-
Korean Journal of Radiology 2014To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial nephrectomy, i.e., complete renal artery embolization, as an alternative to surgical nephrectomy.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial nephrectomy, i.e., complete renal artery embolization, as an alternative to surgical nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective study included 11 patients who underwent transarterial nephrectomy due to a high risk of surgical nephrectomy or their refusal to undergo surgery during the period from April 2002 to February 2013. Medical records and radiographic images were reviewed retrospectively to collect information regarding underlying etiologies, clinical presentations and embolization outcomes.
RESULTS
The underlying etiologies for transarterial nephrectomy included recurrent hematuria (chronic transplant rejection [n = 3], arteriovenous malformation or fistula [n = 3], angiomyolipoma [n = 1], or end-stage renal disease [n = 1]), inoperable renal or ureteral injury (n = 2), and ectopic kidney with urinary incontinence (n = 1). The technical success rate was 100%, while clinical success was achieved in eight patients (72.7%). Subsequent surgical nephrectomy was required for three patients due to an incomplete nephrectomy effect (n = 2) or necrotic pyelonephritis (n = 1). Procedure-related complications were post-infarction syndrome in one patient and necrotic pyelonephritis in another patient. Of four patients with follow-up CT, four showed renal atrophy and two showed partial renal enhancement. No patient developed a procedure-related hypertension.
CONCLUSION
Transarterial nephrectomy may be a safe and effective alternative to surgical nephrectomy in patients with high operative risks.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiomyolipoma; Arteriovenous Malformations; Child; Embolization, Therapeutic; Female; Graft Rejection; Hematuria; Humans; Infarction; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nephrectomy; Renal Artery; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult
PubMed: 25053907
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.4.472 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2022To evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes between robot-assisted (CRO-RAPN) vs. laparoscopic (CRO-LPN) methods of cortical-renorrhaphy-omitting partial...
To evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes between robot-assisted (CRO-RAPN) vs. laparoscopic (CRO-LPN) methods of cortical-renorrhaphy-omitting partial nephrectomy. Between July 2012 and June 2020, patients with localized clinical T1-2 renal masses who underwent CRO-RAPN or CRO-LPN were reviewed. The outcomes of the two groups were compared using propensity-score matching. Trifecta was defined as negative surgical margin, warm ischemic time < 25 min, and absence of complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or more until three months postoperatively. The preservation rate of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was evaluated at six months postoperatively. Among 291 patients (CRO-RAPN, n = 210; CRO-LPN, n = 81) included in the study, 150 matched pairs of patients were analyzed. Compared to the CRO-LPN group, the CRO-RAPN group was associated with shorter warm ischemic time (13 min vs. 20 min, P < 0.001), shorter total operation time (162 min vs. 212 min, P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (40 mL vs. 119 mL, P = 0.002), lower incidence of overall complications (3% vs. 16%, P = 0.001), higher preservation rate of eGFR at six months postoperatively (93% vs. 89%, P = 0.003), and higher trifecta achievement rate (84% vs. 64%, P = 0.004). CRO-RAPN contributed to shorter warm ischemic time, less blood loss, fewer complications, and higher preservation of renal function, all of which allowed this technique to achieve a higher rate of trifecta compared to CRO-LPN.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Robotics; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35906380
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17496-2 -
BMJ Open Sep 2017The provision of complex surgery is increasingly centralised to high-volume (HV) specialist hospitals. Evidence to support nephrectomy centralisation however has been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The provision of complex surgery is increasingly centralised to high-volume (HV) specialist hospitals. Evidence to support nephrectomy centralisation however has been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between hospital case volumes and perioperative outcomes in radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy.
METHODS
Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies published between 1990 and 2016. Pooled effect estimates for nephrectomy mortality and complications were calculated for each nephrectomy type using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the effects of heterogeneity on the pooled effect estimates by excluding studies with the heaviest weighting, lowest methodological score and most likely to introduce bias from misclassification of standardised hospital volume.
RESULTS
Some 226 372 patients from 16 publications were included in our review and meta-analysis. Considerable between-study heterogeneity was noted and only a few reported volume-outcome relationships specifically in partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy.HV hospitals were correlated with a 26% and 52% reduction in mortality for radical nephrectomy (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.90, p<0.01) and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.81, p<0.01), respectively. In addition, radical nephrectomy in HV hospitals was associated with an 18% reduction in complications (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92, p<0.01). No significant volume-outcome relationship in mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.26, p=0.73) or complications (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.30, p=0.44) was observed for partial nephrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that patients undergoing radical nephrectomy have improved outcomes when treated by HV hospitals. Evidence of this in partial nephrectomy and nephrectomy with venous thrombectomy is however not yet clear and could be secondary to the low number of studies included and the small patient number in our analyses. Further investigation is warranted to establish the full potential of nephrectomy centralisation particularly as existing evidence is of low quality with significant heterogeneity.
Topics: Hospitals, High-Volume; Hospitals, Low-Volume; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 28877947
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016833 -
BMC Nephrology Jul 2018Ongoing efforts are focused on shortening ischemia intervals as much as possible during partial nephrectomy to preserve renal function. Off-clamp partial nephrectomy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Ongoing efforts are focused on shortening ischemia intervals as much as possible during partial nephrectomy to preserve renal function. Off-clamp partial nephrectomy (off-PN) has been a common strategy for to avoid ischemia in small renal tumors. Although studies comparing the advantages between off-PN with conventional on-clamp partial nephrectomy (on-PN) have been reported, the impact on short- and especially long-term renal function of the two surgical methods has not been discussed seriously and remained unclear. Our purpose is to evaluate the impact on short- (within postoperative 3 months) and long-term (postoperative 6 months or longer) renal function of off-PN compared with that of on-PN.
METHODS
We comprehensively searched databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, without restrictions on language or region. A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the included studies were performed to assess the impact of the two techniques on short- and long-term renal function.
RESULTS
A total of 23 retrospective studies and 2 prospective cohort studies were included. The pooled postoperative short-term decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly less in the off-PN group (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 4.81 ml/min/1.73 m; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.53 to 6.08; p < 0.00001). The short-term increase in creatinine (Cr) level in the on-PN group was also significant (WMD: - 0.05 mg/dl; 95%CI: - 0.09 to - 0.00; p = 0.04). Significant differences between groups was observed for the long-term change and percent (%) change of eGFR (p = 0.04 and p < 0.00001, respectively) but not for long-term Cr change (p = 0.40). The postoperative short-term eGFR and Cr levels, but not the postoperative long-term eGFR, differed significantly between the two groups. The pooled odds ratios for acute renal failure and postoperative progress to chronic kidney disease (stage≥3) in the off-PN group were found to be 0.25 (p = 0.003) and 0.73 (p = 0.34), respectively, compared with the on-PN group.
CONCLUSIONS
Off-PN exerts a positive impact on the short- and long-term renal function compared with conventional on-PN. Given the inherent limitations of our included studies, large-volume and well-designed RCTS with extensive follow up are needed to confirm and update the conclusion of this analysis.
Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors
PubMed: 30064370
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-0993-3 -
Urology Mar 2016To evaluate perioperative results of open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN) and to identify predictive factors of Trifecta... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate perioperative results of open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN) and to identify predictive factors of Trifecta achievement for clinical T1b renal tumors in a multicenter prospective dataset.
METHODS
Data of 285 patients who had OPN (133), LPN (57), or RAPN (95) for cT1b renal tumors were extracted from the RECORd Project. High-volume centers were defined as ≥50 overall cases of partial nephrectomy per year. Trifecta was defined as simultaneous absence of perioperative complications, negative surgical margins, and ischemia time <25 minutes.
RESULTS
The 3 groups had comparable body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin, creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate, tumor clinical diameter, and growth pattern. LPN and RAPN were more frequently exclusive of high-volume centers. RAPN showed significantly lower median estimated blood loss compared with OPN and LPN. Trifecta was achieved in 62.4%, 63.2%, and 69.5% of OPN, LPN, and RAPN (P = NS) cases. Median warm ischemia time (WIT) was significantly shorter during OPN than during LPN and RAPN. RAPN had significantly shorter WIT compared with LPN. RAPN was significantly less morbid than OPN regarding intraoperative and postoperative complications. LPN (1.9%) and RAPN (2.5%) showed a lower rate of positive margins compared with OPN (6.8%) (P = NS). At multivariable analysis, exophytic tumor growth pattern, estimated blood loss, and high-volume centers were significant predictive factors for Trifecta achievement.
CONCLUSION
Clinically, T1b renal tumors suitable for NSS can be safely treated by LPN or RAPN in high-volume centers. RAPN allows for significantly lower WIT and estimated blood loss with higher rate of Trifecta achievement compared with LPN.
Topics: Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Nephrectomy; Prospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 26743388
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.049 -
Minerva Urology and Nephrology Dec 2021Minimal literature describes the impact of hilar control on the progression to chronic kidney disease (pCKD) after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in solitary kidneys...
On-clamp versus purely off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in solitary kidneys: comparison of perioperative outcomes and chronic kidney disease progression at two high-volume centers.
BACKGROUND
Minimal literature describes the impact of hilar control on the progression to chronic kidney disease (pCKD) after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in solitary kidneys (SK). The aim of this study was to compare purely off-clamp (ocRPN) vs. on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy (onRPN) in SK and to identify predictors of pCKD at two high-volume centers.
METHODS
Between December 2013 and October 2019, 54 patients with SK underwent ocRPN and onRPN for renal tumors at two institutions. Baseline and perioperative data were analyzed. Newly onset of CKD stage 3b,4,5 (CKD3b,4,5) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared for warm ischemia time (WIT) with the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of pCKD.
RESULTS
At a median follow-up of 13 months (IQR 6.3-34), newly onset of CKD3b and CKD 4.5 were observed in 11.1% and 7.4% of patients, respectively. onRPN was associated with a higher risk of progression to CKD 3b,4,5 stages (P=0.034) and higher rate of perioperative complications (P=0.03). On univariable analysis eGFR at discharge (eGFRd), positive surgical margins status (PSM) and WIT were predictors of newly onset of CKD3b,4,5 (each P<0.05). Multivariable analysis identified eGFRd (HR 0.88; CI 95% 0.81-0.96) and WIT (HR 1.09; CI 95% 1.02-1.16) as independent predictors of pCKD (each P<0.01). Main limitations include the retrospective nature of the study, the short-term follow-up and the lack of data adjustment for parenchymal volume loss.
CONCLUSIONS
eGFRd and WIT during RPN are independent predictors of pCKD in SK. In this setting a critical reduction of WIT should be achieved according to the oncologic outcome. In patients with SK, WIT represents the only surgical modifiable factor of RPN for avoiding a quicker onset of pCKD.
Topics: Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Nephrectomy; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Robotics; Solitary Kidney
PubMed: 32573170
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03795-9 -
European Review For Medical and... May 2024The primary surgical techniques used to treat localized renal tumors are laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Obese... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
The primary surgical techniques used to treat localized renal tumors are laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Obese patients have more intra-abdominal fat accumulation, which may make the localization and operation in minimally invasive surgery more complicated. Currently, limited research has been conducted on which method is more suitable for performing a partial nephrectomy on obese individuals. The aim of our investigation was to analyze and compare the perioperative results associated with both approaches to offer valuable information about the selection of LPN or RAPN as an optimal choice when performing a partial nephrectomy in obese patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We retrospectively collected clinical data from 78 cases of obese individuals [Body mass index (BMI) > 28] who underwent RAPN, as well as 50 cases of obese individuals (BMI > 28) who underwent LPN. The analysis covered various aspects, including initial patient characteristics, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), warm ischemia time (WIT), operation time, volume of blood loss during the surgical procedure, time taken to recover bowel function, positive surgical margin rate, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay.
RESULTS
We observed that RAPNs exhibited shorter warm ischemia time and reduced intraoperative blood loss in obese patients, along with decreased postoperative duration of abdominal drainage and hospitalization periods compared to LPNs.
CONCLUSIONS
In obese patients, RAPN demonstrates advantages over LPN in minimizing intraoperative blood loss, WIT, and facilitating postoperative recovery. These findings may serve as valuable evidence when considering the choice between LPN or RAPN for partial nephrectomy in obese individuals.
Topics: Humans; Nephrectomy; Laparoscopy; Obesity; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Retrospective Studies; Kidney Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Aged; Postoperative Complications; Adult; Length of Stay; Operative Time
PubMed: 38856133
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202405_36294 -
Urology Dec 2013To assess the impact of the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines advocating partial nephrectomy for T1 tumors guidelines on the likelihood of undergoing...
OBJECTIVE
To assess the impact of the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines advocating partial nephrectomy for T1 tumors guidelines on the likelihood of undergoing partial nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), a dataset encompassing 20% of all United States inpatient hospitalizations, from 2007 through 2010. Our dependent variable was receipt of radical vs partial nephrectomy (55.50, 55.51, 55.52, and 55.54 vs 55.4) for a renal mass (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD-9] code 189.0). The independent variable of interest was time of surgery (before or after the establishment of AUA guidelines); covariates included a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD), overall comorbidity, age, race, gender, geographic region, income, and hospital characteristics. Bivariate and multivariable adjusted logistic regression was used to determine the association between receipt of partial nephrectomy and time of guideline establishment.
RESULTS
We identified 26,165 patients with renal tumors who underwent surgery. Before the guidelines, 4031 patients (27%) underwent partial nephrectomy compared to 3559 (32%) after. On multivariable analysis, undergoing surgery after the establishment of guidelines (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.32, P <.01) was an independent predictor of partial nephrectomy. Other factors associated with partial nephrectomy were urban location, surgery at a teaching hospital, large hospital bed size, Northeast location, and Black race. Female gender and CKD were not associated with partial nephrectomy.
CONCLUSION
Although adoption of partial nephrectomy increased after establishment of new guidelines on renal masses, partial nephrectomy remains an underutilized procedure. Future research must focus on barriers to adoption of partial nephrectomy and how to overcome them.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Nephrectomy; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Societies, Medical; United States; Young Adult
PubMed: 24295245
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.068 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Jun 2023Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard surgical treatment for resectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors. However, the decision whether a robotic (RAPN) or open...
BACKGROUND
Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard surgical treatment for resectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors. However, the decision whether a robotic (RAPN) or open PN (OPN) approach is chosen is often based on the surgeon's individual experience and preference. To overcome the inherent selection bias when comparing peri- and postoperative outcomes of RAPN vs. OPN, a strict statistical methodology is needed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify RCC patients treated with RAPN and OPN between January 2003 and January 2021. Study endpoints were estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and trifecta. In the first step of analyses, descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models (MVA) were applied. In the second step of analyses, to validate initial findings, MVA were applied after 2:1 propensity-score matching (PSM).
RESULTS
Of 615 RCC patients, 481 (78%) underwent OPN vs 134 (22%) RAPN. RAPN patients were younger and presented with a smaller tumor diameter and lower RENAL-Score sum, respectively. Median EBL was comparable, whereas LOS was shorter in RAPN vs. OPN. Both intraoperative (27 vs 6%) and Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications (11 vs 3%) were higher in OPN (both < 0.05), whereas achievement of trifecta was higher in RAPN (65 vs 54%; p = 0.028). In MVA, RAPN was a significant predictor for shorter LOS, lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as higher trifecta rates. After 2:1 PSM with subsequent MVA, RAPN remained a statistical and clinical predictor for lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications and higher rates of trifecta achievement but not LOS.
CONCLUSIONS
Differences in baseline and outcome characteristics exist between RAPN vs. OPN, probably due to selection bias. However, after applying two sets of statistical analyses, RAPN seems to be associated with more favorable outcomes regarding complications and trifecta rates.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Kidney Neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37349748
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03061-2 -
International Braz J Urol : Official... 2005Open partial nephrectomy is the gold standard nephron-sparing treatment for small renal tumors. Technical aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy have evolved... (Review)
Review
Open partial nephrectomy is the gold standard nephron-sparing treatment for small renal tumors. Technical aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy have evolved considerably, and the technique is approaching established status at our institution. Over the past 4 years, the senior author has performed more than 400 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies at the Cleveland Clinic. Herein we present our current technique and review contemporary outcome data.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Nephrectomy; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 15877827
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382005000200002