-
Injury Aug 2019Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Bennett fractures is increasingly preferred over closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRIF) in an attempt to...
PURPOSE
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Bennett fractures is increasingly preferred over closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRIF) in an attempt to prevent the development of post-traumatic arthrosis. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the preference for ORIF is justified based on the available literature regarding functional outcome and complications after surgery.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of science, and Google scholar. Duplicates were removed and title and abstract were screened after which full text articles were analysed. The reference lists of selected articles were screened for additional relevant studies. Study characteristics were recorded and methodological qualities were assessed after which data was extracted from the included articles. The Eaton-Littler score for post-traumatic arthrosis (primary outcome) on follow-up X-rays was used as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were Grip strength, Pinch strength, persistent pain, fixation failure, functional impairment, infection and surgery time.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included; three retrospective comparative studies and seven retrospective case series. Of the 215 patients in these studies, 138 had been treated using an open technique and 77 by a closed percutaneous technique. The pooled rate of post-traumatic arthrosis was 57.5% (26.6-85.5) in the ORIF group versus 26.1% (3.9-59.0) in the CRIF group. Mean surgical operation time was 71.9 min for ORIF and 30.2 min for percutaneous patients. Fixation failure was significantly more often seen in the ORIF patients, 8.2% (0.7-22.8) vs. 2.9% (0.8-9.1), Risk Ratio 1.132 (0.01-176.745); p = 0.048. Infection was only seen in 5 CRIF patients. Persistent pain was seen in 32.9% (0.6-83.1) in ORIF patients versus 22.3% (8.1-41.1) in the CRIF patients. The pooled means Grip strength was 48.3 kg (95% CI; 39.7-56.9) versus 43.4 kg (95% CI; 22.9-63.8) for ORIF and CRPF, respectively. Functional impairment was similar between the two groups, 1.4% (0.1-4.4) vs 1.8% (0.1-5.7) respectively.
CONCLUSION
The analysed data do not confirm ORIF to prevent post-traumatic arthrosis, secondly more fixation failure and pain was seen in the ORIF group. The pooled data show percutaneous fixation to be preferable over ORIF in the surgical treatment of Bennett fractures.
Topics: Biomechanical Phenomena; Closed Fracture Reduction; Fracture Dislocation; Fracture Healing; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Metacarpal Bones; Open Fracture Reduction; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31288938
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.027 -
The Medical Journal of Malaysia Mar 2024Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) that can significantly result in disability and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) that can significantly result in disability and impaired quality of life. The DPN of the foot has been extensively studied in diabetes care. Nevertheless, the DPN of hand has been the road less taken in research and clinical practice. Thus, a scoping review was conducted to identify all available standardized hand assessments which have been used, developed, or tested in individuals with DM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This scoping review was reported in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies were identified through searches of five databases: Cochrane, Scopus, ProQuest, MEDLINE, and Web of Science (WoS).
RESULTS
Of the 294 articles initially identified, 20 studies were included and analysed thematically after removing duplicates. The majority of these assessments measure body function and structure such as grip and pinch strength while the rest are measuring the activity and participation domain. Most of the hand assessments were performancebased measurements. It is suggestible to employ both types of assessments to obtain a comprehensive understanding of hand conditions in individuals with DM. While some validated hand assessments were identified, only the Duruöz Hand Index (DHI) has been validated as a reliable tool specifically for evaluating hand function in individuals with DM.
CONCLUSION
There is a need to evaluate the measurement properties of existing instruments for assessing the hand function in individuals with DM, or to develop hand assessments specifically for the DM population. This scoping review was forging a new path, by discovering diabetes care through the utilisation of hand assessments.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Upper Extremity; Diabetes Mellitus; Lower Extremity
PubMed: 38555903
DOI: No ID Found -
PloS One 2021People with ulnar, radial or median nerve injuries can present significant impairment of their sensory and motor functions. The prescribed treatment for these conditions... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
People with ulnar, radial or median nerve injuries can present significant impairment of their sensory and motor functions. The prescribed treatment for these conditions often includes electrophysical therapies, whose effectiveness in improving symptoms and function is a source of debate. Therefore, this systematic review aims to provide an integrative overview of the efficacy of these modalities in sensorimotor rehabilitation compared to placebo, manual therapy, or between them.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We perform a literature review in the following databases: Biomed Central, Ebscohost, Lilacs, Ovid, PEDro, Sage, Scopus, Science Direct, Semantic Scholar, Taylor & Francis, and Web of Science, for the period 1980-2020. We include studies that discussed the sensorimotor rehabilitation of people with non-degenerative ulnar, radial, or median nerve injury. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Risk of Bias Tool described in the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the risk of bias across studies with the GRADE approach described in the GRADE Handbook.
RESULTS
Thirty-eight studies were included in the systematic review and 34 in the meta-analysis. The overall quality of evidence was rated as low or very low according to GRADE criteria. Low-level laser therapy and ultrasound showed favourable results in improving symptom severity and functional status compared to manual therapy. In addition, the low level laser showed improvements in pinch strength compared to placebo and pain (VAS) compared to manual therapy. Splints showed superior results to electrophysical modalities. The clinical significance of the results was assessed by effect size estimation and comparison with the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).
CONCLUSIONS
We found favourable results in pain relief, improvement of symptoms, functional status, and neurophysiological parameters for some electrophysical modalities, mainly when applied with a splint. Our results coincide with those obtained in some meta-analyses. However, none of these can be considered clinically significant.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO registration number CRD42020168792; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=168792.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Humans; Median Neuropathy; Neuralgia; Pain Measurement; Radial Neuropathy; Splints; Treatment Outcome; Ulnar Neuropathies
PubMed: 33735212
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248484 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Apr 2020Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) both have advantages and disadvantages for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) both have advantages and disadvantages for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We compared the effectiveness and safety of ECTR and OCTR based on evidence from a high-level randomized controlled trial.
METHODS
We comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline to identify relevant articles published until August 2019. Data regarding operative time, grip strength, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores, digital sensation, patient satisfaction, key pinch strength, return to work time, and complications were extracted and compared. All mean differences (MD) and odds ratios (OR) were expressed as ECTR relative to OCTR.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis contained twenty-eight studies. ECTR was associated with significantly higher satisfaction rates (MD, 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43 to 4.82; P = 0.0003), greater key pinch strengths (MD, 0.79 kg; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.32; P = 0.003), earlier return to work times (MD, - 7.25 days; 95% CI, - 14.31 to - 0.19; P = 0.04), higher transient nerve injury rates (OR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.37 to 17.25; P = 0.01), and a lower incidence of scar-related complications (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.59; P = 0.004). The permanent nerve injury showed no significant differences between the two methods (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 0.58 to 6.40; P = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates that ECTR results in better recovery of daily life functions compared to OCTR, as revealed by higher satisfaction rates, greater key pinch strengths, earlier return to work times, and fewer scar-related complications. Our findings suggest that patients with CTS can be effectively managed with ECTR.
Topics: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Decompression, Surgical; Endoscopy; Hand Strength; Humans; Neurosurgical Procedures; Operative Time; Patient Satisfaction; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Return to Work; Safety; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32340621
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03306-1 -
Disability and Rehabilitation Mar 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of physiotherapeutic interventions in individuals with thumb primary CMC OA on the outcomes of... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of physiotherapeutic interventions in individuals with thumb primary CMC OA on the outcomes of pain, hand function, grip or pinch strength.
METHODS
RCTs that used some type of physiotherapeutic intervention compared to a passive or active control group were included. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach and, for the calculation of the meta-analysis, the standardized difference of means (SMD) was used.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies ( = 1477) were included and eight studies ( = 568) underwent meta-analysis. Orthosis intervention was superior to passive control group for pain improvement (SMD = -1.02, = 0.03, very low evidence), grip strength (SMD = 0.45, = 0.02, very low evidence) and pinch strength (SMD = 1.78, = 0.01, very low evidence), but there was no improvement in hand function ( = 0.54). The use of a neoprene orthosis was similar to the use of a thermoplastic orthosis in improving pain ( = 0.38), hand function ( = 0.50), grip strength ( = 0.42) and pinch strength ( = 0.14). The use of short thermoplastic orthosis was also similar to long thermoplastic orthosis in improving pain ( = 0.88) and hand function ( = 0.58).
CONCLUSION
The use of orthoses is superior to no intervention in all outcomes, exception hand function.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe use of orthosis is recommended for the treatment of patients with rhizoarthrosisUse of orthosis is better than no intervention in improving pain, grip and pinch strength.The type of orthosis (neoprene or thermoplastic, short or long thermoplastic) does not affect the clinical improvement of the individual to the outcomes of pain, hand physical function, grip and pinch strength.
PubMed: 38450686
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2325652 -
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine :... Apr 2024Trigger finger (also known as stenosing tenosynovitis) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects the fingers and causes discomfort and functional impairment. It is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Trigger finger (also known as stenosing tenosynovitis) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects the fingers and causes discomfort and functional impairment. It is estimated to affect 2-3.6% of the population and is more common in manual laborers and individuals engaged in repetitive hand activities. This study comprehensively compares the efficacy of ultrasound-guided release versus traditional open surgery in treating trigger fingers.
MATERIALS
We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were studies evaluating ultrasound-guided release of trigger finger (grade 2 and higher) compared with open surgical release. A meta-analysis was performed by Revman software 5.4.1 to assess efficacy, utilizing appropriate statistical methods to address heterogeneity. Primary outcome measures included "Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand" (QDASH) scores, Grip strength, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included Days of stopping analgesia, full-digit flexion and extension, days to return to normal activities, pinch strength, Quinnell grading score, and bow strengthening.
RESULTS
Out of the initial pool of 820 studies, five met the inclusion criteria, including 275 patients with 283 trigger digits. The analysis revealed significant differences favoring the ultrasound-guided release group over the surgical group for improvement in Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score in the first month (MD -0.48, 95% CI: 0.75 to -0.2, P = .0007, I = 20%). The difference was not statistically significant in the 3-month follow-up period (MD -2.25, 95% CI: -0.54 to 0.05, P = .1, I = 0%). Additionally, there is a significant difference in the days required for return to normal activities in favor of the ultrasound release approach (MD -13.78, 95% CI: -16.68 to 10.89, P = .00001, I = 68%). The data displayed heterogeneity, which was resolved through sensitivity analysis that also favored the ultrasound-guided group. In terms of grip strength, full-digit flexion and extension, VAS, and days of stopping analgesia no significant differences were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound-guided release showed advantages over open surgical release, resulting in improved QDASH score and quicker return to normal activities. This offers a minimally invasive, successful alternative to open surgery, reducing associated risks. Further studies with long-term follow-up are recommended.
Topics: Humans; Trigger Finger Disorder; Tenotomy; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Fingers
PubMed: 38205616
DOI: 10.1002/jum.16408 -
Archives of Physical Medicine and... Jun 2018To provide an overview of rehabilitation for patients who underwent first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-1) arthroplasty, with emphasis on early active mobilization.
OBJECTIVE
To provide an overview of rehabilitation for patients who underwent first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-1) arthroplasty, with emphasis on early active mobilization.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched.
STUDY SELECTION
Articles written in English that described the postoperative regimen (including immobilization period/method and/or description of exercises/physical therapy, follow-up 6wk) on CMC-1 arthroplasty were included.
DATA EXTRACTION
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used as guidance in this review, and methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool. Randomized studies were additionally scored using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Twenty-seven studies were included consisting of 1015 participants, in whom 1118 surgical procedures were performed. A summary of the components of postoperative rehabilitation used in the included studies of CMC-1 osteoarthritis is presented for different surgical interventions. We found that early active recovery (including short immobilization, early initiation of range of motion and strength exercises) provides positive outcomes for pain, limitations in activities of daily living, and grip and pinch strength, but comparative studies are lacking. Furthermore, 3 postoperative exercises/therapy phases were identified in the literature-the acute phase, the unloaded phase, and the functional phase-but again comparative studies are lacking.
CONCLUSIONS
Early active recovery is used more often in the literature and does not lead to worse outcomes or more complications. This systematic review provides guidance for clinicians in the content of postoperative rehabilitation for CMC-1 arthroplasty. The review also clearly identifies the almost complete lack of high-quality comparative studies on postoperative rehabilitation after CMC-1 arthroplasty.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger; Carpometacarpal Joints; Early Ambulation; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Immobilization; Physical Therapy Modalities; Pinch Strength; Range of Motion, Articular; Recovery of Function
PubMed: 29030095
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.114 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Feb 2024There is a controversy on the effectiveness of post-operating splinting in patients with carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery. This study aimed to systematically evaluate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There is a controversy on the effectiveness of post-operating splinting in patients with carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery. This study aimed to systematically evaluate various outcomes regarding the effectiveness of post-operating splinting in CTR surgery.
METHODS
Multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane, were searched for terms related to carpal tunnel syndrome. A total of eight studies involving 596 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of studies was evaluated, and their risk of bias was calculated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) and Cochrane's collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials. Data including the visual analogue scale (VAS), pinch strength, grip strength, two-point discrimination, symptom severity score (SSS), and functional status scale (FSS) were extracted.
RESULTS
Our analysis showed no significant differences between the splinted and non-splinted groups based on the VAS, SSS, FSS, grip strength, pinch strength, and two-point discrimination. The calculated values of the standardized mean difference (SMD) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) for different variables were as follows: VAS [SMD = 0.004, 95% CI (-0.214, 0.222)], pinch strength [WMD = 1.061, 95% CI (-0.559, 2.681)], grip strength [SMD = 0.178, 95% CI (-0.014, 0.369)], SSS [WMD = 0.026, 95% CI (- 0.191, 0.242)], FSS [SMD = 0.089, 95% CI (-0.092, 0.269)], and the two-point discrimination [SMD = 0.557, 95% CI (-0.140, 1.253)].
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings revealed no statistically significant differences between the splinted and non-splinted groups in terms of the VAS, SSS, FSS, grip strength, pinch strength, and two-point discrimination. These results indicate that there is no substantial evidence supporting a significant advantage of post-operative splinting after CTR.
Topics: Humans; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Hand Strength; Pinch Strength; Splints; Pain Measurement
PubMed: 38383364
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07230-6 -
Journal of Hand Therapy : Official... 2024Measurement of treatment outcomes and change in health status over time is a critical component of clinical practice and research for people with osteoarthritis....
BACKGROUND
Measurement of treatment outcomes and change in health status over time is a critical component of clinical practice and research for people with osteoarthritis. Numerous clinical tools are used to assess the structures and function of the thumb in persons with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis however their psychometrics have not yet been systematically explored.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of clinical tools used in persons with non-surgical thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis to objectively measure thumb structures and function, evaluate the quality of such studies, and subsequently make clinical and future research recommendations.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
A systematic search and screening was conducted across nine databases. Original research published between 2002 and 2022 that involved the assessment of psychometric properties (validity, reliability, precision, responsiveness, sensitivity, specificity, and minimal clinically important difference) of clinical tools were included. Sample characteristics, methods, and psychometric findings from each study were compiled. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments' checklist. Two independent researchers screened articles and assessed methodological quality and when not in agreement, a third party was consulted.
RESULTS
Eleven studies were included in the review. The mean age of all participants in the studies was 69 years of age. The study designs included prospective case-control, prospective cohort, and cross-sectional to determine the psychometric properties of the measurements and tools. The included studies examined techniques to assess range of motion, strength, and pain-pressure thresholds, and screen for arthritis (ie, provocative tests). The intermetacarpal distance method, Kapandji index, pain-pressure threshold test, and pain-free grip and pinch dynamometry demonstrate excellent reliability and acceptable precision. Metacarpal extension, adduction, and pressure-shear provocative tests have superior sensitivity and specificity and the extension and adduction tests have excellent reliability. Other assessments included in the review yielded less robust psychometric properties. Studies were of variable methodological quality spanning from inadequate to very good.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available literature on the psychometric properties of assessments of body structures and functions in persons with non-operative thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis, we offer a limited set of recommendations for use when screening for arthritis symptomology and measuring hand strength, thumb mobility, and pain thresholds. Additional psychometric research is needed in these domains as well as in dexterity, sensation, and objective measures of hand function. Future research should employ best practices in psychometric research.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Psychometrics; Thumb; Cross-Sectional Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Osteoarthritis; Carpometacarpal Joints; Pain
PubMed: 37591727
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.07.002 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Apr 2021Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment mononeuropathy of the upper extremity. The previous systematic review of the diagnostic tests for CTS was...
BACKGROUND
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment mononeuropathy of the upper extremity. The previous systematic review of the diagnostic tests for CTS was outdated. The objective of this study was to compile and appraise the evidence on the accuracy of sensory and motor tests used for the diagnosis of CTS.
METHODS
MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched on January 20, 2020. Studies assessing at least one diagnostic accuracy property of the sensory or motor tests for CTS diagnosis were selected by two independent reviewers. Diagnostic test accuracy extension of the PRISMA guidelines was followed. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were rated using QUADAS-2 tool. Any reported diagnostic accuracy property was summarized. Study characteristics and any information on the accuracy of the sensory and motor tests for CTS diagnosis were extracted.
RESULTS
We included sixteen clinical studies, assessing thirteen different sensory or motor tests. The most sensitive test for CTS diagnosis was the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (with 3.22 in any radial digit as the normal threshold) with sensitivity from 0.49 to 0.96. The tests with the highest specificity (Sp) were palmar grip strength (Sp = 0.94), pinch grip strength (Sp from 0.78 to 0.95), thenar atrophy (Sp from 0.96 to 1.00), and two-point discrimination (Sp from 0.81 to 0.98).
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence was inconclusive on which sensory or motor test for CTS diagnosis had the highest diagnostic accuracy. The results suggest that clinicians should not use a single sensory or motor test when deciding on CTS diagnosis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42018109031 , on 20 December 2018.
Topics: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Hand Strength; Humans; Neural Conduction; Pinch Strength
PubMed: 33827512
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04202-y