-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2014Paroxetine is the most potent inhibitor of the reuptake of serotonin of all selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and has been studied in many randomised... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Paroxetine is the most potent inhibitor of the reuptake of serotonin of all selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and has been studied in many randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, these comparative studies provided contrasting findings and systematic reviews of RCTs have always considered the SSRIs as a group, and evidence applicable to this group of drugs might not be applicable to paroxetine alone. The present systematic review assessed the efficacy and tolerability profile of paroxetine in comparison with tricyclics (TCAs), SSRIs and newer or non-conventional agents.
OBJECTIVES
1. To determine the efficacy of paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents in alleviating the acute symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder.2. To review acceptability of treatment with paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents.3. To investigate the adverse effects of paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's Specialized Register (CCDANCTR, to 30 September 2012), which includes relevant randomised controlled trials from the following bibliographic databases: The Cochrane Library (all years), EMBASE (1974 to date), MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). Reference lists of relevant papers and previous systematic reviews were handsearched. Pharmaceutical companies marketing paroxetine and experts in this field were contacted for supplemental data.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials allocating participants with major depression to paroxetine versus any other antidepressants (ADs), both conventional (such as TCAs, SSRIs) and newer or non-conventional (such as hypericum). For trials which had a cross-over design, only results from the first randomisation period were considered.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently checked eligibility and extracted data using a standard form. Data were then entered in RevMan 5.2 with a double-entry procedure. Information extracted included study and participant characteristics, intervention details, settings and efficacy, acceptability and tolerability measures.
MAIN RESULTS
A total of 115 randomised controlled trials (26,134 participants) were included. In 54 studies paroxetine was compared with older ADs, in 21 studies with another SSRI, and in 40 studies with a newer or non-conventional antidepressant other than SSRIs. For the primary outcome (patients who responded to treatment), paroxetine was more effective than reboxetine at increasing patients who responded early to treatment (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.66, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.87, number needed to treat to provide benefit (NNTb) = 16, 95% CI 10 to 50, at one to four weeks, 3 RCTs, 1375 participants, moderate quality of evidence), and less effective than mirtazapine (OR: 2.39, 95% CI 1.42 to 4.02, NNTb = 8, 95% CI 5 to 14, at one to four weeks, 3 RCTs, 726 participants, moderate quality of evidence). Paroxetine was less effective than citalopram in improving response to treatment (OR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.28, NNTb = 9, 95% CI 5 to 102, at six to 12 weeks, 1 RCT, 406 participants, moderate quality of evidence). We found no clear evidence that paroxetine was more or less effective compared with other antidepressants at increasing response to treatment at acute (six to 12 weeks), early (one to four weeks), or longer term follow-up (four to six months). Paroxetine was associated with a lower rate of adverse events than amitriptyline, imipramine and older ADs as a class, but was less well tolerated than agomelatine and hypericum. Included studies were generally at unclear or high risk of bias due to poor reporting of allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessment, and incomplete reporting of outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Some possibly clinically meaningful differences between paroxetine and other ADs exist, but no definitive conclusions can be drawn from these findings. In terms of response, there was a moderate quality of evidence that citalopram was better than paroxetine in the acute phase (six to 12 weeks), although only one study contributed data. In terms of early response to treatment (one to four weeks) there was moderate quality of evidence that mirtazapine was better than paroxetine and that paroxetine was better than reboxetine. However there was no clear evidence that paroxetine was better or worse compared with other antidepressants at increasing response to treatment at any time point. Even if some differences were identified, the findings from this review are better thought as hypothesis forming rather than hypothesis testing and it would be reassuring to see the conclusions replicated in future trials. Finally, most of included studies were at unclear or high risk of bias, and were sponsored by the drug industry. The potential for overestimation of treatment effect due to sponsorship bias should be borne in mind.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Depression; Humans; Paroxetine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
PubMed: 24696195
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006531.pub2 -
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology Oct 2022Postpartum depression is a common mental disease in obstetric puerperium. Its etiology is not completely clear, and its clinical manifestations are complex. It has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Postpartum depression is a common mental disease in obstetric puerperium. Its etiology is not completely clear, and its clinical manifestations are complex. It has serious adverse effects on the body and mind of mothers and infants. Treatment should also follow the principle of individualization. Preliminary studies have shown that traditional chinese medicine prescriptions combined with paroxetine is effective in treating postpartum depression. In order to better determine the therapeutic effect, further exploration was carried out.
HYPOTHESIS
Does the study better evaluate the therapeutic effect and provide data support for clinical promotion?
STUDY DESIGN
The search comes from using the following electronic databases established until January 2022.
STUDY RESULTS
The meta analysis results show that paroxetine combined with traditional chinese medicine prescriptions can reduce the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score [WMD = -7.35, 95 % CI (-10.84, -3.87), P<0.001] and Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) score [WMD = -3.24, 95 % CI (-5.96, -0.53), P < 0.001].And better than paroxetine treatment alone in terms of improving clinical efficacy [RR = 1.22, 95 % CI (1.16, 1.30), P < 0.001].
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the combination of paroxetine and traditional chinese medicine prescriptions in the treatment of postpartum depression, there is a certain clinical effect, and a strong research design and a certain number of RCTs are required at the same time. Future research should clarify the specific composition and composition of traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions.
Topics: Female; Humans; Paroxetine; Depression, Postpartum; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Prescriptions; Depression
PubMed: 35926637
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101019 -
Psychopharmacology Nov 2023Non-invasive home cage monitoring is emerging as a valuable tool to assess the effects of experimental interventions on mouse behaviour. A field in which these...
RATIONALE
Non-invasive home cage monitoring is emerging as a valuable tool to assess the effects of experimental interventions on mouse behaviour. A field in which these techniques may prove useful is the study of repeated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment and discontinuation. SSRI discontinuation syndrome is an under-researched condition that includes the emergence of sleep disturbances following treatment cessation.
OBJECTIVES
We used passive infrared (PIR) monitoring to investigate changes in activity, sleep, and circadian rhythms during repeated treatment with the SSRI paroxetine and its discontinuation in mice.
METHODS
Male mice received paroxetine (10 mg/kg/day, s.c.) for 12 days, then were swapped to saline injections for a 13 day discontinuation period and compared to mice that received saline injections throughout. Mice were continuously tracked using the Continuous Open Mouse Phenotyping of Activity and Sleep Status (COMPASS) system.
RESULTS
Repeated paroxetine treatment reduced activity and increased behaviourally-defined sleep in the dark phase. These effects recovered to saline-control levels within 24 h of paroxetine cessation, yet there was also evidence of a lengthening of sleep bouts in the dark phase for up to a week following discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides the first example of how continuous non-invasive home cage monitoring can be used to detect objective behavioural changes in activity and sleep during and after drug treatment in mice. These data suggest that effects of paroxetine administration reversed soon after its discontinuation but identified an emergent change in sleep bout duration, which could be used as a biomarker in future preclinical studies to prevent or minimise SSRI discontinuation symptoms.
Topics: Male; Animals; Mice; Paroxetine; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sleep; Circadian Rhythm
PubMed: 37584734
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06442-3 -
Tidsskrift For Den Norske Laegeforening... Sep 2011Metoprolol, the most commonly used beta-receptor antagonist in Norway, is eliminated mainly via the enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6. This enzyme is inhibited to a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Metoprolol, the most commonly used beta-receptor antagonist in Norway, is eliminated mainly via the enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6. This enzyme is inhibited to a varying extent by antidepressants. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the interactions between metoprolol and antidepressants with an emphasis on CYP2D6 inhibition.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Relevant literature was identified by a PubMed search using the word "metoprolol" combined with generic names of antidepressant drugs.
RESULTS
The potent CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine has been shown to increase the biologically available dose of metoprolol about 4- to 6-fold. The same degree of increase is expected for the two other potent CYP2D6 inhibitors in the class, fluoxetine and bupropion. Severe bradycardia and atroventricular block has been reported in patients who have taken metoprolol in combination with these three drugs. Escitalopram, citalopram and duloxetine are less potent CYP2D6 inhibitors, and have been shown to cause 2- to 3-fold increases in biologically available dose of metoprolol. Other antidepressants, such as sertraline, venlafaxine, mianserin and mirtazapine, inhibit CYP2D6 to little or no extent, and are not expected to cause clinically relevant interactions with metoprolol.
CONCLUSION
Metoprolol should not be used concomitantly with paroxetine, fluoxetine or bupropion due to extensive interactions and the risk of serious adverse effects. Dose reductions of metoprolol should be considered for combined treatment with citalopram, escitalopram or duloxetine, while concurrent use with sertraline, venlafaxine, mianserin and mirtazapine should be safe.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluoxetine; Humans; Metoprolol; Paroxetine; Risk Factors
PubMed: 21946596
DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.11.0143 -
International Journal of Molecular... Dec 2023Pathological cardiac remodeling is associated with cardiovascular disease and can lead to heart failure. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) is upregulated in the...
Cardioprotective Effects of the GRK2 Inhibitor Paroxetine on Isoproterenol-Induced Cardiac Remodeling by Modulating NF-κB Mediated Prohypertrophic and Profibrotic Gene Expression.
Pathological cardiac remodeling is associated with cardiovascular disease and can lead to heart failure. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) is upregulated in the hypertrophic heart. Moreover, the expression of the G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) is increased and linked to the progression of heart failure. The inhibitory effects of paroxetine on GRK2 have been established. However, its protective effect on IκBα/NFκB signaling has not been elucidated. This study investigated the cardioprotective effect of paroxetine in an animal model of cardiac hypertrophy (CH), focusing on its effect on GRK2-mediated NF-κB-regulated expression of prohypertrophic and profibrotic genes. Wistar albino rats were administered normal saline, paroxetine, or fluoxetine, followed by isoproterenol to induce CH. The cardioprotective effects of the treatments were determined by assessing cardiac injury, inflammatory biomarker levels, histopathological changes, and hypertrophic and fibrotic genes in cardiomyocytes. Paroxetine pre-treatment significantly decreased the HW/BW ratio ( < 0.001), and the expression of prohypertrophic and profibrotic genes Troponin-I ( < 0.001), BNP ( < 0.01), ( < 0.001), hydroxyproline ( < 0.05), ( < 0.05), and ( < 0.01) as well as inflammatory markers. It also markedly decreased pIκBα, NFκB(p105) subunit expression ( < 0.05) and phosphorylation. The findings suggest that paroxetine prevents pathological cardiac remodeling by inhibiting the GRK2-mediated IκBα/NF-κB signaling pathway.
Topics: Rats; Animals; NF-kappa B; Paroxetine; NF-KappaB Inhibitor alpha; Isoproterenol; G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2; Ventricular Remodeling; Myocytes, Cardiac; Cardiomegaly; Heart Failure; Rats, Wistar; Gene Expression
PubMed: 38139099
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417270 -
The American Journal of Managed Care May 1999To compare depression-related treatment costs and total healthcare costs for patients diagnosed with depression and treated with either sertraline, paroxetine, or...
OBJECTIVE
To compare depression-related treatment costs and total healthcare costs for patients diagnosed with depression and treated with either sertraline, paroxetine, or fluoxetine.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Claims records from a national database of patients diagnosed with depression who began treatment with an SSRI in 1995, following an antidepressant medication-free period of at least 6 months, were included. Treatment course and associated depression-related treatment and total healthcare costs during the subsequent 12-month treatment period were examined using univariate and multivariate methods.
RESULTS
Nine-hundred five (905) patients taking sertraline, 492 on paroxetine, and 945 on fluoxetine met inclusion criteria. The groups were similar and representative with respect to gender and age. Mean dose over the 12-month treatment period increased 24%, indicating significant titration in all cohorts. Patients treated with paroxetine had shorter treatment duration (157.0 days) than did patients treated with fluoxetine (192.6 days) or sertraline (166.9 days, P < 0.001). Patients receiving index treatment with paroxetine were most likely to switch to another SSRI (21.3%); those taking sertraline were second most likely to switch (16.1%); and those on fluoxetine were least likely (12.4%, P = 0.001). Mean costs for depression-related outpatient visits and hospitalizations were similar. Mean antidepressant prescription costs differed, being $586, $419, and $446 for fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline cohorts, respectively (P < 0.001). In this sample, the fluoxetine cohort did not have lower nonpharmaceutical healthcare costs to offset higher pharmaceutical acquisition costs. Conclusions from median and multivariate analyses were robust to these findings.
CONCLUSIONS
During this study period when fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline were all well-established agents, similar depression-related treatment courses and cost characteristics among all 3 drugs were observed.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Cost of Illness; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Depressive Disorder; Female; Fluoxetine; Follow-Up Studies; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paroxetine; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sertraline; United States
PubMed: 10537866
DOI: No ID Found -
Iranian Biomedical Journal Sep 2020Neuropathic pain, due to peripheral nerve damage, has influenced millions of people living all over the world. It has been shown that paroxetine can relieve neuropathic...
BACKGROUND
Neuropathic pain, due to peripheral nerve damage, has influenced millions of people living all over the world. It has been shown that paroxetine can relieve neuropathic pain. Recently, the role of certain proteins like brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), GABAA receptor, and K+-Cl- cotransporter 2 (KCC2) transporter in the occurrence of neuropathic pain has been documented. In the current study, the expression of these proteins affected by paroxetine was evaluated.
METHODS
Male Wistar rats were allocated into two main groups of pre- and post-injury. Rats in each main group received paroxetine before nerve injury and at day seven after nerve damage till day 14, respectively. The lumbar spinal cord of animals was extracted to assess the expression of target genes and proteins.
RESULTS
In the preventive study, paroxetine decreased BDNF and increased KCC2 and GABAA gene and protein expression, while in the post-injury paradigm, it decreased BDNF and increased KCC2 genes and protein expression. In this regard, an increase in the protein expression of GABAA was observed.
CONCLUSION
It seems that paroxetine with a change in the expression of three significant proteins involved in neuropathic pain could attenuate this type of chronic pain.
Topics: Animals; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Calcium-Binding Proteins; Gene Expression Regulation; Male; Microfilament Proteins; Nerve Tissue; Neuralgia; Paroxetine; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, GABA-A; Symporters; K Cl- Cotransporters
PubMed: 32429644
DOI: 10.29252/ibj.24.5.301 -
International Journal of Environmental... Nov 2022Paroxetine is a common pharmaceutical to treat depression and has been found to pose threats to aquatic organisms. However, little is known about the effects of...
Paroxetine is a common pharmaceutical to treat depression and has been found to pose threats to aquatic organisms. However, little is known about the effects of paroxetine on the nutrient cycle in aquatic environments. Therefore, DNA metabarcoding is used in this study to analyze the effects of paroxetine on multi-trophic microorganisms and nitrogen transformation in river sediments. Although paroxetine has no significant effect on the diversity of microbenthos, changes in benthic nitrogen-converting bacteria are consistent with the change in the various forms of nitrogen in the sediment, indicating that paroxetine affects the nitrogen conversion process by affecting nitrogen-converting bacteria. In addition, it is found that paroxetine has the ability to influence nitrogen transformation in an indirect way by affecting the trophic transfer efficiency of higher trophic levels (meiofauna and protozoa, protozoa and protozoa), subsequently affecting the growth of nitrogen-converting bacteria through a top-down mechanism (i.e., predation).The results show that paroxetine affects nitrogen transformation directly by affecting nitrogen-converting bacteria and indirectly through top-down effects, emphasizing that the assessment of paroxetine's ecological risks should consider species within different trophic levels.
Topics: Food Chain; Rivers; Nitrogen; Paroxetine; Aquatic Organisms; Bacteria; Geologic Sediments; Ecosystem
PubMed: 36361481
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114602 -
Psychosomatic Medicine Apr 2013Smokers often smoke during stressful events, which leads to large increases in cardiovascular measures such as blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). Because... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
Smokers often smoke during stressful events, which leads to large increases in cardiovascular measures such as blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). Because exaggerated cardiovascular response to stress is associated with cardiovascular disease risk, this study examined paroxetine's effect on the physiological response to combining stress and smoking.
METHODS
Sixty-two participants completed this randomized, double-blind, crossover study in which BP, HR, plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol concentrations were measured at rest, while smoking, and during a speech and math task. Laboratory sessions occurred after 1 month of paroxetine and after 1 month of placebo.
RESULTS
Significant increases occurred for all measures (except cortisol) during smoking, with further increases occurring during the speech task (time effect, p < .001). After 1 month of paroxetine, norepinephrine and HR values were lower and cortisol values were higher (versus placebo) throughout the laboratory session (treatment effect, p < .001). Treatment × time effects were observed for BP and HR (all, p < .01). For systolic and diastolic BP, a smaller increase (from baseline to measures during speech) was observed after paroxetine compared with placebo (both, p < .006). In both measures, the increase in response to smoking was similar for both treatments; however, the further increase during the speech was smaller when taking paroxetine (versus placebo).
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that paroxetine affects physiological response to stress in smokers. Further research is needed to determine the impact of these results on cardiovascular health. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00218439.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Blood Pressure; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Epinephrine; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Norepinephrine; Paroxetine; Smoking; Stress, Psychological
PubMed: 23504241
DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182898f6d -
The American Journal of Cardiology Oct 1999Vasovagal syncope is a common disorder of autonomic cardiovascular regulation. Many pharmacologic agents have been proposed as effective in the management of this... (Review)
Review
Vasovagal syncope is a common disorder of autonomic cardiovascular regulation. Many pharmacologic agents have been proposed as effective in the management of this condition based on nonrandomized clinical trials. Notably, only 3 agents--atenolol, midodrine, and paroxetine--have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of vasovagal syncope in at least 1 prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Other therapies commonly used in treating syncope include increased salt and fluid intake and fludrocortisone. In this review, we provide a summary of currently available data that support or question the use of various pharmacologic agents for treatment of vasovagal syncope.
Topics: Atenolol; Fludrocortisone; Humans; Midodrine; Paroxetine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Syncope, Vasovagal; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 10568557
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00626-8