-
Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official... Nov 2022Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is validated for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (Ga-PSMA PET/CT) combined with mpMRI has...
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is validated for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (Ga-PSMA PET/CT) combined with mpMRI has improved negative predictive value over mpMRI alone for csPCa. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the PRIMARY study was to evaluate the clinical significance of patterns of intraprostatic PSMA activity, proposing a 5-point PRIMARY score to optimize the accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT for csPCa in a low-prevalence population. The PRIMARY trial was a prospective multicenter phase II imaging trial that enrolled men with suspected PCa, no prior biopsy, and a recent mpMRI examination (6 mo) and for whom prostate biopsy was planned. In total, 291 men underwent mpMRI, Ga-PSMA PET/CT, and systematic biopsy with or without targeted biopsy. The mpMRI was read separately using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) (version 2). Ga-PSMA PET/CT (pelvis only) was acquired a minimum of 60 min after injection. Ga-PSMA PET/CT was centrally read for pattern (diffuse transition zone [TZ], symmetric central zone [CZ], focal TZ, or focal peripheral zone [PZ]) and intensity (SUV). In this post hoc analysis, a 5-level PRIMARY score was assigned on the basis of analysis of the central read: no pattern (score of 1), diffuse TZ or CZ (not focal) (score of 2), focal TZ (score of 3), focal PZ (score of 4), or an SUV of at least 12 (score of 5). Two further readers independently assigned a PRIMARY score to 118 scans to determine interrater agreement. Associations between PRIMARY score and csPCa (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥ 2) were evaluated. Of the 291 men enrolled, 162 (56%) had csPCa. A PRIMARY score of 1 was present in 16% (47); a score of 2, in 19% (55); a score of 3, in 10% (29); a score of 4 in 40% (117); and a score of 5, in 15% (43). The proportion of patients with csPCa and a PRIMARY score of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 was 8.5% (4/47), 27% (15/55), 38% (11/29), 76% (89/117), and 100% (43/43), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for a PRIMARY score of 1 or 2 (low-risk patterns) versus a PRIMARY score of 3-5 (high-risk patterns) were 88%, 64%, 76%, and 81%, respectively, compared with 83%, 53%, 69%, and 72%, respectively, for a PI-RADS score of 2 versus 3-5 on mpMRI. The Cohen κ for a PRIMARY score of 1 of 2 versus a PRIMARY score of 3-5 was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.88) for reader 1 and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.78) for reader 2. A PRIMARY score incorporating intraprostatic pattern and intensity on Ga-PSMA PET/CT shows potential, with high diagnostic accuracy for csPCa. Further validation is warranted before implementation.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostate; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prospective Studies; Gallium Radioisotopes; Pelvis
PubMed: 35301240
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263448 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jan 2023Growing evidence of the microbiome's role in human health and disease has emerged since the creation of the Human Microbiome Project. Recent studies suggest that... (Review)
Review
Growing evidence of the microbiome's role in human health and disease has emerged since the creation of the Human Microbiome Project. Recent studies suggest that alterations in microbiota composition (dysbiosis) may play an essential role in the occurrence, development, and prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa), which remains the second most frequent male malignancy worldwide. Current advances in biological technologies, such as high-throughput sequencing, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, have enabled research on the gut, urinary, and intra-prostate microbiome signature and the correlation with local and systemic inflammation, host immunity response, and PCa progression. Several microbial species and their metabolites facilitate PCa insurgence through genotoxin-mediated mutagenesis or by driving tumor-promoting inflammation and dysfunctional immunosurveillance. However, the impact of the microbiome on PCa development, progression, and response to treatment is complex and needs to be fully understood. This review addresses the current knowledge on the host-microbe interaction and the risk of PCa, providing novel insights into the intraprostatic, gut, and urinary microbiome mechanisms leading to PCa carcinogenesis and treatment response. In this paper, we provide a detailed overview of diet changes, gut microbiome, and emerging therapeutic approaches related to the microbiome and PCa. Further investigation on the prostate-related microbiome and large-scale clinical trials testing the efficacy of microbiota modulation approaches may improve patient outcomes while fulfilling the literature gap of microbial-immune-cancer-cell mechanistic interactions.
Topics: Male; Humans; Microbiota; Prostatic Neoplasms; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Prostate; Inflammation; Dysbiosis
PubMed: 36675055
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021511 -
Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official... May 2021Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on most prostate cancer (PCa) cells, and several PSMA ligands for PET imaging are now available worldwide.... (Review)
Review
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on most prostate cancer (PCa) cells, and several PSMA ligands for PET imaging are now available worldwide. Ga-PSMA-11 has already received U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval, and use of PSMA PET is currently suggested by several international guidelines for investigating PCa in different clinical settings. In primary PCa, PSMA PET has been shown to be superior to cross-sectional imaging for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases with subsequent clinical management changes. Additionally, it might also have a role in intraprostatic tumor localization, especially when combined with multiparametric MRI. In a setting of PCa recurrence, higher detection rates have been observed than for any other available imaging techniques, especially at low prostate-specific antigen values. Furthermore, PSMA PET consistently led to a shift in clinical management, thus increasing the proportion of radiotherapy, surgery, or other focal therapies at the expense of systemic options or no treatment. In oligometastatic disease after radical surgery, PSMA PET may be relevant in guiding a metastasis-directed therapy approach, as preliminary data seem to suggest a benefit in terms of progression-free survival after treatment of PSMA PET-positive lesions. As a staging and gatekeeping technique, PSMA PET represents a reliable whole-body imaging procedure in combination with second-line therapy of castration-resistant PCa, as well as being pivotal when assessing patients eligible for radioligand therapy such as Lu-PSMA. This critical review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the latest literature on the current or emerging main indications, as well as a general outlook on the recommended interpretation criteria for PSMA PET imaging.
Topics: Antigens, Surface; Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II; Humans; Male; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 33712536
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257238 -
Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official... Jun 2022The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET in comparison to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the evaluation of intraprostatic cancer foci is not... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Head-to-Head Comparison of Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI with a Histopathology Gold Standard in the Detection, Intraprostatic Localization, and Determination of Local Extension of Primary Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Imaging Trial.
The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET in comparison to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the evaluation of intraprostatic cancer foci is not well defined. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (PSMA PET/CT), mpMRI, and PSMA PET/CT + mpMRI using 3 independent masked readers for each modality and with histopathology as the gold standard in the detection, intraprostatic localization, and determination of local extension of primary prostate cancer. Patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer who underwent PSMA PET/CT as part of a prospective trial (NCT03368547) and mpMRI before radical prostatectomy were included. Each imaging modality was interpreted by 3 independent readers who were unaware of the other modality result. A central majority rule was applied (2:1). Pathologic examination of whole-mount slices was used as the gold standard. Imaging scans and whole-mount slices were interpreted using the same standardized approach on a segment level and a lesion level. A "neighboring" approach was used to define imaging-pathology correlation for the detection of individual prostate cancer foci. Accuracy in determining the location, extraprostatic extension (EPE), and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) of prostate cancer foci was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. Interreader agreement was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient analysis. The final analysis included 74 patients (14 [19%] with intermediate risk and 60 [81%] with high risk). The cancer detection rate (lesion-based analysis) was 85%, 83%, and 87% for PSMA PET/CT, mpMRI, and PSMA PET/CT + mpMRI, respectively. The change in AUC was statistically significant between PSMA PET/CT + mpMRI and the 2 imaging modalities alone for delineation of tumor localization (segment-based analysis) ( < 0.001) but not between PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI ( = 0.093). mpMRI outperformed PSMA PET/CT in detecting EPE ( = 0.002) and SVI ( = 0.001). In the segment-level analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient analysis showed moderate reliability among PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI readers using a 5-point Likert scale (range, 0.53-0.64). In the evaluation of T staging, poor reliability was found among PSMA PET/CT readers and poor to moderate reliability was found for mpMRI readers. PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI have similar accuracy in the detection and intraprostatic localization of prostate cancer foci. mpMRI performs better in identifying EPE and SVI. For the T-staging evaluation of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer, mpMRI should still be considered the imaging modality of reference. Whenever available, PSMA PET/MRI or the coregistration or fusion of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI (PSMA PET/CT + mpMRI) should be used as it improves tumor extent delineation.
Topics: Gallium Isotopes; Gallium Radioisotopes; Humans; Male; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 34649942
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262398 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jan 2021Androgens represent the main hormones responsible for maintaining hormonal balance and function in the prostate and testis. As they are involved in prostate and... (Review)
Review
Androgens represent the main hormones responsible for maintaining hormonal balance and function in the prostate and testis. As they are involved in prostate and testicular carcinogenesis, more detailed information of their active concentration at the site of action is required. Since the introduction of the term intracrinology as the local formation of active steroid hormones from inactive precursors of the adrenal gland, mainly dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA-S, it is evident that blood circulating levels of sex steroid hormones need not reflect their actual concentrations in the tissue. Here, we review and critically evaluate available methods for the analysis of human intraprostatic and intratesticular steroid concentrations. Since analytical approaches have much in common in both tissues, we discuss them together. Preanalytical steps, including various techniques for separation of the analytes, are compared, followed by the end-point measurement. Advantages and disadvantages of chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS, GC-MS), immunoanalytical methods (IA), and hybrid (LC-IA) are discussed. Finally, the clinical information value of the determined steroid hormones is evaluated concerning differentiating between patients with cancer or benign hyperplasia and between patients with different degrees of infertility. Adrenal-derived 11-oxygenated androgens are mentioned as perspective prognostic markers for these purposes.
Topics: Adrenal Glands; Androgens; Animals; Gonadal Steroid Hormones; Humans; Male; Prostate; Steroids; Testis
PubMed: 33466491
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010466 -
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory... Feb 2017Primary intraprostatic synovial sarcoma is a rare presentation of an otherwise well-studied disease, and it is one of the few primary sarcomas to occur in the prostate.... (Review)
Review
Primary intraprostatic synovial sarcoma is a rare presentation of an otherwise well-studied disease, and it is one of the few primary sarcomas to occur in the prostate. Ancillary diagnostic techniques including immunohistochemistry and molecular genetics are useful to establish a definitive diagnosis. Despite its unorthodox location, it shares histologic and molecular genetic characteristics with tumors found elsewhere in the body. Most notably, the chromosomal translocation t(X;18)(p11;q11) encodes a chimeric transcription-activating protein, SS18-SSX, which has been identified as the primary driver mutation. The SS18-SSX fusion gene provides a consistent and dependable means of establishing a definitive diagnosis via reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Recent studies have continued to provide insight into the oncogenesis of this disease. The goal of this review is to elaborate on the clinicopathologic characteristics and underline those techniques that best facilitate the diagnosis of primary intraprostatic synovial sarcoma.
Topics: Humans; Male; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Prostatic Neoplasms; Sarcoma, Synovial
PubMed: 28134577
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0101-RS -
Cancer Biology & Therapy Dec 2024This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of relevant parameters of F-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 PET/CT in predicting the...
This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of relevant parameters of F-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 PET/CT in predicting the pathological grade of primary prostate cancer. Briefly, a prospective analysis was performed on 53 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by systematic puncture biopsy, followed by F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examination prior to treatment within 10 d. The patients were grouped in accordance with the Gleason grading system revised by the International Association of Urology Pathology (ISUP). They were divided into high-grade group (ISUP 4-5 group) and low-grade group (ISUP 1-3 group). The differences in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), intraprostatic PSMA-derived tumor volume (iPSMA-TV), and intraprostatic total lesion PSMA (iTL-PSMA) between the high- and low-grade group were statistically significant ( < .001). No significant difference was found for mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) between the high- and low-grade groups (Z = -1.131, = .258). Besides, binary multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only iPSMA-TV and iTL-PSMA were independent predictors of the pathological grading, for which the odds ratios were 18.821 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.040-173.614, = .010] and 0.758 (95% CI: 0.613-0.938, = .011), respectively. The area under the ROC of this regression model was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.958-1.00, < .001). Only iTL-PSMA was a significant parameter for distinguishing ISUP-4 and ISUP-5 groups (Z = -2.043, = .041). In a nutshell, F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT has good application value in predicting the histopathological grade of primary prostate cancer. Three-dimensional volume metabolism parameters iPSMA-TV and iTL-PSMA were found to be independent predictors for pathological grade.
Topics: Male; Humans; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Multivariate Analysis; Niacinamide
PubMed: 38117551
DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2023.2287120 -
Urology Annals 2023Prolonged urinary incontinence represents one of the most severe complications after a radical prostatectomy procedure, significantly affecting patients' quality of... (Review)
Review
Prolonged urinary incontinence represents one of the most severe complications after a radical prostatectomy procedure, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. In an attempt to ameliorate postprostatectomy continence rates, several sphincter preservation techniques have been reported. The purpose of this article is to report several different sphincter preservation techniques and identify the ones which affect postoperative outcomes the most. For our narrative review, PubMed was searched using the keywords "sphincter," "continence," "preservation," "techniques," and "prostatectomy." Other potentially eligible studies were identified using the reference lists of included studies. Sphincter preservation techniques can be summarized into bladder neck preservation, minimizing injury to the external urethral sphincter, and preserving the maximal length of the external sphincter and of the membranous urethra. Three anatomical structures must be recognized and protected in an attempt to maintain the sphincter complex: the bladder neck, the external urethral sphincter and the musculature of the membranous urethra. While there is strong evidence supporting the importance of bladder neck preservation, the role of maximal preservation of the external sphincter and of the intraprostatic part of the membranous urethra in improving continence rates has not yet been reported in a statistically significant manner by high-quality studies.
PubMed: 38074182
DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_126_22 -
Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids Mar 2022Effective treatments for prostate cancer (PCa) require further development, and previous studies have reported that PTEN and its downstream target CDKN1B are...
Effective treatments for prostate cancer (PCa) require further development, and previous studies have reported that PTEN and its downstream target CDKN1B are significantly downregulated in PCa cells compared with normal cells. Therefore, modulation of PTEN and CDKN1B expression might be a promising therapeutic approach for PCa treatment. Expression of PTEN and CDKN1B was verified in specimens from PCa patients and transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate (TRAMP) mice. The effect of PTEN on PCa cell migration, apoptosis, and the cell cycle was analyzed using a wound-healing assay and flow cytometry. We assessed the ability of intraprostatic and intratumoral injections of recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) 9 expressing Pten or Cdkn1b into TRAMP mice and a subcutaneous tumor xenograft mouse model, respectively, to inhibit PCa progression. PTEN and CDKN1B were significantly downregulated in human and mouse PCa samples, and CDKN1B expression correlated positively with PTEN expression. PTEN overexpression significantly inhibited cell migration and cell-cycle progression and promoted apoptosis in PCa cells by decreasing Ccnd1 expression and increasing that of Cdkn1b. Importantly, treatment with the rAAV9.Pten or rAAV9.Cdkn1b extended the lifespan of TRAMP mice and inhibited the growth rate of tumor xenografts by regulating downstream gene expression. Moreover, neoplasia in treated prostates was significantly diminished compared with that in control prostates, and apoptosis was markedly observed in xenografts treated with Pten or Cdkn1b. These data indicate that rAAV-based PTEN/CDKN1B delivery is promising for the development of novel therapeutics for PCa.
PubMed: 34976432
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.11.018 -
Prostate International Jun 2022The microbiome in various organs involves a vast network that plays a key role in the health and wellness of the human body. With recent advances in biological... (Review)
Review
The microbiome in various organs involves a vast network that plays a key role in the health and wellness of the human body. With recent advances in biological technologies such as high-throughput sequencing, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, it appears that the microbial signature varies dynamically among individuals, creating various roles in metabolism, local and systemic inflammation, and host immunity. Urinary and genital organs, including the prostate, seminal vesicles, and urinary bladder, are reservoirs of several bacterial, viral, and fungal communities. Accumulating evidence has suggested profound roles for the gut, urinary, and intraprostate microbiomes in genitourinary benign and malignant diseases. This review article addresses microbiome-related evidence for three major diseases involved in prostate cancer: chronic prostatitis (CP), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and prostate cancer (PCa). Symptomatic CP is known as CP/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. CP is one of the most common prostate diseases in young men, accounting for 8% of all men visiting a urologic clinic. Although oral medication is the gold standard therapy for patients with BPH, approximately 13% of men present with clinical progression within 4 years after the initiation of treatment, with 5% requiring surgical intervention. The identification of proinflammatory cytokines and pathogens responsible for the clinical progression of BPH is still underway. Several topics regarding the association between PCa and the microbiome are discussed in this review as follows: i) intraprostatic microbiome and the risk of PCa, ii) gut microbiome and PCa, iii) gut microbiome and the risk of radiation-induced side effects, iv) isoflavone intake and equol-producing intestinal flora on PCa, and v) the inhibitory effect of daidzein and equol on tumor growth and progression of PCa. Further studies are required for a comprehensive understanding between the urogenital microbiome and prostate pathogenesis to facilitate the development of preventive and therapeutic approaches for prostate diseases.
PubMed: 35510078
DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.03.004