-
The Journal of Toxicological Sciences 2014While photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for glioma, induction of apoptotic cell death of glioma cells is important for ensuring efficacy and safety of...
While photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for glioma, induction of apoptotic cell death of glioma cells is important for ensuring efficacy and safety of PDT treatment in glioma patients, as necrotic cell death can induce late appearance of obstacles in treatment. Here, we investigated the relationship between type of cell death and PDT treatment conditions involved in laser and photosensitizer dosage in human glioblastoma T98G cells. Photosensitizer talaporfin sodium-mediated PDT (NPe6-PDT) treatment induced laser and NPe6 dose-dependent cell death in T98G cells, whereas almost all cells pretreated with NPe6 at ≥ 30 µg/mL were killed by laser irradiation, regardless of laser dose. Morphological analysis showed that combination of high doses of NPe6 and laser irradiation changes the dominant cell death process from apoptosis to necrosis. Biochemical analysis (detection of caspase-3 activity and staining of cell surface-exposed phosphatidylserine) also showed that increasing laser dose changes the type of cell death from apoptotic to necrotic cell death after high-dose treatment with NPe6. Lactate dehydrogenase leakage assay demonstrated that a laser dose of 5 J/cm(2) induced less leakage than 30 J/cm(2). Our results suggested that type of glioma cell death in NPe6-PDT changed with fluctuations in laser and NPe6 dose, and that combination of 30 µg/mL NPe6 with 5 J/cm(2) laser is the best treatment condition for inducing an increase in apoptotic cells while keeping rate of necrotic cell death low in this in vitro study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Death; Glioblastoma; Humans; Lasers; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins; Radiation Dosage; Tumor Cells, Cultured
PubMed: 25374373
DOI: 10.2131/jts.39.821 -
The Journal of Investigative Dermatology Jan 2015
Topics: Animals; Humans; Lasers, Dye; Mice; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins; Port-Wine Stain; Skin
PubMed: 25036051
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2014.304 -
PloS One 2012Treatment failure at the primary site after chemoradiotherapy is a major problem in achieving a complete response. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with porfimer sodium...
BACKGROUND
Treatment failure at the primary site after chemoradiotherapy is a major problem in achieving a complete response. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with porfimer sodium (Photofrin®) has some problems such as the requirement for shielding from light for several weeks and a high incidence of skin phototoxicity. PDT with talaporfin sodium (Laserphyrin) is less toxic and is expected to have a better effect compared with Photofrin PDT. However, Laserphyrin PDT is not approved for use in the esophagus. In this preclinical study, we investigated tissue damage of the canine normal esophagus caused by photoactivation with Laserphyrin.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
Diode laser irradiation was performed at 60 min after administration. An area 5 cm oral to the esophagogastric junction was irradiated at 25 J/cm(2), 50 J/cm(2), and 100 J/cm(2) using a three-step escalation. The irradiated areas were evaluated endoscopically on postirradiation days 1 and 7, and were subjected to histological examination after autopsy. The areas injured by photoactivation were 52 mm(2), 498 mm(2), and 831 mm(2) after irradiation at 25 J/cm(2), 50 J/cm(2), and 100 J/cm(2), respectively. Tissue injury was observed in the muscle layer or even deeper at any irradiation level and became more severe as the irradiation dose increased. At 100 J/cm(2) both inflammatory changes and necrosis were seen histologically in extra-adventitial tissue.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
To minimize injury of the normal esophagus by photoactivation with Laserphyrin, diode laser irradiation at 25 J/cm(2) appears to be safe. For human application, it would be desirable to investigate the optimal laser dose starting from this level.
Topics: Animals; Dogs; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Esophagus; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins
PubMed: 22719875
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038308 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) May 2023Radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are frequently selected as treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, salvage treatment remains...
Radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are frequently selected as treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, salvage treatment remains challenging when endoscopic resection is not indicated for residual or recurrent ESCC following RT or CRT. Recently, owing to the emergence of second-generation photodynamic therapy (PDT) using talaporfin sodium, PDT can be performed with less phototoxicity and therefore has regained popularity in the treatment of ESCC. In this study, the effectiveness and safety of second-generation PDT in patients with residual or recurrent ESCC following RT or CRT were examined. Local complete response (L-CR) rates, procedure-related adverse events, and prognosis were evaluated. In 12 patients with 20 ESCC lesions, the L-CR rates were 95.0%. Perforation, postoperative bleeding, and photosensitivity were not observed. Esophageal stricture following PDT developed in one patient, but this could be addressed using balloon dilation. During a median follow-up period of 12 (range, 3-42) months, the 3-year cause-specific survival rate was 85.7%. Even in patients with a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 3, the 2-year overall survival rates were 100%. In conclusion, PDT was an efficacious and a safe salvage treatment in patients with local residual or recurrent ESCC following RT or CRT.
PubMed: 37374059
DOI: 10.3390/life13061276 -
Methods and Findings in Experimental... Sep 2010Aclidinium bromide, AE-37, Alemtuzumab, AMA1-C1/ISA 720, Amlodipine besylate/atorvastatin calcium, Arachidonic acid, Arbaclofen placarbil, Aripiprazole, ARQ-621,...
Aclidinium bromide, AE-37, Alemtuzumab, AMA1-C1/ISA 720, Amlodipine besylate/atorvastatin calcium, Arachidonic acid, Arbaclofen placarbil, Aripiprazole, ARQ-621, Azelnidipine, Azilsartan medoxomil potassium; Bevacizumab, Biphasic insulin aspart, Bortezomib; Choriogonadotropin alfa, CTS-1027; Dapagliflozin, Dasatinib, Deforolimus, Degarelix acetate, Denufosol tetrasodium, Desvenlafaxine succinate, Dronedarone hydrochloride, Duloxetine hydrochloride, Dutasteride; Enfuvirtide, Entecavir, Etaracizumab, Everolimus, Exenatide, Ezetimibe; Ferric carboxymaltose, Fludarabine, Foretinib; Gefitinib, GFT-505, GSK-256066; HPV-6/11/16/18, HuM195/rGel, HyperAcute-Lung cancer vaccine; I5NP, Imatinib mesylate, Imexon, Insulin detemir, Insulin glargine, Ivabradine hydrochloride; L2G7, Lacosamide, Lapatinib ditosylate, Lenalidomide, Lidocaine/prilocaine, Liposomal vincristine, Liraglutide, Lixivaptan; Meningococcal (groups A, C, Y and W-135) oligosaccharide diphtheria CRM197 conjugate vaccine, Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin-β, Mirabegron, Morphine/oxycodone, MR Vaccine, MSC-1936369B, Mycophenolic acid sodium salt; Narlaprevir, N-Desmethylclozapine; Ocriplasmin, Olaparib, Olmesartan medoxomil, Olmesartan medoxomil/azelnidipine, ONO-5334, ONO-8539; Palifermin, Panitumumab, Pardoprunox hydrochloride, PCV7, Peginterferon alfa-2a, Peginterferon alfa-2b, Pemetrexed disodium, Pexelizumab, PF-337210, Pitavastatin calcium; Raltegravir potassium, Recombinant interleukin-7, Regadenoson, Reniale, Roflumilast, Rosuvastatin calcium; Safinamide mesilate, SB-1518, SCH-527123, Selumetinib, Sipuleucel-T, Solifenacin succinate, Sorafenib, Sunitinib malate; Tadalafil, Talaporfin sodium, Tanespimycin, Technosphere/Insulin, Telaprevir, Telatinib, Telcagepant, Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide, Teriparatide, Testosterone transdermal gel, TH-302, Tiotropium bromide, Tocilizumab, Trabedersen, Tremelimumab; Valsartan/amlodipine besylate, Vernakalant hydrochloride, Visilizumab, Voreloxin, Vorinostat.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans
PubMed: 21069103
DOI: 10.1358/mf.2010.32.7.1549223 -
PloS One 2015Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and pseudo membranous colitis in the developed world. The aim of this study was to explore...
BACKGROUND
Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and pseudo membranous colitis in the developed world. The aim of this study was to explore whether Photodynamic Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (PACT) could be used as a novel approach to treating C. difficile infections.
METHODS
PACT utilises the ability of light-activated photosensitisers (PS) to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as free radical species and singlet oxygen, which are lethal to cells. We screened thirteen PS against C. difficile planktonic cells, biofilm and germinating spores in vitro, and cytotoxicity of effective compounds was tested on the colorectal adenocarcinoma cell-line HT-29.
RESULTS
Three PS were able to kill 99.9% of bacteria in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, both in the planktonic state and in a biofilm, after exposure to red laser light (0.2 J/cm2) without harming model colon cells. The applicability of PACT to eradicate C. difficile germinative spores indirectly was also shown, by first inducing germination with the bile salt taurocholate, followed by PACT.
CONCLUSION
This innovative and simple approach offers the prospect of a new antimicrobial therapy using light to treat C. difficile infection of the colon.
Topics: Biofilms; Cell Survival; Chlorophyllides; Clostridioides difficile; HT29 Cells; Humans; Methylene Blue; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins
PubMed: 26313448
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135039 -
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2020A photosensitizer is a molecular drug for photodynamic diagnosis and photodynamic therapy (PDT) against cancer. Many studies have developed photosensitizers, but...
A photosensitizer is a molecular drug for photodynamic diagnosis and photodynamic therapy (PDT) against cancer. Many studies have developed photosensitizers, but improvements in their cost, efficacy, and side effects are needed for better PDT of patients. In the present study, we developed a novel photosensitizer β-mannose-conjugated chlorin e6 (β-M-Ce6) and investigated its PDT effects in human glioblastoma U251 cells. U251 cells were incubated with β-M-Ce6, followed by laser irradiation. Cell viability was determined using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. The PDT effects of β-M-Ce6 were compared with those of talaporfin sodium (TS) and our previously reported photosensitizer β-glucose-conjugated chlorin e6 (β-G-Ce6). Cellular uptake of each photosensitizer and subcellular distribution were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. β-M-Ce6 showed 1000× more potent PDT effects than those of TS, and these were similar to those of β-G-Ce6. β-M-Ce6 accumulation in U251 cells was much faster than TS accumulation and distributed to several organelles such as the Golgi apparatus, mitochondria, and lysosomes. This rapid cellular uptake was inhibited by low temperature, which suggested that β-M-Ce6 uptake uses biological machinery. β-M-Ce6 showed potent PDT anti-cancer effects compared with clinically approved TS, which is a possible candidate as a next generation photosensitizer in cancer therapy.
PubMed: 33081106
DOI: 10.3390/ph13100316 -
Annals of Translational Medicine Mar 2014Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment option for local control of remnant cancer after surgical resection or biliary stenosis by the unresectable tumor in...
BACKGROUND
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment option for local control of remnant cancer after surgical resection or biliary stenosis by the unresectable tumor in patients with bile duct carcinomas (BDC). To achieve effective tumor necrosis, an appropriate approach to laser irradiation is necessary.
METHODS
The efficacy of endoscopy-guided PDT using porfimer (n=12) or talaporfin sodium (n=13) was investigated by evaluating the transhepatic biliary routes and endoscopic retrograde biliary (ERB) routes in 25 patients with BDC.
RESULTS
Diseases included perihilar intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in four patients, extrahepatic BDCs in 19 and ampular carcinoma (AC) in two patients. Adjuvant PDT after surgical resection was performed in 18 patients, and PDT for tumor biliary stenosis was performed in seven. In patients undergoing surgical resections, the mean period between the operation and PDT was 87±42 days. In patients who underwent prior surgical resections, the transhepatic route was used in five (28%), the jejunal loop was used in 11 (61%), the T-tube route was used in one, and the endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) route via papilla Vater was used in one. In unresectable BDC, the ERC route was used in four patients (57%), and the transhepatic biliary route was used in three (43%). Endoscopic-guided PDT could not be performed in one patient because of a technical failure. Except for the complication of photosensitivity, endoscopy-related complications were not observed in any patients. Patients undergoing PDT with porfimer sodium had a significantly longer admission period compared to patients undergoing PDT with talaporfin sodium (36 vs. 5 days, respectively) (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
PDT was safely and definitively performed using the endoscopy-guided approach via the transhepatic or ERC route. By considering the disadvantages of both routes, PDT must be adequately achieved for local control of BDC.
PubMed: 25332999
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.03.04 -
DEN Open Apr 2024We describe a case of gastric cancer treated by photodynamic therapy (PDT) with talaporfin sodium using a novel simultaneous light-emitting method. An 82-year-old man...
We describe a case of gastric cancer treated by photodynamic therapy (PDT) with talaporfin sodium using a novel simultaneous light-emitting method. An 82-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric cancer near the cardia with suspected deep submucosal invasion. Surgical resection was deemed high-risk owing to an underlying pulmonary disease. After ruling out endoscopic procedures due to intense fibrosis resulting from the scarring, PDT with talaporfin sodium was chosen. PDT was successfully conducted using an endoscope with simultaneous light emission. The patient experienced a complete response to the treatment and showed no signs of recurrence during follow-up. This case highlights the potential of PDT with talaporfin sodium as a viable alternative for challenging cases, particularly in patients unsuitable for surgery and endoscopic resection. Furthermore, the novel simultaneous light-emitting method may improve the efficiency of the procedure. This case demonstrates the potential of PDT in gastric cancer treatment, especially for high-risk patients.
PubMed: 38264465
DOI: 10.1002/deo2.334 -
The Journal of Surgical Research May 2013Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective laser treatment for locally treating advanced bile duct carcinoma (BDC). The study objective was to evaluate the synergic...
BACKGROUND
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective laser treatment for locally treating advanced bile duct carcinoma (BDC). The study objective was to evaluate the synergic effect of PDT using a new photosensitizer, talaporfin sodium (Laserphyrin), in combination with conventional anticancer drug treatments.
METHODS
The range of the necrotic area, the percentage of apoptosis-positive cells, the vascular endothelial growth factor expression quantification, and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen-labeling index, as treatment effects, were examined in the BDC cell line (NOZ) in vitro and in vivo (4-wk-old male BALB/c mice).
RESULTS
Tumor viability was determined by an in vitro MTS assay. PDT with a single treatment of 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum showed a significantly lower viability compared with the control or the PDT-alone group (P<0.05). Furthermore, administering PDT combined with two anticancer drugs showed a further decline in the tumor viability. A treatment of PDT combined with oxaliplatin and gemcitabine showed the least viability (P<0.05). Thus, this regimen was administered in the in vivo study. The tumor necrotic area, apoptosis positivity, and the vascular endothelial growth factor expression rate were higher in the PDT with anticancer drugs group compared with those of the other groups (P<0.05). The proliferating cell nuclear antigen-labeling index results in the PDT with the anticancer drugs group were significantly lower than those of the other groups (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
A treatment of PDT combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin showed the best synergic effect for necrosis, apoptosis, and cytostatic alterations for the treatment of BDC.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Cisplatin; Deoxycytidine; Drug Synergism; Fluorouracil; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; In Situ Nick-End Labeling; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins; Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 22835954
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.047