-
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2022New therapies are required for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for which the current standards of care poorly affect the patient prognosis of this...
New therapies are required for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for which the current standards of care poorly affect the patient prognosis of this aggressive cancer subtype. In this preclinical study, we aim to investigate the efficacy of Fingolimod, a described inhibitor of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptors axis, and Dimethyl Fumarate (DMF), a methyl ester of fumaric acid, both already approved as immunomodulators in auto-immune diseases with additional expected anti-cancer effects. The impact of both drugs was analyzed with in vitro cell survival analysis and in vivo graft models using mouse and human NSCLC cells implanted in immunocompetent or immunodeficient mice, respectively. We demonstrated that Fingolimod and DMF repressed tumor progression without apparent adverse effects in vivo in three preclinical mouse NSCLC models. In vitro, Fingolimod did not affect either the tumor proliferation or the cytotoxicity, although DMF reduced tumor cell proliferation. These results suggest that Fingolimod and DMF affected tumor progression through different cellular mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment. Fingolimod and DMF might uncover potential therapeutic opportunities in NSCLC.
Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Dimethyl Fumarate; Fingolimod Hydrochloride; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 35897763
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158192 -
CNS Drugs Jul 2021Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience relapses and sustained disability progression. Since 2004, the number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS has...
BACKGROUND
Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience relapses and sustained disability progression. Since 2004, the number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS has grown substantially. As a result, patients, healthcare providers, and insurers are increasingly interested in comparative efficacy and safety evaluations to distinguish between treatment options, but head-to-head studies between DMTs are limited.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the current study was to compare efficacy and safety outcomes with the DMTs ozanimod and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to adjust for cross-trial differences in study design and population.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of ozanimod compared with DMF. Individual patient-level data (IPD) for ozanimod were obtained from the SUNBEAM and RADIANCE Part B trials, and aggregate-level patient data (APD) for DMF were obtained from CONFIRM and DEFINE. A MAIC is used to weight IPD to APD based on important baseline patient characteristics considered to be effect modifiers or prognostic factors in order to balance the covariate distribution to establish more homogenous trial populations. Once trial populations are determined to be sufficiently homogenous, outcomes of interest are estimated and used to generate treatment effects between the weighted IPD and APD. We used MAIC methodology to compare efficacy and safety outcomes of interest between ozanimod 1.0 mg once daily (OD) and DMF 240 mg twice daily (BID), including confirmed disability progression (CDP) at 3 and 6 months, annualized relapse rate (ARR), proportion of patients relapsed, overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuations due to AEs.
RESULTS
After matching patient data, baseline patient characteristics were balanced between patients receiving ozanimod and those receiving DMF. Compared with DMF, ozanimod demonstrated significantly improved CDP at 3 months (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.86), ARR (rate ratio [RR] 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.97), proportion of patients relapsed (odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.83), overall AEs (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.08-0.16), SAEs (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.19-0.39), and discontinuations (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.07-0.17). CDP at 6 months did not differ significantly between the two agents (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.62-1.26).
CONCLUSIONS
After adjustment of baseline patient characteristics, the MAIC demonstrated that the efficacy and safety of ozanimod 1.0 mg OD was superior to that of DMF 240 mg BID. Although a MAIC is less likely to produce biased estimates than a naïve or a standard indirect treatment comparison via a common comparator, limitations include potential confounding due to unobserved and thus unaccounted for baseline differences.
Topics: Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dimethyl Fumarate; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Indans; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Oxadiazoles; Sphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor Modulators; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33847901
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-021-00805-0 -
PloS One 2015Dimethyl fumarate is an immunomodulatory and neuroprotective drug, approved recently for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. In view of the limited...
BACKGROUND
Dimethyl fumarate is an immunomodulatory and neuroprotective drug, approved recently for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. In view of the limited therapeutic options for human acute and chronic polyneuritis, we used the animal model of experimental autoimmune neuritis in the Lewis rat to study the effects of dimethyl fumarate on autoimmune inflammation and neuroprotection in the peripheral nervous system.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Experimental autoimmune neuritis was induced by immunization with the neuritogenic peptide (amino acids 53-78) of P2 myelin protein. Preventive treatment with dimethyl fumarate given at 45 mg/kg twice daily by oral gavage significantly ameliorated clinical neuritis by reducing demyelination and axonal degeneration in the nerve conduction studies. Histology revealed a significantly lower degree of inflammatory infiltrates in the sciatic nerves. In addition, we detected a reduction of early signs of axonal degeneration through a reduction of amyloid precursor protein expressed in axons of the peripheral nerves. This reduction correlated with an increase of nuclear factor (erythroid derived 2)-related factor 2 positive axons, supporting the neuroprotective potential of dimethyl fumarate. Furthermore, nuclear factor (erythroid derived 2)-related factor 2 expression in Schwann cells was only rarely detected and there was no increase of Schwann cells death during EAN.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that immunomodulatory and neuroprotective dimethyl fumarate may represent an innovative therapeutic option in human autoimmune neuropathies.
Topics: Animals; Axons; Dimethyl Fumarate; Female; Neuritis, Autoimmune, Experimental; Neuroprotective Agents; Rats; Rats, Inbred Lew; Schwann Cells
PubMed: 26618510
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143416 -
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease Jul 2016Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is one of the newer additions to the armamentarium of potent immunomodulators for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).... (Review)
Review
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is one of the newer additions to the armamentarium of potent immunomodulators for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). After more than 2 years of real-world experience and more than 190,000 patients currently treated with DMF worldwide, it is a good timepoint to review the experience gathered so far and to re-evaluate the potential of this first-line oral multiple sclerosis (MS) drug. Post-hoc analyses of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, some comprising more than 6 years of drug exposure including patients from the clinical trials, and the overall notion in clinical practice widely confirm the good efficacy of DMF in RRMS. Despite an overall good safety profile, it became also clear that the necessary clinical vigilance while using DMF may not be neglected. So far, four reported cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a towering shadow over many MS therapies, warrant proper attention in newly-updated risk management plans. This review recapitulates efficacy and safety aspects of DMF therapy in relation to reported data from the pivotal clinical trials. In addition, we summarize recent insights into DMF mechanisms of action drawn from the field of basic research which may have important implications for clinical practice.
PubMed: 27433310
DOI: 10.1177/2040622316653307 -
European Journal of Pharmacology Jul 2022Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an antioxidative and anti-inflammatory drug approved for treatment of multiple sclerosis and psoriasis; however, beneficial effects of DMF... (Review)
Review
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an antioxidative and anti-inflammatory drug approved for treatment of multiple sclerosis and psoriasis; however, beneficial effects of DMF have also been found in other inflammatory diseases and cancers. DMF is a prodrug that is immediately hydrolysed to monomethyl fumarate (MMF) in vivo. Both fumarates activate the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) pathway, and Nrf2 is a key transcription factor of the antioxidant response. The immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory actions of DMF occur through several mechanisms: via inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway and by downregulation of aerobic glycolysis and pyroptosis in activated myeloid and lymphoid cells. MMF is also an agonist of hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2 (HCAR2). Differences in the strength of effects and mechanisms of action of both fumarates are discussed. The aim of this review was to analyse and compare the neuroprotective, antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects of DMF and its active metabolite, MMF, in cellular (in vitro) and animal models of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs), other than multiple sclerosis. There are more than twenty studies that currently represent this field. Most of the studies are concerned with cellular or animal models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), one utilized a mouse model of Huntington's disease (HD) and one clinical trial was carried out with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. The discrepancies in the results of the various studies are discussed, and issues requiring further research have been identified.
Topics: Animals; Dimethyl Fumarate; Fumarates; Humans; Mice; Multiple Sclerosis; NF-E2-Related Factor 2; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Neuroprotective Agents; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 35569547
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175025 -
JCI Insight Nov 2023New medicines are urgently required to treat the fatal neuromuscular disease Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a potent immunomodulatory...
New medicines are urgently required to treat the fatal neuromuscular disease Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a potent immunomodulatory small molecule nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 activator with current clinical utility in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and psoriasis that could be effective for DMD and rapidly translatable. Here, we tested 2 weeks of daily 100 mg/kg DMF versus 5 mg/kg standard-care prednisone (PRED) treatment in juvenile mdx mice with early symptomatic DMD. Both drugs modulated seed genes driving the DMD disease program and improved force production in fast-twitch muscle. However, only DMF showed pro-mitochondrial effects, protected contracting muscles from fatigue, improved histopathology, and augmented clinically compatible muscle function tests. DMF may be a more selective modulator of the DMD disease program than PRED, warranting follow-up longitudinal studies to evaluate disease-modifying impact.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Mice, Inbred mdx; Dimethyl Fumarate; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Prednisone; Muscles
PubMed: 37751291
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.165974 -
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and... Dec 2019In a prospective phase IV trial of the first-line oral treatment dimethyl fumarate (DMF), we examined dynamics of neurofilament light (NFL) chain in serum, plasma and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
In a prospective phase IV trial of the first-line oral treatment dimethyl fumarate (DMF), we examined dynamics of neurofilament light (NFL) chain in serum, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples collected over 12 months from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. NFL changes were related to disease activity.
METHODS
We examined NFL levels by single-molecule array in 88 CSF, 348 plasma and 131 sera from treatment-naïve RRMS patients (n=52), healthy controls (n=23) and a placebo group matched by age, sex and NFL (n=52). Plasma/sera were collected at baseline, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after DMF. CSF samples were collected at baseline and 12 months after DMF.
RESULTS
NFL concentration in CSF, plasma and serum correlated highly (p<0.0001 for all), but plasma levels were only 76.9% of paired serum concentration. After 12 months of DMF treatment, NFL concentration decreased by 73%, 69% and 55% in the CSF, serum and plasma (p<0.0001, respectively). Significant reduction in blood was observed after 6 and 12 months treatment compared with baseline (p<0.01 and p<0.0001, respectively) and to placebo (p<0.0001). Patients with NFL above the 807.5 pg/mL cut-off in CSF had 5.0-times relative risk of disease activity (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides Class II evidence that first-line DMF reduces NFL in both blood and CSF after 6 months and normalises CSF levels in 73% of patients. High NFL concentration in CSF after a year reflected disease activity. NFL levels were higher in serum than in plasma, which should be considered when NFL is used as a biomarker.
Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Dimethyl Fumarate; Female; Humans; Intermediate Filaments; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Neurofilament Proteins; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31611264
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321321 -
Revue Neurologique 2021The current treated MS population is very different from that of patients in randomized clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
The current treated MS population is very different from that of patients in randomized clinical trials.
OBJECTIVES
To study the long-term efficacy and tolerance of fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF), both available as first-line treatment in early-treated treatment-naïve MS patients.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of 75 patients from our prospective MS registry fulfilling the inclusion criteria: FTY or DMF as first-line treatment, treatment initiation within 36months of disease onset and treatment duration>12months.
RESULTS
Demographics and MRI characteristics at baseline were similar in both groups (FTY 55 patients, DMF 20), but patients on FTY had higher pretreatment clinical activity (P=0.008). Twenty-two percent of patients in the FTY group and 15% in the DMF group had highly active disease. At last follow-up (mean: 44.2, SD: 17.3months), the majority of the patients were still on treatment while 54.5% of FTY and 65% of DMF patients reached NEDA 3 status (P=0.444). Both treatments significantly decreased relapses and occurrence of new T1 Gd-enhancing lesions (P<0.001). The main reason for discontinuation was disease activity without severe side effects on either treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings support efficacy and tolerance of both drugs in early-treated treatment-naive MS patients, arguing in favour of efficient early immunomodulation in MS patients. Both drugs significantly reduced the incidence of new relapses and Gd-enhancing lesions on treatment with FTY being more frequently prescribed than DMF, especially in patients with evidence of higher clinical disease activity.
Topics: Dimethyl Fumarate; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Multiple Sclerosis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32771209
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.05.014 -
Biomolecules Feb 2020The skin represents an indispensable barrier between the organism and the environment and is the first line of defense against exogenous insults. The transcription... (Review)
Review
The skin represents an indispensable barrier between the organism and the environment and is the first line of defense against exogenous insults. The transcription factor NRF2 is a central regulator of cytoprotection and stress resistance. NRF2 is activated in response to oxidative stress by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and electrophiles. These electrophiles oxidize specific cysteine residues of the NRF2 inhibitor KEAP1, leading to KEAP1 inactivation and, subsequently, NRF2 activation. As oxidative stress is associated with inflammation, the NRF2 pathway plays important roles in the pathogenesis of common inflammatory diseases and cancer in many tissues and organs, including the skin. The electrophile and NRF2 activator dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an established and efficient drug for patients suffering from the common inflammatory skin disease psoriasis and the neuro-inflammatory disease multiple sclerosis (MS). In this review, we discuss possible molecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic activity of DMF and other NRF2 activators. Recent evidence suggests that electrophiles not only activate NRF2, but also target other inflammation-associated pathways including the transcription factor NF-κB and the multi-protein complexes termed inflammasomes. Inflammasomes are central regulators of inflammation and are involved in many inflammatory conditions. Most importantly, the NRF2 and inflammasome pathways are connected at different levels, mainly antagonistically.
Topics: Animals; Dermatologic Agents; Dimethyl Fumarate; Electrons; Humans; Inflammasomes; Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1; NF-E2-Related Factor 2; NF-kappa B; Reactive Oxygen Species; Skin Diseases
PubMed: 32053878
DOI: 10.3390/biom10020271 -
Multiple Sclerosis Journal -... 2017Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease-modifying therapies approved to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis. Prior observational studies and our previous...
BACKGROUND
Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease-modifying therapies approved to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis. Prior observational studies and our previous 12-month investigation showed comparable clinical efficacy.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to assess real-world efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod over 24 months in patients with multiple sclerosis.
METHODS
Patients treated with dimethyl fumarate ( = 395) or fingolimod ( = 264) completed 24-month follow-up in a large academic multiple sclerosis center. Discontinuation rates and measures of disease activity were compared after propensity score weighting. The primary outcome was on-treatment annualized relapse rate ratio. Other measures included rate of drug discontinuation and brain magnetic resonance imaging activity defined as new T2 and/or gadolinium-enhancing lesions.
RESULTS
Propensity score weighting showed excellent covariate balance. At 24 months, dimethyl fumarate demonstrated comparable annualized relapse rate (rate ratio = 1.45, 95% confidence interval 0.53-3.99) and brain magnetic resonance imaging activity (odds ratio = 1.38, 95% confidence interval 0.83-2.32). Dimethyl fumarate patients discontinued therapy earlier compared to fingolimod (hazard ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.77) and were more likely to discontinue therapy due to intolerability (odds ratio = 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.23).
CONCLUSION
Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod had similar reductions in annualized relapse rate in clinical trials, and our real-world experience supports this observation. Dimethyl fumarate-treated patients had higher likelihood of early discontinuation, and this was mostly due to intolerability.
PubMed: 28890796
DOI: 10.1177/2055217317715485