-
Journal of Medical Case Reports Apr 2021Abdominal aortic aneurysm and acute appendicitis occur relatively frequently in elderly patients. However, the co-occurrence of the two pathologies is very rare and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Abdominal aortic aneurysm and acute appendicitis occur relatively frequently in elderly patients. However, the co-occurrence of the two pathologies is very rare and serious.
CASE PRESENTATION
We present the case of an elderly Caucasian patient who was aware of having an abdominal aortic aneurysm but refused treatment and was subsequently admitted to the hospital's emergency department with acute abdominal symptoms. A computed tomography scan raised the possibility of complication due to the characteristics of the aneurysm. The patient then agreed to emergency surgery. Laparotomy revealed the existence of an acute perforated appendicitis with a significant abscess in the right iliac fossa and an uncomplicated aneurysm. Appendectomy was performed and the abscess drained. The postoperative period passed without complications, and the patient again refused surgery for the aneurysm, which due to its anatomical characteristics was not a candidate for standard endovascular treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
In light of this experience, we review the literature about the relationship between abdominal aortic aneurysm and acute appendicitis.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Acute Disease; Aged; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Drainage; Humans; Laparotomy
PubMed: 33863365
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-021-02703-x -
International Surgery 2014Treatment of complicated acute appendicitis is controversial. The dilemma is further complicated by presence of free fecalith in a well-circumscribed abscess, which has...
Treatment of complicated acute appendicitis is controversial. The dilemma is further complicated by presence of free fecalith in a well-circumscribed abscess, which has been repeatedly demonstrated to be a major predicting factor of treatment failure of nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis complicated with appendiceal abscess. If left behind after drainage of the abscess, further operations for removal of retained fecalith or recurrence of abscess might be required. However, little had been stressed over the significance of removal of the free fecalith when it was first encountered. We report our experience of drainage of appendiceal abscess and removal of free fecalith by taking an extraperitoneal approach. Both of our cases made a smooth recovery without any complication or recurrence after a 2-year follow-up. Treatment with this approach avoids many of the complications associated with formal laparotomy. Unlike image-guided drainage or laparoscopic drainage, this procedure is relatively simple and straightforward and can be performed in any level of hospital, including private practitioners and in less well-developed areas and countries. With proper case selection, we recommend this approach as one of the alternatives in the treatment of late-presenting appendiceal abscess with free fecalith.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Adolescent; Aged; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Diagnosis, Differential; Drainage; Fecal Impaction; Female; Humans; Male; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 25058769
DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00040.1 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Mar 2010
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Humans; Male; Medical Errors; Osteomyelitis; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis, Osteoarticular
PubMed: 20305766
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0147b -
Acta Clinica Croatica Sep 2019We present an atypical case of retrouterine gangrenous perforated appendicitis with Douglas abscess in a 33-year-old woman, with clinical picture developing over two...
We present an atypical case of retrouterine gangrenous perforated appendicitis with Douglas abscess in a 33-year-old woman, with clinical picture developing over two weeks. Laparotomy and appendectomy with abdominal drainage and antibiosis were performed and resulted in complete recovery.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Adult; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Female; Gangrene; Humans; Laparoscopy; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Perforation
PubMed: 31969773
DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.03.24 -
Surgery May 2023The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review was to evaluate the association between intraoperative bile cultures and postoperative complications of patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review was to evaluate the association between intraoperative bile cultures and postoperative complications of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS
A detailed literature search was performed from January 2015 to July 2022 in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EMBASE for related research publications. The data were extracted, screened, and graded independently. An analysis of pooled data was performed, and a risk ratio with corresponding confidence intervals was calculated and summarized.
RESULTS
A total of 8 articles were included with 1,778 pancreaticoduodenectomy patients who had an intraoperative bile culture performed. A systematic review demonstrated that some of the most common organisms isolated in a positive intraoperative bile culture were Enterococcus species, Klebsiella species, and E. coli. Four studies also showed that specific microorganisms were associated with specific postoperative complications (surgical site infection and intra-abdominal abscess). The postoperative complications that were evaluated for an association with a positive intraoperative bile culture were surgical site infections (risk ratio = 2.33, 95% confidence interval [1.47-3.69], P < .01), delayed gastric emptying (risk ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [0.63-2.38], P = n.s.), 90-day mortality (risk ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [0.01-52.76], P = n.s.), postoperative pancreatic hemorrhage (risk ratio = 1.70, 95% confidence interval [0.33-8.74], P = n.s.), intra-abdominal abscess (risk ratio = 1.70, 95% confidence interval [0.38-7.56], P = n.s.), and postoperative pancreatic fistula (risk ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [0.72-1.32], P = n.s.).
CONCLUSION
The cumulative data suggest that a positive intraoperative bile culture has no association with predicting the postoperative complications of delayed gastric emptying, 90-day mortality, postoperative pancreatic hemorrhage, intra-abdominal abscess, or postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, the data also suggest that a positive intraoperative bile culture was associated with a patient developing a surgical site infection.
Topics: Humans; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Surgical Wound Infection; Pancreatic Fistula; Bile; Gastroparesis; Escherichia coli; Pancreatic Diseases; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Abdominal Abscess; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 36707272
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.12.012 -
Danish Medical Journal Aug 2014The treatment strategy for appendiceal mass is controversial, ranging from operation or image-guided drainage to conservative treatment with or without antibiotics. The... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The treatment strategy for appendiceal mass is controversial, ranging from operation or image-guided drainage to conservative treatment with or without antibiotics. The aim of this study was to assess the various treatment modalities with respect to complications and treatment failure.
METHODS
The analysis was based on the principles of a qualitative systematic review. The literature was searched in PubMed for the period from 1966 to March 2014. The articles were reviewed with respect to complications, treatment failure and hospital stay. Papers on post-operative intra-abdominal abscesses and abscesses of any cause other than appendicitis were excluded as were also studies only describing recurrent appendicitis and/or interval appendectomy. Sub-analyses were performed in children, adults, and in mixed populations.
RESULTS
A total of 48 studies were found eligible; they included in total 3,772 patients. Operation for appendiceal mass was beset with a moderate to high risk of complications of up to 57% and a risk of intestinal resection of up to 25%. Major complications were observed in up to 18% of cases. Conservative treatment with or without antibiotics was associated with a treatment failure rate of 8-15%. Drainage was beset with a risk of complications of 2-15% and a risk of treatment failure of 2-13%.
CONCLUSION
Operation with appendectomy for appendiceal mass carries a high risk of complications compared with conservative treatment or drainage. Drainage may lower the risk of treatment failure but entails a risk of complications. Based on the best evidence, we propose a step-down treatment strategy.
FUNDING
Not relevant.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Not relevant.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Drainage; Humans; Treatment Failure; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 25162440
DOI: No ID Found -
Andes Pediatrica : Revista Chilena de... Apr 2022Kidney abscess is an unusual entity in childhood with few studies about its clinical characteris tics.
UNLABELLED
Kidney abscess is an unusual entity in childhood with few studies about its clinical characteris tics.
OBJECTIVE
To report the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and therapy used in a cohort of 20 children with kidney abscess.
PATIENTS AND METHOD
retrospective study of cases of kidney abscess during a 10-year period at the Hospital Roberto del Río. The analysis of clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics were evaluated as well as the treatment usedfor this condition.
RESULTS
20 cases were reported among which 65% were women with a median age of 3.6 years. The most com mon clinical presentation was fever, vomit, and dysuria. Eighty percent of patients presented an increase of inflammatory parameters, 88% presented positive urine culture, and the most common organism identified was Escherichia Coli (77.8%). The diagnosis was mostly made through kidney ultrasound (75%) followed by an abdominal CT scan (35%). 93% of abscesses were unilateral. About 95% of the patients only required antibiotic treatment. Vesicoureteral reflux was diagno sed in 28% of the patients with no sphincter control, and only one of them presented high-grade reflux. In patients with sphincter control, bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) was diagnosed in 90% of the cases. Forty four percent of the patients with late DMSA renal scintigraphy presented renal scarring.
CONCLUSIONS
In this series, pediatric kidney abscess appears with persistent fever despite the treatment, requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy and rarely surgical drains. We su ggest a study aimed at detecting modifiable factors, such as vesicoureteral reflux in patients with no sphincter control and BBD in patients with sphincter control, as well as identifying renal paren chymal sequels in all patients.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Abscess; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Retrospective Studies; Urinary Tract Infections; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
PubMed: 35735301
DOI: 10.32641/andespediatr.v93i2.3765 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jul 2014With the development of imaging technology and surgical techniques, pancreatic resections to treat pancreatic tumors, ampulla tumors, and other pancreatic diseases have... (Review)
Review
With the development of imaging technology and surgical techniques, pancreatic resections to treat pancreatic tumors, ampulla tumors, and other pancreatic diseases have increased. Pancreaticoduodenectomy, one type of pancreatic resection, is a complex surgery with the loss of pancreatic integrity and various anastomoses. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy such as pancreatic fistulas and anastomosis leakage are common and significantly associated with patient outcomes. Pancreatic fistula is one of the most important postoperative complications; this condition can cause intraperitoneal hemorrhage, septic shock, or even death. An effective way has not yet been found to avoid the occurrence of pancreatic fistula. In most medical centers, the frequency of pancreatic fistula has remained between 9% and 13%. The early detection and routine drainage of anastomotic fistulas, pancreatic fistulas, bleeding, or other intra-abdominal fluid collections after pancreatic resections are considered as important and effective ways to reduce postoperative complications and the mortality rate. However, many recent studies have argued that routine drainage after abdominal operations, including pancreaticoduodenectomies, does not affect the incidence of postoperative complications. Although inserting drains after pancreatic resections continues to be a routine procedure, its necessity remains controversial. This article reviews studies of the advantages and disadvantages of routine drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy and discusses the necessity of this procedure.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Drainage; Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Unnecessary Procedures
PubMed: 25009383
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8110 -
German Medical Science : GMS E-journal 2022Pyometra is a rare gynecological condition and is characterized by pus accumulation in the uterine cavity. It occurs more frequently in postmenopausal women than...
BACKGROUND
Pyometra is a rare gynecological condition and is characterized by pus accumulation in the uterine cavity. It occurs more frequently in postmenopausal women than tubo-ovarian abscesses, which constitute a more common gynecological complication among premenopausal women.
OBJECTIVE
A 72-year-old woman was admitted to our emergency department with lower abdominal pain, diarrhea and fever for the last three days. The laboratory results were indicative to sepsis. The clinical examination revealed sensitivity by palpation of the lower abdomen without any signs of acute abdomen. The gynecological assessment showed pus outflow through the cervix and a pus culture was done. The ultrasound examination found an enlarged uterus, full of hypoechoic fluid, unclear borders between endometrium-myometrium, a mixed echogenicity adnexal mass and no free fluid in the pouch of Douglas. A computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed the presence of pyometra and a tubo-ovarian abscess of the right adnexa.
METHOD
The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotic therapy. When the patient was hemodynamically stable and afebrile, she underwent ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage of the cervical canal and the endometrium in order to exclude an underlying malignancy, under general anesthesia.
RESULTS
The patient responded promptly to the intravenous antibiotic therapy which was adapted to the pus culture result. The laboratory results withdrew to normal values and the patient was discharged after fifteen days of hospitalization in an afebrile and hemodynamically stable condition.
CONCLUSION
Pyometra and tubo-ovarian abscess in postmenopausal women could be a lethal complication of pelvic inflammatory disease. The key in treatment is the dilatation of the cervix and drainage of the pyometra. The administration of intravenous antibiotics and drainage through the cervix could be a suitable method of treatment for pyometra in older patients or those with poor performance status if only the histological examination is negative for malignancy.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Abscess; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Female; Humans; Oophoritis; Postmenopause; Pyometra; Salpingitis
PubMed: 35875245
DOI: 10.3205/000311 -
Medicine Dec 2019There currently exists no substantial evidence reporting the efficacy of peritoneal irrigation in reducing the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
There currently exists no substantial evidence reporting the efficacy of peritoneal irrigation in reducing the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess in pediatric patients. The purpose of our study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare rates of intra-abdominal abscess after appendectomy between irrigation and suction alone groups.
METHODS
We identified studies by a systematic search in EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to recognize randomized controlled trials and case control studies from the 1950 to May 2019. We limited the English language studies. We checked the reference list of studies to recognize other potentially qualified trials. We analyzed the merged data with use of the Review Manager 5.3.
RESULTS
We identified 6 eligible papers enrolling a total of 1633 participants. We found no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscess, wound infection, and the length of hospitalization between 2 group, but duration of surgery is longer in irrigation group (MD = 6.76, 95% CI = 4.64 to 8.87, P < .001; heterogeneity, I = 25%, P = .26).
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis did not provide strong evidence allowing definite conclusions to be drawn, but suggested that peritoneal irrigation during appendectomy did not decrease the incidence of postoperative IAA. This meta-analysis also indicated the need for more high-quality trials to identify methods to decrease the incidence of postoperative IAA in pediatric perforated appendicitis patients.Trial registration number Standardization of endoscopic treatment of acute abdomen in children: 14RCGFSY00150.
Topics: Abdominal Abscess; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Child; Humans; Intraoperative Period; Laparoscopy; Peritoneal Lavage; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 31852066
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018047