-
Medicine Nov 2022This study aims to investigate the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided coaxial puncture needle in puncture biopsy of peripheral pulmonary masses. In this retrospective...
This study aims to investigate the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided coaxial puncture needle in puncture biopsy of peripheral pulmonary masses. In this retrospective analysis, 157 patients who underwent US-guided percutaneous lung biopsy in our hospital were divided into a coaxial biopsy group and a conventional biopsy group (the control group) according to the puncture tools involved, with 73 and 84 patients, respectively. The average puncture time, number of sampling, sampling satisfaction rate, puncture success rate and complication rate between the 2 groups were compared and discussed in detail. One hundred fifty-seven patients underwent puncture biopsy, and 145 patients finally obtained definitive pathological results. The overall puncture success rate was 92.4% ([145/157]; with a puncture success rate of 97.3% [71/73] from the coaxial biopsy group and a puncture success rate of 88.1% [74/84] from the conventional biopsy group (P < .05). For peripheral pulmonary masses ≤3 cm, the average puncture time in the coaxial biopsy group was shorter than that in the conventional biopsy group, and the number of sampling, sampling satisfaction rate and puncture success rate were significantly higher than those in the conventional biopsy group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the 2 groups (P > .05). For peripheral pulmonary masses >3 cm, the average puncture time in the coaxial biopsy group was still shorter than that in the conventional biopsy group (P < .05). The differences between the 2 groups in the number of sampling, satisfaction rate of the sampling, the success rate of puncture and the incidence of complications were not significant (P > .05). US guided coaxial puncture biopsy could save puncture time, increase the number of sampling, and improve the satisfaction rate of sampling and the success rate of puncture (especially for small lesions) by establishing a biopsy channel on the basis of the coaxial needle sheath. It provided reliable information for the diagnosis, differential diagnosis and individualized accurate treatment of lesions as well.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Image-Guided Biopsy; Biopsy, Needle; Punctures; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 36397368
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031070 -
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging 2022To compare the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and conventional ultrasound-guided puncture biopsy in peripulmonary lesions of different sizes. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
To compare the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and conventional ultrasound-guided puncture biopsy in peripulmonary lesions of different sizes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
110 patients with peripulmonary lesions were randomly divided into two groups: the conventional ultrasound-guided group and the contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided group. The lesions in the two groups were further divided into two groups according to the size of the lesions, and the tissues taken after puncture biopsy were sent for pathological examination. The pathological results were compared with the postoperative pathological results and other examination results, and the complications were recorded at the same time.
RESULTS
In the conventional ultrasound group, the success rate of single puncture was 72.7% and the success rate of puncture was 80.0%; in the contrast group, the success rate of single puncture was 90.9% and the success rate of puncture was 94.6%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in needle bleeding and pneumothorax between the two groups. In the <30 mm group, there was no significant difference in the success rate of single puncture and the success rate of puncture between the two groups according to the size of the lesions. In the ≥30 mm group, the success rate of single puncture (97.1%) and puncture success rate (97.1%) in the contrast guidance group were higher than those in the conventional ultrasound guidance group (70.3%, 78.4%) and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Compared with conventional ultrasound, for peripheral pulmonary lesions guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, especially when the maximum diameter of the lesion is ≥ 30 mm, needle biopsy has better guiding significance; for peripheral lung lesions with a maximum diameter of <30 mm, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is compared with conventional ultrasound guidance. The puncture success rate was not significantly different.
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Humans; Lung; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 35615730
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6425145 -
Nefrologia : Publicacion Oficial de La... 2010
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Computer Systems; Humans; Kidney; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 20882089
DOI: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2010.Jul.10537 -
Gastroenterologie Clinique Et Biologique 1997
Review
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Endosonography; Humans; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 9208009
DOI: No ID Found -
Folia Histochemica Et Cytobiologica 2009This study aims to present the origins and the historical evolution of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and to also underline its importance in the history of modern... (Review)
Review
This study aims to present the origins and the historical evolution of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and to also underline its importance in the history of modern cytology. The article focuses on the advances made in the 20th century that have led to the modern techniques associated with the procedure. The authors conducted a thorough review of early reports on needle biopsy, particularly those published during 19th and 20th century, examining in brief also the origins of the needle biopsy. The first report on the use of needle puncture is referred in early writings of Arab medicine. In the early 20th century, Martin and Ellis are considered to be the founders of modern needle aspiration techniques. The German doctor Mannheim was the first to publish reports suggesting the use of fine needles with a small gauge. The establishment and world-wide expansion of FNA should be attributed to the representatives of the Swedish School of Cytopathology. The school embraced FNA in the second half of the 20th century while serving as a training ground for doctors around the world. The history of needle biopsy spans ten centuries. However, the development and establishment of the technique in its modern form took place primarily during the twentieth century. Today, FNA is considered an important cytologic technique with sufficient diagnostic accuracy, especially when applied in cases of lung and prostate cancer.
Topics: Biopsy, Fine-Needle; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasms
PubMed: 19995703
DOI: 10.2478/v10042-009-0027-x -
International Braz J Urol : Official... 2008
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Humans; Male; Prostate; Prostatic Diseases
PubMed: 18986556
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of... Apr 2020This study investigates the effect of needle tip geometry on the needle deflection and tissue sampling length in biopsy. Advances in medical imaging have allowed the...
This study investigates the effect of needle tip geometry on the needle deflection and tissue sampling length in biopsy. Advances in medical imaging have allowed the identification of suspicious cancerous lesions which then require needle biopsy for tissue sampling and subsequent confirmatory pathological analysis. Precise needle insertion and adequate tissue sampling are essential for accurate cancer diagnosis and individualized treatment decisions. However, the single-bevel needles in current hand-held biopsy devices often deflect significantly during needle insertion, causing variance in the targeted and actual locations of the sampled tissue. This variance can lead to inaccurate sampling and false-negative results. There is also a limited understanding of factors affecting the tissue sampling length which is a critical component of accurate cancer diagnosis. This study compares the needle deflection and tissue sampling length between the existing single-bevel and exploratory multi-bevel needle tip geometries. A coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element analysis was applied to understand the needle-tissue interaction during needle insertion. The needle deflection and tissue sampling length were experimentally studied using tissue-mimicking phantoms and ex-vivo tissue, respectively. This study reveals that the tissue separation location at the needle tip affects both needle deflection and tissue sampling length. By varying the tissue separation location and creating a multi-bevel needle tip geometry, the bending moments induced by the insertion forces can be altered to reduce the needle deflection. However, the tissue separation location also affects the tissue contact inside the needle groove, potentially reducing the tissue sampling length. A multi-bevel needle tip geometry with the tissue separation point below the needle groove face may reduce the needle deflection while maintaining a long tissue sampling length. Results from this study can guide needle tip design to enable the precise needle deployment and adequate tissue sampling for the needle biopsy procedures.
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Equipment Design; Finite Element Analysis; Needles; Phantoms, Imaging
PubMed: 32174391
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103632 -
Acta Ophthalmologica Sep 2009Ocular oncologists require a strong indication for intraocular biopsy before the procedure can be performed because it carries a risk for serious eye complications and... (Review)
Review
Ocular oncologists require a strong indication for intraocular biopsy before the procedure can be performed because it carries a risk for serious eye complications and the dissemination of malignant cells. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the extent to which this restricted practice is supported by evidence from previous reports and to outline our main indications and contraindications. The different intraocular biopsy techniques in the anterior and posterior segment are discussed with a focus on our preferred method, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). In the literature, complications are typically under-reported, which reduces the possibilities of evaluating the risks correctly and of making fair comparisons with other biopsy methods. In FNAB, the exact placement of the needle is critical, as is an accurate assessment of the size of the lesion. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy is usually not a reliable diagnostic tool in lesions < 2 mm in thickness. It is very advantageous to have a cytopathologist present in the operating theatre or close by. This ensures adequate sampling and encourages repeated biopsy attempts if necessary. This approach reduces false negative results to < 3%. Adjunct immunocytochemistry is documented to increase specificity and is essential for diagnosis and management in about 10% of cases. In some rare pathological processes the diagnosis depends ultimately on the identification of specific cell markers. An accurate diagnosis may have a decisive influence on prognosis. The cytogenetic prognostications made possible after FNAB are reliable. Biopsy by FNA has a low complication rate. The calculated risk for retinal detachment is < 4%. Intraocular haemorrhage is frequently observed, but clears spontaneously in nearly all cases. Only a single case of epibulbar seeding of malignant cells at the scleral pars plana puncture site of transvitreal FNAB has been documented. Endophthalmitis has been reported and adequate standard preoperative preparation is obligatory. An open biopsy is still an option in the anterior segment, but has been abandoned in the posterior segment. Although vitrectomy-based procedures are becoming increasingly popular, we recommend using FNAB as part of a stepwise approach. A vitrectomy-assisted biopsy should be considered in cases where FNAB fails. In any adult patient with suspected intraocular malignancy in which enucleation is not the obvious treatment, the clinician should strive for a diagnosis based on biopsy. When the lesion is too small for biopsy or the risks related to the procedure are too great, it is reasonable to be reluctant to biopsy. The standards applied in the treatment of intraocular malignant diseases should be equivalent to those in other fields of oncology. Our view is controversial and contrary to opinion that supports current standards of care for this group of patients.
Topics: Biopsy; Biopsy, Needle; Contraindications; Cytogenetic Analysis; Endophthalmitis; Eye; Eye Hemorrhage; Eye Neoplasms; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Neoplasm Seeding; Prognosis; Retinal Detachment; Risk Assessment; Sensitivity and Specificity; Specimen Handling; Vitrectomy
PubMed: 19719804
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01637.x -
The British Journal of Radiology Oct 2011Needle biopsy of the breast is widely practised. Image guidance ensures a high degree of accuracy. However, sporadic cases of disease recurrence suggest that in some... (Review)
Review
Needle biopsy of the breast is widely practised. Image guidance ensures a high degree of accuracy. However, sporadic cases of disease recurrence suggest that in some cases the procedure itself may contribute to this complication. This article reviews evidence relating to needle biopsy of the breast and the potential for tumour cell migration into adjacent tissues following the procedure. A literature search was undertaken using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Results are grouped under three categories: histological evidence of spread, clinical evidence of recurrent disease and the likelihood of seeding dependent upon tumour type. There is histological evidence of seeding of tumour cells from the primary neoplastic site into adjacent breast tissue following biopsy. However, as the interval between biopsy and surgery lengthens then the incidence of seeding declines, which suggests that displaced tumour cells are not viable. Clinical recurrence at the site of a needle biopsy is uncommon and the relationship between biopsy and later recurrence is difficult to confirm. There is some evidence to suggest that cell seeding may be reduced when vacuum biopsy devices are deployed.
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Seeding; Vacuum
PubMed: 21933978
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/77245199 -
International Urology and Nephrology Dec 2022At present, both 16G and 18G needles are used for percutaneous renal biopsy in China. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of biopsy performed with the...
BACKGROUND
At present, both 16G and 18G needles are used for percutaneous renal biopsy in China. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of biopsy performed with the 18G needle vs. the 16G needle.
METHODS
The data of patients who underwent percutaneous renal biopsy at our hospital between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The number of glomeruli obtained by puncture and postoperative complications were compared between patients undergoing biopsy with the 16G and 18G needles. Continuous variables were compared by the t test or the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables by the chi-square test. Correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship of different variables with hematoma size.
RESULTS
Of the total 3138 kidney biopsies, 2526 were performed with the18G needle and 612 with the 16G needle. The number of glomeruli obtained was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.078). Large hematomas were significantly more common the 16G group than in the 18G group (9.31% vs. 5.98%, P = 0.003). Arteriovenous fistula was also more common in the 16G group (1.14% vs. 0.23%, P = 0.005). Other complications were rare, with similar incidence in the two groups.
CONCLUSION
The 18G needle is as effective as the 16G needle for percutaneous renal biopsy. The risk of large hematoma and arteriovenous fistula appear to be lower with the 18G needle.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Biopsy, Needle; Needles; Hematoma; Arteriovenous Fistula
PubMed: 35781773
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03276-4