-
Blood Purification 2019Intermittent infusion hemodiafiltration (I-HDF) has been developed to prevent a rapid drop in blood pressure during a dialysis session and to improve peripheral... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Intermittent infusion hemodiafiltration (I-HDF) has been developed to prevent a rapid drop in blood pressure during a dialysis session and to improve peripheral circulation. In Japan, >10,000 dialysis patients underwent treatment with I-HDF in 2017, and the number of dialysis patients is increasing year by year. I-HDF involves the intermittent infusion of ultrapure dialysis fluid or sterile nonpyrogenic substitution fluid, for example, at a volume of 200 mL and a rate of 150 mL/min by backfiltration every 30 min during treatment. The total infusion volume can therefore be estimated at 200 (mL) × 7 (infusions) or 1.4 L/session. I-HDF may be regarded as online HDF with a very small replacement volume.
SUMMARY
Several clinical trials of I-HDF have been conducted in Japan. (1) In a 2007 study, despite there being no differences noted in the volume of water removal between hemodialysis (HD) and I-HDF, a significantly lower rate of reduction in the time-averaged blood volume was seen in I-HDF than in HD, so the plasma refilling rate was greater during I-HDF. (2) In a 2015 study, at 13 weeks after a switch from HD, I-HDF was found to be significantly superior to HD in terms of the incidence of events needing intervention by medical staff. However, significantly lower blood β2-microglobulin (MG) and α1-MG levels were observed in the predilution online HDF (pre-HDF) group than in the I-HDF group, and the amount of albumin leak was lower in the I-HDF group than in the pre-HDF group. (3) In a 2017 study, compared with HD, I-HDF was associated with a reduced number of interventions for intradialytic hypotension and less severe tachycardia, suggesting less sympathetic stimulation during I-HDF. Key messages: I-HDF is a valid treatment option because it is associated with an increased plasma refilling rate and fewer interventions needed by medical staff.
Topics: Blood Pressure; Blood Volume; Dialysis Solutions; Female; Hemodiafiltration; Humans; Hypotension; Male
PubMed: 31752002
DOI: 10.1159/000503891 -
Nefrologia : Publicacion Oficial de La... 2017The measure of intraperitoneal pressure in peritoneal dialysis is easy and provides clear therapeutic benefits. However it is measured only rarely in adult peritoneal... (Review)
Review
The measure of intraperitoneal pressure in peritoneal dialysis is easy and provides clear therapeutic benefits. However it is measured only rarely in adult peritoneal dialysis units. This review aims to disseminate the usefulness of measuring intraperitoneal pressure. This measurement is performed in supine before initiating the drain of a manual exchange with "Y" system, by raising the drain bag and measuring from the mid-axillary line the height of the liquid column that rises from the patient. With typical values of 10-16 cmHO, intraperitoneal pressure should never exceed 18 cmHO. With basal values that depend on body mass index, it increases 1-3 cmHO/L of intraperitoneal volume, and varies with posture and physical activity. Its increase causes discomfort, sleep and breathing disturbances, and has been linked to the occurrence of leaks, hernias, hydrothorax, gastro-esophageal reflux and enteric peritonitis. Less known and valued is its ability to decrease the effectiveness of dialysis significantly counteracting ultrafiltration and decreasing solute clearance to a smaller degree. Because of its easy measurement and potential utility, should be monitored in case of ultrafiltration failure to rule out its eventual contribution in some patients. Although not yet mentioned in the clinical practice guidelines for PD, its clear benefits justify its inclusion among the periodic measurements to consider for prescribing and monitoring peritoneal dialysis.
Topics: Adult; Ascitic Fluid; Body Mass Index; Dialysis Solutions; Humans; Hydrostatic Pressure; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Manometry; Peritoneal Dialysis; Pressure; Reference Values; Supine Position; Ultrafiltration
PubMed: 28739249
DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2017.05.014 -
Kidney & Blood Pressure Research 2023Hemodialysis is one of the most resources consuming medical intervention. Due to its concept, the proper amount of dialysis fluid passed through dialyzer is crucial to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hemodialysis is one of the most resources consuming medical intervention. Due to its concept, the proper amount of dialysis fluid passed through dialyzer is crucial to obtain the expected outcomes. The most frequent source of dialysis fluid is production from liquid concentrate (delivered in containers or plastic bags) in dialysis machine. Alternatively, concentrates for dialysis may be produced in dialysis center by dilution in mixing devices dry or semidry premixed compounds connected with system of central dialysis fluid delivery system. Dialysate consumption depends on various factors like type of hemodialysis machine, session duration, prescribed flow, etc. Summary: Modern hemodialysis machines are equipped with the modules which automatically reduce flow rate of dialysis fluid to the patient blood flow and minimize dialysate consumption during preparation and after reinfusion. Smart using of available options offered by manufacturers allows to save additional portion of acid concentrate and water. The weight of concentrates to be delivered to the dialysis center is the major factor influencing the cost (financial and environmental) of transportation from the manufacturer to the final consumer. The crisis on the energy carriers market and extremely high fuel prices made the transportation cost one of the significant costs of the treatment, which must be bear by supplier and finally influence on the price of goods.
KEY MESSAGES
The careful choice of the concentrate delivery system can improve cost-effectiveness of dialysis. Such solutions implemented in dialysis unit helps make significant savings and decrease the impact on natural environment by carbon footprint reduction.
Topics: Humans; Renal Dialysis; Dialysis Solutions
PubMed: 37166319
DOI: 10.1159/000530439 -
Clinical Journal of the American... Sep 2018
Topics: Calcinosis; Dialysis Solutions; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Magnesium
PubMed: 30131426
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.08380718 -
Clinical Journal of the American... Sep 2013The effect of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions on PD-related peritonitis is unclear. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between use of... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The effect of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions on PD-related peritonitis is unclear. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between use of biocompatible solutions and the probability of occurrence or clinical outcomes of peritonitis.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS
The study included all incident Australian patients receiving PD between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2010, using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry data. All multicompartment PD solutions of neutral pH were categorized as biocompatible solutions. The independent predictors of peritonitis and the use of biocompatible solutions were determined by multivariable, multilevel mixed-effects Poisson and logistic regression analysis, respectively. Sensitivity analyses, including propensity score matching, were performed.
RESULTS
Use of biocompatible solutions gradually declined (from 7.5% in 2007 to 4.2% in 2010), with preferential use among smaller units and among younger patients without diabetes mellitus. Treatment with biocompatible solution was associated with significantly greater overall rate of peritonitis (0.67 versus 0.47 episode per patient-year; incidence rate ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 1.89) and with shorter time to first peritonitis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.87), a finding replicated in propensity score-matched cohorts (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.71).
CONCLUSIONS
In an observational registry study, use of biocompatible PD solutions was associated with higher overall peritonitis rates and shorter time to first peritonitis. Further randomized studies adequately powered for a primary peritonitis outcome are warranted.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Australia; Biocompatible Materials; Dialysis Solutions; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Peritoneal Dialysis; Peritonitis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23949232
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12361212 -
Kidney International. Supplement Aug 2000Uremia is characterized by gross contamination of body water with a wide spectrum of retained solutes normally excreted by the kidney. The rationale for dialysis therapy... (Review)
Review
Uremia is characterized by gross contamination of body water with a wide spectrum of retained solutes normally excreted by the kidney. The rationale for dialysis therapy is that these retained solutes have concentration-dependent toxicity, which can be ameliorated through removal by dialysis. Apart from the well-established clinical consequences of abnormalities in fluid, electrolyte, acid base metabolism, and retained beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2 m), there is very little understanding of solute-specific uremic toxicity. Evidence is reviewed to demonstrate the following: (1) Many aspects of the uremic syndrome are controlled by adequate dialysis of low molecular weight solutes. (2) Urea can serve as a generic molecule to quantitate the fractional clearance of body water by dialysis (Kt/V) of retained low molecular weight solutes. (3) Urea has no concentration-dependent toxicity, and the generation rate of putative toxic low molecular weight solutes is not proportional to urea generation. The major clinical consequences and controversies stemming from these interrelationships are reviewed. Kinetic approaches to determine Kt/V dose equivalency between intermittent and continuous dialysis therapy are reviewed. We conclude that Kt/V can and will be generalized to describe the kinetics of other solutes such as beta2m as our knowledge of uremic toxicity grows, and hence, it is predicted that it will goeth and goeth and goeth.
Topics: Dialysis Solutions; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Nephrology; Renal Dialysis; Uremia
PubMed: 10936795
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07602.x -
Blood Purification 2019Calcium (Ca) is an essential element that plays a critical role in many biological processes. In dialysis patients, the regulation of Ca balance is highly complex, given... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Calcium (Ca) is an essential element that plays a critical role in many biological processes. In dialysis patients, the regulation of Ca balance is highly complex, given the absence of kidney function, endocrine disturbances and the use of drugs such as phosphate binders, vitamin D analogues, and calcimimetics. Also, the use of different dialysate Ca (DCa) baths has profound effect on Ca balance, which depends both on the difference between the Ca concentration in the bath and the serum of the patients, as on the ultrafiltration volume.
SUMMARY
The choice of DCa may have important short- and long-term consequences. While lower DCa (especially < 2.5 mEq/L) concentrations have been associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death in observational studies, DCa in the higher ranges (3.0 mEq/L and above) may contribute to vascular pathology. Intra-dialytic hemodynamics may also be affected by the choice of DCa. In general, lower DCa concentrations are associated with an increase, and higher DCa concentrations with a decrease in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Preliminary data has suggested that a DCa of 2.75 mEq/L may help in obtaining a net zero intradialytic Ca balance in individual patients, but clinical experience is still limited. Key Message: The optimal Ca balance depends on multiple parameters including blood Ca levels, PTH and the use of phosphate binders and vitamin D analogues, as well as on the risk of hemodynamic stability and cardiac arrhythmias. Therefore, DCa prescription should be individualised. A DCa of 2.75 mEq/L may be useful adjunct for dialysis providers.
Topics: Calcium; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Dialysis Solutions; Hemodynamics; Humans; Parathyroid Hormone
PubMed: 30517930
DOI: 10.1159/000494584 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2014The high mortality rate among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains an unsolved problem in intensive care medicine, despite the use of renal... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The high mortality rate among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains an unsolved problem in intensive care medicine, despite the use of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Increasing evidence from clinical studies in adults and children suggests that the new peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluids may allow for better long-term preservation of peritoneal morphology and function. Formation of glucose degradation products (GDPs) can be reduced and even avoided with the use of newer "biocompatible" solutions. However, it is still unclear if there are any differences in using conventional (lactate) solutions compared with low GDP (bicarbonate) solutions for acute PD.
OBJECTIVES
To look at the benefits and harms of bicarbonate versus lactate solutions in acute PD.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database LILACS (from 1982), and reference lists of articles.Date of last search: 6 May 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bicarbonate to lactate solution for acute PD.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assess the methodological quality of studies. One author abstracted data onto a standard form, and a second author checked data extraction. We used the random-effects model and expressed the results as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
MAIN RESULTS
We included one study (20 patients) in this review. In shock patients, bicarbonate did not differ from lactate with respect to mortality (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.06 to 3.91); however there were significant differences in blood lactate (MD -1.60 mmol/L, 95% CI -2.04 to -1.16), serum bicarbonate (MD 5.00 mmol/L, 95% CI 3.26 to 6.74) and blood pH (MD 0.12, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.18). In non-shock patients there was a significance difference in blood lactate (MD -0.60 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.35) but not in serum bicarbonate (MD 1.10 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.27 to 2.47) or blood pH (MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.06). Other outcomes could not be analysed because of the limited data available.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no strong evidence that any clinical advantage for patients requiring acute PD for AKI when comparing conventional (lactate) with low GDP dialysis solutions (bicarbonate).
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adult; Bicarbonates; Dialysis Solutions; Humans; Lactic Acid; Peritoneal Dialysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 24992903
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007034.pub3 -
Clinical Journal of the American... Jun 2019
Topics: Dialysis Solutions; Humans; Peritoneal Dialysis
PubMed: 31123182
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04660419 -
Pediatric Nephrology (Berlin, Germany) Oct 2017Introduction of the so-called biocompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluids was based on a large body of experimental evidence and various clinical trials suggesting... (Review)
Review
Introduction of the so-called biocompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluids was based on a large body of experimental evidence and various clinical trials suggesting important clinical benefits. Of these, until now, only preservation of residual renal function-likely due to lower glucose degradation product load and, in case of icodextrin, improved fluid and blood pressure control-have consistently been proven, whereas the impact on important clinical endpoints such as infectious complications, preservation of PD membrane transport function, and patient outcome, are still debated. In view of the high morbidity and mortality rates of PD patients, novel approaches are warranted and comprise the search for alternative osmotic agents and enrichment of PD fluids with specific pharmacologic agents, such as alanyl-glutamine, potentially counteracting local but also systemic sequelae of uremia and PD.
Topics: Biocompatible Materials; Blood Pressure; Dialysis Solutions; Glucose; Health Services Needs and Demand; Humans; Icodextrin; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Osmosis; Peritoneal Dialysis; Peritoneum; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27722783
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3461-y