-
International Journal of Cardiology.... Dec 2019Both native T1 time and extracellular volume (ECV) fraction have been shown to be important measures for the detection of myocardial fibrosis. However, ECV determination...
Native T1 time and extracellular volume fraction in differentiation of normal myocardium from non-ischemic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myocardium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Both native T1 time and extracellular volume (ECV) fraction have been shown to be important measures for the detection of myocardial fibrosis. However, ECV determination requires the administration of an intravenous contrast agent, whereas native T1 mapping can be performed without a contrast agent.
METHODS
Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of myocardial native T1 data obtained for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NIC) patients and controls. A literature review included studies that applied T1 mapping using modified Look-Locker inversion recovery to measure myocardial fibrosis, and the results were validated by comparing datasets for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients and healthy controls (HCs).
RESULTS
We identified 16 eligible studies. Pooled mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated as follows. Native T1 at 1.5-T, DCM vs. HC: MD = 45.26 (95% CI: 30.92-59.59); HCM vs. HC: MD = 47.09 (95% CI: 32.42-61.76). Native T1 at 3.0-T, DCM vs. HC: MD = 82.52 (95% CI: 47.60-117.44); HCM vs. HC: MD = 115.87 (95% CI: 50.71-181.04). ECV at 1.5-T, DCM vs. HC: MD = 4.26 (95% CI: 3.06-5.46); HCM vs. HC: MD = 1.49 (95% CI: -1.45-4.43). ECV at 3.0-T, DCM vs. HC: MD = 8.40 (95% CI: 2.94-13.86); HCM vs. HC: MD = 8.02 (95% CI: 5.45-1-0.59).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, native T1 values were significantly different between NIC patients and controls. Native T1 mapping may be a useful noninvasive method to detect diffuse myocardial fibrosis in NIC patients.
PubMed: 31517037
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100422 -
Heart, Lung & Circulation Sep 2023Current pharmacological options for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are not disease-specific; while it treats symptoms, mavacamten targets the underlying pathology. We... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Current pharmacological options for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are not disease-specific; while it treats symptoms, mavacamten targets the underlying pathology. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of mavacamten, a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor, in symptomatic obstructive HCM.
METHODS
This systematic review of the literature followed the PRISMA guidelines. Title/abstract and topics were searched using the following term: "mavacamten". The electronic research literature databases included the Cochrane Library, MedLine, and clinicaltrials.gov from July to August 2022. Primary efficacy endpoint was to assess clinical response at the end of treatment compared with baseline, defined as, at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) class reduction. Two secondary endpoints from baseline were determined. The first was defined as improvement in mixed venous oxygen pressure (pVO). The second was defined as reduction of the post-exercise left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient.
RESULTS
We included in our analyses data from four studies that met our review eligibility criteria. There were three randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials and one non-randomised open-label clinical trial. All four studies showed a reduction in NYHA class from mavacamten use. Three out of four studies demonstrated >1 NYHA functional class improvement ranging from 34% to 80%, while only one study showed a smaller percentage of patients remaining at class 3. Three out of four studies measured pVO as an outcome, and all three studies noticed an increase in peak oxygen consumption after mavacamten treatment. Additionally, three out of four studies measured post-exercise LVOT gradient reduction as an outcome and all three found significant reduction in the post-exercise LVOT gradient after treatment. The most commonly observed adverse side effects were atrial fibrillation and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, but all participants recovered without long-term sequelae and only one patient dropped out of the trial.
CONCLUSIONS
Mavacamten has a greater efficacy than placebo in the treatment of HCM. It also showed promising tolerability and efficacy profiles in the treatment of HCM in adults. The three endpoints used in the evaluation of studies were reduction in NYHA class, increase in pVO, and post-exercise LVOT gradient reduction. Mavacamten showed greater reduction in NYHA, larger effects on increase of pVO, and significant reduction of the LVOT gradient. Mavacamten was also found to be well tolerated, like the placebo. The side effect profile was limited for the majority of individuals taking mavacamten. In the future, authors recommended dose-optimisation studies, and studies that evaluate mavacamten both in comparison to, and in conjunction with other current treatments.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Heart; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37453852
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.05.019 -
ESC Heart Failure Dec 2022Heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) have overlapping clinical features, compared with patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) have overlapping clinical features, compared with patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aim to perform a meta-analysis of studies reporting long-term outcomes in HFmrEF compared with HFrEF and HFpEF.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Data from 18 eligible large-scale studies including 126 239 patients were pooled. Patients with HFmrEF had a lower risk of all-cause death than those with HFrEF [risk ratio (RR) = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.85-0.98; P < 0.001]. This significant difference was seen in the follow-up at 1, 2, and 3 years. Patients with HFmrEF had significantly lower risk of cardiovascular (CV) deaths than HFrEF (RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.65-0.92; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that studies recruiting >50% of males had higher risk of deaths with HFrEF (RR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.04-1.26; P = 0.006). When compared with HFpEF, patients with HFmrEF had comparable risk of all-cause death (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.96-1.09; P = 0.53). Similarly, there were no differences in the 1, 2, and 3 year deaths; CV and non-CV deaths were insignificant between HFmrEF and HFpEF.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the study support that HFmrEF has better prognosis than HFrEF but similar prognosis when compared with HFpEF. Gender disparity between studies seems to influence the results between HFmrEF and HFrEF. Transition in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which could not be addressed in the study, may play a decisive role in determining outcomes. PROSPERO review registration number CRD42021277107.
Topics: Male; Humans; Heart Failure; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Prognosis; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 36045010
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14125 -
Frontiers in Physiology 2023Exercise-derived exosomes have been identified as novel players in mediating cell-to-cell communication in the beneficial effects of improving cardiovascular disease... (Review)
Review
Exercise-derived exosomes have been identified as novel players in mediating cell-to-cell communication in the beneficial effects of improving cardiovascular disease (CVD). This review aimed to systematically investigate exosomes as delivery tools for the benefits of exercise in the prevention and treatment of CVD and summarize these outcomes with an overview of their therapeutic implications. Among the 1417 articles obtained in nine database searches (PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Ovid, Science Direct, Scopus, and Wiley), 12 articles were included based on eligibility criteria. The results indicate that exercise increases the release of exosomes, increasing exosomal markers (TSG101, CD63, and CD81) and exosome-carried miRNAs (miR-125b-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-342-5p, miR-126, miR-130a, miR-138-5p, and miR-455). These miRNAs mainly regulate the expression of MAPK, NF-kB, VEGF, and Caspase to protect the cardiovascular system. Moreover, the outcome indicators of myocardial apoptosis and myocardial infarction volume are significantly reduced following exercise-induced exosome release, and angiogenesis, microvessel density and left ventricular ejection fraction are significantly increased, as well as alleviating myocardial fibrosis following exercise-induced exosome release. Collectively, these results further confirm that exercise-derived exosomes have a beneficial role in potentially preventing and treating CVD and support the use of exercise-derived exosomes in clinical settings.
PubMed: 37841310
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1190095 -
Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia :... Apr 2017Aortic stenosis (AS) is a complex systemic valvular and vascular disease with a high prevalence in developed countries. The new entity "paradoxical low-flow,... (Review)
Review
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a complex systemic valvular and vascular disease with a high prevalence in developed countries. The new entity "paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis" refers to cases in which patients have severe AS based on assessment of aortic valve area (AVA) (≤1 cm) or indexed AVA (≤0.6 cm/m), but paradoxically have a low mean transvalvular gradient (<40 mmHg) and a low stroke volume index (≤35 ml/m), despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%). A search was carried out in the PubMed database on paradoxical AS for the period 2007-2014. A total of 57 articles were included for this review. The prevalence of paradoxical AS ranged from 3% to 35% of the population with severe degenerative AS. It was more frequent in females and in older patients. Paradoxical AS was associated with characteristic left ventricular remodeling as well as an increase in systemic arterial stiffness. It was noted that there may be errors and inaccuracies in the calculation of AVA by the continuity equation, which could erroneously suggest the paradoxical phenotype. There are new diagnostic methods to facilitate the study of AS, such as aortic valve calcium score, valvuloarterial impedance and the longitudinal mechanics of the left ventricle. With regard to its natural history, it is not clear whether paradoxical AS corresponds to an advance stage of the disease or if paradoxical AS patients have a distinct phenotype with specific characteristics. Valve replacement, either surgical or percutaneous, may be indicated in patients with severe and symptomatic paradoxical AS.
Topics: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Humans
PubMed: 28336114
DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2016.09.010 -
European Urology Focus Nov 2023Erectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and analyze the cardiac structure and function in men with ED assessed with echocardiography.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library on June 2, 2022, and included studies evaluating cardiac structure and function using echocardiography in men with ED compared with controls without ED. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used for assessing the quality of studies. We analyzed the mean differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the ratio of early transmitral filling velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e'), ratio of the early to late diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E/A), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), and left ventricular mass index (LVMi) in a random-effect model computed using means and standard deviations. The review was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42022337183). We received no funding.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
We included ten studies with 763 men diagnosed with ED (mean age: 55.6 yr) and 358 control men (mean age: 54.4 yr). E/e' was significantly worse in men with ED than in controls (mean absolute difference = 1.17, 95% confidence interval or CI [0.68, 1.65], p < 0.005). No significant differences were observed in LVEF, E/A, IVRT, or LVMi (-0.06, 95% CI [-1.06, 0.95], p = 0.91; -0.06, 95% CI [-0.24, 0.13], p = 0.55; 11.76, 95% CI [-0.88, 24.39], p = 0.07; and 4.37, 95% CI [-2.91, 11.65], respectively). The studies exhibited heterogeneity regarding study populations, reported echocardiography data, and variations in adjustments for confounding factors.
CONCLUSIONS
Left ventricle diastolic dysfunction, as assessed by E/e', was more frequent in men with ED than in matched controls without ED. The results imply that echocardiography may be useful in the cardiovascular evaluation of men with ED to help identify myocardial impairment.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This study reviewed for the first time previous research on cardiac structure and function in men with erectile dysfunction (ED), as assessed by echocardiography. We found that men with ED, compared with men without ED, had a higher ratio of early transmitral filling velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity , indicating a potentially higher rate of impaired diastolic function-a potential early indicator of heart disease. Identification of early signs of heart problems in men with ED may help initiate necessary lifestyle modifications or preventative therapies before the development of heart disease. However, more research is required to determine the clinical utility of using echocardiography as a risk assessment method.
Topics: Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Erectile Dysfunction; Ventricular Function, Left; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Diastole
PubMed: 37355365
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.06.001 -
Clinical Cardiology Oct 2022This meta-analysis aims to look at the impact of early intravenous Metoprolol in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) before percutaneous coronary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effect of early metoprolol before PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
AIM
This meta-analysis aims to look at the impact of early intravenous Metoprolol in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on infarct size, as measured by cardio magnetic resonance (CMR) and left ventricular ejection fraction.
METHODS
We searched the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science. We included only randomized control trials that reported the use of early intravenous Metoprolol in STEMI before PCI on infarct size, as measured by CMR and left ventricular ejection fraction. RevMan software 5.4 was used for performing the analysis.
RESULTS
Following a literature search, 340 publications were found. Finally, 18 studies were included for the systematic review, and 8 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis after the full-text screening. At 6 months, the pooled effect revealed a statistically significant association between Metoprolol and increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) compared to controls (mean difference [MD] = 3.57, [95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.22-4.92], p < .00001), as well as decreased infarcted myocardium(g) compared to controls (MD = -3.84, [95% [CI] = -5.75 to -1.93], p < .0001). At 1 week, the pooled effect revealed a statistically significant association between Metoprolol and increased LVEF (%) compared to controls (MD = 2.98, [95% CI = 1.26-4.69], p = .0007), as well as decreased infarcted myocardium(%) compared to controls (MD = -3.21, [95% CI = -5.24 to -1.18], p = .002).
CONCLUSION
A significant decrease in myocardial infarction and increase in LVEF (%) was linked to receiving Metoprolol at 1 week and 6-month follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Metoprolol; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 36040709
DOI: 10.1002/clc.23894 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Jul 2012The concept of radiation dose-volume effect has been exploited in breast cancer as boost treatment for high risk patients and more recently in trials of Partial Breast... (Review)
Review
The concept of radiation dose-volume effect has been exploited in breast cancer as boost treatment for high risk patients and more recently in trials of Partial Breast Irradiation for low risk patients. However, there appears to be paucity of published data on the dose-volume effect of irradiation on breast tissue including the recently published report on Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC). This systematic review looks at the current literature for relationship between irradiated breast volume and normal tissue complications and introduces the concept of dose modulation.
Topics: Brachytherapy; Breast; Breast Neoplasms; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Female; Humans; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
PubMed: 22682540
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.04.025 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2012Chronic heart failure (HF) is a prevalent world-wide. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed for chronic HF although their role is controversial. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic heart failure (HF) is a prevalent world-wide. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed for chronic HF although their role is controversial.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefit and harm of ARBs compared with ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) or placebo on mortality, morbidity and withdrawals due to adverse effects in patients with symptomatic HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction or preserved systolic function.
SEARCH METHODS
Clinical trials were identified by searching CENTRAL, HTA, and DARE , (The Cochrane Library 2010 Issue 3), as well as MEDLINE (2002 to July 2010), and EMBASE (2002 to July 2010). Reference lists of retrieved articles and systematic reviews were checked for additional studies not identified by the electronic searches.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Double blind randomised controlled trials in men and women of all ages who have symptomatic (NYHA Class II to IV) HF and: 1) left ventricular systolic dysfunction, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%; or 2) preserved ejection fraction, defined as LVEF >40%.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data from included studies.
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty two studies evaluated the effects of ARBs in 17,900 patients with a LVEF ≤40% (mean 2.2 years). ARBs did not reduce total mortality (RR 0.87 [95% CI 0.76, 1.00]) or total morbidity as measured by total hospitalisations (RR 0.94 [95% CI 0.88, 1.01]) compared with placebo.Total mortality (RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.91, 1.22]), total hospitalisations (RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.92, 1.08]), MI (RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.62, 1.63]), and stroke (RR 1.63 [0.77, 3.44]) did not differ between ARBs and ACEIs but withdrawals due to adverse effects were lower with ARBs (RR 0.63 [95% CI 0.52, 0.76]). Combinations of ARBs plus ACEIs increased the risk of withdrawals due to adverse effects (RR 1.34 [95% CI 1.19, 1.51]) but did not reduce total mortality or total hospital admissions versus ACEI alone.Two placebo-controlled studies evaluated ARBs in 7151 patients with a LVEF >40% (mean 3.7 years). ARBs did not reduce total mortality (RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.93, 1.12]) or total morbidity as measured by total hospitalisations (RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.97, 1.05]) compared with placebo. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were higher with ARBs versus placebo when all patients were pooled irrespective of LVEF (RR 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.12]).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In patients with symptomatic HF and systolic dysfunction or with preserved ejection fraction, ARBs compared to placebo or ACEIs do not reduce total mortality or morbidity. ARBs are better tolerated than ACEIs but do not appear to be as safe and well tolerated as placebo in terms of withdrawals due to adverse effects. Adding an ARB in combination with an ACEI does not reduce total mortality or total hospital admission but increases withdrawals due to adverse effects compared with ACEI alone.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Chronic Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 22513909
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003040.pub2 -
ESC Heart Failure Feb 2020To retrieve and assess the available data in the literature about the safety and efficacy of baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) in heart failure with reduced ejection... (Review)
Review
To retrieve and assess the available data in the literature about the safety and efficacy of baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, through a rapid systematic review of clinical studies. Rapid systematic review of literature. Searched electronic databases included PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science using Mesh and free terms for heart failure and BAT. No language restriction was used for the searches. We included full peer reviewed publications of clinical studies (randomized or not), including patients with HFrEF undergoing BAT, with or without control group, assessing safety and efficacy outcomes. One reviewer conducted the analysis of the selected abstracts and the full-text articles, performed data extraction, and evaluated the methodological quality of the selected articles. The methodological quality was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration instruments. A descriptive summary of the results is provided. Of the 441 citations screened, 10 publications were included (three were only conference abstracts), reporting data from three studies. Only one study was a randomized clinical trial. Two studies reported a 6 month following, and the other study analysed outcomes up to 41 months. The procedure seems to be safe when performed by a well-trained multi-professional team. An 86% rate of system and procedure-related complication-free was reported, with no cranial nerve injuries. Improvements in New York Heart Association class of heart failure, quality of life, 6 min walk test, and hospitalization rates, as well as in muscle sympathetic nerve activity. No meta-analysis was conducted because of the lack of homogeneity across studies; the results from each study are reported individually. BAT procedure seems to be safe if appropriate training is provided. Improvements in clinical outcomes were described in all included studies. However, several limitations do not allow us to make conclusive statements on the efficacy of BAT for HFrEF. New well-designed trials are still needed.
Topics: Baroreflex; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Heart Failure; Humans; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 31965746
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12543