-
BMC Nephrology Nov 2018Different methods to prevent contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) have been proposed in recent years. We performed a mixed treatment comparison to evaluate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Different methods to prevent contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) have been proposed in recent years. We performed a mixed treatment comparison to evaluate and rank suggested interventions.
METHODS
A comprehensive Systematic review and a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was completed. Results were tabulated and graphically represented using a network diagram; forest plots and league tables were shown to rank treatments by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A stacked bar chart rankogram was generated. We performed main analysis with 200 RCTs and three analyses according to contrast media and high or normal baseline renal profile that includes 173, 112 & 60 RCTs respectively.
RESULTS
We have included 200 trials with 42,273 patients and 44 interventions. The primary outcome was CI-AKI, defined as ≥25% relative increase or ≥ 0.5 mg/dl increase from baseline creatinine one to 5 days post contrast exposure. The top ranked interventions through different analyses were Allopurinol, Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) & Oxygen (0.9647, 0.7809 & 0.7527 in the main analysis). Comparatively, reference treatment intravenous hydration was ranked lower but better than Placebo (0.3124 VS 0.2694 in the main analysis).
CONCLUSION
Multiple CA-AKI preventive interventions have been tested in RCTs. This network evaluates data for all the explored options. The results suggest that some options (particularly allopurinol, PGE1 & Oxygen) deserve further evaluation in a larger well-designed RCTs.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Allopurinol; Alprostadil; Contrast Media; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30424723
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1113-0 -
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia 2020Lubiprostone is a type 2 chloride channel activator that has been shown to be efficacious and safe in the treatment for chronic constipation. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Lubiprostone is a type 2 chloride channel activator that has been shown to be efficacious and safe in the treatment for chronic constipation.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing efficacy of lubiprostone for patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC), irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS-C) and opioid-induced constipation (OIC).
METHODS
Searches were conducted in PubMed, LILACS, Cochrane Collaboration Database, and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Lubiprostone RCTs reporting outcomes of spontaneous bowel movements (SBM) and abdominal pain or discomfort were deemed eligible. Meta-analysis was performed calculating risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals, using the Mantel-Haenszel method and random effects model.
RESULTS
Searches yielded 109 records representing 93 non-duplicate publications, and 11 RCTs (978 CIC, 1,366 IBS-C, 1,300 OIC, total = 3,644) met inclusion criteria. Qualitative synthesis showed that for CIC patients, lubiprostone is superior to placebo in terms of SBM outcomes. Meta-analysis for CIC was feasible for full responder and SBM within 24h rates, indicating superiority of lubiprostone over placebo. For IBS-C, lubiprostone was significantly superior for all SBM outcomes in follow-ups ranging from 1 week-3 months. In terms of abdominal pain, lubiprostone provided significantly better symptoms relief, particularly after 1 month of treatment. For OIC, lubiprostone was more effective than placebo for both SBM and discomfort measures.
CONCLUSION
Our findings demonstrated that lubiprostone is superior to placebo in terms of SBM frequency for CIC, IBS-C and OIC. In terms of abdominal symptoms, the most pronounced effect was seen for abdominal pain in IBS-C patients.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Defecation; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Lubiprostone; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33331483
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-83 -
American Journal of Cardiovascular... Jun 2024The clinical advantage of alprostadil [prostaglandin E1 (PGE1)] in the treatment of microcirculatory disturbances (defined as no-reflow or slow-flow) in acute...
OBJECTIVE
The clinical advantage of alprostadil [prostaglandin E1 (PGE1)] in the treatment of microcirculatory disturbances (defined as no-reflow or slow-flow) in acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still disputed. The purpose of our study was to review the efficacy of PGE1 supplements in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who had urgent PCI.
DESIGN
This study was a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, ProQuest, Scopus, the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Internet, the China Science and Technology Journal Database, and the Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform were used as sources.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
We included randomized controlled trials including PGE1 for the treatment of intraoperative microcirculatory disorders and major cardiovascular adverse events in emergency PCI in people with AMI. Independent data extraction was conducted, and study quality was assessed. The meta-analysis was carried out by using random effects models to calculate the risk ratio (RR) of microcirculatory disorders between groups receiving PGE1 and those receiving placebo, nitroglycerin, or tirofiban.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of microcirculatory disturbances. Secondary outcomes included corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count (cTFC), the percentage of patients with TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3 (TMPG3), and the percentage of patients with myocardial blush grade 3 (MBG3) as efficacy indicators. Additionally, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days and 180 days were assessed as safety indicators.
RESULTS
There were 18 trials involving a total of 1458 participants. PGE1 significantly reduced the occurrence of microcirculation disorders compared with conventional medications and placebo [risk ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.63, I = 46%; cTFC (RR -4.74, 95% -6.85 to -2.63, I 93%); percentage of patients with TMPG3 (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.68, I 70%) or MBG3 (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19-1.49, I 0%); major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in 30 days (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86, I 0%); and MACEs in 180 days (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28-0.60, I 0%)].
CONCLUSIONS
We found that PGE1 decreased the occurrence of micro-circulation disturbance in AMI and enhanced the outcome of PCI. Additional studies should be conducted to confirm these findings.
PubMed: 38850398
DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00655-3 -
Sexual Medicine Reviews Jul 2019On-demand phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) monotherapy is a first-line treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), but 30%-40% of patients exhibit little or no...
INTRODUCTION
On-demand phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) monotherapy is a first-line treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), but 30%-40% of patients exhibit little or no response. The success rate of alprostadil therapy is high in these patients, but this treatment requires painful intracavernosal injection.
AIM
To systematically review the efficacy and safety of second-line oral pharmacologic combination therapies of ED when PDE5i monotherapy fails.
METHODS
PubMed and Embase were searched to identify reports providing quantitative data on the treatment of ED in patients failing PDE5i monotherapy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The measures of erectile function were the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Erectile Function Domain (EFD).
RESULTS
Chronic treatment with the PDE5i tadalafil alone or in combination with sildenafil on demand showed similar IIEF-5 score improvements. None of the 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients who had failed PDE5i monotherapy found a superior effect on IIEF scores from the combination of androgen plus PDE5i compared with PDE5i monotherapy. Combination therapy with androgen supplementation and PDE5i appears safe. In 1 RCT, combination therapy with PDE5i and an α-adrenoceptor antagonist was not superior to PDE5i monotherapy. Six other studies, each with a different combination of PDE5i and another drug (eg, metformin, folic acid, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors), were identified, but further research is required to investigate their efficacy in treating ED.
CONCLUSION
For ED, chronic treatment with low-dose PDE5i can be attempted when standard on-demand regimens fail. Combination therapy with androgen supplementation and a PDE5i appears to be safe. The combination of an α-adrenoceptor antagonist and PDE5i shows no advantageous effect on ED compared with PDE5i monotherapy. The efficacy of combining PDE5i with metformin, folic acid, or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors is uncertain and requires further research. There is an unmet need for oral treatment of ED in nonresponders to PDE5i treatment. Munk NE, Knudsen JS, Comerma-Steffensen S, et al. Systematic Review of Oral Combination Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction When Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Monotherapy Fails. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:430-441.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Alprostadil; Drug Therapy, Combination; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Penile Erection; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Sildenafil Citrate; Tadalafil; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 30711478
DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.11.007 -
Gastroenterology Dec 2018Several secretagogues have been approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). However, their relative efficacy is unclear because... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Several secretagogues have been approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). However, their relative efficacy is unclear because there have been no head-to-head randomized controlled trials. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare their efficacies in patients with IBS-C.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through June 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of secretagogues in adults with IBS-C. Trials included in the analysis reported a dichotomous assessment of overall response to therapy, and data were pooled using a random-effects model. Efficacy and safety of secretagogues were reported as a pooled relative risk with 95% confidence interval to summarize the effect of each comparison tested, and treatments were ranked according to their P score.
RESULTS
We identified 15 eligible randomized controlled trials of secretagogues that included 8462 patients. Linaclotide, lubiprostone, plecanatide, and tenapanor were superior to placebo for the treatment of IBS-C. Linaclotide (290 μg once daily) was ranked first in efficacy based on the end point recommended by the Food and Drug Administration for trials in IBS-C, the primary end point used in each trial, abdominal pain, and complete spontaneous bowel movements. Tenapanor (50 mg twice daily) was ranked first for decreasing bloating. Total numbers of adverse events were significantly larger with linaclotide (290 and 500 μg once daily) and plecanatide (3 mg once daily) compared with placebo. However, plecanatide 6 mg once daily ranked first for safety. Diarrhea was significantly more common with all drugs, except lubiprostone (8 μg twice daily). Nausea was significantly more common in patients who received lubiprostone.
CONCLUSIONS
In a network analysis of randomized controlled trials of secretagogues for IBS-C, we found all drugs to be superior to placebo. Efficacy was similar among individual drugs and dosages for most end points. However, data were extracted at the 12-week time point, so the long-term relative efficacy of these drugs is unknown.
Topics: Adult; Constipation; Female; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Isoquinolines; Lubiprostone; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptides; Network Meta-Analysis; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secretagogues; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30144426
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.021 -
Medicine Feb 2020Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
Adequate bowel preparation is essential to the quality of colonoscopy. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of the addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation process prior to colonoscopy.
METHODS
Online databases, namely, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed the additive effect of lubiprostone on the quality of colon preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Each included study was evaluated by the Jadad score to assess the quality of the study. The primary outcome was bowel preparation efficacy, defined as the proportion of patients with an excellent or poor preparation. The secondary outcomes included the length of the colonoscopy, polyp detection, and any adverse effects.
RESULTS
In total, 5 articles published between 2008 and 2016 fulfilled the selection criteria. The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel cleansing process significantly increased the proportion of patients with an excellent preparation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40-2.02, P < .00001) but did not decrease the procedural time or increase the polyp detection rate (mean difference = -0.52, 95% CI: -3.74-2.69, P = .75; RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.96-1.42, P = .13, respectively). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with any adverse events.
CONCLUSION
The addition of lubiprostone to the bowel preparation regimen prior to colonoscopy is effective and safe.
Topics: Cathartics; Colonoscopy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Lubiprostone; Operative Time; Polyethylene Glycols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32080109
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019208 -
Pharmacological Research Jul 2020Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) is a life-threatening complication after splenectomy in cirrhotics patients with portal hypertension, while the application of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
What intervention regimen is most effective prevention for Portal venous system thrombosis after splenectomy in cirrhotics patients with Portal hypertension? Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) is a life-threatening complication after splenectomy in cirrhotics patients with portal hypertension, while the application of intervention regimen may prevent the incidence of PVST. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to determine the most appropriate intervention regimen and application time. Several electronic databases were searched up to December 2019. We estimated summary odds ratios (OR) using pairwise and network meta-analyses with random effects for the outcome of occurrence of PVST. This work was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019161406). The analysis was based on 19 researches, which included 1853 patients. The results drawn from the data in standard meta-analysis indicated that the application of intervention was better than no intervention use, and early application of interventions was better than delayed application in preventing the occurrence of PVST. Subsequent network meta-analysis was performed to determine the most suitable intervention regimen used early post-operation. For separate mono-therapy drug, alprostadil, antithrombin III, low molecular dextran were significantly more efficacious than others. However, mono-therapy analysis was not so close to clinical application. In the follow-up network meta-analysis, low molecular dextran combined with low molecular weight heparin exhibited the largest effect on the preventing the incidence of PVST (0.12, 0.03-0.49), followed by antithrombin III (0.12, 0.04-0.41) with low molecular dextran (0.14, 0.05-0.41). We could draw the conclusion that early application of low molecular weight heparin combined with low molecular dextran seems to be the most satisfactory treatment to prevent the incidence of PVST for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension after splenectomy.
Topics: Dextrans; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Liver Cirrhosis; Network Meta-Analysis; Portal Pressure; Portal Vein; Protective Factors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Splenectomy; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 32330553
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104825