-
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Sep 2015The aim of this study was to systematically review the findings of publications addressing the epidemiology of anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, anal... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to systematically review the findings of publications addressing the epidemiology of anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, anal intraepithelial neoplasia, and anal cancer in women. We conducted a systematic review among publications published from Jan. 1, 1997, to Sept. 30, 2013, to limit to publications from the combined antiretroviral therapy era. Three searches were performed of the National Library of Medicine PubMed database using the following search terms: women and anal HPV, women anal intraepithelial neoplasia, and women and anal cancer. Publications were included in the review if they addressed any of the following outcomes: (1) prevalence, incidence, or clearance of anal HPV infection, (2) prevalence of anal cytological or histological neoplastic abnormalities, or (3) incidence or risk of anal cancer. Thirty-seven publications addressing anal HPV infection and anal cytology remained after applying selection criteria, and 23 anal cancer publications met the selection criteria. Among HIV-positive women, the prevalence of high-risk (HR)-HPV in the anus was 16-85%. Among HIV-negative women, the prevalence of anal HR-HPV infection ranged from 4% to 86%. The prevalence of anal HR-HPV in HIV-negative women with HPV-related pathology of the vulva, vagina, and cervix compared with women with no known HPV-related pathology, varied from 23% to 86% and from 5% to 22%, respectively. Histological anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater) was found in 3-26% of the women living with HIV, 0-9% among women with lower genital tract pathology, and 0-3% for women who are HIV negative without known lower genital tract pathology. The incidence of anal cancer among HIV-infected women ranged from 3.9 to 30 per 100,000. Among women with a history of cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3, the incidence rates of anal cancer ranged from 0.8 to 63.8 per 100,000 person-years, and in the general population, the incidence rates ranged from 0.55 to 2.4 per 100,000 person-years. This review provides evidence that anal HPV infection and dysplasia are common in women, especially in those who are HIV positive or have a history of HPV-related lower genital tract pathology. The incidence of anal cancer continues to grow in all women, especially those living with HIV, despite the widespread use of combined antiretroviral therapy.
Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Anus Diseases; Anus Neoplasms; Carcinoma in Situ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Coinfection; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Papillomavirus Infections; Prevalence; Proctitis
PubMed: 25797230
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.034 -
International Journal of Environmental... Jul 2021Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the anogenital region, which may present in a prepubertal or adolescent patient. The most...
Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the anogenital region, which may present in a prepubertal or adolescent patient. The most popular theories are its autoimmune and genetic conditioning, although theories concerning hormonal and infectious etiology have also been raised. The most common presenting symptoms of VLS is vulva pruritus, discomfort, dysuria and constipation. In physical examination, a classic "Figure 8" pattern is described, involving the labia minora, clitoral hood, and perianal region. The lesions initially are white, flat-topped papules, thin plaques, or commonly atrophic patches. Purpura is a hallmark feature of VLS. The treatment includes topical anti-inflammatory agents and long-term follow-up, as there is a high risk of recurrence and an increased risk of vulvar cancer in adult women with a history of lichen sclerosus. This article reviews vulvar lichen sclerosus in children and provides evidence-based medicine principles for treatment in the pediatric population. A systematic search of the literature shows recurrence of VLS in children. Maintenance regimens deserve further consideration.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Child; Female; Humans; Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus; Vulvar Diseases; Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
PubMed: 34281089
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137153 -
Cancers Feb 2021According to our systematic literature review (PRISMA guidelines), only 37 vulvar squamous cell carcinomas (VSCCs) were diagnosed during pregnancy (age range: 17-41... (Review)
Review
According to our systematic literature review (PRISMA guidelines), only 37 vulvar squamous cell carcinomas (VSCCs) were diagnosed during pregnancy (age range: 17-41 years). The tumor size range was 0.3-15 cm. The treatment was performed after (14/37, 38%), before (10/37, 27%), or before-and-after delivery (11/37, 30%). We found that 21/37 (57%) cases were stage I, 2 II (5%), 11 III (30%), and 3 IVB (8%). HPV-related features (condylomas/warts; HPV infection; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) were reported in 11/37 (30%) cases. We also found that 9/37 (24%) patients had inflammatory conditions (lichen sclerosus/planus, psoriasis, chronic dermatitis). The time-to-recurrence/progression (12/37, 32%) ranged from 0 to 36 (mean 9) months. Eight women died of disease (22%) 2.5-48 months after diagnosis, 2 (5%) were alive with disease, and 23 (62%) were disease-free at the end of follow-up. Pregnant patients must be followed-up. Even if they are small, newly arising vulvar lesions should be biopsied, especially in women with risk factors (HPV, dermatosis, etc.). The treatment of VSCCs diagnosed in late third trimester might be delayed until postpartum. Elective cesarean section may prevent vulvar wound dehiscence. In the few reported cases, pregnancy/fetal outcomes seemed to not be affected by invasive treatments during pregnancy. However, clinicians must be careful; larger cohorts should define the best treatment. Definite guidelines are lacking, so a multidisciplinary approach and discussion with patients are mandatory.
PubMed: 33671249
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040836 -
International Journal of Dermatology Aug 2019The vulva is an unusual site for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Vulvar BCC accounts for <1% of all BCCs and <5% of all vulvar malignancies. We report the case of an...
The vulva is an unusual site for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Vulvar BCC accounts for <1% of all BCCs and <5% of all vulvar malignancies. We report the case of an 83 year-old woman who presented with a 2-month history of a tender labial growth, with histopathology confirming nodular BCC. We conducted a systematic literature review of the characteristics of reported cases of vulvar BCCs. A comprehensive systematic review of articles indexed for MEDLINE and Embase yielded 96 reports describing 437 patients with 446 BCCs of the vulva. The mean age at presentation was 70 (range 20-100). Most women had no underlying vulvar disease. Approximately 60% of cases were of the nodular subtype. Treatment approach varied widely with over half of cases treated with wide local or local excision. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for vulvar BCC was first reported in 1988 with seven total MMS cases reported. Twenty-three cases of recurrence have been reported; 21 of these cases after local excision but none following MMS. Vulvar BCC is a rarely reported cancer that affects older women predominantly. MMS represents a promising treatment for BCC in this anatomic location.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Female; Humans; Mohs Surgery; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vulva; Vulvar Neoplasms; Vulvectomy
PubMed: 30506682
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14307 -
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy &... Oct 2016Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an endoscopic technique whereby surgical interventions can be performed with a flexible endoscope passed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an endoscopic technique whereby surgical interventions can be performed with a flexible endoscope passed through a natural orifice (mouth, vulva, urethra, anus) then through a transluminal opening of the stomach, vagina, bladder, or colon. Although in the early stage of research and development, NOTES has been clinically applied across the globe, above all the transvaginal cholecystectomy is among the most frequently performed procedures. In the existing 2 types of transvaginal routes, the hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy (NC) is more likely to be accepted. However, there has been controversy regarding the safety outcomes of hybrid NC in comparison with classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the characteristics between NC and classical LC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A meta-analysis of eligible studies comparing NC with classical LC was performed to evaluate the safety outcomes including wound complications, other postoperative complications and intraoperative conversion between the 2 groups.
RESULTS
Pooling 3 randomized controlled trials (n=157) and 7 nonrandomized trial (n=593) demonstrated that the rates of wound complications and other postoperative complications in NC group did not significantly differ from those of classical LC group [wound complications: ratio difference (RD)=-0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.04to 0.01, P=0.23; other postoperative complication: RD=-0.01; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.02; P=0.6]. The intraoperative conversion rate in NC groups was higher than that of LC groups (RD=0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.06; P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
There is no significate difference between the safety of NC and laparoscope cholecystectomy. NC is associated with a higher rate of intraoperative conversion when compared with LC. It is worthy of further promotion and validation in clinical settings.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Conversion to Open Surgery; Humans; Length of Stay; Middle Aged; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery; Observational Studies as Topic; Operative Time; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult
PubMed: 27557339
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000284 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2022Lichen sclerosus (LS) is defined as a chronic mucocutaneous inflammatory disease with a localization predominantly to the anus and genitals (vulvar sclerosus (VLS)).... (Review)
Review
Lichen sclerosus (LS) is defined as a chronic mucocutaneous inflammatory disease with a localization predominantly to the anus and genitals (vulvar sclerosus (VLS)). Pediatric lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition with predilection for the anogenital area that if untreated can lead to scarring. Vulvar LS is characterized by two peaks in incidence: it occurs in prepubertal girls and in postmenopausal women. To date, several mechanisms and risk factors have been proposed in the pathogenesis of pediatric vulvar LS; however, the etiology of this condition is still not fully understood and constitutes a challenge for scientists and clinicians. The presented research aimed to systematically review the existing literature on the pathogenesis of pediatric LS and to identify possible underlying autoimmune mechanisms and molecular networks. The clinical presentation of pediatric lichen sclerosus and available treatment modalities are also presented to acquaint a broader audience with this underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. As a result of our review, we discuss several potential mechanisms, molecules, and pathways that have been recognized in this disease. The purpose of our review was also to summarize what we can induce in further studies, which will ultimately help to identify the mechanism responsible for the disease and aid in the development of new, more effective treatment strategies for diagnosis and treatment by clinicians and researchers.
Topics: Humans; Female; Child; Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus; Vulva; Immune System Diseases; Genitalia; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36430687
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232214212 -
PloS One 2015To systematically review previous studies and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in vulvar cancer. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review previous studies and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in vulvar cancer.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive review of studies published through September 2014 to retrieve all relevant articles. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wan Fang Data and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched for all relevant studies published in English or Chinese through September 2014. Data were abstracted independently by two reviewers, and any differences were resolved by consensus.
RESULTS
A total of 9 studies containing 249 VEIL procedures involving 138 patients were reviewed. Of the 249 VEIL procedures, only 1 (0.4%) was converted to an open procedure for suturing because of injury to the femoral vein. The range of operative time was 62 to 110 minutes, and the range of estimated blood loss was 5.5 to 22 ml. The range of the number of harvested lymph nodes was 7.3 to 16. The length of hospital stay varied from 7 to 13.6 days across reports. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was 19.7% (27/138), and the recurrence rate was 4.3% (3/70) within 3 to 41 months of follow-up. One or more short-term complications were documented in 18 of 138 (13.0%) patients. Complications after VEIL were observed in 14 (10.13%) patients and in 15 (6.0%) of the VEIL cases, including major lymphocyst formation in 9 (3.6%), lymphorrhea in 2 (0.8%), inguinal wound infection without wound breakdown in 3 (1.2%) and lymphedema in 1 (0.4%).
CONCLUSIONS
VEIL appears to be a feasible procedure in the management of vulvar cancer. There may be potential benefits that result in lower morbidity compared to traditional methods, but this has yet to be objectively proven.
Topics: Bacterial Infections; Blood Loss, Surgical; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymphocele; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Video-Assisted Surgery; Vulva; Vulvar Neoplasms
PubMed: 26496391
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140873 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jun 2023The most important causative agent of neoplasms in the anogenital area is the human papillomavirus (HPV). Due to the anatomical proximity of the genital and anus area... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The most important causative agent of neoplasms in the anogenital area is the human papillomavirus (HPV). Due to the anatomical proximity of the genital and anus area and the ease with which HPV infection is transmitted, it seems that patients after the treatment of HPV-related gynecological diseases may have an increased risk of developing a second HPV-related neoplasm anal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and anal cancer (AC) among patients after the treatment of HPV-related gynecological diseases.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive review of the available literature from multiple databases. The study was performed following and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 guidelines. Moreover, we assessed the quality of each study using QUADAS-2.
RESULTS
Twenty-five studies were included in the final analysis. Patients after the treatment of HPV-related gynecological diseases have a significantly higher risk of AC (mean standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 5.387, mean incidence risk (IR) = 0.096%, mean IR per 100,000 person-years = 10.37) and AIN (mean IR = 23.683%) compared to the population risk.
CONCLUSIONS
patients with HPV-related gynecological diseases should constitute a group for which an appropriate primary and secondary screening for AC should be introduced.
PubMed: 37445251
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134216 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000Radical surgery has been standard treatment for patients with early vulvar cancer since mid century. Survival figures are excellent, but complication rates are high.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Radical surgery has been standard treatment for patients with early vulvar cancer since mid century. Survival figures are excellent, but complication rates are high. Over the last two decades, surgical treatment has become more individualised in order to decrease complications in patients with limited disease.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether the effectiveness and safety of individualised treatment is comparable with that of more extensive (non-individualised) surgery.
SEARCH STRATEGY
The cirteria set by the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group were used. We searched Medline and Embase (last search on 16 November 1999) We used our own publication archives, based on a prospective handsearch of six leading relevant journalswhich was started in December 1986. Reference lists of identified studies, gynaecological cancer handbooks and conference abstracts were also used.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Types of study: RCT's, case control and observational studies on the effectiveness of surgical treatment of vulvar cancer.
TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS
patients with cT1N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Types of interventions: local surgical treatment as well as regional lymph node dissection. Types of outcome measurements: overall, disease specific and disease free survival; treatment complications; quality of life issues.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
Only two studies with a total of 94 participants were included in the review. Both were observational studies. None of the other eleven considered studies met the minimum criteria as set by the Cochrane Collaboration. From these two studies, it can be concluded that: 1. radical local excision is as safe as a radical vulvectomy; 2. An ipsilateral lymph node dissection is safe in patients with a well lateralised tumour, and 3. A superficial groin node dissection is not as safe as a full femoro-inguinal groin node dissection. The fourth question we intended to answer is of great clinical importance: is the triple incision technique as safe as an en bloc dissection? This question could only be answered by using some of the unselected studies. From these studies, the triple incision technique appears to be as safe as the en bloc technique.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
The available evidence regarding surgical treatment of early vulvar cancer is generally of poor quality. From the evidence with sufficient quality we conclude that radical local excision, ipsilateral lymph node dissection in lateral tumors and triple incision technique are safe treatment options for early vulvar cancer. However, superficial groin node dissection results in an excess of groin recurrences compared to a full femoro-inguinal groin node dissection.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Humans; Vulvar Neoplasms
PubMed: 10796849
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002036 -
Translational Cancer Research Feb 2021Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) has fewer complications than open surgery for vulva cancer. No high-level evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of...
BACKGROUND
Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) has fewer complications than open surgery for vulva cancer. No high-level evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of the two routes of VEIL (VEIL-H and VEIL-L) is available.
METHODS
We performed a comprehensive literature search for reports on VEIL for vulva cancer from 2000 to 2020 and reviewed our experience. Data extraction includes patients' characteristics, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, and cancer recurrence.
RESULTS
A total of 11 eligible studies were included in the systematic review. Nine studies included only one route of VEIL, and the other two studies directly compared the two routes of VEIL. The average operation time of the VEIL-L group was 85 (range, 33-180.12) minutes, and that of the VEIL-H group was 112 (range, 35-170.79) minutes. The average blood loss of the VEIL-L group was 9 (range, 5-30) mL, and that of the VEIL-H group was 96 (range, 5.5-214.8) mL. The average number of intraoperatively removed lymph nodes in the VEIL-L group was 9 (range, 7.5-13.2), and that in the VEIL-H group was 14 (range, 9.5-16). No significant difference was observed in the cancer recurrence rate between the two groups. We found similar results in our cohort study.
CONCLUSIONS
The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and time of drainage of the VEIL-L procedure seemed less than those of the VEIL-H procedure. VEIL-L and VEIL-H were equivalent in the efficacy of lymph node dissection, surgery-related complications, and cancer recurrence rate.
PubMed: 35116430
DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-2690