-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2015Sickle cell disease includes a group of inherited haemoglobinopathies affecting multiple organs including the eyes. Some people with the disease develop ocular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Sickle cell disease includes a group of inherited haemoglobinopathies affecting multiple organs including the eyes. Some people with the disease develop ocular manifestations due to vaso-occlusion. Vision-threatening complications of sickle cell disease are mainly due to proliferative sickle retinopathy which is characterized by proliferation of new blood vessels. Laser photocoagulation is widely applicable in proliferative retinopathies such as proliferative sickle retinopathy and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. It is important to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser photocoagulation in the treatment of proliferative sickle retinopathy to prevent sight-threatening complications.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness of various techniques of laser photocoagulation therapy in sickle cell disease-related retinopathy.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. Date of last search: 21 September 2015.We also searched the following resources (24 March 2015): Latin American and Carribean Health Science Literature Database (LILACS); WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platforms (ICTRP); and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials comparing laser photocoagulation to no treatment in children and adults.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, the risk of bias of the included trials and extracted and analysed data. We contacted the trial authors for additional information.
MAIN RESULTS
Two trials (341 eyes of 238 children and adults) were included comparing efficacy and safety of laser photocoagulation to no therapy in people with proliferative sickle retinopathy. There were 121 males and 117 females with an age range from 13 to 67 years. The laser photocoagulation technique used was different in the two trials; one single-centre trial employed sectoral scatter laser photocoagulation using an argon laser; and the second, two-centre trial, employed feeder vessel coagulation using argon laser in one centre and xenon arc in the second centre. The follow-up period ranged from a mean of 21 to 32 months in one trial and 42 to 47 months in the second. Both trials were at risk of selection bias (random sequence generation) because of the randomisation method employed for participants with bilateral disease. One study was considered to be at risk of reporting bias.Using sectoral scatter laser photocoagulation, one trial (174 eyes) reported that complete regression of proliferative sickle retinopathy was seen in 30.2% in the laser group and 22.4% in the control group (no difference between groups). The same trial reported the development of new proliferative sickle retinopathy in 34.3% of laser-treated eyes and in 41.3% of eyes given no treatment; again, there was no difference between treatment groups. The second trial, using feeder vessel coagulation, did not present full data for either treatment group for these outcomes.There was evidence from both trials (341 eyes) that laser photocoagulation using scatter laser or feeder vessel coagulation may prevent the loss of vision in eyes with proliferative sickle retinopathy (at median follow up of 21 to 47 months). Data from both trials indicated that laser treatment prevented the occurrence of vitreous haemorrhage with both argon and xenon laser; with the protective effect being greater with feeder vessel laser treatment compared to scatter photocoagulation.Regarding adverse effects, the incidence of retinal tear was minimal, with only one event reported. Combined data from both trials were available for 341 eyes; there was no difference between the laser and control arms for retinal detachment. In relation to choroidal neovascularization, treatment with xenon arc was found to be associated with a significantly higher risk, but visual loss related to this complication is uncommon with long-term follow up of three years or more.Data regarding quality of life and other adverse effects were not reported in the included trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Our conclusions are based on the data from two trials conducted over 20 years ago. In the absence of further evidence, laser treatment for sickle cell disease-related retinopathy should be considered as a one of therapeutic options for preventing visual loss and vitreous haemorrhage. However, it does not appear to have a significant different effect on other clinical outcomes such as regression of proliferative sickle retinopathy and development of new ones. No evidence is available assessing efficacy in relation to patient-important outcomes (such as quality of life or the loss of a driving licence). There is limited evidence on safety, overall, scatter argon laser photocoagulation is superior in terms of adverse effects, although feeder vessel coagulation has a better effect in preventing vitreous haemorrhage. Further research is needed to examine the safety of laser treatment compared to other interventions such as intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors. In addition, patient-important outcomes as well as cost-effectiveness should be addressed.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Child; Choroidal Neovascularization; Female; Humans; Laser Coagulation; Lasers, Gas; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retinal Neovascularization; Vision Disorders; Vitreous Hemorrhage
PubMed: 26451693
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010790.pub2 -
Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and... 2022To compare the complications of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with those of conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) for age-related... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To compare the complications of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with those of conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) for age-related cataracts.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies comparing FLACS and CPS. Outcomes were operative complications, including the intraoperative capsule tear, postoperative corneal edema, macular edema, uncontrolled IOP, etc. The effect measures were weighted with odds ratios with 95% CIs.
RESULTS
Nineteen RCTs and 18 cohort studies, including 24,806 eyes (11,375 of the FLACS group and 13,431 of the CPS group), were identified. There were no significant differences between the two groups in anterior capsule tear, corneal edema, macular edema, uncontrolled IOP, vitreous loss, posterior vitreous detachment, etc. Posterior capsule tear rate showed a significantly lower in RCT subgroups ( = 0.04) and without differences in total ( = 0.63). Significant differences were observed in the incidence of descemet membrane tear/trauma ( = 0.02) and IFIS/iris trauma ( = 0.04. Additionally, The FLACS specific complications showed a significantly higher rate of miosis ( < 0.0001), corneal epithelial defect ( = 0.001), corneal haze ( = 0.002), and subconjunctival hemorrhage ( = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
FLACS maintains the same safety compared with CPS in terms of all intraoperative and postoperative complications. Although FLACS did show a statistically significant difference for several FLACS specific complications, it would not influence the visual outcome and heal itself.
PubMed: 37846222
DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100027 -
Middle East African Journal of... 2020Peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy (PEHCR) is a rare retinal vasculopathy that might cause subretinal and/or vitreous hemorrhages. Although the primary...
Peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy (PEHCR) is a rare retinal vasculopathy that might cause subretinal and/or vitreous hemorrhages. Although the primary etiology is still unknown, choroidal neovascularization is mainly involved in the pathogenesis. The main risk factors are age and systemic hypertension. Ancillary testing such as fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography and ultrasonography can be of great value for diagnosing this entity and distinguishing PEHCR from other lesions as choroidal melanoma and retinal vasoproliferative tumor. Various treatments have been reported including photocoagulation, cryotherapy, intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) and surgical intervention as pars plana vitrectomy. This review handles an up-to-date perspective regarding PEHCR.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Coloring Agents; Cryotherapy; Fluorescein Angiography; Humans; Indocyanine Green; Intravitreal Injections; Laser Coagulation; Retinal Hemorrhage; Risk Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Ultrasonography; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vitrectomy; Vitreous Hemorrhage
PubMed: 32549717
DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_85_20 -
JAMA Network Open Feb 2020Diagnosing posterior chamber ocular abnormalities typically requires specialist assessment. Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) performed by nonspecialists, if... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Diagnosing posterior chamber ocular abnormalities typically requires specialist assessment. Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) performed by nonspecialists, if accurate, could negate the need for urgent ophthalmologist evaluation.
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis sought to define the diagnostic test characteristics of emergency practitioner-performed ocular POCUS to diagnose multiple posterior chamber abnormalities in adults.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed (OVID), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and SCOPUS were searched from inception through June 2019 without restrictions. Conference abstracts and trial registries were also searched. Bibliographies of included studies and relevant reviews were manually searched, and experts in the field were queried.
STUDY SELECTION
Included studies compared ocular POCUS performed by emergency practitioners with a reference standard of ophthalmologist evaluation. Pediatric studies were excluded. All 116 studies identified during abstract screening as potentially relevant underwent full-text review by multiple authors, and 9 studies were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, multiple authors extracted data from included studies. Results were meta-analyzed for each diagnosis using a bivariate random-effects model. Data analysis was performed in July 2019.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The outcomes of interest were diagnostic test characteristics of ocular POCUS for the following diagnoses: retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, vitreous detachment, intraocular foreign body, globe rupture, and lens dislocation.
RESULTS
Nine studies (1189 eyes) were included. All studies evaluated retinal detachment, but up to 5 studies assessed each of the other diagnoses of interest. For retinal detachment, sensitivity was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-0.97) and specificity was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98). Sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.65-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.75-0.98), respectively, for vitreous hemorrhage and were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51-0.81) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.53-0.98), respectively, for vitreous detachment. Sensitivity and specificity were high for lens dislocation (0.97 [95% CI, 0.83-0.99] and 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.00]), intraocular foreign body (1.00 [95% CI, 0.81-1.00] and 0.99 [95% CI, 0.99-1.00]), and globe rupture (1.00 [95% CI, 0.63-1.00] and 0.99 [95% CI, 0.99-1.00]). Results were generally unchanged in sensitivity analyses of studies with low risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This study suggests that emergency practitioner-performed ocular POCUS is an accurate test to assess for retinal detachment in adults. Its utility in diagnosing other posterior chamber abnormalities is promising but needs further study.
Topics: Eye Diseases; Humans; Point-of-Care Systems; Posterior Eye Segment; Retinal Detachment; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 32074291
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21460 -
Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology 2021Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of visual loss in the working population. Pars plana vitrectomy has become the mainstream treatment option for severe...
BACKGROUND
Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of visual loss in the working population. Pars plana vitrectomy has become the mainstream treatment option for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) associated with significant vitreous haemorrhage and/or tractional retinal detachment. Despite the advances in surgical equipment, diabetic vitrectomy remains a challenging operation, requiring advanced microsurgical skills, especially in the presence of tractional retinal detachment. Preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab has been widely employed as an adjuvant to ease surgical difficulty and improve postoperative prognosis.Aims: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab in reducing intraoperative complications and improving postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing vitrectomy for the complications of PDR.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify all related studies published before 31/10/2020. Prespecified outcome measures were operation time, intraoperative iatrogenic retinal breaks, best-corrected visual acuity in the last follow-up visit, the presence of any postoperative vitreous haemorrhage and the need to re-operate. Evidence synthesis was performed using Fixed or Random Effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q-statistic and I. Additional meta-regression models, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed as appropriate.
RESULTS
Thirteen randomized control trials, with a total of 688 eyes were included in this review. Comparison of the intraoperative data showed that bevacizumab reduced operation time ( < 0.001), minimized iatrogenic retinal breaks ( < 0.001), provided better long-term visual acuity outcomes ( = 0.005), and prevented vitreous haemorrhage ( < 0.001) and the need for reoperation ( = 0.001 < 0.05). Findings were strongly corroborated by additional sensitivity and subgroup analyses.
CONCLUSION
Preoperative administration of bevacizumab is effective in reducing intraoperative complications and improving the postoperative prognosis of diabetic vitrectomy. CRD42021219280.
PubMed: 34901749
DOI: 10.1177/25158414211059256 -
Acta Medica Portuguesa Aug 2017Postoperative vitreous hemorrhage is a complication following vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, delaying visual recovery and making fundus examination... (Review)
Review
[Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor for Prevention of Postoperative Vitreous Cavity Hemorrhage after Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD008214.].
Postoperative vitreous hemorrhage is a complication following vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, delaying visual recovery and making fundus examination and disease follow-up more difficult. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs such as bevacizumab, when injected in the vitreous cavity, reduce vascular proliferation and their use has been proposed to reduce the incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage. The authors of this Cochrane systematic review evaluated all randomized controlled trials on the pre- or intraoperative use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor to reduce postoperative vitreous hemorrhage occurrence after vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The results suggested that the use of intravitreal bevacizumab was effective in reducing early postoperative vitreous hemorrhage (i.e. at four weeks) occurrence, with a good safety profile. This work aims to summarize and discuss the findings and clinical implications of this Cochrane systematic review.
Topics: Diabetic Retinopathy; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vitrectomy; Vitreous Hemorrhage
PubMed: 28926323
DOI: 10.20344/amp.9437 -
Cureus Feb 2023Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) is the most common intracranial tumor in tuberous sclerosis (TS) patients. The tumor generally localizes in the proximity of...
Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) is the most common intracranial tumor in tuberous sclerosis (TS) patients. The tumor generally localizes in the proximity of Monro's foramen; as it grows, it subsequently causes hydrocephalus and increases intracranial pressure (ICP). However, acute symptoms of increased ICP due to intratumoral bleeding rarely manifest in SEGA patients. We present a 27-year-old male with TS who presented due to hemorrhagic complications of SEGA with intratumoral bleeding and vitreous orbital hemorrhage. We then conducted a systematic review with four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) to identify similar cases using the following keywords: "Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma," "Hemorrhage," "Haemorrhage," and "Bleeding." Our review identified 12 articles reporting 14 cases of hemorrhagic complications of SEGA in addition to our case report. The median age of diagnosis was 21 (range 5-79) years with unequal gender distribution (M:F ratio, 11:4). Headache was the most presented symptom, followed by hemiparesis, seizure, altered mental status, visual deterioration, and headache accompanied by seizure. TS was seen in most of the cases (80%). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 53.5% of the patients. Regarding the clinical outcome, 66.7% had a good outcome, 20% died, and 13.3% had no report of their outcomes. No tumor recurrence was seen in the cases with a reported duration of follow-up. Catastrophic presentation of SEGA apoplexy is a rare occurrence. We present a case report with a systematic review and discuss SEGA apoplexy's possible pathophysiology and outcome.
PubMed: 36915840
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34784 -
Acta Ophthalmologica Sep 2021To conduct a systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus anti-vascular...
Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, panretinal photocoagulation and combined treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
To conduct a systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment alone or in combination with PRP, for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
METHODS
PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were searched for RCTs comparing PRP versus intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and/or combined PRP and intravitreal anti-VEGF for PDR. The primary outcome measures were the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change and the regression of neovascularization. Mean change of central macular thickness (CMT), the subgroup analyses of patients without diabetic macular oedema (DME) and the rate of vitreous haemorrhage and vitrectomy were secondary outcomes. Frequentist NMAs were performed.
RESULTS
Twelve RCTs were included. For the 12-month mean BCVA change, NMA showed a better visual outcome in both the anti-VEGF group and combined group compared to PRP [anti-VEGF vs PRP, mean difference (MD) = 3.42; standard error (SE) = 1.5; combined vs PRP, MD = 3.92; SE = 1.65], with no difference between combined group and anti-VEGF (MD = -0.50; SE = 1.87). No difference in neovascularization regression was found between PRP and anti-VEGF alone or in combination with PRP, but there was significant inconsistency (p = 0.016). Subgroup analyses in patients without DME yielded no difference for the 12-month visual outcome between the three interventions, but with significant inconsistency (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION
This NMA showed limited evidence of comparable efficacy in terms of neovascularization regression between PRP and anti-VEGF therapy alone or in combination with PRP, but better visual outcomes were associated with anti-VEGF use. Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy could be a valid therapeutic option in association with PRP.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Diabetic Retinopathy; Humans; Intravitreal Injections; Laser Coagulation; Network Meta-Analysis; Visual Acuity; Vitrectomy
PubMed: 33326183
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14681 -
BMJ Open Dec 2018To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and corticosteroids for the treatment of macular oedema (ME) secondary to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and corticosteroids for the treatment of macular oedema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
DESIGN
Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients from previously reported randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGF and corticosteroids for the treatment of ME secondary to CRVO.
METHODS
Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov until March 2017. Therapeutic effects were estimated using the proportions of patients gaining/losing ≥15 letters, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Treatment safety was estimated using the proportions of adverse events, namely increased intraocular pressure (IOP), cataracts, vitreous haemorrhage (VH) and retinal tear. The software ADDIS (V.1.16.8) was used for analysis. Treatment effect and safety of different drugs could be ranked based on simulation.
RESULTS
Eleven RCTs comprising 2060 patients were identified. Regarding patients gaining ≥15 letters, aflibercept and ranibizumab were significantly more effective than sham/placebo at 6 months. Regarding patients losing ≥15 letters at 6 months, ranibizumab showed significant improvement compared with dexamethasone. Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab showed greater improvements in BCVA than sham/placebo at 6 months. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection demonstrated greater CRT reduction than both sham and dexamethasone did. Dexamethasone had a higher risk of increased IOP than aflibercept and ranibizumab. Ranibizumab demonstrated a greater risk of cataracts than dexamethasone. Aflibercept and ranibizumab demonstrated low incidence of VH and retinal tear, respectively. Aflibercept had a slight advantage over ranibizumab as assessed by benefit-risk analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Anti-VEGF agents have advantages in the treatment of ME secondary to CRVO. Aflibercept and ranibizumab showed marked BCVA improvement and CRT reduction. Aflibercept may have a slight advantage over ranibizumab. The results of this study can serve as a reference for clinicians to provide patient-tailored treatment.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42017064076.
Topics: Humans; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aptamers, Nucleotide; Dexamethasone; Intraocular Pressure; Intravitreal Injections; Macular Edema; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ranibizumab; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Retinal Vein Occlusion; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome; Triamcinolone; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 30593547
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022700 -
Ophthalmology and Therapy Dec 2022This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) as treatment for patients with primary symptomatic vitreous floaters.
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) as treatment for patients with primary symptomatic vitreous floaters.
METHODS
We searched 12 databases for studies performing PPV for primary symptomatic vitreous floaters with at least 3 months follow-up. Two authors reviewed the studies and extracted data. Our main outcome of interest was patient satisfaction/reduction of symptoms/quality of life, but other measures of efficacy and safety were also extracted. Where possible, meta-analyses were performed to provide summary estimates.
RESULTS
We identified 18 eligible studies, which included 2077 eyes of 1789 patients. Studies reported that at least 90% of the patients were satisfied or had relief of symptoms. Best corrected visual acuity improved - 0.08 logMAR (95% CI - 0.10 to - 0.06 logMAR, P < 0.0001). Contrast sensitivity improved - 2.26% (95% CI - 3.26 to - 1.26%, P < 0.0001). After surgery, cataract occurred in 31.7% (95% CI 21.7-42.7%), retinal tears/breaks in 2.92% (95% CI 1.38-4.97%), vitreous hemorrhage in 1.97% (95% CI 0.83-3.54%), macular edema in 1.70% (95% CI 0.84-2.83%), retinal detachment in 1.54% (95% CI 0.62-2.82%), glaucoma in 1.04% (95% CI 0.53-1.73%), and endophthalmitis in 0.18% (95% CI 0.02-0.45%).
CONCLUSIONS
Postoperative patient satisfaction is high after PPV for primary symptomatic vitreous floaters. However, the patient should be carefully counselled as what to expect from the treatment and understand the risks associated with PPV.
PubMed: 36198880
DOI: 10.1007/s40123-022-00578-9