-
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Apr 2014Increasing evidence suggests that surgical removal of the axillary lymph nodes (axillary dissection, ALD) in early breast cancer yields no advantage in terms of either... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Increasing evidence suggests that surgical removal of the axillary lymph nodes (axillary dissection, ALD) in early breast cancer yields no advantage in terms of either overall or disease-free survival, even in women with involvement of sentinel nodes. The optimal role of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in neo-adjuvant therapy is currently under discussion.
METHOD
This review is based on a selective search in the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and G.I.N. (Guidelines International Network) databases for relevant articles on the role of axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer and the role of SNB in neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS
Although no single study provides adequate evidence, the available literature increasingly casts doubt on the putative therapeutic benefit of ALD as part of a multimodal treatment strategy for breast cancer. It is currently unclear what group of patients, if any, might benefit from ALD. Nor is any definitive judgment possible, from the available evidence, regarding the optimal role of SNB in neo-adjuvant therapy. The most recent evidence indicates that SNB after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in ycN0 patients who had suspect lymph nodes before systemic treatment has a low rate of sensitivity.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence indicates that the radicality of lymph node surgery in the treatment of breast cancer can be reduced, even if the node status is positive.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Incidence; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Risk Factors; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Survival Rate
PubMed: 24766712
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0244 -
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aug 2021There have been recent reports in the breast imaging literature of unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. It is unclear whether the reactive... (Review)
Review
There have been recent reports in the breast imaging literature of unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. It is unclear whether the reactive lymphadenopathy may impact the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure. In this article, we provide guidelines regarding the timing of the COVID-19 vaccine and breast cancer surgery which were formulated after a review of the available literature and in consultation with infectious disease specialists.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; SARS-CoV-2; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Vaccination
PubMed: 34156582
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06293-6 -
Clinical & Translational Oncology :... Apr 2023Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer surgery. But the criteria of SLND only for patients...
BACKGROUND
Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer surgery. But the criteria of SLND only for patients with limited disease in the sentinel node is disputed.
METHODS
From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 2000-2015, we identified 97,296 early breast cancer females with 1-3 axillary lymph nodes macro-metastasis. Of them, 1-5 (axillary conservation group), 6-9, and ≥ 10 (ALND group) axillary lymph nodes were dissected in 28,639, 16,838, and 51,819 patients, respectively. According to the criteria of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, two historical cohort studies of patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy were conducted and the survival outcomes between ALND and axillary conservation were compared.
RESULTS
Overall, dissection of 6-9 regional lymph nodes resulted in the worst prognosis. After propensity-matched analysis, it was found that patients in the axillary conservation group had worse survival than the ALND group in overall survival. No significant difference in prognosis between the group undergoing lumpectomy was found both in OS and BCSS. Subgroup analysis revealed that Grade 3, T2, two lymph nodes positive, or Her2 positive were the main causes of worse survival in the axillary conservation group.
CONCLUSION
Not all patients with N1 early breast cancer suit axillary conservation. Axillary conservation was sufficient in patients who were treated with lumpectomy. ALND cannot be omitted in patients who were ineligible for the Z0011 and undergoing mastectomy with the following characteristics: T2, Grade 3, two positive lymph nodes, and Her2 positive, which may be better complemented to the Z0011 trial. Hence, under different surgical methods, the clinical precision treatment of ALND or axillary preservation is essential.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Mastectomy; Lymphatic Metastasis; Follow-Up Studies; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Axilla
PubMed: 36515887
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-03017-0 -
Trends of Axillary Treatment in Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Mastectomy.Annals of Surgical Oncology Sep 2023The ACOSOG-Z0011- and the AMAROS-trial obviated the need for axillary surgery in most sentinel node-positive (SLN+) breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving...
BACKGROUND
The ACOSOG-Z0011- and the AMAROS-trial obviated the need for axillary surgery in most sentinel node-positive (SLN+) breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Data for patients who undergo mastectomy is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate patterns of axillary treatment in SLN+ patients treated by mastectomy in the years after the publication of landmark studies regarding axillary treatment in SLN+ breast cancer patients undergoing BCS.
METHODS
This was a population-based study in cT1-3N0M0 breast cancer patients treated by mastectomy and staged as SLN+ between 2009 and 2018. The performance of an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and/or administration of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) were primary outcomes and were studied over time.
RESULTS
The study included 10,633 patients. The frequency of ALND performance decreased from 78% in 2009 to 10% in 2018, whereas PMRT increased from 4 to 49% (P < 0.001). In ≥N1a patients, ALND performance decreased from 93 to 20%, whereas PMRT increased to 70% (P < 0.001). In N1mi and N0itc patients, ALND was abandoned during the study period, whereas PMRT increased to 38% and 13% respectively (P < 0.001), respectively. Age, tumor subtype, N-stage, and hospital type affected the likelihood that patients underwent ALND.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study in SLN+ breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy, use of ALND decreased drastically over time. By the end of 2018 most ≥N1a patients received PMRT as the only adjuvant axillary treatment, whereas the majority of N1mi and N0itc patients received no additional treatment.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy; Lymphatic Metastasis; Sentinel Lymph Node; Lymph Node Excision; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Mastectomy, Segmental; Lymphadenopathy; Axilla
PubMed: 37225832
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13568-3 -
Surgical Oncology Sep 2022The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using the single-incision round block technique in breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node (SLN)... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using the single-incision round block technique in breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node (SLN) retrieval for breast cancer without compromising oncological safety.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective observational case-control study was conducted from January 2017 to October 2021. The study population consisted of two groups. In both groups, breast-conserving surgery was carried out through the round-block technique. In group A, SLN retrieval was performed using the round-block incision (study group), while in group B, SLN retrieval was conducted through a second skin incision in the axilla (control group). The study was approved by the local ethics committee Zurich (BASEC-Nr. 2020-02857), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
RESULTS
Overall, 134 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 86 women underwent breast-conserving surgery and SLN retrieval using the single-incision approach (group A), and 48 women underwent conventional surgery, using two independent incisions for tumour resection and SLN retrieval (group B). The overall success rate in group A regarding SLN retrieval was 97.7%, whereas most tumours were located in the upper outer (47.7%) and upper inner quadrant (27.9%). Although the technique was equally successful in the other quadrants, the share of tumours in the lower outer, and the lower inner quadrant, and the retroareolar region was smaller, representing 17.4%, 3.5% and 3.5%, respectively. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was two, with a positivity rate of 24.4%. The occurrence of axillary neuralgia and axillary skin retraction was significantly higher in group B along with tendentially more axillary seroma formation. There were no significant differences regarding reintervention rates, in terms of complications, resection margins, locoregional recurrences, or deaths with a mean follow-up of 11 months.
CONCLUSIONS
The single-incision method through the round block technique is as safe and effective as the standard two-incision approach regarding nodal staging and resection margins, and seems to be applicable for tumours in all breast quadrants.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Margins of Excision; Mastectomy, Segmental; Retrospective Studies; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 36126348
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101847 -
Medicine Dec 2022Axillary staging is 1 of the major issues of current breast cancer management after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an option...
Axillary staging is 1 of the major issues of current breast cancer management after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an option for clinically node negative patients. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) was introduced to identify and preserve the lymphatic drainage from the arm. The aim of the presented study is to employ triple mapping (radiocolloid, blue dye and indocyanine green [ICG]) to assess the crossover rate and metastatic involvement of ARM nodes after NST. Clinically node positive patients before NST who were converted to N0 and scheduled for targeted axillary dissection were included. sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping was performed via dual agent mapping. ICG was used for ARM procedure. Blue, hot and fluorescent nodes and lymphatics were visualized in the axilla using infrared camera system and dual opto-nuclear probe (Euoroprobe3). Fifty-two patients underwent targeted axillary dissection and ARM procedures 12 out of whom had axillary node dissection. 45 of the 52 patients had at least 1 hot or blue SLN identified intraoperatively. Of these, 61.5% cases had hot SLNs, 42.3% had hot and blue, 15.4% had hot/blue/fluorescent, 7.7% had blue/fluorescent, 6 11.5% had hot/fluorescent and 7 13.5% had only clipped nodes. The overall identification rate of ARM-nodes by means of ICG technique was 86.5%. Overall crossover of ARM nodes with SLNs was determined in 36.5%. The ICG intensity was found to be higher in both hot and blue SLNS (8 out of 18 ICG positive cases, 44.4%). In 3 of 52 patients (5.7%) metastatic SLNs were hot or blue but fluorescent which predicts metastatic involvement of the ARM-nodes. More than 1-third of the patients revealed a crossover between arm and breast draining nodes. The higher observed rate of overlap might partially explain why more patients develop clinically significant lymphedema after NST even after sentinel lymph node biopsy alone. The triple mapping provides valuable data regarding the competency of lymphatic drainage and would have the potential to serve selecting patients for lymphovenous by-pass procedures at the index procedure. NST reduces the metastatic involvement of the ARM nodes. However, conservative axillary staging with sparing ARM nodes after NST necessitates further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Female; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Indocyanine Green; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Axilla; Lymph Nodes; Lymph Node Excision; Breast Neoplasms; Coloring Agents
PubMed: 36596061
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032545 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Nov 2021Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of premature mortality among women and it is one of the most frequently diagnosed tumours worldwide. For this reason,... (Review)
Review
Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of premature mortality among women and it is one of the most frequently diagnosed tumours worldwide. For this reason, routine screening for prevention and early diagnosis is important for the quality of life of patients. Breast cancer cells can enter blood and lymphatic capillaries, then metastasizing to the regional lymph nodes in the axilla and to both visceral and non-visceral sites. Rather than at the primary site, they seem to enter the systemic circulation mainly through the sentinel lymph node and the biopsy of this indicator can influence the axillary dissection during the surgical approach to the pathology. Furthermore, secondary lymphoedema is another important issue for women following breast cancer surgical treatment or radiotherapy. Considering these fundamental aspects, the present article aims to describe new methodological approaches to assess the anatomy of the lymphatic network in the axillary region, as well as the molecular and physiological control of lymphatic vessel function, in order to understand how the lymphatic system contributes to breast cancer disease. Due to their clinical implications, the understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing lymph node metastasis in breast cancer are also examined. Beyond the investigation of breast lymphatic networks and lymphatic molecular mechanisms, the discovery of new effective anti-lymphangiogenic drugs for future clinical settings appears essential to support any future development in the treatment of breast cancer.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic System; Quality of Life; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 34833492
DOI: 10.3390/medicina57111272 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Aug 2022Currently, the standard method for staging and treatment of axillary lymph nodes for early-stage breast cancer is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), while axillary lymph... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparing Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis with and without Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Currently, the standard method for staging and treatment of axillary lymph nodes for early-stage breast cancer is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), while axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is used in cases with palpable axillary lymph nodes or positive SLNB cases. The aim of this review was to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and axillary recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients underwent SLNB or SLNB and completion ALND.
METHODS
The databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched using the key words of "breast cancer", "axillary lymph node dissection", and "sentinel lymph node dissection". In addition, other sources were searched for ongoing studies (i.e., clinicaltrials.gov). The clinical trials were evaluated based on the Jadad quality criteria, and cohort studies were evaluated according to the STROBE criteria. At the end of the search, the articles were screened independently by two reviewers to check their eligibility to be included in the study. Afterwards, the data were extracted independently by two researchers.
RESULTS
After searching the databases, 169 papers were retrieved. However, after removing the duplicates and studying the titles and abstracts of these papers, only ten ones underwent further investigation. After reading full-text of each article, four studies were finalized. Following a manual search, 27 papers were entered into the study for the final evaluation, 11 of which were included in the meta-analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings showed no significant differences in OS, DFS, and axillary recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients underwent SLNB or SLNB and completion ALND.
CONCLUSION
The findings did not confirm that ALND improved OS, DFS, and axillary recurrence in patients who were clinically node-negative and positive SLNB.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Sentinel Lymph Node; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 36037108
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.8.2561 -
Cancer Medicine Nov 2022More initial clinical node-positive breast cancer patients achieve axillary pathological complete response (ax-pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Restaging... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Diagnostic accuracy of de-escalated surgical procedure in axilla for node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
More initial clinical node-positive breast cancer patients achieve axillary pathological complete response (ax-pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Restaging axillary status and performing de-escalated surgical procedures to replace routine axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) is urgently needed. Targeted axillary lymph node biopsy (TLNB) is a novel de-escalated surgical strategy marking metastatic axillary nodes before NST and targeted dissection and biopsy intraoperatively to tailor individual axillary management.
METHODS
This study provided a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and diagnosis accuracy of TLNB. Prospective and retrospective clinical trials on TLNB were searched from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane. Identification rate (IFR), false-negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV), and rate of ax-pCR were the outcomes of this meta-analysis.
RESULTS
One thousand nine hundred and twenty patients attempted TLNB, with an overall IFR of 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.1%-96.2%). IFR of three nodal marking methods, namely iodine seeds, clips, and carbon dye, was 95.6% (95% CI 91.2%-98.7%), 91.7% (95% CI 87.3%-95.4%), and 97.1% (95% CI 89.1%-100.0%), respectively. Of them, 847 patients received ALND, with an overall FNR of 5.5% (95% CI 3.3%-8.0%), and NPV ranged from 90.1% to 96.1%. Regression analysis showed that the overlap of targeted and sentinel biopsied nodes might associate with IFRs and FNRs.
CONCLUSION
TLNB is a novel, less invasive surgical approach to distinguish initial node-positive breast cancer that achieves negative axillary conversion after NST. It yields an excellent IFR with a low FNR and a high NPV. A combination of preoperative imaging, intraoperative TLNB with SLNB, and postoperative nodal radiotherapy might affect the future treatment paradigm of primary breast cancer with nodal metastases.
Topics: Humans; Female; Axilla; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Breast Neoplasms; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Neoplasm Staging
PubMed: 35502768
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4769 -
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) Jun 2022There is a lack of studies examining the long-term trend and survival of axillary surgery for breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis, especially for the...
BACKGROUND
There is a lack of studies examining the long-term trend and survival of axillary surgery for breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis, especially for the patients with 3-5 node metastases.
METHODS
Breast cancer patients with 1-5 sentinel node metastases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2016. Our study presented the trend of axillary surgery and assessed the long-term survival of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for those patients.
RESULTS
Of the 41,996 patients diagnosed with T breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation included, 34,940 had 1-2 sentinel node metastases and 7056 had 3-5 sentinel node metastases. The percentage of patients undergoing SLNB alone increased from 22.4% in 2000 to 81.0% in 2016 for patients with 1-2 sentinel node metastases, and quadrupled from 5.2% in 2009 to 20.6% in 2016 for those with 3-5 sentinel node metastases. Completion of ALND did not benefit the long-term survival of 1-2 sentinel node metastasis patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02, P = 0.539), but improved the long-term survival of 3-5 node metastasis patients (HR = 0.73, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the inferiority of SLNB to ALND in all subgroups of 3-5 sentinel node metastases.
CONCLUSION
For patients with T breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation, SLNB alone was an efficient and safe surgical choice for 1-2 sentinel node metastases but not for 3-5 sentinel node metastases. It is worth noting that for patients with 3-5 node metastasis, the proportion of omitted ALND quadrupled after 2009.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphadenopathy; Lymphatic Metastasis; Sentinel Lymph Node; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 35245747
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.02.014