-
Pain Physician Sep 2021The management of pain after osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fracture has not reached a treatment consensus. Percutaneous kyphoplasty has been shown to be efficient in...
BACKGROUND
The management of pain after osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fracture has not reached a treatment consensus. Percutaneous kyphoplasty has been shown to be efficient in reducing acute pain after burst fracture, although the topic remains highly controversial in this field.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the current literature to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous kyphoplasty on the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fracture.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review.
SETTING
University hospital.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library without time restriction. Among the studies meeting the eligible criteria, any study in which percutaneous kyphoplasty was utilized alone in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fracture was included in the current review. For radiographic outcome evaluation, vertebral height and kyphotic angle were analyzed. VAS (Visual Analog Scale) and ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) were utilized for clinical outcome evaluation. Complications such as cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fracture or relapse were also analyzed.
RESULTS
In total, 289 patients (338 vertebral bodies) were included in the 8 studies. Clinical outcomes indicated that patients achieved pain relief (VAS) from 6.8 preoperatively to 1.1 postoperatively, and improvement of quality of life (ODI) ranged from 87.0 ± 6.0% to 23.9 ± 4.4%. The radiological outcome indicated that anterior vertebral height restoration ranged from 20.1 ± 2.3 to 85.3 ± 10.6, and posterior vertebral height restoration ranged from 27.3 ± 1.7 to 83.3 ± 7.4. Kyphotic angle achieved correction ranged from 21.7 ± 7.8° preoperatively to 3.17° postoperatively. The main complications after PKP were cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fracture or relapse, which had an incidence of 7.7% -45.4% and 4.3% -74.1%, respectively.
LIMITATIONS
Due to the good quality of the English publications, only English-language research searches were conducted, but they do not unduly affect our aggregate results impact. More prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to provide higher evidence for clinical practice.
CONCLUSIONS
To osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fracture is absolutely not a contraindication to percutaneous kyphoplasty. Percutaneous kyphoplasty can obtain satisfactory effectiveness for the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures. Complications can be effectively decreased by meticulous evaluation, careful manipulation, and appropriate precautionary measures.
Topics: Bone Cements; Contraindications; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34554685
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Palliative Care Sep 2009Spinal fractures are a common source of morbidity in cancer patients. Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP) is a minimally invasive procedure designed to stabilize fractures and...
BACKGROUND
Spinal fractures are a common source of morbidity in cancer patients. Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP) is a minimally invasive procedure designed to stabilize fractures and correct vertebral deformities. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of BKP for spinal fractures in cancer patients.
METHODS
We searched several electronic databases up to September 2008 and the reference lists of relevant publications for studies reporting on BKP in patients with spinal fractures secondary to osteolytic metastasis and multiple myeloma. Outcomes sought included pain relief, functional capacity, quality of life, vertebral height, kyphotic angle and adverse events. Studies were assessed for methodological bias, and estimates of effect were calculated using a random-effects model. Potential reasons for heterogeneity were explored.
RESULTS
The literature search revealed seven relevant studies published from 2003 to 2008, none of which were randomized trials. Analysis of those studies indicated that BKP resulted in less pain and better functional outcomes, and that these effects were maintained up to 2 years post-procedure. While BKP also improved early vertebral height loss and spinal deformity, these effects were not long-term. No serious procedure-related complications were described. Clinically asymptomatic cement leakage occurred in 6% of all treated levels, and new vertebral fractures in 10% of patients. While there is a lack of studies comparing BKP to other interventions, some data suggested that BKP provided similar pain relief as vertebroplasty and a lower cement leakage rate.
CONCLUSION
It appears that there is level III evidence showing BKP is a well-tolerated, relatively safe and effective technique that provides early pain relief and improved functional outcomes in patients with painful neoplastic spinal fractures. BKP also provided long-term benefits in terms of pain and disability. However, the methodological quality of the original studies prevents definitive conclusions being drawn. Further investigation into the use of BKP for spinal fractures in cancer patients is warranted.
PubMed: 19740423
DOI: 10.1186/1472-684X-8-12 -
Medicine Feb 2019To contrast the effects and complications in unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in elderly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To contrast the effects and complications in unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in elderly patients.
METHODS
Multiple databases were adopted to search relevant studies, and the articles eventually satisfied the criteria were included. All the meta-analyses were conducted with the Review Manager 5.2. To estimate the quality of each article, risk of bias table was performed.
RESULTS
Finally, 627 patients were enrolled in 9 studies and ultimately met the eligibility criteria. The unilateral and bilateral surgical samples were 314 and 313, respectively. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in Visual Analog Scale/Score (VAS) (MD = -0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.24, 0.13], P = .57), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (MD = 0.03, 95% CI [-0.57, 0.62], P = .93) and cement leakage (OR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.67, 1.50], P = 1.00) between unilateral group and bilateral group. The surgery time of unilateral PVP is much less than that of bilateral PVP (MD = -8.42, 95% CI [-13.17, -3.66], P = .0005). Patients with bilateral PVP surgery have been injected more cement than patients with a unilateral surgery (MD = -2.56, 95% CI [-2.79, -2.33], P <.00001).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated unipedicular approach is the preferred surgical technique for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) compared with bilateral PVP since unipedicular approach injects less cement and cost less surgery time.
Topics: Aged; Bone Cements; Disability Evaluation; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Operative Time; Osteoporotic Fractures; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Spinal Fractures; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 30813133
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014317 -
BioMed Research International 2022This study aimed to assess whether the third-generation PVAS was superior to percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in treating patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Therapeutic Efficacy of Third-Generation Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation System (PVAS) in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures (OVCFs): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
This study aimed to assess whether the third-generation PVAS was superior to percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in treating patients with OVCFs.
METHODS
Databases, including Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library, were searched to identify relevant interventional and observational articles in vivo or in vitro comparing the third-generation PVAS to PVP/PKP in OVCFs patients. A meta-analysis was performed under the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook.
RESULTS
11 in vivo articles involving 1035 patients with 1320 segments of diseased vertebral bodies and 8 in vitro studies enrolling 40 specimens with 202 vertebral bodies were identified. The vivo studies indicated no significant differences were found in visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), operation time, or injected cement volume ( > 0.05). The third-generation PVAS was associated with significant improvement in vertebral height and Cobb angle ( < 0.05) and also with a significantly lower risk of cement leakages and new fractures ( < 0.05). The vitro studies suggest that the third-generation PVAS was associated with better anterior vertebral height (AVH) and kyphotic angle (KA) after deflation and cement. No significant differences were found in stiffness or failure load after cement between the two groups ( > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Based on current evidence, although providing similar improvement in VAS and ODI, the third-generation PVAS may be superior to PVP/PKP in local kyphosis correction, vertebral height maintenance, and adverse events reduction. Further high-quality randomized studies are required to confirm these results.
Topics: Acrylic Resins; Bone Cements; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Kyphosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 35578725
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9637831 -
Global Spine Journal Jul 2022Systematic review.
Instrumentation Techniques to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
OBJECTIVES
To summarize the results of clinical studies investigating spinal instrumentation techniques aiming to reduce the postoperative incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and/or failure (PJF) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.
METHODS
EMBASE and Medline® were searched for articles dating from January 2000 onward. Data was extracted by 2 independent authors and methodological quality was assessed using ROBINS-I.
RESULTS
18 retrospective- and prospective cohort studies with a severe or critical risk of bias were included. Different techniques were applied at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV): tethers in various configurations, 2-level prophylactic vertebroplasty (2-PVP), transverse process hooks (TPH), flexible rods (FR), sublaminar tapes (ST) and multilevel stabilization screws (MLSS). Compared to a pedicle screw (PS) group, significant differences in PJK incidence were found using tethers in various configurations (18% versus 45%, = 0.001, 15% versus 38%, = 0.045), 2-PVP (24% vs 36%, = 0.020), TPH (0% vs. 30%, = 0.023) and FR (15% versus 38%, = 0.045). Differences in revision rates for PJK were found in studies concerning tethers (4% versus 18%, = 0.002), 2-PVP (0% vs 13%, = 0.031) and TPH (0% vs 7%, = n.a.).
CONCLUSION
Although the studies are of low quality, the most frequently studied techniques, namely 2-PVP as anterior reinforcement and (tensioned) tethers or TPH as posterior semi-rigid fixation, show promising results. To provide a reliable comparison, more controlled studies need to be performed, including the use of clinical outcome measures and a uniform definition of PJF.
PubMed: 34325554
DOI: 10.1177/21925682211034500 -
European Review For Medical and... Aug 2021This study aimed to investigate whether percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) was associated with clinical and radiological subsequent adjacent fractures in patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures will increase the number of subsequent fractures at adjacent vertebral levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate whether percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) was associated with clinical and radiological subsequent adjacent fractures in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrial.gov, from database inception to March 2020. Eligible studies were those that assessed subsequent adjacent fractures after PVA in comparison with conservative treatment (CT). The number of patients with adjacent secondary vertebral fractures was calculated, and the pooled risk ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was used. Moreover, heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses were performed.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies were included finally. Moreover, 20/421 (4.75%) patients from the PVA group and 25/359 (6.96%) patients from the CT group had clinical subsequent adjacent fractures, and 46/440 (10.45%) patients from the PVA group and 36/444 (8.10%) patients from the CT group had radiological subsequent adjacent fractures. Both had no significant difference between the two groups (RR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.38, 1.19], p = 0.17)/(RR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.75, 1.70], p = 0.576). However, the number of fractured vertebrae was higher in the PVA group than in the CT group (RR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.03, 1.93], p = 0.03). A sensitivity analysis did not identify specific trials that seriously deflected. No obvious publication bias was identified.
CONCLUSIONS
The systematic review revealed that PVA did not increase the incidence for subsequent adjacent fractures regardless of whether they were clinical or radiological fractures. However, PVA can increase the number of subsequent fractures at adjacent vertebral levels.
Topics: Fractures, Compression; Humans; Incidence; Osteoporotic Fractures; Radiography; Spinal Fractures; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 34486692
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202108_26531 -
Pain Physician Sep 2018Metastatic spinal lesions are difficult-to-treat entities that are most commonly associated with pain and severely reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Within...
BACKGROUND
Metastatic spinal lesions are difficult-to-treat entities that are most commonly associated with pain and severely reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Within the last 5 to 10 years, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as an option in the palliative treatment of vertebral metastases.
OBJECTIVES
Our review aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of RFA, mostly in combination with vertebroplasty, in patients with painful vertebral metastases.
STUDY DESIGN
The design of this study is a systematic review.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search and a manual search of 5 databases in December 2016. The review applied a methodological framework based on the HTA Core Model®. Data on each selected outcome category were synthesized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) scheme. Risk of bias was assessed using the Institute of Health Economics (IHE) Risk of Bias checklist for case series.
RESULTS
We identified 299 citations. After applying the inclusion criteria, a total of 9 studies (4 prospective and 5 retrospective studies) were determined to be eligible. These studies included a total of 583 patients with vertebral metastases who were treated with RFA and, in most cases, received an additional vertebroplasty treatment (n = 437). The studies were categorized as having a moderate to high risk of bias. The strength of evidence was found to be "very low" for safety outcomes and could not be assessed for efficacy outcomes. Current evidence suggests that RFA leads to significant pain reduction. Furthermore, no major complications occurred when using RFA.
LIMITATIONS
A major concern is the low number of included patients and heterogeneity of study characteristics in most of the studies. The low number of patients also impeded comparison of the effectiveness of RFA alone to RFA in combination with vertebroplasty.
CONCLUSION
According to the available evidence, RFA may be safe and effective, especially for patients with painful vertebral metastases who show contraindications or unresponsiveness to conventional therapies (e.g., radiation) or for those who are at risk of tumor progression.
KEY WORDS
Radiofrequency ablation, vertebral metastases, metastatic spinal lesions, pain, clinical effectiveness, safety, palliative pain treatment.
Topics: Cancer Pain; Humans; Pain Management; Palliative Care; Quality of Life; Radiofrequency Ablation; Spinal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30282388
DOI: No ID Found -
Medicine Nov 2023To investigate the effect of Vertebral augmentation (VA) in the treatment of single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) on new vertebral fractures. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The risk of new vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation in patients suffering from single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
BACKGROUND
To investigate the effect of Vertebral augmentation (VA) in the treatment of single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) on new vertebral fractures.
METHODS
Electronic databases Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database creation to 5 September 2022. Eligible studies had to use VA as an intervention and conservative treatment as a control group. Studies had to explicitly report whether new vertebral fractures occurred during follow-up. Data were extracted by multiple investigators. Data were pooled using random or fixed effects models depending on the degree of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Of the 682 articles screened, 7 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, giving a total of 1240 patients. Meta-analysis showed that VA (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.35-3.28, P = .001) increased the risk of new postoperative vertebral fractures compared with conservative treatment. Subgroup analyses showed that the risk was greater in the group with a follow-up time greater than 1 year (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.06-6.26, P = .001). Compared with conservative treatment, VA (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.23-3.82, P = .007) increased the risk of postoperative adjacent vertebral fracture.
CONCLUSION SUBSECTIONS
VA is associated with an increased risk of new vertebral fractures and adjacent vertebral fractures following single-level OVCFs. With longer follow-ups, new vertebral fractures may be more significant. Clinical surgeons should pay attention to long-term postoperative complications and choose treatment carefully.
Topics: Humans; Spinal Fractures; Fractures, Compression; Kyphoplasty; Vertebroplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37986316
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035749 -
Pain Physician Jul 2018Several meta-analyses have been performed to compare unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and bilateral PKP in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Is Unilateral Percutaneous Kyphoplasty Superior to Bilateral Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures? Evidence from a Systematic Review of Discordant Meta-Analyses.
BACKGROUND
Several meta-analyses have been performed to compare unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and bilateral PKP in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), but inconsistencies in the results have led to questions as to which technique is preferable.
OBJECTIVE
This study was designed to clarify the benefits and disadvantages of unilateral PKP versus bilateral PKP as found in numerous discordant meta-analyses and thereby present surgical treatment recommendations for OVCFs considering the current best evidence.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review/Meta-analysis.
METHODS
Meta-analyses on unilateral and bilateral PKP for OVCFs were included by searching Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library. Meta-analysis quality was assessed using Oxford Levels of Evidence and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). The Jadad decision algorithm was used to identify the best evidence.
RESULTS
Eight eligible meta-analyses were included, 7 of which were Level-II evidence and one was Level-III evidence. The AMSTAR scores varied from 7 to 8. The Jadad decision algorithm suggested that the best meta-analysis should be selected depending upon publication characteristics and methodology of primary studies, language restrictions, and whether data analysis was performed on individual patients. The best available evidence indicated that both unilateral and bilateral PKP could receive similar good clinical and radiological outcomes. However, without increasing the risk of complications, unilateral PKP required shorter surgical time and less cement volume, offering better pain relief and quality of life at post-operative short term follow-ups.
LIMITATIONS
Primary studies had defects in their methodologies.
CONCLUSIONS
Unilateral PKP appears to be superior to bilateral PKP in the treatment of OVCFs.
KEY WORDS
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, percutaneous kyphoplasty, meta-analysis.
Topics: Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Quality of Life; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30045590
DOI: No ID Found -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Apr 2023Procedures like kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty have become an established treatment option for vertebral compression fractures (VCF). The transpedicular approach used...
The role of routine transpedicular biopsies during kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures in the detection of malignant diseases: a systematic review.
INTRODUCTION
Procedures like kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty have become an established treatment option for vertebral compression fractures (VCF). The transpedicular approach used during these procedures allows to take biopsies from the affected vertebral body. The aim of this study was to systematically summarize the existing knowledge on the value of routine transpedicular biopsies during kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature using PubMed/Medline databases with the goal of finding all articles describing the value trans-pedicular biopsies for detecting primary bone tumors, metastases, bone diseases, or spondylitis in patients with vertebral compression fractures was performed. Search terms were (*biopsy/ OR biops*.ti,ab.) AND (vertebral compression fracture*.ti,ab.).
RESULTS
Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria, among these were six prospective and ten retrospective case series. Publication dates ranged from 2005 to 2020. A total of 3083 patients with 3667 transpedicular biopsies performed were included. Most biopsies confirmed osteoporosis as the dominant underlying pathology of VCFs. Transpedicular biopsies revealed an unexpected malignant diagnosis in 0.4-6% of the cases.
CONCLUSION
Routine transpedicular biopsies during kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty detect unexpected malignant lesions in 0.4-6% of the patients, even though the definition of "unexpected" varies among the analyzed studies. The evidence to support a routine biopsy is inconsistent. Nevertheless, routine biopsies can be considered, especially when sufficient preoperatvie imaging is not available or radiological findings are unclear.
Topics: Humans; Kyphoplasty; Fractures, Compression; Spinal Fractures; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Vertebroplasty; Neoplasms; Biopsy; Syndrome
PubMed: 35233719
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04392-7