-
Journal of Hand Therapy : Official... 2020Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment syndrome worldwide. There are limited studies on the effectiveness of carpal ligament stretching on... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment syndrome worldwide. There are limited studies on the effectiveness of carpal ligament stretching on symptomatic and electrophysiologic outcomes.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of self-myofascial stretching of the carpal ligament on symptom outcomes and nerve conduction findings in persons with CTS.
STUDY DESIGN
This is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
METHODS
Eighty-three participants diagnosed with median mononeuropathy across the wrist by nerve conduction study were randomized 1:1 to sham treatment or self-carpal ligament stretching. Participants were instructed to perform the self-treatment four times a day for six weeks. Seventeen participants in the sham treatment group and 19 participants in the carpal ligament stretching group completed the study. Pre- and post-treatment outcome measures included subjective complaints, strength, nerve conduction findings, and functional scores.
RESULTS
Groups were balanced on age, sex, hand dominance, symptom duration, length of treatment, presence of nocturnal symptoms, and compliance with treatment. Even though the ANOVA analyses were inconclusive about group differences, explorative post hoc analyses revealed significant improvements in numbness (P = .011, Cohen's d = .53), tingling (P = .007, Cohen's d = .60), pinch strength (P = .007, Cohen's d = -.58), and symptom severity scale (P = .007, Cohen's d = .69) for the treatment group only.
CONCLUSIONS
The myofascial stretching of the carpal ligament showed statistically significant symptom improvement in persons with CTS. Larger comparative studies that include other modalities such as splinting should be performed to confirm the effectiveness of this treatment option.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hand Strength; Humans; Ligaments, Articular; Male; Median Nerve; Middle Aged; Muscle Stretching Exercises; Neural Conduction; Prospective Studies; Self Care; Symptom Assessment; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32362377
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.002 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2018Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory polyarthritis that frequently affects the hands and wrists. Hand exercises are prescribed to improve mobility and strength, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory polyarthritis that frequently affects the hands and wrists. Hand exercises are prescribed to improve mobility and strength, and thereby hand function.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the benefits and harms of hand exercise in adults with rheumatoid arthritis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), OTseeker, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) up to July 2017.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered all randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared hand exercise with any non-exercise therapy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures as outlined by the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
MAIN RESULTS
We included seven studies involving 841 people (aged 20 to 94 years) in the review. Most studies used validated diagnostic criteria and involved home programmes.Very low-quality evidence (due to risk of bias and imprecision) from one study indicated uncertainty about whether exercise improves hand function in the short term (< 3 months). On a 0 to 80 points hand function test (higher scores mean better function), the exercise group (n = 11) scored 76.1 points and control group (n = 13) scored 75 points.Moderate-quality evidence (due to risk of bias) from one study indicated that exercise compared to usual care probably slightly improves hand function (mean difference (MD) 4.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58 to 7.42; n = 449) in the medium term (3 to 11 months) and in the long term (12 months or beyond) (MD 4.3, 95% CI 0.86 to 7.74; n = 438). The absolute change on a 0-to-100 hand function scale (higher scores mean better function) and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) were 5% (95% CI 2% to 7%); 8 (95% CI 5 to 20) and 4% (95% CI 1% to 8%); 9 (95% CI 6 to 27), respectively. A 4% to 5% improvement indicates a minimal clinical benefit.Very low-quality evidence (due to risk of bias and imprecision) from two studies indicated uncertainty about whether exercise compared to no treatment improved pain (MD -27.98, 95% CI -48.93 to -7.03; n = 124) in the short term. The absolute change on a 0-to-100-millimetre scale (higher scores mean more pain) was -28% (95% CI -49% to -7%) and NNTB 2 (95% CI 2 to 11).Moderate-quality evidence (due to risk of bias) from one study indicated that there is probably little or no difference between exercise and usual care on pain in the medium (MD -2.8, 95% CI - 6.96 to 1.36; n = 445) and long term (MD -3.7, 95% CI -8.1 to 0.7; n = 437). On a 0-to-100 scale, the absolute changes were -3% (95% CI -7% to 2%) and -4% (95% CI -8% to 1%), respectively.Very low-quality evidence (due to risk of bias and imprecision) from three studies (n = 141) indicated uncertainty about whether exercise compared to no treatment improved grip strength in the short term. The standardised mean difference for the left hand was 0.44 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.78), re-expressed as 3.5 kg (95% CI 0.87 to 6.1); and for the right hand 0.46 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.8), re-expressed as 4 kg (95% CI 1.13 to 7).High-quality evidence from one study showed that exercise compared to usual care has little or no benefit on mean grip strength (in kg) of both hands in the medium term (MD 1.4, 95% CI -0.27 to 3.07; n = 400), relative change 11% (95% CI -2% to 13%); and in the long term (MD 1.2, 95% CI -0.62 to 3.02; n = 355), relative change 9% (95% CI -5% to 23%).Very low-quality evidence (due to risk of bias and imprecision) from two studies (n = 120) indicated uncertainty about whether exercise compared to no treatment improved pinch strength (in kg) in the short term. The MD and relative change for the left and right hands were 0.51 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.9) and 44% (95% CI 11% to 78%); and 0.82 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.21) and 68% (95% CI 36% to 101%).High-quality evidence from one study showed that exercise compared to usual care has little or no benefit on mean pinch strength of both hands in the medium (MD 0.3, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.74; n = 396) and long term (MD 0.4, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.88; n = 351). The relative changes were 8% (95% CI -4% to 19%) and 10% (95% CI -2% to 22%).No study evaluated the American College of Rheumatology 50 criteria.Moderate-quality evidence (due to risk of bias) from one study indicated that people who also received exercise with strategies for adherence were probably more adherent than those who received routine care alone in the medium term (risk ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.48; n = 438) and NNTB 6 (95% CI 4 to 10). In the long term, the risk ratio was 1.09 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.28; n = 422).Moderate-quality evidence (due to risk of bias) from one study (n = 246) indicated no adverse events with exercising. The other six studies did not report adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
It is uncertain whether exercise improves hand function or pain in the short term. It probably slightly improves function but has little or no difference on pain in the medium and long term. It is uncertain whether exercise improves grip and pinch strength in the short term, and probably has little or no difference in the medium and long term. The ACR50 response is unknown. People who received exercise with adherence strategies were probably more adherent in the medium term than who did not receive exercise, but with little or no difference in the long term. Hand exercise probably does not lead to adverse events. Future research should consider hand and wrist function as their primary outcome, describe exercise following the TIDieR guidelines, and evaluate behavioural strategies.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Exercise Therapy; Hand; Hand Strength; Humans; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 30063798
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003832.pub3 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery, European... Feb 2009Assessment of hand strength is used in a wide range of clinical settings especially during treatment of diseases affecting the function of the hand. This investigation...
Assessment of hand strength is used in a wide range of clinical settings especially during treatment of diseases affecting the function of the hand. This investigation aimed to determine age- and gender-specific reference values for grip and pinch strength in a normal Swiss population with special regard to old and very old subjects as well as to different levels of occupational demand. Hand strength data were collected using a Jamar dynamometer and a pinch gauge with standard testing position, protocol and instructions. Analysis of the data from 1023 tested subjects between 18 and 96 years revealed a curvilinear relationship of grip and pinch strength to age, a correlation to height, weight and significant differences between occupational groups. Hand strength values differed significantly from those of other populations, confirming the thesis that applying normative data internationally is questionable. Age- and gender-specific reference values for grip and pinch strength are presented.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Female; Functional Laterality; Hand Strength; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle Strength Dynamometer; Pinch Strength; Reference Values; Sex Factors; Switzerland; Young Adult
PubMed: 19129352
DOI: 10.1177/1753193408096763 -
Current Opinion in Neurology Dec 2019This review discusses recent advances in the rehabilitation of motor deficits after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) using neuromodulatory... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This review discusses recent advances in the rehabilitation of motor deficits after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) using neuromodulatory techniques.
RECENT FINDINGS
Neurorehabilitation is currently the only treatment option for long-term improvement of motor functions that can be offered to patients with TBI or SCI. Major advances have been made in recent years in both preclinical and clinical rehabilitation. Activity-dependent plasticity of neuronal connections and circuits is considered key for successful recovery of motor functions, and great therapeutic potential is attributed to the combination of high-intensity training with electrical neuromodulation. First clinical case reports have demonstrated that repetitive training enabled or enhanced by electrical spinal cord stimulation can yield substantial improvements in motor function. Described achievements include regaining of overground walking capacity, independent standing and stepping, and improved pinch strength that recovered even years after injury.
SUMMARY
Promising treatment options have emerged from research in recent years using neurostimulation to enable or enhance intense training. However, characterizing long-term benefits and side-effects in clinical trials and identifying patient subsets who can benefit are crucial. Regaining lost motor function remains challenging.
Topics: Animals; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Deep Brain Stimulation; Humans; Neurological Rehabilitation; Neuronal Plasticity; Recovery of Function; Spinal Cord; Spinal Cord Injuries; Spinal Cord Stimulation; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
PubMed: 31567546
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000750 -
The Israel Medical Association Journal... Apr 2023Physiotherapy can help treat of trigger fingers (TF). (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Physiotherapy can help treat of trigger fingers (TF).
OBJECTIVES
To compare efficacy of fascial manipulation (FM) and traditional physiotherapy (TP) techniques in treatment of TF.
METHODS
Nineteen patients were randomized in the FM group and 15 in the TP group. All patients underwent eight physiotherapy sessions. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, staging of stenosing tenosynovitis (SST) classification, triggering frequency, grip and pinch strength were recorded before and after treatment. We surveyed participants at 6 months for recurrence, further treatment, and the VAS and QuickDASH scores. The primary outcome measure was reduction in QuickDASH and VAS scores.
RESULTS
Both FM and TF improved the QuickDASH and VAS scores at 6 months follow-up, without a significant difference. The QuickDASH score in the FM group improved from 28.4 ± 17.1 to 12.7 ± 16.3; TF scores improved from 27 ± 16.7 to 18.8 ± 29.4 (P = 0.001). The VAS score improved from 5.7 ± 2.1 to 1.2 ± 2.1 and from 4.8 ± 1.8 to 2 ± 2.6 for both groups, respectively (P < 0.001). SST and grip strength also improved following treatment, regardless of modality. At 6 months, four patients (22%) with an SST score of 1, three (30%) with a score of 2, and two (40%) with a score of 3A underwent additional treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Both FM and TP techniques are effective for the treatment of TF and should be considered for patients who present with SST scores of 1 or 2.
Topics: Humans; Trigger Finger Disorder; Treatment Outcome; Pilot Projects; Physical Therapy Modalities; Hand
PubMed: 37129129
DOI: No ID Found -
Neural Plasticity 2021Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common chronic complications of diabetes, leading to disability and decreased quality of life. In past research...
OBJECTIVE
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common chronic complications of diabetes, leading to disability and decreased quality of life. In past research and clinical studies, the lower limb function of DPN patients was often the principal subject of research, with little attention given to the upper limb and hand. Our goal was to assess and compare hand function between elderly diabetic patients with DPN and without DPN.
METHODS
A total of 52 diabetic patients were registered and underwent hand function assessments and electrodiagnostic tests. Dynamometer, pinch meter, Semmes Weinstein monofilaments, and the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) were used to assess the patients' grip strength, pinch strength, tactile sensory threshold, and hand dexterity.
RESULTS
Compared with the non-DPN group, the elderly DPN group showed worse thumb-middle fingertip pinch strength and thumb-little fingertip pinch strength in the dominant hand (3.50 (2.50, 4.25) vs. 4.50 (3.00, 5.00), = 0.019; 1.50 (1.00, 2.00) vs. 2.50 (2.00, 3.00), < 0.001); the elderly DPN group displayed worse thumb-middle fingertip pinch strength, thumb-ring fingertip pinch strength, and thumb-little fingertip pinch strength in the nondominant hand (3.50 (2.00, 4.50) vs. 4.00 (3.00, 5.00), = 0.013; 2.50 (1.25, 3.00) vs. 3.00 (2.50, 3.50), = 0.033; 1.00 (0.75, 2.25) vs. 2.50 (2.00, 2.50), < 0.001). The elderly DPN group scored lower than the non-DPN group on the PPT test of assembly (13.96 ± 5.18 vs. 16.96 ± 4.61, = 2.212, = 0.032).
CONCLUSION
Motor function limitation is the principal hand dysfunction in elderly patients with DPN, which is mainly manifested as a decline in fingertip pinch strength and a decrease in hand dexterity. This trial is registered with Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR1900025358.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetic Neuropathies; Female; Hand; Humans; Male; Muscle Strength; Muscle Strength Dynamometer; Neural Conduction; Pinch Strength
PubMed: 34335735
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9959103 -
Current Biology : CB Jan 2018Mark Laidre introduces the coconut crab (Birgus latro), the world's largest terrestrial invertebrate.
Mark Laidre introduces the coconut crab (Birgus latro), the world's largest terrestrial invertebrate.
Topics: Animal Distribution; Animals; Anomura; Biomechanical Phenomena; Brain; Conservation of Natural Resources; Diet; Indian Ocean Islands; Life History Traits; Longevity; Pacific Islands; Pinch Strength
PubMed: 29374442
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.017 -
The Bone & Joint Journal Jan 2017We performed a systematic review of the current literature regarding the outcomes of unconstrained metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) arthroplasty. (Review)
Review
AIMS
We performed a systematic review of the current literature regarding the outcomes of unconstrained metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We initially identified 1305 studies, and 406 were found to be duplicates. After exclusion criteria were applied, seven studies were included. Outcomes extracted included pre- and post-operative pain visual analogue scores, range of movement (ROM), strength of pinch and grip, satisfaction and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical and radiological complications were recorded. The results are presented in three groups based on the design of the arthroplasty and the aetiology (pyrocarbon-osteoarthritis (pyro-OA), pyrocarbon-inflammatory arthritis (pyro-IA), metal-on-polyethylene (MoP)).
RESULTS
Results show that pyrocarbon implants provide an 85% reduction in pain, 144% increase of pinch grip and 13° improvements in ROM for both OA and IA combined. Patients receiving MoP arthroplasties had a reduction in pinch strength. Satisfaction rates were 91% and 92% for pyrocarbon-OA and pyrocarbon-IA groups, respectively. There were nine failures in 87 joints (10.3%) over a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (1.0 to 14.3) for pyro-OA. There were 18 failures in 149 joints (12.1%) over a mean period of 6.6 years (1.0 to 16.0) for pyro-IA. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of the studies and the limited presentation of data.
CONCLUSION
We would recommend prospective data collection for small joint arthroplasties of the hand consisting of PROMs that would allow clinicians to come to stronger conclusions about the impact on function of replacing the MCPJs. A national joint registry may be the best way to achieve this. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:100-6.
Topics: Arthroplasty; Carbon; Hand Strength; Humans; Metacarpophalangeal Joint; Musculoskeletal Pain; Osteoarthritis; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Prostheses and Implants; Prosthesis Failure; Range of Motion, Articular; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28053264
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.37237 -
JPMA. the Journal of the Pakistan... Feb 2022The objective of the study was to observe the change in Pinch Strength (PS) of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) arm and non-AVF arm before and after haemodialysis (HD). A...
The objective of the study was to observe the change in Pinch Strength (PS) of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) arm and non-AVF arm before and after haemodialysis (HD). A total of 31 patients (21 Male and 10 Female) undergoing HD during January and February 2020 at a trust hospital were selected through purposive sampling. Mean PS was calculated from the measurements taken using the Jamar digital pinch gauge with an interval of five seconds between each measurement. Paired sample T-test was applied using SPSS 20. The mean PS values for AVF arm when compared before and after the session were 3.64 ±1.01 and 2.87 ±1.20 kgs (p<0.01), whereas for non AVF arm PS values were 3.96 ±1.50 and 3.69 ±1.37 kgs (p=0.09). It was concluded that PS of AVF arm decreased more significantly after HD as compared to the non AVF arm.
Topics: Arteriovenous Fistula; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Pinch Strength; Renal Dialysis
PubMed: 35320205
DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.1406 -
Journal of Cardiology Mar 2021We aimed to examine the relationship between the difficulty of activity using the arms and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the relationship between the difficulty of...
BACKGROUND
We aimed to examine the relationship between the difficulty of activity using the arms and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the relationship between the difficulty of activity using the arms and manual function, and cognitive function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 263 non-dementia patients who met the study criteria from 2328 CAD patients. MCI was estimated with the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J). The difficulty of activity using the arms was evaluated using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Manual function was evaluated by pinch strength and handgrip strength.
RESULTS
Age (odds ratio, 1.10), three-fingered pinch strength (odds ratio, 0.69), and DASH score (odds ratio, 1.03) were independently associated with MCI in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Hemoglobin (β=-0.15), handgrip strength (β=-0.37), and MoCA-J score (β=-0.15) were independently associated with DASH score (Model 1: p<0.001, adjusted R=0.33); hemoglobin (β=-0.17), eGFR (β=-0.14), three-fingered pinch strength (β=-0.25), and MoCA-J score (β=-0.14) were independently associated with DASH score in the multivariate regression analysis (Model 2: p<0.001, adjusted R=0.31).
CONCLUSIONS
The difficulty of activity using the arms was independently associated with manual and cognitive function and MCI in CAD patients.
Topics: Arm; Cognitive Dysfunction; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Sectional Studies; Hand Strength; Humans; Pinch Strength
PubMed: 33121796
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.10.009