worse clinical severity, vasospasm, cerebral infarction and cerebral oedema are significant risk factors for the development of seizures after endovascular intervention in aSAH. The mechanism for this correlation is not clear.
PubMed: 33659196
DOI: 10.14581/jer.20009 -
Frontiers in Physiology 2018While cannabis is perceived as a relatively safe drug by the public, accumulating clinical data suggest detrimental cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids. Cannabis has... (Review)
Review
While cannabis is perceived as a relatively safe drug by the public, accumulating clinical data suggest detrimental cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids. Cannabis has been legalized in several countries and jurisdictions recently. Experimental studies specifically targeting cannabinoids' effects on the cerebral vasculature are rare. There is evidence for transient vasoconstrictive effects of cannabinoids in the peripheral and cerebral vasculature in a complex interplay of vasodilation and vasoconstriction. Vasoreactivity to cannabinoids is dependent on the specific molecules, their metabolites and dose, baseline vascular tone, and vessel characteristics as well as experimental conditions and animal species. We systematically review the currently available literature of experimental results in and animal studies, examining cannabinoids' effects on circulation and reactive vasodilation or vasoconstriction, with a particular focus on the cerebral vascular bed.
PubMed: 29896112
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00622 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2007Secondary ischaemia is a frequent cause of poor outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Besides vasospasm, platelet aggregation seems to play... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Secondary ischaemia is a frequent cause of poor outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Besides vasospasm, platelet aggregation seems to play a role in the pathogenesis of secondary ischaemia. Experimental studies have suggested that antiplatelet agents can prevent secondary ischaemia.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether antiplatelet agents change outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched August 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2006) and EMBASE databases (1980 to August 2006). We also searched reference lists of identified trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any antiplatelet agent with control in patients with aneurysmal SAH.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. Relative risks (RR) were calculated with regard to poor outcome, case fatality, secondary ischaemia, haemorrhagic intracranial complications and aneurysmal rebleeding according to the intention-to-treat principle. In case of a statistically significant primary analysis, a worst case analysis was performed.
MAIN RESULTS
Seven RCTs were included in the review, totalling 1385 patients. Four of these trials met the criteria for good quality studies. For any antiplatelet agent there were reductions of a poor outcome (RR 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 1.01) and secondary brain ischaemia (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.22) and more intracranial haemorrhagic complications (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.59 to 3.12), but none of these differences were statistically significant. There was no effect on case fatality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.37) or aneurysmal rebleeding (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.38). For individual antiplatelet agents, only ticlopidine was associated with statistically significant fewer occurrences of a poor outcome (RR 0.37, 95% CI 95% CI 0.14 to 0.98) but this estimate was based on only one small RCT.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review shows a trend towards better outcome in patients treated with antiplatelet agents, possibly due to a reduction in secondary ischaemia. However, results were not statistically significant, thus no definite conclusions can be drawn. Also, antiplatelet agents could increase the risk of haemorrhagic complications. On the basis of the current evidence treatment with antiplatelet agents in order to prevent secondary ischaemia or poor outcome cannot be recommended.
Topics: Brain Ischemia; Humans; Intracranial Aneurysm; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 17943892
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006184.pub2