-
JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging Mar 2023Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is common in current clinical practice. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) plays an important role in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is common in current clinical practice. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) plays an important role in its management and is increasingly recommended by all the current guidelines. However, the prognostic value of CMR in patients with MINOCA is still undetermined.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMR in the management of patients with MINOCA.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting the results of CMR findings in patients with MINOCA. Random effects models were used to determine the prevalence of different disease entities: myocarditis, myocardial infarction (MI), or takotsubo syndrome. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of CMR diagnosis in the subgroup of studies that reported clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 26 studies comprising 3,624 patients were included. The mean age was 54.2 ± 5.3 years, and 56% were men. MINOCA was confirmed in only 22% (95% CI: 0.17-0.26) of the cases and 68% of patients with initial MINOCA were reclassified after the CMR assessment. The pooled prevalence of myocarditis was 31% (95% CI: 0.25-0.39), and takotsubo syndrome 10% (95% CI: 0.06-0.12). In a subgroup analysis of 5 studies (770 patients) that reported clinical outcomes, CMR diagnosis of confirmed MI was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (pooled OR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.60-3.59).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with MINOCA, CMR has been demonstrated to add an important diagnostic and prognostic value, proving to be crucial for the diagnosis of this condition. Sixty-eight percent of patients with initial MINOCA were reclassified after the CMR evaluation. CMR-confirmed diagnosis of MINOCA was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; MINOCA; Myocardial Infarction; Myocarditis; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy
PubMed: 36889851
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.029 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Apr 2021The risk of complications, including death, is substantially increased in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing anaesthesia for surgical procedures,...
BACKGROUND
The risk of complications, including death, is substantially increased in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing anaesthesia for surgical procedures, especially in those with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH). Sedation also poses a risk to patients with PH. Physiological changes including tachycardia, hypotension, fluid shifts, and an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PH crisis) can precipitate acute right ventricular decompensation and death.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed of studies in patients with PH undergoing non-cardiac and non-obstetric surgery. The management of patients with PH requiring sedation for endoscopy was also reviewed. Using a framework of relevant clinical questions, we review the available evidence guiding operative risk, risk assessment, preoperative optimisation, and perioperative management, and identifying areas for future research.
RESULTS
Reported 30 day mortality after non-cardiac and non-obstetric surgery ranges between 2% and 18% in patients with PH undergoing elective procedures, and increases to 15-50% for emergency surgery, with complications and death usually relating to acute right ventricular failure. Risk factors for mortality include procedure-specific and patient-related factors, especially markers of PH severity (e.g. pulmonary haemodynamics, poor exercise performance, and right ventricular dysfunction). Most studies highlight the importance of individualised preoperative risk assessment and optimisation and advanced perioperative planning.
CONCLUSIONS
With an increasing number of patients requiring surgery in specialist and non-specialist PH centres, a systematic, evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach is required to minimise complications. Adequate risk stratification and a tailored-individualised perioperative plan is paramount.
Topics: Consensus; Expert Testimony; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 33612249
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.005 -
Circulation Feb 2018Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in women, yet many people perceive breast cancer to be the number one threat to women's health. CVD...
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in women, yet many people perceive breast cancer to be the number one threat to women's health. CVD and breast cancer have several overlapping risk factors, such as obesity and smoking. Additionally, current breast cancer treatments can have a negative impact on cardiovascular health (eg, left ventricular dysfunction, accelerated CVD), and for women with pre-existing CVD, this might influence cancer treatment decisions by both the patient and the provider. Improvements in early detection and treatment of breast cancer have led to an increasing number of breast cancer survivors who are at risk of long-term cardiac complications from cancer treatments. For older women, CVD poses a greater mortality threat than breast cancer itself. This is the first scientific statement from the American Heart Association on CVD and breast cancer. This document will provide a comprehensive overview of the prevalence of these diseases, shared risk factors, the cardiotoxic effects of therapy, and the prevention and treatment of CVD in breast cancer patients.
Topics: Age Factors; Breast Neoplasms; Cancer Survivors; Cardiovascular Diseases; Decision Making; Female; Humans; Obesity; Risk Factors; Smoking
PubMed: 29437116
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000556 -
EClinicalMedicine Aug 2023Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is associated with adverse outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, there are no studies describing the long-term,...
BACKGROUND
Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is associated with adverse outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, there are no studies describing the long-term, full-spectrum right ventricular parameters on morphology, pressure and function at certain follow-up time points after PE onset. More exploration of right ventricular function would provide useful clues for long-term management of patients with PE.
METHODS
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we completed a literature search in Pubmed, EMBASE and WebofScience (from Jan 1st, 1998 to April 20th, 2023). Studies of patients with acute PE followed-up longer than 3 months with right ventricle assessment and written in English-language were included. Right ventricular function was assessed by either echocardiography or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). The primary outcome was structural and functional parameters of the right ventricle, and the secondary outcomes were functional assessments [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification and 6-min walk test distance (6 MWD)], at each follow-up time points. Random effect meta-analyses were performed using R software (PROSPERO: CRD42023433332).
FINDINGS
A total of 33 studies (3920 patients) were included in the final analysis. The 3-month, 6-month and 1-year prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) was 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.48, I = 96%], 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.36, I = 93%) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.48, I = 94%), respectively. Pooled tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), right ventricular to left ventricular diameter (RV/LV) ratio and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) at 1-year was 21.80 mm (95% CI 20.08-23.52, I = 93%), 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.81, I = 92%) and 27.33 mmHg (95% CI 18.88-35.78) (I = 96%), respectively. The proportion of NYHA III-IV was 0.06 (95% CI 0.0-0.12) and the pooled 6 MWD was 462.98 m (95% CI 447.55-478.41) over 1 year. Patients treated with thrombolysis had lower prevalence of RVD (1-year 0.17 and 0.07 in systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis, respectively) than those treated with anticoagulation therapy alone (1-year 0.24) but the pooled risk ratio (RR) was not statistically significant.
INTERPRETATION
Although the conclusion of this study may be limited by its high heterogeneity from varied study designs, inclusion criteria and definition of RVD of each study, our findings suggested that persistent RVD and functional impairment were of considerable high prevalence during long-term follow-up after acute PE. Treatment strategy may influence the prevalence of long-term RVD.
FUNDING
This study is supported by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2021-I2M-1-061). The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0905600). National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-NHLHCRF-LX-01-02-03). CAMS Institute of Respiratory Medicine Grant for Young Scholars (2023-ZF-8).
PubMed: 37638233
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102153 -
European Journal of Heart Failure Nov 2019To provide reliable survival estimates for people with chronic heart failure and explain variation in survival by key factors including age at diagnosis, left... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
To provide reliable survival estimates for people with chronic heart failure and explain variation in survival by key factors including age at diagnosis, left ventricular ejection fraction, decade of diagnosis, and study setting.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We searched in relevant databases from inception to August 2018 for non-interventional studies reporting survival rates for patients with chronic or stable heart failure in any ambulatory setting. Across the 60 included studies, there was survival data for 1.5 million people with heart failure. In our random effects meta-analyses the pooled survival rates at 1 month, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years were 95.7% (95% confidence interval 94.3-96.9), 86.5% (85.4-87.6), 72.6% (67.0-76.6), 56.7% (54.0-59.4) and 34.9% (24.0-46.8), respectively. The 5-year survival rates improved between 1970-1979 and 2000-2009 across healthcare settings, from 29.1% (25.5-32.7) to 59.7% (54.7-64.6). Increasing age at diagnosis was significantly associated with a reduced survival time. Mortality was lowest in studies conducted in secondary care, where there were higher reported prescribing rates of key heart failure medications. There was significant heterogeneity among the included studies in terms of heart failure diagnostic criteria, participant co-morbidities, and treatment rates.
CONCLUSION
These results can inform health policy and individual patient advanced care planning. Mortality associated with chronic heart failure remains high despite steady improvements in survival. There remains significant scope to improve prognosis through greater implementation of evidence-based treatments. Further research exploring the barriers and facilitators to treatment is recommended.
Topics: Adult; Age of Onset; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Disease Progression; Europe; Female; Health Services Accessibility; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; North America; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume; Survival Analysis; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 31523902
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1594 -
European Journal of Heart Failure Dec 2016Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are increasingly recognized in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The prevalence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are increasingly recognized in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The prevalence and prognostic value of RV dysfunction in HFpEF have been widely but variably reported. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
METHODS AND RESULTS
English literature until May 2016 was evaluated for prevalence of RV dysfunction [i.e. tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) <16 mm, fractional area change (FAC) <35%, or tricuspid annular systolic velocity (RV S') <9.5 cm/s)] and PH [i.e. mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) ≥25 mmHg or pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) ≥35 mmHg]. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes were calculated. A total of 38 studies was included. In studies with stringent HFpEF criteria, prevalence of RV dysfunction was 28% for TAPSE, 18% for FAC, and 21% for RV S'. Prevalence of PH was 68% for both increased MPAP and PASP. TAPSE (HR 1.26/5 mm decrease; P < 0.0001), FAC (HR 1.15/5% decrease; P < 0.0001), MPAP (HR 1.26/5 mmHg increase; P < 0.0001), and PASP (1.16/5 mmHg increase; P < 0.0001) were all univariably associated with mortality. HRs for RV S' were not reported.
CONCLUSION
RV dysfunction and PH are highly prevalent and are both associated with poor outcome in patients with HFpEF.
Topics: Echocardiography; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Mortality; Prevalence; Prognosis; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
PubMed: 27650220
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.630 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Aug 2011Heart failure occurs in 3% to 4% of adults aged over 65 years, usually as a consequence of coronary artery disease or hypertension, and causes breathlessness, effort... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Heart failure occurs in 3% to 4% of adults aged over 65 years, usually as a consequence of coronary artery disease or hypertension, and causes breathlessness, effort intolerance, fluid retention, and increased mortality. The 5-year mortality in people with systolic heart failure ranges from 25% to 75%, often owing to sudden death following ventricular arrhythmia. Risks of cardiovascular events are increased in people with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) or heart failure.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of multidisciplinary interventions for heart failure? What are the effects of exercise in people with heart failure? What are the effects of drug treatments for heart failure? What are the effects of devices for treatment of heart failure? What are the effects of coronary revascularisation for treatment of heart failure? What are the effects of drug treatments in people at high risk of heart failure? What are the effects of treatments for diastolic heart failure? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to August 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 80 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: aldosterone receptor antagonists, amiodarone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, anticoagulation, antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, cardiac resynchronisation therapy, coronary revascularisation, digoxin (in people already receiving diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), exercise, hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate, implantable cardiac defibrillators, multidisciplinary interventions, non-amiodarone antiarrhythmic drugs, and positive inotropes (other than digoxin).
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Heart Failure; Humans; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 21878135
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Feb 2010Heart failure occurs in 3% to 4% of adults aged over 65 years, usually as a consequence of coronary artery disease or hypertension, and causes breathlessness, effort... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Heart failure occurs in 3% to 4% of adults aged over 65 years, usually as a consequence of coronary artery disease or hypertension, and causes breathlessness, effort intolerance, fluid retention, and increased mortality. The 5-year mortality in people with systolic heart failure ranges from 25% to 75%, often owing to sudden death following ventricular arrhythmia. Risks of cardiovascular events are increased in people with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) or heart failure.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of non-drug treatments, and of drug and invasive treatments, for heart failure? What are the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in people at high risk of heart failure? What are the effects of treatments for diastolic heart failure? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 85 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: aldosterone receptor antagonists; amiodarone; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; angiotensin II receptor blockers; anticoagulation; antiplatelet agents; beta-blockers; calcium channel blockers; cardiac resynchronisation therapy; digoxin (in people already receiving diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors); exercise; hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate; implantable cardiac defibrillators; multidisciplinary interventions; non-amiodarone antiarrhythmic drugs; and positive inotropes (other than digoxin).
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 21718583
DOI: No ID Found -
Clinical Cardiology Oct 2021There is limited evidence about the prognostic utility of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We assessed the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
There is limited evidence about the prognostic utility of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We assessed the association between RVD and mortality in COVID-19 patients. We searched electronic databases from inception to February 15, 2021. RVD was defined based on the following echocardiographic variables: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid S' peak systolic velocity, fractional area change (FAC), and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS). All meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Nineteen cohort studies involving 2307 patients were included. The mean age ranged from 59 to 72 years and 65% of patients were male. TAPSE (mean difference [MD], -3.13 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.08--2.19), tricuspid S' peak systolic velocity (MD, -0.88 cm/s; 95% CI, -1.68 to -0.08), FAC (MD, -3.47%; 95% CI, -6.21 to -0.72), and RVFWLS (MD, -5.83%; 95% CI, -7.47--4.20) were significantly lower in nonsurvivors compared to survivors. Each 1 mm decrease in TAPSE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.37), 1% decrease in FAC (aHR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14), and 1% increase in RVFWLS (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19-1.48) were independently associated with higher mortality. RVD was significantly associated with higher mortality using unadjusted risk ratio (2.05; 95% CI, 1.27-3.31), unadjusted hazard ratio (3.37; 95% CI, 1.72-6.62), and adjusted hazard ratio (aHR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.52-4.96). Our study shows that echocardiographic parameters of RVD were associated with an increased risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients.
Topics: Aged; COVID-19; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; SARS-CoV-2; Systole; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right; Ventricular Function, Right
PubMed: 34528706
DOI: 10.1002/clc.23719 -
Herz Dec 2020Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is associated with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Several studies have reported that it affects the left ventricle;... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is associated with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Several studies have reported that it affects the left ventricle; however, large randomized controlled trials are lacking. The current study aimed to summarize the association between OSAS and left ventricular (LV) structure and function.
METHODS
Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane) and references were searched for articles published until March 2018. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess LV structure and function in OSAS patients based on echocardiography.
RESULTS
In total, 17 studies with 747 OSAS patients and 426 control participants were included. Patients with OSAS showed an increase in LV diastolic diameter (weighted mean difference [WMD], 95% CI: 1.24 [0.68, 1.80]; p < 0.001), LV systolic diameter (WMD, 95% CI: 1.14 [0.47, 1.81]; p = 0.001), and LV mass (WMD, 95% CI: 35.34 [20.67, 50.00]; p < 0.001). In addition, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly decreased in the OSAS group compared with the controls (WMD, 95% CIs: -1.82 [-2.76, -0.87]; p < 0.001), and the reduction in LVEF was consistent with the severity of OSAS. The OSAS group also showed an increase in left atrial diameter (WMD, 95% CI: 2.13 [1.48, 2.77]; p < 0.001) and left atrial diameter volume index (WMD, 95% CIs: 3.96 [3.32, 4.61]; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome leads to atrial dilatation, left ventricular hypertrophy, enlargement, mass increase and reduction of systolic function. Treatments for OSAS might be beneficial for the preservation of left cardiac structure and function.
Topics: Echocardiography; Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling
PubMed: 31555891
DOI: 10.1007/s00059-019-04850-w