-
BMJ Open Jun 2019To identify research priorities and explore potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following a stillbirth.
Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates.
OBJECTIVES
To identify research priorities and explore potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following a stillbirth.
DESIGN
Web-based survey by invitation.
PARTICIPANTS
Multidisciplinary panel of 79 individuals involved in stillbirth research, clinical practice and/or advocacy from the international stillbirth research community (response rate=64%).
OUTCOME MEASURES
Importance of 16 candidate research topics and perceived utility and appropriateness of randomised controlled trial (RCT) methodology for the evaluation of four pertinent interventions: (1) medical therapies for placental dysfunction (eg, antiplatelet agents); (2) additional antepartum fetal surveillance (eg, ultrasound scans); (3) early planned birth from 37 weeks' gestation and (4) different forms of psychosocial support for parents and families.
RESULTS
Candidate research topics that were rated as 'important and urgent' by the greatest proportion of participants were: medical therapies for placental dysfunction (81%); additional antepartum fetal surveillance (80%); the development of a core outcomes dataset for stillbirth research (79%); targeted antenatal interventions for women who have risk factors (79%) and calculating the risk of recurrent stillbirth according to specific causes of index stillbirth (79%). Whether RCT methodologies were considered appropriate for the four selected interventions varied depending on the criterion being assessed. For example, while 72% of respondents felt that RCTs were 'the best way' to evaluate medical therapies for placental dysfunction, fewer respondents (63%) deemed RCTs ethical in this context, and approximately only half (52%) felt that such RCTs were feasible. There was considerably less support for RCT methodology for the evaluation of different forms of psychosocial support, which was reinforced by free-text comments.
CONCLUSIONS
Five priority research topics to inform care in pregnancies after stillbirth were identified. There was support for RCTs in this area, but the panel remained divided on the ethics and feasibility of such trials. Engagement with parents and families is a critical next step.
Topics: Attitude of Health Personnel; Family Planning Services; Female; Humans; Patient Care Management; Placenta Diseases; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Psychosocial Support Systems; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research; Research Design; Risk Adjustment; Stillbirth; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 31230027
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028735 -
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology... Mar 2015To evaluate the maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies delivered at 23+0 to 23+6 weeks' gestation.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies delivered at 23+0 to 23+6 weeks' gestation.
METHODS
This prospective cohort study included women in the Canadian Perinatal Network who were admitted to one of 16 Canadian tertiary perinatal units between August 1, 2005, and March 31, 2011, and who delivered at 23+0 to 23+6 weeks' gestation. Women were included in the network if they were admitted with spontaneous preterm labour with contractions, a short cervix without contractions, prolapsing membranes with membranes at or beyond the external os or a dilated cervix, preterm premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine growth restriction, gestational hypertension, or antepartum hemorrhage. Maternal outcomes included Caesarean section, placental abruption, and serious complication. Perinatal outcomes were mortality and serious morbidity.
RESULTS
A total of 248 women and 287 infants were included in the study. The rate of Caesarean section was 10.5% (26/248) and 40.3% of women (100/248) had a serious complication, the most common being chorioamnionitis (38.6%), followed by blood transfusion (4.5%). Of infants with known outcomes, perinatal mortality was 89.9% (223/248) (stillbirth 23.3% [67/287] and neonatal death 62.9% [156/248]). Of live born neonates with known outcomes (n = 181), 38.1% (69/181) were admitted to NICU. Of those admitted to NICU, neonatal death occurred in 63.8% (44/69). Among survivors at discharge, the rate of severe brain injury was 44.0% (11/25), of retinopathy of prematurity 58.3% (14/24), and of any serious neonatal morbidity 100% (25/25). Two subgroup analyses were performed: in one, antepartum stillbirths were excluded, and in the other only centres that indicated they offered fetal monitoring at 23 weeks' gestation were included and antepartum stillbirths were excluded. In each of these, perinatal outcomes similar to the overall group were found.
CONCLUSION
Pregnant women delivering at 23 weeks' gestation are at risk of morbidity. Their infants have high rates of serious morbidity and mortality. Further research is needed to identify strategies and forms of management that not only increase perinatal survival but also reduce morbidities in these extremely low gestational age infants and reduce maternal morbidity.
Topics: Adult; Brain Diseases; Canada; Cesarean Section; Cohort Studies; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Infant, Premature, Diseases; Intensive Care, Neonatal; Morbidity; Perinatal Death; Perinatal Mortality; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Prospective Studies; Retinopathy of Prematurity
PubMed: 26001868
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30307-8 -
Reproductive Sciences (Thousand Oaks,... Feb 2024There are approximately 5 million pregnancies per year in the USA, with 1 million ending in miscarriage (a loss occurring prior to 20 weeks of gestation) and over...
There are approximately 5 million pregnancies per year in the USA, with 1 million ending in miscarriage (a loss occurring prior to 20 weeks of gestation) and over 20,000 ending in stillbirth at or beyond 20 weeks of gestation. As many as 50% of these losses are unexplained. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of expanding the placental pathology diagnostic categories to include the explicit categories of (1) dysmorphic chorionic villi and (2) small placenta in examining previously unexplained losses. Using a clinical database of 1256 previously unexplained losses at 6-43 weeks of gestation, the most prevalent abnormality associated with each loss was determined through examination of its placental pathology slides. Of 1256 cases analyzed from 922 patients, there were 878 (69.9%) miscarriages and 378 (30.1%) antepartum stillbirths. We determined the pathologic diagnoses for 1150/1256 (91.6%) of the entire series, 777/878 (88.5%) of the miscarriages (< 20 weeks' gestation), and 373/378 (98.7%) of the stillbirths (≥ 20 weeks' gestation). The most common pathologic feature observed in unexplained miscarriages was dysmorphic chorionic villi (757 cases; 86.2%), a marker associated with genetic abnormalities. The most common pathologic feature observed in unexplained stillbirths was a small placenta (128 cases; 33.9%). Our classification system reinforced the utility of placental examination for elucidating potential mechanisms behind pregnancy loss. The improved rate of diagnosis appeared to be the result of filling a gap in previous pregnancy loss classification systems via inclusion of the categories of dysmorphic chorionic villi and small placenta.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Abortion, Spontaneous; Stillbirth; Placenta; Placenta Diseases; Gestational Age
PubMed: 37725247
DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01344-3 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Dec 2019In 2015, Nigeria's estimated 317,700 stillbirths accounted for 12.2% of the 2.6 million estimated global stillbirths. This suggests that Nigeria still makes substantial...
BACKGROUND
In 2015, Nigeria's estimated 317,700 stillbirths accounted for 12.2% of the 2.6 million estimated global stillbirths. This suggests that Nigeria still makes substantial contribution to the global burden of stillbirths. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and identify the causes and factors associated with stillbirth in eight referral hospitals in Nigeria.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional study of all deliveries over a period of 6 months in six general hospitals (4 in the south and 2 in the north), and two teaching hospitals (both in the north) in Nigeria. The study population was women delivering in the hospitals during the study period. A pre-tested study protocol was used to obtain clinical data on pregnancies, live births and stillbirths in the hospitals over a 6 months period. Data were analyzed centrally using univariate, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The main outcome measure was stillbirth rate in the hospitals (individually and overall).
RESULTS
There were 4416 single births and 175 stillbirths, and a mean stillbirth rate of 39.6 per 1000 births (range: 12.7 to 67.3/1000 births) in the hospitals. Antepartum (macerated) constituted 22.3% of the stillbirths; 47.4% were intrapartum (fresh stillbirths); while 30.3% was unclassified. Acute hypoxia accounted for 32.6% of the stillbirths. Other causes were maternal hypertensive disease (6.9%), and intrapartum unexplained (5.7%) among others. After adjusting for confounding variables, significant predictors of stillbirth were referral status, parity, past experience of stillbirth, birth weight, gestational age at delivery and mode of delivery.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that the rate of stillbirth is high in Nigeria's referral hospitals largely because of patients' related factors and the high rates of pregnancy complications. Efforts to address these factors through improved patients' education and emergency obstetric care would reduce the rate of stillbirth in the country.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Trial Registration Number NCTR91540209. Nigeria Clinical Trials Registry. http://www.nctr.nhrec.net/ Registered April 14th 2016.
Topics: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Nigeria; Parity; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Prevalence; Referral and Consultation; Risk Factors; Stillbirth; Young Adult
PubMed: 31888536
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2682-z -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Feb 2010Normal and abnormal processes of pregnancy and childbirth are poorly understood. This second article in a global report explains what is known about the etiologies of...
BACKGROUND
Normal and abnormal processes of pregnancy and childbirth are poorly understood. This second article in a global report explains what is known about the etiologies of preterm births and stillbirths and identifies critical gaps in knowledge. Two important concepts emerge: the continuum of pregnancy, beginning at implantation and ending with uterine involution following birth; and the multifactorial etiologies of preterm birth and stillbirth. Improved tools and data will enable discovery scientists to identify causal pathways and cost-effective interventions. PREGNANCY AND PARTURITION CONTINUUM: The biological process of pregnancy and childbirth begins with implantation and, after birth, ends with the return of the uterus to its previous state. The majority of pregnancy is characterized by rapid uterine and fetal growth without contractions. Yet most research has addressed only uterine stimulation (labor) that accounts for <0.5% of pregnancy. ETIOLOGIES: The etiologies of preterm birth and stillbirth differ by gestational age, genetics, and environmental factors. Approximately 30% of all preterm births are indicated for either maternal or fetal complications, such as maternal illness or fetal growth restriction. Commonly recognized pathways leading to preterm birth occur most often during the gestational ages indicated: (1) inflammation caused by infection (22-32 weeks); (2) decidual hemorrhage caused by uteroplacental thrombosis (early or late preterm birth); (3) stress (32-36 weeks); and (4) uterine overdistention, often caused by multiple fetuses (32-36 weeks). Other contributors include cervical insufficiency, smoking, and systemic infections. Many stillbirths have similar causes and mechanisms. About two-thirds of late fetal deaths occur during the antepartum period; the other third occur during childbirth. Intrapartum asphyxia is a leading cause of stillbirths in low- and middle-income countries.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Utilizing new systems biology tools, opportunities now exist for researchers to investigate various pathways important to normal and abnormal pregnancies. Improved access to quality data and biological specimens are critical to advancing discovery science. Phenotypes, standardized definitions, and uniform criteria for assessing preterm birth and stillbirth outcomes are other immediate research needs.
CONCLUSION
Preterm birth and stillbirth have multifactorial etiologies. More resources must be directed toward accelerating our understanding of these complex processes, and identifying upstream and cost-effective solutions that will improve these pregnancy outcomes.
Topics: Female; Fetal Death; Global Health; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Premature Birth; Stillbirth
PubMed: 20233383
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S2 -
BJOG : An International Journal of... Jan 2018We sought to classify causes of stillbirth for six low-middle-income countries using a prospectively defined algorithm. (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research: probable causes of stillbirth in low- and middle-income countries using a prospectively defined classification system.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to classify causes of stillbirth for six low-middle-income countries using a prospectively defined algorithm.
DESIGN
Prospective, observational study.
SETTING
Communities in India, Pakistan, Guatemala, Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia and Kenya.
POPULATION
Pregnant women residing in defined study regions.
METHODS
Basic data regarding conditions present during pregnancy and delivery were collected. Using these data, a computer-based hierarchal algorithm assigned cause of stillbirth. Causes included birth trauma, congenital anomaly, infection, asphyxia, and preterm birth, based on existing cause of death classifications and included contributing maternal conditions.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary cause of stillbirth.
RESULTS
Of 109 911 women who were enrolled and delivered (99% of those screened in pregnancy), 2847 had a stillbirth (a rate of 27.2 per 1000 births). Asphyxia was the cause of 46.6% of the stillbirths, followed by infection (20.8%), congenital anomalies (8.4%) and prematurity (6.6%). Among those caused by asphyxia, 38% had prolonged or obstructed labour, 19% antepartum haemorrhage and 18% pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. About two-thirds (67.4%) of the stillbirths did not have signs of maceration.
CONCLUSIONS
Our algorithm determined cause of stillbirth from basic data obtained from lay-health providers. The major cause of stillbirth was fetal asphyxia associated with prolonged or obstructed labour, pre-eclampsia and antepartum haemorrhage. In the African sites, infection also was an important contributor to stillbirth. Using this algorithm, we documented cause of stillbirth and its trends to inform public health programs, using consistency, transparency, and comparability across time or regions with minimal burden on the healthcare system.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
Major causes of stillbirth are asphyxia, pre-eclampsia and haemorrhage. Infections are important in Africa.
Topics: Africa; Algorithms; Asia; Developing Countries; Female; Global Health; Guatemala; Humans; Maternal-Child Health Services; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Prospective Studies; Registries; Stillbirth
PubMed: 28139875
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14493 -
BMC Medicine Feb 2019The India Newborn Action Plan (INAP) aims for < 10 stillbirths per 1000 births by 2030. A population-based understanding of risk factors for stillbirths compared with...
BACKGROUND
The India Newborn Action Plan (INAP) aims for < 10 stillbirths per 1000 births by 2030. A population-based understanding of risk factors for stillbirths compared with live births that could assist with reduction of stillbirths is not readily available for the Indian population.
METHODS
Detailed interviews were conducted in a representative sample of all births between January and December 2016 from 182,486 households (96.2% participation) in 1657 clusters in the Indian state of Bihar. A stillbirth was defined as foetal death with gestation period of ≥ 7 months wherein the foetus did not show any sign of life. The association of stillbirth was investigated with a variety of risk factors among all births using a hierarchical logistic regression model approach.
RESULTS
A total of 23,940 births including 338 stillbirths were identified giving the state stillbirth rate (SBR) of 15.4 (95% CI 13.2-17.9) per 1000 births, with no difference in SBR by sex. Antepartum and intrapartum SBR was 5.6 (95% CI 4.3-7.2) and 4.5 (95% CI 3.3-6.1) per 1000 births, respectively. Detailed interview was available for 20,152 (84.2% participation) births including 275 stillbirths (81.4% participation). In the final regression model, significantly higher odds of stillbirth were documented for deliveries with gestation period of ≤ 8 months (OR 11.36, 95% CI 8.13-15.88), for first born (OR 5.79, 95% CI 4.06-8.26), deferred deliveries wherein a woman was sent back home and asked to come later for delivery by a health provider (OR 5.51, 95% CI 2.81-10.78), and in those with forceful push/pull during the delivery by the health provider (OR 4.85, 95% CI 3.39-6.95). The other significant risk factors were maternal age ≥ 30 years (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.52-6.74), pregnancies with multiple foetuses (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.49-5.33), breech presentation of the baby (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.75-4.18), and births in private facilities (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.19-2.56) and home (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.87-3.62). Varied risk factors were associated with antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths. Birth weight was available only for 40 (14.5%) stillborns. Among the facility deliveries, the women who were referred from one facility to another for delivery had significantly high odds of stillbirth (OR 3.32, 95% CI 2.03-5.43).
CONCLUSIONS
We found an increased risk of stillbirths in deferred and referred deliveries in addition to demographic and clinical risk factors for antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths, highlighting aspects of health care that need attention in addition to improving skills of health providers to reduce stillbirths. The INAP could utilise these findings to further strengthen its approach to meet the stillbirth reduction target by 2030.
Topics: Adult; Delivery of Health Care; Female; Humans; India; Infant, Newborn; Logistic Models; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Stillbirth; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult
PubMed: 30728016
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1265-1 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jan 2019The optimal route of delivery in early-onset preeclampsia before 34 weeks is debated because many clinicians are reluctant to proceed with induction for perceived high... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
The optimal route of delivery in early-onset preeclampsia before 34 weeks is debated because many clinicians are reluctant to proceed with induction for perceived high risk of failure.
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to investigate labor induction success rates and compare maternal and neonatal outcomes by intended mode of delivery in women with early preterm preeclampsia.
STUDY DESIGN
We identified 914 singleton pregnancies with preeclampsia in the Consortium on Safe Labor study for analysis who delivered between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks. We excluded fetal anomalies, antepartum stillbirth, or spontaneous preterm labor. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women undergoing induction of labor (n = 460) and planned cesarean delivery (n = 454) and women with successful induction of labor (n = 214) and unsuccessful induction of labor (n = 246). We calculated relative risks and 95% confidence intervals to determine outcomes by Poisson regression model with propensity score adjustment. The calculation of propensity scores considered covariates such as maternal age, gestational age, parity, body mass index, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, hospital type and site, birthweight, history of cesarean delivery, malpresentation/breech, simplified Bishop score, insurance, marital status, and steroid use.
RESULTS
Among the 460 women with induction (50%), 47% of deliveries were vaginal. By gestational age, 24 to 27 6/7, 28 to 31 6/7, and 32 to 33 6/7, the induction of labor success rates were 38% (12 of 32), 39% (70 of 180), and 54% (132 of 248), respectively. Induction of labor compared with planned cesarean delivery was less likely to be associated with placental abruption (adjusted relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.67), wound infection or separation (adjusted relative risk, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.85), and neonatal asphyxia (0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.78). Women with vaginal delivery compared with those with failed induction of labor had decreased maternal morbidity (adjusted relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.82) and no difference in neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSION
About half of women with preterm preeclampsia who attempted an induction had a successful vaginal delivery. The rate of successful vaginal delivery increases with gestational age. Successful induction has the benefit of preventing maternal and fetal comorbidities associated with previous cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies. While overall rates of a composite of serious maternal and neonatal morbidity/mortality did not differ between induction of labor and planned cesarean delivery groups, women with failed induction of labor had increased maternal morbidity highlighting the complex route of delivery counseling required in this high-risk population of women.
Topics: Adult; Cesarean Section; Clinical Decision-Making; Cohort Studies; Decision Making; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Labor, Induced; Labor, Obstetric; Maternal Mortality; Natural Childbirth; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; United States; Young Adult
PubMed: 30273585
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.027 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Aug 2007Perinatal outcomes differ by week of gestational age. However, it appears that how measures to examine these outcomes vary among various studies. The current paper...
BACKGROUND
Perinatal outcomes differ by week of gestational age. However, it appears that how measures to examine these outcomes vary among various studies. The current paper explores how perinatal complications are reported and how they might differ when different denominators, numerators, and comparison groups are utilized.
CONCLUSION
One issue that can clearly affect absolute rates and trends is how groups of women are categorized by their gestational age. Since most perinatal outcomes can only occur in women and neonates who have delivered, using the number of pregnancies delivered (PD) as the denominator of outcomes is appropriate. However, for an outcome such as antepartum stillbirth, all women who are pregnant at a particular gestational age are at risk. Thus, the denominator should include all ongoing pregnancies (OP). When gestational age is used by week this means using both deliveries during a particular week plus those women who deliver beyond the particular week of gestation in the denominator. Researchers should be careful to make sure they are utilizing the appropriate measure of perinatal complications so they do not report findings that would be misleading to clinicians, patients, and policy makers.
Topics: Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Risk Assessment; Stillbirth
PubMed: 17760989
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-18 -
Cureus Nov 2018Stillbirth is a sudden and painful event for parents and obstetrical specialists as well. It is, therefore, of greatest importance to be able to give answers for the...
Stillbirth is a sudden and painful event for parents and obstetrical specialists as well. It is, therefore, of greatest importance to be able to give answers for the cause in order to plan a subsequent pregnancy. The aim of this retrospective study is to estimate the placental and umbilical cord cause of intrauterine death in relation to different gestational ages. The study took place on the Medical Birth Registry of Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece. We include a total of 19,283 pregnancies from 1998 to 2012. In this study period, 431 embryonic deaths occurred. The clinical history was documented on admission at delivery. Conditions thought to be associated with the intrauterine fetal death were recorded. Gestational age was calculated from the last menstrual period as well as with the three-trimester system. The autopsy, placenta and umbilical cord examination were performed by the same laboratory of pathology in Aretaieio University Hospital. We found that the majority of stillbirths occurred in the second trimester. We examined placenta and umbilical cord in all cases. The most frequent histologic abnormalities were those indicated placental vascular insufficiency. As far as the umbilical cord is concerned we found that the inflammatory disorder was the most common in antepartum deaths. A single umbilical artery was significantly related to gestational diabetes and congenital embryonic anomalies. Finally, our results showed steady declines in antepartum deaths during 1998-2012. As a result, we reached the conclusion that in order to reduce the fetal death rate, we have to insist on the autopsy of the placenta and umbilical cord in order to gain the appropriate information in counseling the parents.
PubMed: 30648088
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3556