-
Scandinavian Journal of Urology Feb 2018The impact of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy on oncological outcome in patients with prostate cancer and limited number of bone metastases is unclear. Data from... (Review)
Review
The impact of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy on oncological outcome in patients with prostate cancer and limited number of bone metastases is unclear. Data from cancer registries, multi-institutional databases and a single institutional case-control study indicate a possible benefit of combined cytoreduction and hormonal therapy compared to hormonal therapy alone. However, the results may be biased by a number of factors. The evidence from studies on cytoreductive prostatectomy is reviewed.
Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Humans; Male; Prostate; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate
PubMed: 28818014
DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1363816 -
Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine Jun 2022Prostate cancer (PC) presents great challenges in early diagnosis and often leads to unnecessary invasive procedures as well as over diagnosis and treatment, thus... (Review)
Review
Prostate cancer (PC) presents great challenges in early diagnosis and often leads to unnecessary invasive procedures as well as over diagnosis and treatment, thus highlighting the need for promising early diagnostic biomarkers. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary of chronologically existing metabolomics PC biomarkers, their potential to improve clinical PC diagnosis and to reduce the proliferation and monitoring of PC. The systematic research was conducted on PubMed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to report PC biomarkers. The majority of the studies distinguished malignant from benign prostate and few explored the biomarkers associated with the progression of PC. The present review summarises the primary outcomes of most significant studies to extend our knowledge of PC metabolomics biomarkers. We observed divergent inter-laboratory technical procedures employing different statistical approaches produced abundant information regarding PC metabolites perturbation. Since PC metabolomics is still in its early phase, it is vital that we dig out the most specific, sensitive and accurate metabolic signatures and conduct more studies with milestone findings with comparable sample sizes to validate and corroborate the findings.
Topics: Biomarkers; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Male; Metabolomics; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 35730322
DOI: 10.1017/erm.2022.20 -
Anticancer Research Mar 2018A systematic review on toxicity, local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) after postoperative hypofractionated... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/AIM
A systematic review on toxicity, local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) after postoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) on prostate cancer (PCa) was performed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Based on the PRISMA methodology, studies reporting clinical results after adjuvant or salvage HFRT were included.
RESULTS
A total of 1,208 patients from 17 eligible studies were included. Median follow-up was 30 months. No case of severe acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was recorded. Grade ≥3 acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity ranged between 0% and 3%. Different rates of grade ≥2 late GI (range=0-8.7%) and GU (range=0-66%) toxicity were recorded. Encouraging results on LC, OS, and bRFS were reported.
CONCLUSION
Acute toxicity does not seem to be increased in patients receiving postoperative HFRT, but the results of late-GU toxicity are conflicting. Further prospective studies are needed before including postoperative HFRT in clinical practice.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Postoperative Period; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiation Dose Hypofractionation; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Salvage Therapy
PubMed: 29491044
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12343 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer is still a matter of debate. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer is still a matter of debate. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the necessity of androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of articles was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biological Medicine, Wanfang, and VIP Databases published between February 1988 and April 2022. Studies comparing the survival of patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk prostate cancer who were treated with androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone were included. Data were extracted and analyzed with the RevMan software (version 5.3) and the Stata software (version 17).
RESULTS
Six randomized controlled trials and nine retrospective studies, including 6853 patients (2948 in androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy group and 3905 in radiotherapy alone group) were enrolled. Androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy did not provide an overall survival (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.12, p=0.04) or biochemical recurrence-free survival (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39, P=0.001) advantage to intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.
CONCLUSION
Androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy did not show some advantages in terms of overall survival and biochemical recurrence-free survival and radiotherapy alone may be the effective therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-8-0095/, identifier 202280095.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36733800
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1074540 -
BMC Cancer Jan 2018There is ongoing debate about the harms and benefits of a national prostate cancer screening programme. Several model-based cost-effectiveness analyses have been... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is ongoing debate about the harms and benefits of a national prostate cancer screening programme. Several model-based cost-effectiveness analyses have been developed to determine whether the benefits of prostate cancer screening outweigh the costs and harms caused by over-detection and over-treatment, and the different approaches may impact results.
METHODS
To identify models of prostate cancer used to assess the cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening strategies, a systematic review of articles published since 2006 was conducted using the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Medline, EMBASE and HTA databases. The NICE website, UK National Screening website, reference lists from relevant studies were also searched and experts contacted. Key model features, inputs, and cost-effectiveness recommendations were extracted.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included. Four of the studies identified some screening strategies to be potentially cost-effective at a PSA threshold of 3.0 ng/ml, including single screen at 55 years, annual or two yearly screens starting at 55 years old, and delayed radical treatment. Prostate cancer screening was modelled using both individual and cohort level models. Model pathways to reflect cancer progression varied widely, Gleason grade was not always considered and clinical verification was rarely outlined. Where quality of life was considered, the methods used did not follow recommended practice and key issues of overdiagnosis and overtreatment were not addressed by all studies.
CONCLUSION
The cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening is unclear. There was no consensus on the optimal model type or approach to model prostate cancer progression. Due to limited data availability, individual patient-level modelling is unlikely to increase the accuracy of cost-effectiveness results compared with cohort-level modelling, but is more suitable when assessing adaptive screening strategies. Modelling prostate cancer is challenging and the justification for the data used and the approach to modelling natural disease progression was lacking. Country-specific data are required and recommended methods used to incorporate quality of life. Influence of data inputs on cost-effectiveness results need to be comprehensively assessed and the model structure and assumptions verified by clinical experts.
Topics: Aged; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Disease Progression; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; United Kingdom
PubMed: 29347916
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3974-1 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Jul 2022The impact of prostate cancer on the mental wellbeing of patients is increasingly being appreciated. Two important aspects of this include fear of cancer recurrence... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The impact of prostate cancer on the mental wellbeing of patients is increasingly being appreciated. Two important aspects of this include fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) anxiety. However, their prevalence, severity and associating factors remain poorly understood. Therefore, this review aims to evaluate the current evidence for the prevalence, severity and associating features of PSA anxiety and FCR.
METHODS
A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases was conducted by two independent reviewers. Observational studies measuring FCR and PSA anxiety in prostate cancer using validated measures were included. Outcome measures were prevalence of significant levels, mean scores and significant correlations of FCR and PSA anxiety scores with patient, disease, treatment or other mental health and quality of life outcomes.
RESULTS
One thousand one hundred forty-eight individual records underwent screening with 32 studies included. Median prevalence of significant FCR and PSA anxiety was 16% and 22% respectively across all studies. Longitudinal studies demonstrated severity of both symptoms peaks at diagnosis, with little variability, even several years following this. Evaluating associating factors revealed younger age, generalised quality of life and mental health symptoms to be important factors for both outcomes. Few studies evaluated associations and differences between other patient, disease and treatment characteristics.
CONCLUSION
FCR and PSA anxiety are prominent symptoms for prostate cancer patients and importantly when present, are associated with poorer quality of life and mental health symptoms. Screening for these constructs and referral to appropriate services should form part of routine follow-up care.
Topics: Anxiety; Fear; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35106656
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06876-z -
European Urology Oct 2017Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is associated with poor prognosis. While it is often regarded as a rare pathology, the prevalence of IDC-P remains unclear,... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is associated with poor prognosis. While it is often regarded as a rare pathology, the prevalence of IDC-P remains unclear, with variable reports from small and disparate patient populations. To determine how common IDC-P is across the spectrum of prostate cancer, we conducted a systematic review correlating IDC-P prevalence with prostate cancer risk. Electronic searches of the OVID Medline, PubMed, and Scopus literature databases identified 38 patient cohorts in 24 articles, which were divided between four prostate cancer risk categories (low, moderate, high, and recurrent or metastatic disease). This review, which included radical prostatectomy and prostate biopsy specimens from >7000 patients, revealed an unexpectedly high rate of IDC-P. The IDC-P prevalence increased from 2.1% in low-risk patient cohorts to 23.1%, 36.7%, and 56.0% in moderate-risk, high-risk, and metastatic or recurrent disease risk categories, respectively (p<0.0001). IDC-P was also highly prevalent in tumours following androgen deprivation therapy or chemotherapy (60%). Contrary to common perceptions, this study demonstrates a strong association between IDC-P prevalence and aggressive prostate cancer, with a significantly higher frequency in high-risk disease. Greater recognition and systematic reporting of IDC-P may improve patient risk stratification.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Prostate cancer can grow within ducts of the prostate, as well as in prostate tissue. By reviewing all reports describing prostate cancer growing within ducts, we found that it occurs more commonly than many scientists and clinicians appreciate, especially in aggressive prostate cancers. We conclude that there should be more awareness of this pattern of prostate cancer.
Topics: Carcinoma; Cell Proliferation; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Grading; Prevalence; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 28342640
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.013 -
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine... Mar 2018There is a controversy as to the relative efficacy of Lu prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) and third-line treatment for patients with... (Review)
Review
AIMS
There is a controversy as to the relative efficacy of Lu prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) and third-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of our systematic review was to elucidate whether Lu-PSMA RLT and third-line treatment have similar effects and adverse effects (PROSPERO ID CRD42017067743).
METHODS
The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in Pubmed and Embase selected articles up to September 2017. A search in ClinicalTrials.gov indicated ongoing studies. The meta-analysis used the random-effects model.
RESULTS
Twelve studies including 669 patients reported Lu-PSMA RLT. Overall, 43% of the patients had a maximum decline of PSA of ≥50% following treatment with Lu-PSMA RLT. The treatment with Lu-PSMA-617 and Lu-PSMA for imaging and therapy (I&T) had mainly transient adverse effects. Sixteen studies including 1338 patients reported third-line treatment. Overall, 21% of the patients had a best decline of PSA of ≥50% following third-line treatment. After third-line treatment with enzalutamide and cabazitaxel, adverse effects caused discontinuation of treatment for 10% to 23% of the patients. Lu-PSMA RLT gave a best PSA decline ≥50% more often than third-line treatment (mean 44% versus 22%, p = 0.0002, t test). Lu-PSMA RLT gave objective remission more often than third-line treatment (overall 31 of 109 patients versus 43 of 275 patients, p = 0.004, χ test). Median survival was longer after Lu-PSMA RLT than after third-line treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (mean 14 months versus 12 months, p = 0.32, t test). Adverse effects caused discontinuation of treatment more often for third-line treatment than for Lu-PSMA RLT (22 of 66 patients versus 0 of 469 patients, p < 0.001, χ test).
CONCLUSIONS
As for patients with mCRPC, treatment with Lu-PSMA-617 RTL and Lu-PSMA I&T gave better effects and caused fewer adverse effects than third-line treatment.
Topics: Antigens, Surface; Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II; Humans; Ligands; Lutetium; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Radioisotopes
PubMed: 29247284
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3895-x -
Cancer Prevention Research... Oct 2019Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, and sedentary behavior is widespread, yet reviews and meta-analyses summarizing the role of sedentary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, and sedentary behavior is widespread, yet reviews and meta-analyses summarizing the role of sedentary behavior as a potential risk factor for prostate cancer are scarce. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for relevant articles up to January 2019. We pooled maximally adjusted risk estimates in a random effects model and performed meta-regression meta-analysis, assessed heterogeneity and publication bias using , funnel plots, and Egger and Begg tests, and conducted sensitivity analyses and influence diagnostics. Data from 12 prospective cohort studies including a total of 30,810 prostate cancer cases were analyzed. We found no statistically significant association between high versus low sedentary behavior and prostate cancer incidence [RR = 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.99-1.16; 0.10]. We noted that adjustment for body mass index (BMI) modified the relation of sedentary behavior to prostate cancer, particularly aggressive cancer. Sedentary behavior was related to a statistically significant increased risk of aggressive prostate cancer in analyses not adjusted for BMI (RR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43), whereas no association was apparent in BMI-adjusted analyses (RR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.07), and the difference between those summary risk estimates was statistically significant ( = 0.02). Sedentary behavior is not independently associated with prostate cancer. However, prolonged sedentary behavior may be related to increased risk of aggressive prostate cancer through a mechanism involving obesity. This finding represents a potentially important step toward considering sedentary behavior as a modifiable behavioral risk factor for aggressive prostate cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Cohort Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Obesity; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Sedentary Behavior
PubMed: 31362941
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0271 -
World Journal of Urology May 2023The reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a local and nodal staging tool in radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is still unclear. The present study aims... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a local and nodal staging tool in radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is still unclear. The present study aims at evaluating the predictive value of MRI in the detection of extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesical invasion (SVI) and nodal involvement (LNI) in patients after primary radio (EBRT) and/or brachytherapy (BT) before salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP).
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systemically reviewed to extract the data on diagnostic performance of MRI in radio-recurrent PCa.
RESULTS
Four studies comprising 94 radio-recurrent PCa patients were included. The pooled prevalence of ECE, SVI, and LNI was 61%, 41%, and 20%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity for ECE, SVI and LNI detection was 53% (CI 95% 19.8-83.6%), 53% (CI 95% 37.2-68%) and 33% (CI 95% 4.7-83.1%) respectively, whereas specificity was 75% (CI 95% 40.6-92.6%), 88% (CI 95% 71.7-95.9%) and 92% (CI 95% 79.6-96.8%). The sensitivity analysis revealed that a single outlying study using only T2-weighted imaging instead of multiparametric MRI reported significantly higher sensitivity with significantly lower specificity.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first meta-analysis reporting reliability of staging MRI in a radio-recurrent setting. MRI provides poor sensitivity while maintaining high specificity for local and nodal staging before SRP. However, current evidence is limited to the low number of heterogenous studies at meaningful risk of bias.
Topics: Male; Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37019997
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04383-2