-
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia 2021To compare postoperative pain and discomfort between mechanical and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomies.
PURPOSE
To compare postoperative pain and discomfort between mechanical and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomies.
METHODS
This prospective comparative study included 190 eyes of 95 patients with hyperopia (up to +4.00 D), astigmatism (up to -5.00 D), and myopia (up to -8.00 D) who underwent mechanical photorefractive keratectomy in one eye and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in the contralateral eye using Wavelight Allegretto EX500 excimer laser. The patients were unaware of the side treated with each technique. The interval between operations in the same patient was 15-30 days. Both eyes had similar refraction before surgery, with a maximum of 15-µm difference in ablation. Postoperative questionnaires were administered on days 1 and 7 to assess the patients' level of discomfort (0=no discomfort to 5=extreme discomfort) with the following symptoms: pain, burning sensation, itchiness, tearing, photophobia, eye redness, foreign body sensation, and eyelid swelling. Patients were also asked about which method they preferred.
RESULTS
The sample consisted of 61 women (64.21%) and 34 men (35.79%). The mean (SD) patient age was 31.66 (6.69) years (range, 22-54 years). On postoperative day 1, the patients reported significantly less discomfort in terms of pain (1.9 ± 1.74 vs 2.5 ± 1.83; p=0.017), burning sensation (1.8 ± 1.56 vs 2.5 ± 1.68; p=0.004), tearing (2.3 ± 1.71 vs 3.1 ± 1.69; p=0.001), and foreign body sensation (1.9 ± 1.77 vs 2.5 ± 1.86; p=0.024) in the eye that received mechanical photorefractive keratectomy than in the eye that received transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. No significant differences were found between the mechanical and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomies on postoperative day 7. Fifty-nine patients (62.10%) preferred mechanical photorefractive keratectomy, while 32 (33.68%) preferred transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. Four patients (4.22%) expressed no preference.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results showed that pain scores were significantly lower in the mechanical photorefractive keratectomy-treated eyes than in the transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy-treated eyes on postoperative day 1, which may have provided greater patient comfort after surgery and led patients to prefer the mechanical photorefractive keratectomy technique.
Topics: Adult; Female; Foreign Bodies; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Male; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Prospective Studies; Refraction, Ocular; Young Adult
PubMed: 34431901
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20220026 -
Journal of Optometry 2015Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) remodels corneal stroma to compensate refractive errors. The removal of epithelium and the ablation of stroma provoke the disruption of... (Review)
Review
Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) remodels corneal stroma to compensate refractive errors. The removal of epithelium and the ablation of stroma provoke the disruption of corneal nerves and a release of several peptides from tears, epithelium, stroma and nerves. A myriad of cytokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteases participate in the process of corneal wound healing. Their balance will determine if reepithelization and stromal remodeling are appropriate. The final aim is to achieve corneal transparency for restoring corneal function, and a proper visual quality. Therefore, wound-healing response is critical for a successful refractive surgery. Our goal is to provide an overview into how corneal wounding develops following PRK. We will also review the influence of intraoperative application of mitomycin C, bandage contact lenses, anti-inflammatory and other drugs in preventing corneal haze and post-PRK pain.
Topics: Alkylating Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Contact Lenses; Cornea; Corneal Opacity; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Mitomycin; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Postoperative Complications; Regeneration; Wound Healing
PubMed: 25444646
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2014.09.001 -
BMC Ophthalmology Feb 2022To assess transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of corneal epithelial healing rate, postoperative pain, postoperative discomfort, and visual and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
To assess transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of corneal epithelial healing rate, postoperative pain, postoperative discomfort, and visual and refraction outcomes compared to mechanical epithelial debridement PRK (mPRK) and alcohol-assisted PRK (aaPRK).
METHODS
In this double-masked, randomized clinical trial, thirty-nine patients underwent tPRK in one eye and mPRK in the fellow eye (arm A), and 33 patients underwent tPRK in one eye and aaPRK in the contralateral eye (arm B). All surgical procedures were done using the Schwind Amaris excimer laser. The area of corneal epithelial defect in all eyes was captured and analyzed using ImageJ software.
RESULTS
Mean epithelial healing time was respectively 3.74 ± 0.82 and 3.59 ± 0.79 days in tPRK versus mPRK (P = 0.21) in arm A, and 3.67 ± 0.92 and 3.67 ± 0.74 days in tPRK versus aaPRK (P = 1.00) in arm B. Accounting for the initial corneal epithelial defect area, the epithelial healing rate was faster in conventional PRK groups compared to tPRK (both P<0.001) in both arms. However, there was no significant difference in safety, efficacy, spherical equivalent refractive accuracy, or corneal haze development between tPRK and conventional PRK groups (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
All three methods are effective in terms of visual and refractive outcomes. However, although time to complete re-epithelialization was similar with the three methods, the epithelial healing rate was faster in conventional PRK considering the initial corneal epithelial defect area, and the patients experienced less pain and discomfort in the first postoperative day.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
IRCT, IRCT20200317046804N1 . Retrospectively registered 5 May 2020.
Topics: Astigmatism; Epithelium, Corneal; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Pain, Postoperative; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Refraction, Ocular; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35148689
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02293-2 -
International Ophthalmology Dec 2023The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of combined photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) on intraocular...
PURPOSE
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of combined photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) on intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with keratoconus (KC).
METHODS
We included 64 eyes of 34 patients (19 males and 15 females; age: 19-40y) with stages 1-2 keratoconus which had undergone combined wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross linking. Two other groups of patients were added as controls: the PRK group including 110 eyes of 57 patients (23 males and 34 females; age: 18-44y) which had undergone wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy for myopic refractive errors, and the CXL group including 36 eyes of 23 patients (14 males and 9 females; age: 12-38y) with keratoconus, not filling the inclusion criteria for combined PRK and CXL, which had undergone corneal collagen cross-linking. IOP was recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up visits.
RESULTS
Preoperative IOP in both CXL (12.1 ± 2.53 mmHg) and PRK + CXL (13.2 ± 2.50 mmHg) groups was significantly lower than PRK group (15.8 ± 3.10 mmHg) (F = 30.505, p < 0.001). At 3 months postoperatively, IOP showed no statistically significant difference between the three studied groups (F = 1.821, p = 0.164). At 6 months postoperatively, IOP in the CXL group (14.6 ± 2.64 mmHg) was significantly higher than both PRK (13.4 ± 2.27 mmHg) and PRK + CXL (13.3 ± 2.62 mmHg) groups (F = 3.721, p = 0.026). At 12 months postoperatively, IOP in the CXL group (14.3 ± 2.69 mmHg) was significantly higher than the PRK group (13.2 ± 2.23 mmHg) and was higher than PRK + CXL group (13.3 ± 2.59 mmHg) although not statistically significant (F = 3.393, p = 0.035). Regarding the percent of change from preoperative IOP, a statistically significant difference between the three studied groups was detected at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (H = 117.459, 109.303, 122.694 respectively, p < 0.001). The median percent of change from preoperative IOP in the PRK group was -16.7%, -15%, and -16.7%, in the CXL group was + 14.3%, + 19.4%, and + 19.1%, while in PRK + CXL group was 0% at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. (Post-hoc power analysis 75%).
CONCLUSIONS
Combined PRK and CXL in patients with KC shows no significant effect on IOP, in contrast to either procedure performed separately.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Adolescent; Child; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Keratoconus; Corneal Cross-Linking; Intraocular Pressure; Photosensitizing Agents; Prospective Studies; Visual Acuity; Riboflavin; Cornea; Cross-Linking Reagents; Corneal Topography
PubMed: 37861937
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-023-02886-w -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Dec 2020
Topics: Corneal Stroma; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Photorefractive Keratectomy
PubMed: 33229633
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2543_20 -
Beyoglu Eye Journal 2022The aim of the study was to present and compare 2 years results of mechanical photorefractive keratectomy (M-PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK)...
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the study was to present and compare 2 years results of mechanical photorefractive keratectomy (M-PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) for myopia.
METHODS
One hundred and nine eyes of 55 patients were included in this retrospective study. The mean age of the patients was 26.9±5.2 years. Forty-four eyes (40.4%) had M-PRK and 65 eyes (59.6%) had T-PRK. Follow-up time was 2 years. Refractive errors (RE), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and high-order corneal aberrations were compared.
RESULTS
The mean RE was -2.33±0.88 D and the mean UCVA was 0.24±0.17 logMAR at baseline for M-PRK patients. At month 24, those measurements were changed to -0.27±0.32 D and 0.99±0.04 logMAR. The mean RE was 2.19±0.73 D and the mean UCVA was 0.23 ± 0.15 logMAR at baseline for T-PRK patients. At month 24, those measurements were changed to -0.14±0.32 D and 0.99±0.01 logMAR. The mean REs significantly decreased and the mean UCVA significantly increased after both type of surgeries (all p<0.001). In M-PRK group, 4 mm zone total corneal aberration and 6 mm total-coma-spherical corneal aberrations were statistically significantly increased in post-operative term. In T-PRK group, only 6 mm total-spherical corneal aberrations were statistically significantly increased in post-operative term. There was no serious complication during surgeries or follow-up time.
CONCLUSION
M-PRK and T-PRK were a safe and effective in the treatment of myopia in 2 years term. Some high-order aberrations may be increase after those treatments.
PubMed: 35692276
DOI: 10.14744/bej.2022.06978 -
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Jun 2023Isolated from , mitomycin C (MMC) has various applications in the management of corneal and external disease due to its ability to modulate cellular proliferation. It... (Review)
Review
Isolated from , mitomycin C (MMC) has various applications in the management of corneal and external disease due to its ability to modulate cellular proliferation. It has been employed in pterygium surgery, ocular surface neoplasia, and refractive surgery. Currently, there is no definite consensus on the treatment protocols for each of the aforementioned applications. Although its benefits in the management of corneal and external diseases are promising, MMC use has potential complications including endothelial cell loss, corneal perforation, scleral melt, secondary glaucoma, iritis, and endophthalmitis. This article will review the literature regarding the use of MMC in the field of cornea and external disease and describe protocols employed with corresponding outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Mitomycin; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Lasers, Excimer; Cornea
PubMed: 37345314
DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.97932 -
Journal of Optometry 2019To investigate immediate and short-term visual recovery in a large cohort of 2093 myopic eyes (with or without astigmatism) treated with SmartSurf procedure, a...
PURPOSE
To investigate immediate and short-term visual recovery in a large cohort of 2093 myopic eyes (with or without astigmatism) treated with SmartSurf procedure, a combination of Transepithelial Photo Refractive Keratectomy (PRK) and Smart Pulse Technology (SPT, SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany).
METHODS
In this retrospective case series, post-operative outcomes were evaluated immediately after the surgery (Day 0), at day 1 and 3 months postoperatively, after myopic SmartSurf treatment with mean pre-operative spherical equivalent -4.65±2.53D and range from -16.13D to -0.13D. In all cases, pre and postoperative standard examinations were performed. The analysis evaluated preoperative Corrected and Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA and UDVA, respectively), and postoperative UDVA, monocularly and binocularly, immediately after the surgery, at day 1 and 3 month follow up.
RESULTS
Sixty-two percent eyes achieved monocular UDVA 20/40 or better immediately after the surgery, while 82% patients achieved binocular UDVA 20/32 or better immediately after the surgery. At 3-month postoperatively, monocular UDVA 20/25 or better was achieved in 94% eyes. Treated eyes achieved immediately after the surgery or by the next day mean UDVA 20/41±8. UDVA improved significantly from Day 1 to 3-months follow up (p<0.0001 for both OS and OD) to mean UDVA 20/21±5 (equal to preoperative CDVA 20/21±8).
CONCLUSION
Immediate and short-term visual recovery after SmartSurf PRK in our large cohort was rapid, providing functional binocular UDVA immediately after the surgery.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Corneal Topography; Female; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Male; Middle Aged; Myopia; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Recovery of Function; Refraction, Ocular; Retrospective Studies; Vision, Binocular; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 31473174
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2019.04.003 -
The Western Journal of Medicine Feb 1997
Topics: Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Humans; Lasers, Excimer; Myopia; Patient Satisfaction; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Refraction, Ocular; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity; Wound Healing
PubMed: 9109332
DOI: No ID Found -
Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology... 2016Myopia is a generally benign refractive error with an increasing prevalence worldwide. It can be corrected temporarily with glasses and contact lenses and permanently... (Review)
Review
Myopia is a generally benign refractive error with an increasing prevalence worldwide. It can be corrected temporarily with glasses and contact lenses and permanently with laser vision correction. The 2 main procedures currently being performed for myopia correction are photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Each technique has its advantages, but they appear to yield similar visual outcomes 1 year after surgery. Laser vision correction for myopia was considered a paradigm shift because healthy eyes could now undergo a surgical procedure to permanently and safely correct the error by altering the center of the cornea, which was previously off limits because of the potential for loss of transparency. Customized ablation using wavefront aberrometry and its optimized profiles were created to correct higher-order aberrations and give more vision quality to patients. Topography-guided ablation, initially used for complex retreatments, shows potential to make vision even better than glasses and contact lenses in a recent study on previously untreated eyes. One major concern is to identify corneas that are at risk of developing ectasia after the procedure. Topographic and tomographic screening indices have been implemented clinically, but there is still much to learn about corneal biomechanics. A more recently developed procedure for myopia correction is small-incision lenticule extraction, in which a lenticule is created in the cornea's stroma with a femtosecond laser and extracted through a small corneal incision. Long-term outcomes and new complication risks need to be better understood as this procedure develops.
Topics: Astigmatism; Cornea; Corneal Stroma; Humans; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ; Lasers, Excimer; Myopia; Photorefractive Keratectomy
PubMed: 27898448
DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000237