-
Hand (New York, N.Y.) Jan 2023Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis is a salvage option in the management of end-stage PIPJ arthropathy. Numerous techniques have been described, including... (Review)
Review
Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis is a salvage option in the management of end-stage PIPJ arthropathy. Numerous techniques have been described, including screws, Kirschner wires, tension band wiring, intramedullary devices, and plate fixation. There remains no consensus as to the optimum method, and no recent summary of the literature exists. A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. English-language articles reporting PIPJ arthrodesis outcomes were included and presented in a systematic review. Pearson χ and 2-sample proportion tests were used to compare fusion time, nonunion rate, and complication rate between arthrodesis techniques. The mean fusion time ranged from 5.1 to 12.9 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in fusion time between arthrodesis techniques. Nonunion rates ranged from 0.0% to 33.3%. Screw arthrodesis demonstrated a lower nonunion rate than wire fusion (3.0% and 8.5% respectively; = .01). Complication rates ranged from 0.0% to 22.1%. Aside from nonunions, there were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between arthrodesis techniques. The available PIPJ arthrodesis techniques have similar fusion time, nonunion rate, and complication rate outcomes. The existing data have significant limitations, and further research would be beneficial to elucidate any differences between techniques.
Topics: Humans; Bone Wires; Bone Screws; Arthrodesis; Joint Diseases; Finger Joint
PubMed: 33682483
DOI: 10.1177/1558944721998019 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... 2022Hindfoot arthrodesis is often required for end-staged deformities, such as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Although the... (Review)
Review
Hindfoot arthrodesis is often required for end-staged deformities, such as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Although the need for hindfoot arthrodesis is generally accepted in severe deformities, there is a debate whether a double or triple arthrodesis should be performed. The aim of our systematic review is to review the fusion rates and mean time to fusion in double and triple arthrodesis. A total of 184 articles were identified using the keyword search through the database of articles published from 2005 to 2017. After review by 3 physicians, a total of 13 articles met the eligibility criteria. The reason for double or triple arthrodesis within the studies were posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, tarsal coalition, degenerative joint disease, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Charcot Marie Tooth, Multiple Sclerosis, Polio, neuromuscular disorder, cerebral palsy, acrodystrophic neuropathy, clubfoot, post-traumatic, and seronegative arthropathy (spondyloarthritis). Within these 13 studies, there were a total of 343 (6-95) subjects extremities operated on. The overall fusion rate for double arthrodesis was 91.75% (289/315) compared to 92.86% (26/28) triple arthrodesis fusion rate, p value .8370. The mean time to fusion for double arthrodesis was 17.96 ± 7.96 weeks compared to 16.70 ± 8.18 weeks for triple arthrodesis, p value = .8133. There are risks associated with triple arthrodesis including increased surgical times, lateral wound complications, residual deformity, surgical costs and peri-articular arthritis. Given the benefits of double arthrodesis over triple arthrodesis and the nearly equivalent fusion rates and time to fusion, double arthrodesis is an effective alternative to triple arthrodesis. The authors of this systematic review recommend double arthrodesis as the hindfoot fusion procedure of choice.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Arthrodesis; Humans; Osteoarthritis; Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction; Tarsal Joints
PubMed: 35221217
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.01.012 -
Foot & Ankle International Dec 2023First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis is a common surgical intervention for addressing MTP pain and deformity. Despite great interest on the topic of return to...
BACKGROUND
First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis is a common surgical intervention for addressing MTP pain and deformity. Despite great interest on the topic of return to sport (RTS) after first MTP arthrodesis in the literature, no systematic review exists on this topic. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate RTS after first MTP arthrodesis.
METHODS
This study is a systematic review using PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from database inception until May 10, 2023. Search algorithm used was (MTPJ OR MTP OR "hallux rigidus" OR cheilectomy OR metatarsal OR metatarsophalangeal) AND (arthrodesis OR fusion) AND sport. Inclusion criteria were surgical intervention of first MTP arthrodesis and outcomes related to sport.
RESULTS
Ten articles were included out of 249 articles initially retrieved. Patients (n = 450) had a frequency weighted mean (FWM) age of 58.6 ± 5.1 years with a FWM follow-up time of 32.1 ± 18.9 months. A total of 153 patients (reported in 34.0% of patients) had a FWM postoperative Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sport score of 70.4 ± 21.8 at final follow-up. For sporting activities reported by multiple studies (running, yoga, golf, hiking, tennis, elliptical, and biking), about 9.8% to 28.1% of patients (n = 69 reports) stated that sporting activity difficulty decreased, 67.2% to 87.5% of patients (n = 340 reports) stated that sporting activity remained the same, and 1.8% to 8.5% of patients (n = 23 reports) stated that sporting activity difficulty increased after first MTP arthrodesis depending on the sporting activity. One article reported RTS time of 11.7 ± 5.1 weeks after first MTP arthrodesis (n = 39).
CONCLUSION
RTS after first MTP arthrodesis is highly variable depending on patient and sport. Numerous different sporting activities have high rates of RTS after first MTP arthrodesis, with a majority of patients reporting similar or increased ability to perform sporting activities after surgery.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Return to Sport; Metatarsophalangeal Joint; Hallux Rigidus; Arthrodesis; Pain; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37750390
DOI: 10.1177/10711007231198817 -
Foot & Ankle Specialist Feb 2023Nonunion is a postoperative complication after ankle arthrodesis (AA), which leads to increased morbidity and revision rates. Previous studies have identified risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Nonunion is a postoperative complication after ankle arthrodesis (AA), which leads to increased morbidity and revision rates. Previous studies have identified risk factors for nonunion following AA, but no meta-analysis has been performed to stratify risk factors based on strength of evidence.
METHODS
Abstracts and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Relevant data were extracted from the included studies. Random effects meta-analyses were summarized as forest plots of individual study and pooled random effect results.
RESULTS
Database search yielded 13 studies involving 987 patients were included, and 37 potential risk factors for nonunion. Meta-analysis found 5 significant risk factors for nonunion post-AA. Strong evidence supports male gender (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.13-3.41), smoking (OR: 2.89; 95% CI: 1.23-6.76), and history of operative site infection prior to arthrodesis (OR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.13-5.09) as predictors for nonunion following AA. There was moderate evidence supporting history of open injury (OR: 5.95; 95% CI: 2.31-15.38) and limited evidence for preoperative avascular necrosis (OR: 13.16; 95% CI: 2.17-79.61) as possible risk factors for nonunion.
CONCLUSION
The results of our meta-analysis suggest that male gender, smoking, and history of operative site infection have strong evidence and that history of open injury and avascular necrosis also have evidence as risk factors for nonunion. Surgeons should be cognizant of these risks when performing AA and closely follow up with patients with the aforementioned risk factors to ensure postoperative success.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
Level V: Systematic review of cohort and case-control studies.
Topics: Humans; Male; Ankle; Ankle Joint; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Arthrodesis; Necrosis
PubMed: 33660542
DOI: 10.1177/1938640021998493 -
International Orthopaedics Oct 2016Arthrodesis (AD) of the knee reduces pain and provides stability, but has severe functional and social limitations. There has been ample discussion on the value of a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Arthrodesis (AD) of the knee reduces pain and provides stability, but has severe functional and social limitations. There has been ample discussion on the value of a conversion of an AD to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to perform a review and meta-analysis of the current literature on conversion of an AD to TKA and assess clinical outcome, complication rate, surgical technique and overall patient-related outcome measures.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, ScienceDirect and searching by hand for papers on conversion of AD of the knee to TKA. Two reviewers independently reviewed all titles and abstracts, and extracted the available data. Study eligibility criteria were: conversion of knee AD to TKA, five cases or more and non-oncology patients. Data consisted of study characteristics, patient demographics, clinical outcome and complications. Additionally, details on surgical technique were reviewed.
RESULTS
Of the 866 unique references identified, six papers were included for further analyses, comprising a total of 123 knees with conversion of AD of the knee to TKA. Mean gain of knee flexion was 80 degrees and the mean HSS score improved with 20 points. A complicated postoperative course was found in 65 % of all cases. The most frequent complication was skin necrosis (25 %), followed by arthrofibrosis (13 %), infection (11 %) and revision (11 %). Major complications such as refusion, amputation and death occurred in less than 5 % of all cases.
DISCUSSION
The majority of the papers consisted of small case series of moderate methodological quality, resulting in 123 included knees. Further series are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on conversion of a knee arthrodesis to TKA. Good clinical results can be expected after conversion, albeit at a high risk of postoperative complications.
Topics: Arthrodesis; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Humans; Joint Diseases; Knee Joint; Recovery of Function; Reoperation
PubMed: 26980621
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3150-2 -
Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) Dec 2021Both arthrodesis and total arthroplasty are acceptable surgical options for end stage hallux rigidus without significant angular deformity. Total arthroplasty preserves... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Both arthrodesis and total arthroplasty are acceptable surgical options for end stage hallux rigidus without significant angular deformity. Total arthroplasty preserves first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) motion, which may help restore a more physiological gait pattern.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Is there a difference in the findings of gait studies after 1st MTPJ total arthroplasty or arthrodesis for end-stage hallux rigidus?
METHODS
PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct a systematic review of literature for studies reporting gait analysis after the above procedures. Predetermined criteria were used to select papers and evaluated the findings of kinematic (spatial-temporal and dynamic motion), kinetic and foot pressure (pedobarographic) studies.
RESULTS
12 titles were short-listed for synthesis. There was 1 randomized controlled trial comparing the two procedures. Among the remaining cohort studies, 5 reported on total arthroplasty and 6 on arthrodesis of the 1st MTPJ. Due to significant heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. No studies in the arthroplasty group reported spatial-temporal or kinetic parameters. Only 2 papers, 1 in each group, recorded motion within the foot. One of them showed preserved dynamic motion at the 1st MTPJ after total arthroplasty. Pedobarographic studies had discordant findings in studies within both groups regarding restoration of weight bearing through the medial forefoot and the pulp of the great toe during gait.
CONCLUSION
Currently available studies are heterogenous and report inconsistent findings, which do not convincingly answer our research question. Prospective comparative studies with a large sample size, using standardized methodology in accredited laboratories with detailed reporting of kinetic, kinematic and pedobarographic components of gait analysis are required in order to draw concrete conclusions.
Topics: Arthrodesis; Arthroplasty; Hallux Rigidus; Humans; Metatarsophalangeal Joint; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34619518
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101838 -
The Orthopedic Clinics of North America Oct 2022This review article examines contemporary methods and assesses radiographic outcomes and postoperative complications following the modified Lapidus procedure. A... (Review)
Review
This review article examines contemporary methods and assesses radiographic outcomes and postoperative complications following the modified Lapidus procedure. A systematic review demonstrated significant improvements in intermetatarsal angle, hallux valgus angle, and tibial sesamoid position. We are updating a modified Lapidus technique for achieving triplanar correction of hallux valgus. Two cases of hallux valgus, one primary and one recurrent, are presented. As demonstrated in the systematic review, outcomes of Lapidus procedures create future opportunities. Surprisingly, only 78% of the studies assessed for this review reported on the hallux valgus angle and only 33% reported on tibial sesamoid position.
Topics: Arthrodesis; Hallux Valgus; Humans; Osteotomy; Radiography; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36208892
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2022.05.005 -
Clinical Spine Surgery May 2023This was a systematic review.
STUDY DESIGN
This was a systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
The present study aims to review the available literature concerning sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain and degeneration after lumbosacral fixation to identify the prevalence and potential risk factors.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Although numerous factors can predispose patients to SIJ degeneration and pain various clinical studies indicate lumbosacral arthrodesis as a major cause.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The PubMed-MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Embase Biomedical database were searched. Peer-reviewed comparative studies, cohort studies, case series studies and case control studies, conducted either in a retrospective or prospective design, that registered data about SIJ pain and degeneration after lumbosacral fixation were included.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies including 2678 patients met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of SIJ pain after lumbosacral fixation diagnosed with injections and physical examination varied widely, from 3% to 90%. Among patients who underwent spinal fusion, SIJ pain prevalence was higher when arthrodesis was fixed compared with floating fusions (59% vs. 10%, P -value >0.05). The prevalence of SIJ degenerative changes at computed tomography scan was more frequent in patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis than in those who did not (75% vs. 38.2%, P -value ≤0.05).
CONCLUSION
According to current evidence, patients who received lumbosacral fixation are at risk of SIJ pain. Number of fused levels, involvement of pelvis or sacrum in the arthrodesis area, inadequate lumbosacral sagittal alignment, and site of bone graft harvesting could be possible risk factor leading to sacroiliac degeneration and pain after lumbar spine fixation that should be investigated by physicians. However, there is a lack of homogeneity of the studies that address the problem, therefore, further prospective comparative studies, with a homogeneous architecture and cohorts are needed.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III.
Topics: Humans; Spinal Fusion; Sacroiliac Joint; Retrospective Studies; Cohort Studies; Arthralgia
PubMed: 35551147
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001341 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... May 2020Osteoarthritis (OA) is a growing health concern that affects approximately 27 million people in the USA and is associated with a $185 billion annual cost burden.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a growing health concern that affects approximately 27 million people in the USA and is associated with a $185 billion annual cost burden. Choosing between open surgery and arthroscopic arthrodesis for ankle arthritis is still controversial. This study compared arthroscopic arthrodesis and open surgery by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
For the systematic review, a literature search was conducted in 4 English databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Library) from inception to February 2020. Three prospective cohort studies and 7 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 507 patients with ankle arthritis, were included.
RESULTS
For fusion rate, the pooled data showed a significantly higher rate of fusion during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (odds ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57, p = 0.0010). Regarding estimated blood loss, the pooled data showed significantly less blood loss during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 52.04, 95% CI 14.14 to 89.94, p = 0.007). For tourniquet time, the pooled data showed a shorter tourniquet time during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 22.68, 95% CI 1.92 to 43.43, p = 0.03). For length of hospital stay, the pooled data showed less hospitalisation time for patients undergoing arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 1.62, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.26, p < 0.00001). The pooled data showed better recovery for the patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery at 1 year (WMD 14.73, 95% CI 6.66 to 22.80, p = 0.0003).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, arthroscopic arthrodesis was associated with a higher fusion rate, smaller estimated blood loss, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of hospitalisation than open surgery.
Topics: Ankle Joint; Arthrodesis; Arthroscopy; Humans; Length of Stay; Osteoarthritis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 32448398
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01708-4 -
JBJS Reviews Jun 2018
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Debridement; Discitis; Humans; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 29916943
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00104