-
Frontiers in Physiology 2022The transmembrane protein Sidestep (Side) functions as a substrate-bound attractant for motor axons in . Outgrowing motor axons recognize Side Beaten path Ia (Beat) and...
The transmembrane protein Sidestep (Side) functions as a substrate-bound attractant for motor axons in . Outgrowing motor axons recognize Side Beaten path Ia (Beat) and migrate along Side-expressing tissues. Here, we report a structure-function analysis of these guidance molecules using a variety of mutant lines and transgenic constructs. Investigation of Side mutants shows that the exchange of a single amino acid (L241H) in the second immunoglobulin domain disturbs Side function and subcellular localization. Overexpression of Side and Beat deletion constructs in S2 cells and muscles demonstrate that the first Ig domains of both proteins are necessary for their interaction. Furthermore, subcellular distributions of several Beat constructs identify functional domains and suggest a potential posttranslational processing step in ER compartments. In fact, fusing full-length Beat at both the N- and C-terminus with GFP and mCherry, respectively, shows that the N-terminal domain is transported to the plasma membrane and exposed on the cell surface, while the C-terminal domain accumulated in the nucleus. Taken together, these results give insights into the interaction of Side and Beat and imply that Beat might be subject to proteolytic cleavage during maturation.
PubMed: 36518105
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1057413 -
Neural Regeneration Research Jul 2017Receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1) is an evolutionarily conserved scaffolding protein within the tryptophan-aspartate (WD) repeat family of proteins. RACK1 can... (Review)
Review
Receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1) is an evolutionarily conserved scaffolding protein within the tryptophan-aspartate (WD) repeat family of proteins. RACK1 can bind multiple signaling molecules concurrently, as well as stabilize and anchor proteins. RACK1 also plays an important role at focal adhesions, where it acts to regulate cell migration. In addition, RACK1 is a ribosomal binding protein and thus, regulates translation. Despite these numerous functions, little is known about how RACK1 regulates nervous system development. Here, we review three studies that examine the role of RACK1 in neural development. In brief, these papers demonstrate that (1) RACK-1, the homolog of mammalian RACK1, is required for axon guidance; (2) RACK1 is required for neurite extension of neuronally differentiated rat PC12 cells; and (3) RACK1 is required for axon outgrowth of primary mouse cortical neurons. Thus, it is evident that RACK1 is critical for appropriate neural development in a wide range of species, and future discoveries could reveal whether RACK1 and its signaling partners are potential targets for treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders or a therapeutic approach for axonal regeneration.
PubMed: 28852378
DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.211175 -
Protein & Cell Apr 2023Neurons migrate from their birthplaces to the destinations, and extending axons navigate to their synaptic targets by sensing various extracellular cues in... (Review)
Review
Neurons migrate from their birthplaces to the destinations, and extending axons navigate to their synaptic targets by sensing various extracellular cues in spatiotemporally controlled manners. These evolutionally conserved guidance cues and their receptors regulate multiple aspects of neural development to establish the highly complex nervous system by mediating both short- and long-range cell-cell communications. Neuronal guidance genes (encoding cues, receptors, or downstream signal transducers) are critical not only for development of the nervous system but also for synaptic maintenance, remodeling, and function in the adult brain. One emerging theme is the combinatorial and complementary functions of relatively limited classes of neuronal guidance genes in multiple processes, including neuronal migration, axonal guidance, synaptogenesis, and circuit formation. Importantly, neuronal guidance genes also regulate cell migration and cell-cell communications outside the nervous system. We are just beginning to understand how cells integrate multiple guidance and adhesion signaling inputs to determine overall cellular/subcellular behavior and how aberrant guidance signaling in various cell types contributes to diverse human diseases, ranging from developmental, neuropsychiatric, and neurodegenerative disorders to cancer metastasis. We review classic studies and recent advances in understanding signaling mechanisms of the guidance genes as well as their roles in human diseases. Furthermore, we discuss the remaining challenges and therapeutic potentials of modulating neuronal guidance pathways in neural repair.
Topics: Humans; Axon Guidance; Neurons; Axons; Signal Transduction; Cell Communication
PubMed: 36942388
DOI: 10.1093/procel/pwac030 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2018The question of whether mossy fiber sprouting is epileptogenic has not been resolved; both sprouting-induced recurrent excitatory and inhibitory circuit hypotheses have... (Review)
Review
The question of whether mossy fiber sprouting is epileptogenic has not been resolved; both sprouting-induced recurrent excitatory and inhibitory circuit hypotheses have been experimentally (but not fully) supported. Therefore, whether mossy fiber sprouting is a potential therapeutic target for epilepsy remains under debate. Moreover, the axon guidance mechanisms of mossy fiber sprouting have attracted the interest of neuroscientists. Sprouting of mossy fibers exhibits several uncommon axonal growth features in the basically non-plastic adult brain. For example, robust branching of axonal collaterals arises from pre-existing primary mossy fiber axons. Understanding the branching mechanisms in adulthood may contribute to axonal regeneration therapies in neuroregenerative medicine in which robust axonal re-growth is essential. Additionally, because granule cells are produced throughout life in the neurogenic dentate gyrus, it is interesting to examine whether the mossy fibers of newly generated granule cells follow the pre-existing trajectories of sprouted mossy fibers in the epileptic brain. Understanding these axon guidance mechanisms may contribute to neuron transplantation therapies, for which the incorporation of transplanted neurons into pre-existing neural circuits is essential. Thus, clarifying the axon guidance mechanisms of mossy fiber sprouting could lead to an understanding of central nervous system (CNS) network reorganization and plasticity. Here, we review the molecular and cellular mechanisms of axon guidance in mossy fiber sprouting by discussing mainly studies.
PubMed: 29896153
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00382 -
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 2019Neurons have evolved specialized growth structures to reach and innervate their target cells. These growth cones express specific receptor molecules that sense...
Neurons have evolved specialized growth structures to reach and innervate their target cells. These growth cones express specific receptor molecules that sense environmental cues and transform them into steering decisions. Historically, various concepts of axon guidance have been developed to better understand how axons reach and identify their targets. The essence of these efforts seems to be that growth cones require solid substrates and that major guidance decisions are initiated by extracellular cues. These sometimes highly conserved ligands and receptors have been extensively characterized and mediate four major guidance forces: chemoattraction, chemorepulsion, contact attraction and contact repulsion. However, during development, cells, too, do migrate in order to reach molecularly-defined niches at target locations. In fact, axonal growth could be regarded as a special case of cellular migration, where only a highly polarized portion of the cell is elongating. Here, I combine several examples from genetically tractable model organisms, such as or zebrafish, in which cells and axons are guided by attractive cues. Regardless, if these cues are secreted into the extracellular space or exposed on cellular surfaces, migrating cells and axons seem to keep close contact with these attractants and seem to detect them right at their source. Migration towards and along such substrate-derived attractants seem to be particularly robust, as genetic deletion induces obvious searching behaviors and permanent guidance errors. In addition, forced expression of these factors in ectopic tissues is highly distractive too, regardless of the pattern of other endogenous cues. Thus, guidance and migration towards and along attractive tissues is a powerful steering mechanism that exploits affinity differences to the surroundings and, in some instances, determines growth trajectories from source to target region.
PubMed: 31244602
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00148 -
Science (New York, N.Y.) Aug 2019The central and peripheral nervous system (CNS and PNS, respectively) are composed of distinct neuronal and glial cell types with specialized functional properties.... (Review)
Review
The central and peripheral nervous system (CNS and PNS, respectively) are composed of distinct neuronal and glial cell types with specialized functional properties. However, a small number of select cells traverse the CNS-PNS boundary and connect these two major subdivisions of the nervous system. This pattern of segregation and selective connectivity is established during embryonic development, when neurons and glia migrate to their destinations and axons project to their targets. Here, we provide an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that control cell migration and axon guidance at the vertebrate CNS-PNS border. We highlight recent advances on how cell bodies and axons are instructed to either cross or respect this boundary, and present open questions concerning the development and plasticity of the CNS-PNS interface.
Topics: Animals; Astrocytes; Axon Guidance; Basement Membrane; Cell Movement; Central Nervous System; Neuroglia; Neurons; Peripheral Nervous System
PubMed: 31467195
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw8231 -
Neural Regeneration Research Jan 2020The peripheral nervous system has an astonishing ability to regenerate following a compression or crush injury; however, the potential for full repair following a... (Review)
Review
The peripheral nervous system has an astonishing ability to regenerate following a compression or crush injury; however, the potential for full repair following a transection injury is much less. Currently, the major clinical challenge for peripheral nerve repair come from long gaps between the proximal and distal nerve stumps, which prevent regenerating axons reaching the distal nerve. Precise axon targeting during nervous system development is controlled by families of axon guidance molecules including Netrins, Slits, Ephrins and Semaphorins. Several recent studies have indicated key roles of Netrin1, Slit3 and EphrinB2 signalling in controlling the formation of new nerve bridge tissue and precise axon regeneration after peripheral nerve transection injury. Inside the nerve bridge, nerve fibroblasts express EphrinB2 while migrating Schwann cells express the receptor EphB2. EphrinB2/EphB2 signalling between nerve fibroblasts and migrating Schwann cells is required for Sox2 upregulation in Schwann cells and the formation of Schwann cell cords within the nerve bridge to allow directional axon growth to the distal nerve stump. Macrophages in the outermost layer of the nerve bridge express Slit3 while migrating Schwann cells and regenerating axons express the receptor Robo1; within Schwann cells, Robo1 expression is also Sox2-dependent. Slit3/Robo1 signalling is required to keep migrating Schwann cells and regenerating axons inside the nerve bridge. In addition to the Slit3/Robo1 signalling system, migrating Schwann cells also express Netrin1 and regenerating axons express the DCC receptor. It appears that migrating Schwann cells could also use Netrin1 as a guidance cue to direct regenerating axons across the peripheral nerve gap. Engineered neural tissues have been suggested as promising alternatives for the repair of large peripheral nerve gaps. Therefore, understanding the function of classic axon guidance molecules in nerve bridge formation and their roles in axon regeneration could be highly beneficial in developing engineered neural tissue for more effective peripheral nerve repair.
PubMed: 31535634
DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.264441 -
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual... Sep 2023Dry eye disease (DED) is multifactorial and associated with nerve abnormalities. We explored an Aquaporin 5 (AQP5)-deficiency-induced JunB activation mechanism, which...
PURPOSE
Dry eye disease (DED) is multifactorial and associated with nerve abnormalities. We explored an Aquaporin 5 (AQP5)-deficiency-induced JunB activation mechanism, which causes abnormal lacrimal gland (LG) nerve distribution through Slit2 upregulation and Netrin-1 repression.
METHODS
Aqp5 knockout (Aqp5-/-) and wild-type (Aqp5+/+) mice were studied. LGs were permeabilized and stained with neuronal class III β-tubulin, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Whole-mount images were acquired through tissue clearing and 3D fluorescence imaging. Mouse primary trigeminal ganglion (TG) neurons were treated with LG extracts and Netrin-1/Slit2 neutralizing antibody. Transcription factor (TF) prediction and chromatin immunoprecipitation-polymerase chain reaction (ChIP-PCR) experiments verified the JunB binding and regulatory effect on Netrin-1 and Slit2.
RESULTS
Three-dimensional tissue and section immunofluorescence showed reduced LG nerves in Aqp5-/- mice, with sympathetic and sensory nerves significantly decreased. Netrin-1 was reduced and Slit2 increased in Aqp5-/- mice LGs. Aqp5+/+ mice LG tissue extracts (TEs) promoted Aqp5-/- TG neurons axon growth, but Netrin-1 neutralizing antibody (NAb) could inhibit that promotion. Aqp5-/- mice LG TEs inhibited Aqp5+/+ TG axon growth, but Slit2 NAb alleviated that inhibition. Furthermore, JunB, a Netrin-1 and Slit2 TF, could bind them and regulate their expression. SR11302, meanwhile, reversed the Netrin-1 and Slit2 shifts caused by AQP5 deficiency.
CONCLUSIONS
AQP5 deficiency causes LG nerve abnormalities. Persistent JunB activation, the common denominator for Netrin-1 suppression and Slit2 induction, was found in Aqp5-/- mice LG epithelial cells. This affected sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers' distribution in LGs. Our findings provide insights into preventing, reversing, and treating DED.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Antibodies, Neutralizing; Aquaporin 5; Axon Guidance; Lacrimal Apparatus; Mice, Knockout; Netrin-1
PubMed: 37707834
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.12.27 -
Neurotherapeutics : the Journal of the... Apr 2016…once the development was ended, the founts of growth and regeneration of the axons and dendrites dried up irrevocably. Santiago Ramón y Cajal Cajal's neurotropic... (Review)
Review
…once the development was ended, the founts of growth and regeneration of the axons and dendrites dried up irrevocably. Santiago Ramón y Cajal Cajal's neurotropic theory postulates that the complexity of the nervous system arises from the collaboration of neurotropic signals from neuronal and non-neuronal cells and that once development has ended, a paucity of neurotropic signals means that the pathways of the central nervous system are "fixed, ended, immutable". While the capacity for regeneration and plasticity of the central nervous system may not be quite as paltry as Cajal proposed, regeneration is severely limited in scope as there is no spontaneous regeneration of long-distance projections in mammals and therefore limited opportunity for functional recovery following spinal cord injury. It is not a far stretch from Cajal to hypothesize that reappropriation of the neurotropic programs of development may be an appropriate strategy for reconstitution of injured circuits. It has become clear, however, that a significant number of the molecular cues governing circuit development become re-active after injury and many assume roles that paradoxically obstruct the functional re-wiring of severed neural connections. Therefore, the problem to address is how individual neural circuits respond to specific molecular cues following injury, and what strategies will be necessary for instigating functional repair or remodeling of the injured spinal cord.
Topics: Animals; Axon Guidance; Ephrins; Humans; Neural Pathways; Neuronal Plasticity; Semaphorins; Spinal Cord Injuries
PubMed: 26676670
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-015-0416-0 -
Trends in Neurosciences Mar 2009Axon-guidance-pathway molecules are involved in connectivity and repair throughout life (beyond guiding brain wiring during fetal development). One study found that... (Review)
Review
Axon-guidance-pathway molecules are involved in connectivity and repair throughout life (beyond guiding brain wiring during fetal development). One study found that variations (single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) in axon-guidance-pathway genes were predictive of three Parkinson's disease (PD) outcomes (susceptibility, survival free of PD and age at onset of PD) in genome-wide association (GWA) datasets. The axon-guidance-pathway genes DCC, EPHB1, NTNG1, SEMA5A and SLIT3 were represented by SNPs predicting PD outcomes. Beyond GWA analyses, we also present relevant neurobiological roles of these axon-guidance-pathway molecules and consider mechanisms by which abnormal axon-guidance-molecule signaling can cause loss of connectivity and, ultimately, PD. Novel drugs and treatments could emerge from this new understanding.
Topics: Animals; Axons; Humans; Neural Pathways; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Neurons; Synapses
PubMed: 19162339
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.11.006