-
The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care... Aug 2023Clavicle and rib fractures are often sustained concomitantly. The combination of injuries may result in decreased stability of the chest wall, making these patients...
In patients with combined clavicle and multiple rib fractures, does fracture fixation of the clavicle improve clinical outcomes? A multicenter prospective cohort study of 232 patients.
BACKGROUND
Clavicle and rib fractures are often sustained concomitantly. The combination of injuries may result in decreased stability of the chest wall, making these patients prone to (respiratory) complications and prolonged hospitalization. This study aimed to assess whether adding chest wall stability by performing clavicle fixation improves clinical outcomes in patients with concurrent clavicle and rib fractures.
METHODS
A prospective multicenter study was performed including all adult patients admitted between January 2018 and March 2021 with concurrent ipsilateral clavicle and rib fractures. Patients treated operatively versus nonoperatively for their clavicle fracture were matched using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (HLOS). Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, pain, complications, and quality of life at 6 weeks and 12 months of follow-up.
RESULTS
In total, 232 patients with concomitant ipsilateral clavicle and rib fractures were included. Fifty-two patients (22%) underwent operative treatment of which 39 could be adequately matched to 39 nonoperatively treated patients. No association was observed between clavicle plate fixation and HLOS (mean difference, 2.3 days; 95% confidence interval, -2.1 to 6.8; p = 0.301) or any secondary endpoint. Eight of the 180 nonoperatively treated patients (4%) had a symptomatic nonunion, for which 5 underwent secondary clavicle fixation.
CONCLUSION
We found no evidence that, in patients with combined clavicle and multiple rib fractures, plate fixation of the clavicle reduces HLOS, pain, or (pulmonary) complications, nor that it improves quality of life.
STUDY TYPE
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Rib Fractures; Prospective Studies; Clavicle; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Fracture Fixation; Fractures, Bone; Spinal Fractures; Pain; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37165478
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004001 -
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 202074 year-old-man, former smoker, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD grade 4, group D, with emphysema component, treated in a pulmonary rehabilitation...
74 year-old-man, former smoker, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD grade 4, group D, with emphysema component, treated in a pulmonary rehabilitation program, on oxygen therapy and nocturnal bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation. During the night he had a traumatic rib fracture (5-11th right ribs) but still he used BiPAP ventilation during the sleep. In the morning after he presented with a diffuse and massive emphysema in the face, thorax and abdominal regions. On physical examination, the patient presented with massive swelling and crepitus on palpation. A chest computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed a diffuse subcutaneous emphysema and revealed a mediastinal emphysema and bilateral small pneumothorax. A fast resolution of the emphysema was of paramount importance as the patient was severely agitated due to his inability to open both eyes, and the need to reintroduce BiPAP ventilation as soon as possible. It was placed a fenestrated subcutaneous catheter on left hemithorax and a subcutaneous ostomy on right hemithorax for comparative purpose. It was also performed a confluent centripetal massage towards drainage orifices, with immediate and substantial improvement of emphysema, especially in left hemithorax, and progressive ocular opening. Further emphysema absorption occurred during hospitalization.
Topics: Aged; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Humans; Male; Mediastinal Emphysema; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Rib Fractures; Subcutaneous Emphysema; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33355081
DOI: 10.14712/18059694.2020.63 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Aug 2022Literature on outcomes after SSRF, stratified for rib fracture pattern is scarce in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale...
PURPOSE
Literature on outcomes after SSRF, stratified for rib fracture pattern is scarce in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12). We hypothesized that SSRF is associated with improved outcomes as compared to nonoperative management without hampering neurological recovery in these patients.
METHODS
A post hoc subgroup analysis of the multicenter, retrospective CWIS-TBI study was performed in patients with TBI and stratified by having sustained a non-flail fracture pattern or flail chest between January 1, 2012 and July 31, 2019. The primary outcome was mechanical ventilation-free days and secondary outcomes were in-hospital outcomes. In multivariable analysis, outcomes were assessed, stratified for rib fracture pattern.
RESULTS
In total, 449 patients were analyzed. In patients with a non-flail fracture pattern, 25 of 228 (11.0%) underwent SSRF and in patients with a flail chest, 86 of 221 (38.9%). In multivariable analysis, ventilator-free days were similar in both treatment groups. For patients with a non-flail fracture pattern, the odds of pneumonia were significantly lower after SSRF (odds ratio 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.77; p = 0.013). In patients with a flail chest, the ICU LOS was significantly shorter in the SSRF group (beta, - 2.96 days; 95% CI - 5.70 to - 0.23; p = 0.034).
CONCLUSION
In patients with TBI and a non-flail fracture pattern, SSRF was associated with a reduced pneumonia risk. In patients with TBI and a flail chest, a shorter ICU LOS was observed in the SSRF group. In both groups, SSRF was safe and did not hamper neurological recovery.
Topics: Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Flail Chest; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Length of Stay; Pneumonia; Retrospective Studies; Rib Fractures
PubMed: 35192003
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-01906-1 -
World Journal of Surgery Mar 2015Rib fracture stabilization has become a more accepted practice although stabilization of the most cephalad ribs presents a unique challenge. We present our experience... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Rib fracture stabilization has become a more accepted practice although stabilization of the most cephalad ribs presents a unique challenge. We present our experience with use of a 90° drill and screwdriver to bridge these difficult rib fractures.
METHODS
This retrospective review included patients who underwent rib fracture stabilization from August 1, 2009, through September 30, 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: those whose procedure used the 90° device and those that did not. Data were compared using standard statistical analysis and reported as percentages and medians [interquartile ranges]. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS
We identified 89 patients: 29 (33%) had 90° devices used and 60 (67%) did not. There were no differences between groups in age, sex, Trauma-Related Injury Severity Score, the presence of flail chest, occurrence of pneumonia, and intensive care unit or hospital length of stay. The Injury Severity Score was higher in the 90° group (22 vs. 16; P = 0.03). The highest rib stabilized was different between the 2 groups (3 [2-5] vs. 5 [2-9]; P = 0.001), with more third rib stabilizations in the 90° group (38 vs. 20%; P = 0.04) as well as more total number of ribs fixed (5 vs. 4; P = 0.001). There was no difference in operative time between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The surgical reach for rib fracture stabilization has been extended with use of a 90° drill and screwdriver. High fractures under the scapula where access is technically challenging can be stabilized without prolonging operative times.
Topics: Aged; Bone Screws; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Injury Severity Score; Male; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Retrospective Studies; Rib Fractures
PubMed: 25403887
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2862-y -
Journal of Digital Imaging Oct 2023To develop a deep learning-based model for detecting rib fractures on chest X-Ray and to evaluate its performance based on a multicenter study. Chest digital radiography...
To develop a deep learning-based model for detecting rib fractures on chest X-Ray and to evaluate its performance based on a multicenter study. Chest digital radiography (DR) images from 18,631 subjects were used for the training, testing, and validation of the deep learning fracture detection model. We first built a pretrained model, a simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations (simCLR), using contrastive learning with the training set. Then, simCLR was used as the backbone for a fully convolutional one-stage (FCOS) objective detection network to identify rib fractures from chest X-ray images. The detection performance of the network for four different types of rib fractures was evaluated using the testing set. A total of 127 images from Data-CZ and 109 images from Data-CH with the annotations for four types of rib fractures were used for evaluation. The results showed that for Data-CZ, the sensitivities of the detection model with no pretraining, pretrained ImageNet, and pretrained DR were 0.465, 0.735, and 0.822, respectively, and the average number of false positives per scan was five in all cases. For the Data-CH test set, the sensitivities of three different pretraining methods were 0.403, 0.655, and 0.748. In the identification of four fracture types, the detection model achieved the highest performance for displaced fractures, with sensitivities of 0.873 and 0.774 for the Data-CZ and Data-CH test sets, respectively, with 5 false positives per scan, followed by nondisplaced fractures, buckle fractures, and old fractures. A pretrained model can significantly improve the performance of the deep learning-based rib fracture detection based on X-ray images, which can reduce missed diagnoses and improve the diagnostic efficacy.
Topics: Humans; Rib Fractures; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; X-Rays; Radiography; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37407842
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-023-00868-z -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Feb 2023Multiple rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients. There is growing interest in surgical stabilization in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients. There is growing interest in surgical stabilization in this subgroup of patients. This systematic review compares conservative treatment to surgical fixation in elderly patients (older than 60 years) with multiple rib fractures. The primary outcome is mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital and intensive care length of stay (HLOS and ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) and pneumonia rates.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched for comparative studies reporting on conservative versus operative treatment for rib fractures in patients older than 60 years. Both observational studies and randomised clinical trials were considered.
RESULTS
Five observational studies (n = 2583) were included. Mortality was lower in operatively treated patients compared to conservative treatment (4% vs. 8%). Pneumonia rate and DMV were similar (5/6% and 5.8/6.5 days) for either treatment modality. Overall ILOS and HLOS of stay were longer in operatively treated patients (6.5 ILOS and 12.7 HLOS vs. 2.7 ILOS and 6.5 ILOS). There were only minimal reports on perioperative complications. Notably, the median number of rib fractures (8.4 vs. 5) and the percentage of flail chest were higher in operatively treated patients (47% vs. 39%).
CONCLUSION
It remains unknown to what extent conservative and operative treatment contribute individually to reducing morbidity and mortality in the elderly with multiple rib fractures. To date, the quality of evidence is rather low, thus well-performed comparative observational studies or randomised controlled trials considering all confounders are needed to determine whether operative treatment can improve a patient's outcome.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Rib Fractures; Flail Chest; Length of Stay; Fracture Fixation; Spinal Fractures; Pneumonia; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35137253
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04362-z -
Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie Jun 2021Surgical stabilization of patients with flail chest, dislocated serial rib and sternal fractures, posttraumatic deformities of the thorax, symptomatic non-unions of the...
OBJECTIVE
Surgical stabilization of patients with flail chest, dislocated serial rib and sternal fractures, posttraumatic deformities of the thorax, symptomatic non-unions of the ribs and/or sternum, and weaning failure to biomechanically stabilize the thorax and avoid respirator-dependent complications.
INDICATIONS
Combination of clinically and radiologically observed parameters, such as pattern of thoracic injuries, grade of fracture dislocation, pathological changes to breathing biomechanics, and failure of nonsurgical treatment.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Acute hemodynamical instability and signs of systemic infection.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Detailed preoperative planning. Open, minimally invasive reduction and osteosynthesis using precontoured, low-profile locking plates and/or intramedullary splints. Careful reduction drilling/implantation of screws due to proximity of the pleura, lungs and pericardium.
POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Weaning from respirator as early as possible and early therapy of pneumothorax perioperatively. Removal of implants usually not necessary.
RESULTS
In a retrospective study, 15 polytraumatized patients with flail chest benefitted from an early interdisciplinary surgical treatment strategy within 24-48 h. Early osteosynthesis after severe thoracic trauma significantly reduced ventilator dependency and lowered the risk of pneumonia compared to patients who underwent surgery at a later time point. Patients with severe thoracic injury and life-threatening polytrauma, who meet the indication criteria for open reduction and surgical stabilization of the thorax, are in need of a throughly planned and interdisciplinary synchronized priorization and strategy. Longer intensive care unit stay, overall prolonged duration of admission in hospital, and higher level of respirator-associated complication should be expected in patients with life-threatening severe thoracic trauma (Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) ≥ 3) compared to patients without thoracic trauma.
Topics: Flail Chest; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rib Fractures; Thoracic Wall; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33289872
DOI: 10.1007/s00064-020-00688-2 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Feb 2022Rib fractures following thoracic trauma are frequently encountered injuries and associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to...
PURPOSE
Rib fractures following thoracic trauma are frequently encountered injuries and associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to provide current data on the epidemiology, in-hospital outcomes and 30-day mortality of rib fractures, and to evaluate these results for different subgroups.
METHODS
A nationwide retrospective cohort study was performed with the use of the Dutch Trauma Registry which covers 99% of the acutely admitted Dutch trauma population. All patients aged 18 years and older admitted to the hospital between January 2015 and December 2017 with one or more rib fractures were included. Incidence rates were calculated using demographic data from the Dutch Population Register. Subgroup analyses were performed for flail chest, polytrauma, primary thoracic trauma, and elderly patients.
RESULTS
A total of 14,850 patients were admitted between 2015 and 2017 with one or more rib fractures, which was 6.0% of all trauma patients. Of these, 573 (3.9%) patients had a flail chest, 4438 (29.9%) were polytrauma patients, 9273 (63.4%) were patients with primary thoracic trauma, and 6663 (44.9%) were elderly patients. The incidence rate of patients with rib fractures for the entire cohort was 29 per 100.000 person-years. The overall 30-day mortality was 6.9% (n = 1208) with higher rates observed in flail chest (11.9%), polytrauma (14.8%), and elderly patients (11.7%). The median hospital length of stay was 6 days (IQR, 3-11) and 37.3% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).
CONCLUSIONS
Rib fractures are a relevant and frequently occurring problem among the trauma population. Subgroup analyses showed that there is a substantial heterogeneity among patients with rib fractures with considerable differences regarding the epidemiology, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day mortality.
Topics: Adolescent; Aged; Flail Chest; Humans; Length of Stay; Netherlands; Retrospective Studies; Rib Fractures; Thoracic Injuries
PubMed: 32506373
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01412-2 -
Pros and cons of rib unfolding software: a reliability and reproducibility study on trauma patients.Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi =... Jun 2023Examination of all 24 ribs on axial computed tomography (CT) slices might become a leeway and rib fractures (RF) may easily overlook in daily practice. Rib unfolding...
BACKGROUND
Examination of all 24 ribs on axial computed tomography (CT) slices might become a leeway and rib fractures (RF) may easily overlook in daily practice. Rib unfolding (RU), a computer-assisted software, that promises rapid assessment of the ribs in a two-dimensional plan, was developed to facilitate rib evaluation. We aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of RU software for RF detection on CT and to determine the accelerating effect to determine any drawback of RU application.
METHODS
Fifty-one patients with thoracic trauma formed the sample to be assessed by the observers. The characterization and distribution of RFs on CT images in this sample were recorded independently by the non-observers. Regarding the presence or ab-sence of RF, CT images were assessed blindedly by two radiologists with 5 years (observer-A) and 18 years (observer-B) of experience in thoracic radiology. Each observer assessed the axial CT and RU images on different days under non-observer supervision.
RESULTS
A total of 113 RFs were detected in 22 patients. The mean evaluation time for the axial CT images was 146.64 s for ob-server-A and 119.29 s for observer-B. The mean evaluation time for RU images was 66.44 s for observer-A and 32.66 s for observer-B. A statistically significant decrease was observed between the evaluation periods of observer-A and observer-B with RU software compared to the axial CT image assessment (p<0.001). The inter-observer κ value was 0.638, while the intra-observer results showed moderate (κ: 0.441) and good (κ: 0.752) reproducibility comparing the RU and axial CT assessments. Observer-A detected 47.05% non-displaced fractures, 48.93% minimally displaced (≤2 mm) fractures, and 38.77% displaced fractures on RU images (p=0.009). Ob-server-B detected 23.52% non-displaced fractures, 57.44% minimally displaced (≤2 mm) fractures, and 48.97% displaced fractures on RU images (p=0.045).
CONCLUSION
RU software accelerates fracture evaluation, while it has drawbacks including low sensitivity in fracture detection, false negativity, and underestimation of displacement.
Topics: Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Observer Variation; Ribs; Rib Fractures; Software
PubMed: 37278081
DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.64359 -
Injury May 2024Rib fracture nonunion is a probable cause of chronic pain following chest trauma, although its prevalence remains unknown. The aims of this study were to determine rib...
Radiographic rib fracture nonunion and association with fracture classification in adults with multiple rib fractures without flail segment: A multicenter prospective cohort study.
BACKGROUND
Rib fracture nonunion is a probable cause of chronic pain following chest trauma, although its prevalence remains unknown. The aims of this study were to determine rib fracture nonunion prevalence following nonoperative management and to determine if presence of nonunion was associated with the number of rib fractures, or the rib fracture classification of anatomical location, type, and displacement.
METHODS
This multicenter prospective cohort study included trauma patients with three or more fractured ribs but without a flail segment, who participated in the nonoperative management group of the FixCon trial between January 2019 and June 2022. The number and classification of rib fractures were assessed on trauma chest CT. Chest CTs conducted six months post-trauma were evaluated for the presence of nonunion. Radiological characteristics of nonunions were compared with normally healed rib fractures using the Mann-Whitney U, χ test, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A generalized linear model adjusted for multiple observations per patient when assessing the associations between nonunion and fracture characteristics.
RESULTS
A total of 68 patients were included with 561 post-traumatic fractures in 429 ribs. Chest CT after six months revealed nonunions in 67 (12 %) rib fractures in 29 (43 %) patients with a median of 2 (P-P 1-3) nonunions per patient. Nonunion was most commonly observed in ribs seven to 10 (20-23 %, p < 0.001, adjusted p = 0.006). Nonunion occurred in 14 (5 %) undisplaced, 22 (19 %) offset, and 20 (23 %) displaced rib fractures (p < 0.001). No statistically significant association between rib fracture type and nonunion was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Forty-three percent of patients with multiple rib fractures had radiographic nonunion six months after trauma. Fractures in ribs seven to 10 and dislocated fractures had an increased risk of rib fracture nonunion.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Rib Fractures; Prospective Studies; Flail Chest; Thoracic Injuries; Fractures, Ununited; Ribs; Retrospective Studies; Fracture Fixation, Internal
PubMed: 38290909
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111335