-
European Urology Open Science Jul 2022Previous reports have shown an association between vasectomy and prostate cancer (PCa). However, there exist significant discrepancies between studies and systematic... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Previous reports have shown an association between vasectomy and prostate cancer (PCa). However, there exist significant discrepancies between studies and systematic reviews due to a lack of strong causal association and residual confounding factors such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the association between vasectomy and PCa, in both unadjusted and PSA screen-adjusted studies.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched in January 2022 for studies that analyzed the association between vasectomy and PCa.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 37 studies including 16 931 805 patients met our inclusion criteria. A pooled analysis from all studies showed a significant association between vasectomy and any-grade PCa (odds ratio [OR] 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.37; < 0.001; I = 96%), localized PCa (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.11; < 0.00001; I = 31%), or advanced PCa (OR 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13; = 0.006; I = 0%). The association with PCa remained significant when the analyses were restricted to studies with a low risk of bias (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10; = 0.02; I = 48%) or cohort studies (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13; < 0.0001; I = 64%). Among studies adjusted for PSA screening, the association with localized PCa (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09; < 0.001; I = 0%) remained significant. Conversely, vasectomy was no longer associated with localized high-grade ( = 0.19), advanced ( = 0.22), and lethal ( = 0.42) PCa.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis found an association between vasectomy and any, mainly localized, PCa. However, the effect estimates of the association were increasingly close to null when examining studies of robust design and high quality. On exploratory analyses including studies, which adjusted for PSA screening, the association for aggressive and/or advanced PCa diminished.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this study, we found an association between vasectomy and the risk of developing localized prostate cancer without being able to determine whether the procedure leads to a higher prostate cancer incidence.
PubMed: 35633829
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.012 -
European Urology Open Science Aug 2023Identifying malignant tissue and leaving adjacent structures undisturbed constitute an ongoing challenge in prostate cancer (PCa) surgery. Image and radioguided surgical... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Identifying malignant tissue and leaving adjacent structures undisturbed constitute an ongoing challenge in prostate cancer (PCa) surgery. Image and radioguided surgical technologies targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) receptor may facilitate identification and removal of diseased tissue.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of the clinical studies on PSMA-targeted surgery.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
The MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase.com, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Identified reports were critically appraised according to the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term framework criteria. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed as per the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool. The strengths and limitations of the techniques and corresponding oncological outcomes were extracted as areas of interest. Data were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
In total, 29 reports were selected, including eight prospective studies, 12 retrospective analyses, and nine case reports, all with a high or an unclear RoB. In 72.4% of studies, PSMA targeting was achieved via radioguided surgery (RGS), predominantly using Tc-PSMA-I&S (66.7%). Hybrid approaches that complement RGS with optical guidance are emerging. The majority of studies retrieved were pilot studies with a short follow-up. In 13 reports, salvage lymph node surgery was discussed (44.8%). In 12 more recent reports (41.4%), PSMA targeting was studied in primary PCa surgery (50.0% lymph nodes and 50.0% surgical margins), and four studied both primary and salvage surgery (13.8%). Overall, specificity was higher than sensitivity (median 98.9% and 84.8%, respectively). Oncological outcomes were discussed only in reports on the use of Tc-PSMA-I&S in salvage surgery (median follow-up of 17.2 mo). A decline in prostate-specific antigen level of >90% ranged from 22.0% to 100.0%, and biochemical recurrence ranged from 50.0% to 61.8% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS
In PSMA-targeted surgery, most studies address salvage PSMA-RGS using Tc-PSMA-I&S. Available evidence suggests that the specificity of intraoperative PSMA targeting is higher than the sensitivity. The studies that included follow-up did not yet objectify a clear oncological benefit. Lacking solid outcome data, PSMA-targeted surgery remains investigational.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this paper, we review recent advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted surgery, which is used to help identify and remove prostate cancer. We found good evidence to suggest that PSMA targeting helps identify prostate cancer during surgery. The oncological benefits have yet to be investigated further.
PubMed: 37361200
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.014 -
European Urology Focus Sep 2022Staging, restaging, and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is challenging due to suboptimal accuracy of standard of care imaging modalities. Prostate-specific... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Staging, restaging, and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is challenging due to suboptimal accuracy of standard of care imaging modalities. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging may serve to improve characterisation of UC.
OBJECTIVE
To appraise available literature regarding cellular, imaging, and prognostic implications of PSMA for UC.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review was performed considering all available literature (including conference abstracts) published from 1990 to 2020 and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines following registration in PROSPERO (CRD42020186744). All relevant texts relating to immunohistochemical analysis and PSMA-based imaging in UC were included and collated. Additionally, FOLH1 (gene encoding PSMA) expression according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was analysed as well as according to consensus and TCGA molecular classification subtypes and subsequently compared with clinical outcomes.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
PSMA expression across UC tumour tissue was heterogeneous (0-100%) but appeared to decrease with increased grade and stage. The TCGA analysis demonstrated loss of FOLH1 expression with increasing T stage (p = 0.0180) and N stage (p = 0.0269), and reduced FOLH1 expression was associated with worse disease-free survival. PSMA expression in UC neovasculature was variable but mostly increased (44-100%). Eleven reports of PSMA-based imaging for UC were identified, reporting on 18 patients. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was positive in 17 out of 18 patients. The included literature review data were limited by mostly low-quality, retrospective studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Tissue PSMA, or FOLH1 expression, may inversely be associated with pathological and survival outcomes in localised UC. PSMA PET imaging may improve detection of metastatic disease and response to systemic therapy due to PSMA expression in neovasculature. Available evidence is limited; thus, larger, prospective studies are required to confirm early results and define populations that benefit most.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this systematic review, we assess the potential role of prostate-specific membrane antigen in urothelial cancer. We found that its utility is in expression of blood vessels surrounding metastasis. We conclude that it may be beneficial in detecting metastasis and response to systemic therapies.
Topics: Male; Humans; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Prostate; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prostatic Neoplasms; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 34429271
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.016 -
World Journal of Urology Dec 2023To compare long-term reoperation rate and functional outcomes between EEP (endoscopic enucleation of the prostate) and TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare long-term reoperation rate and functional outcomes between EEP (endoscopic enucleation of the prostate) and TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic literature review of Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted with primary outcome assessed being reoperation rate and secondary outcomes after a long term (> 3 years) being functional outcomes or related values (prostate volume, PSA level, etc.).
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Five studies were found with long-term follow-up 4-7 years. EEP reoperation rate ranged from 0 to 1.27%, while from 1.7 to 17.6% for TURP. Meta-analysis showed significantly lower OR for EEP, 0.27 (95% CI 0.24-0.31), with notable homogeneity of the results, I = 0%. Long-term Qmax and IPSS were significantly better for EEP. Q pooled mean difference was 1.79 (95% CI 1.72-1.86) ml/s with a high concordance among the studies, I = 0%. IPSS mean difference -1.24 (95% CI - 1.28 to - 1.2) points, I = 57% but QoL did not differ, with mean difference being 0.01 (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.04), I = 0%. IIEF-5 score was also significantly better for EEP, mean difference 1.08 (95% CI 1.03-1.13), but heterogeneity was high, I = 70%. PSA level and prostate volume were only reported in one study and favored EEP slightly yet statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
EEP had a significantly lower reoperation rate and better functional outcomes (Q and IPSS) at long term compared with TURP. It may also be beneficial in terms of IIEF-5, PVR, and PSA level.
Topics: Male; Humans; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Quality of Life; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37980297
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04666-8 -
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of... Nov 2023The present systematic review and meta-analysis are focused on the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/MRI in primary prostate cancer assessment. A literature search was... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Systematic Review and Metanalysis on the Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Intraprostatic Tumour Assessment.
The present systematic review and meta-analysis are focused on the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/MRI in primary prostate cancer assessment. A literature search was conducted on the PubMed database using the terms "PSMA" AND "prostate cancer" or "prostate" AND "PET/MRI" or "PET MRI" or "PET-MRI" or "PET-MR" AND "primary" or "staging." Ten articles were eligible for analysis after applying the exclusion criteria. PET/MRI showed better diagnostic accuracy in detecting primary PCa compared to multiparametric (mp) MRI and PET alone. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI at the per-patient level were 0.976 (CI: 0.943-0.991) and 0.739 (CI: 0.437-0.912); respectively. PSMA PET/MRI has good sensitivity in detecting primary PCa, especially in patients with PIRADS 3 PCa.
Topics: Humans; Male; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostatic Neoplasms; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Positron-Emission Tomography; Pelvis
PubMed: 37741644
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2023.06.006 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2023The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the association between periodontal disease and prostate inflammation with a null hypothesis stating... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the association between periodontal disease and prostate inflammation with a null hypothesis stating that periodontal disease does not increase the incidence of prostate inflammation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational cohort and case-control studies that evaluated the odds ratio or hazard ratio and confidence interval was undertaken based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations (2020). A total of four databases were consulted in the literature search: PubMed-Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. After eliminating duplicated articles and applying the inclusion criteria, seven articles were selected for the qualitative and quantitative analyses.
RESULTS
Four observational cohort studies and three observational cohort case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. The four observational cohort studies were combined using the random effects model to estimate a hazard ratio of 1.32 with a confidence interval of 95% between 0.87 and 1.77. The meta-analysis presented high heterogeneity (Q test = 56.1; value < 0.001; I = 94.9%). Moreover, the three observational case-control studies were combined using the random effects model to estimate an odds ratio of 1.62 with a confidence interval of 95% between 1.41 and 1.84. The meta-analysis presented high heterogeneity (Q test = 1.07; value = 0.782; I = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of periodontal disease does not increase the risk of the incidence of prostate inflammation.
PubMed: 37763009
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186070 -
The Journal of Urology May 2015Prostate specific antigen is an important tool to monitor patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assays are... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Prostate specific antigen is an important tool to monitor patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assays are increasingly used with a lower limit of detection as low as 0.001 ng/ml. We systematically reviewed currently available ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen technologies and the role of this method in monitoring patients after radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched the relevant literature using the MEDLINE® database. For various study objectives the series eligible for review provided serial ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen (lower detection limit less than 0.1 ng/ml) data on men after radical prostatectomy as well as comparative data on standard prostate specific antigen (lower detection limit 0.1 ng/ml or greater).
RESULTS
Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen could potentially detect prostate cancer recurrence years earlier than standard prostate specific antigen assays. The specificity of detectable ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen is low. Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen kinetics may improve the positive predictive value for detecting cancer recurrence. However, the usefulness of prostate specific antigen doubling time at the ultrasensitive level remains controversial. Undetectable nadir ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy confers a low risk of disease recurrence while a detectable nadir above 0.01 ng/ml requires additional measurement and consideration of other risk factors to determine management and avoid overtreatment. This monitoring method may spare patients with high risk disease adjuvant radiation therapy and enable more selective early salvage radiation. Currently no data demonstrate improved survival after early salvage therapy prompted by ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen surveillance.
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen is useful in the early diagnosis of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy but specificity is poor. To date there is a lack of evidence that earlier detection of recurrence translates into prolonged time to metastasis. Integrating ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen with other clinicopathological factors can help determine optimal adjuvant and salvage therapy.
Topics: Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 25444980
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.087 -
Cureus Jun 2022Cryotherapy is one of the recognised ablative modalities for both primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer. It presents an alternative, less invasive treatment... (Review)
Review
Cryotherapy is one of the recognised ablative modalities for both primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer. It presents an alternative, less invasive treatment for an organ-confined disease, improved preservation of surrounding tissue and a more suitable option for patients who are unfit for radical prostatectomy. Nevertheless, the currently available literature is relatively too scarce to provide definite conclusions regarding the treatment outcomes in cryotherapy. The present study aimed to review current oncological and survival outcomes in cryotherapy for primary and recurrent prostate cancer. Furthermore, this study aimed to establish the complications and functional outcomes of cryotherapy for prostate cancer. A literature search was performed on the PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases. Current guidelines and recommendations from the European Association of Urology were also reviewed. The search keywords used included 'Cryotherapy, Prostate Cancer', 'Cryoablation, Prostate Cancer' and 'Cryosurgery, Focal Prostate Cancer'. Truncations and Boolean operators were used with the keywords. All relevant studies from after 2015, including abstracts and non-English research assessing oncological and functional outcomes and complications, were included. Twenty-six studies consisting of 11,228 patients were reviewed. Fifteen studies assessed the outcomes of primary cryotherapy, whereas 11 studies reported the outcomes in salvage therapy. The patient's age ranged 55-85 years, and the pre-procedural prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ranged 0.01-49.33 ng/mL. A total of 2031 patients were classified to be at low risk, 2,995 were at moderate risk and 253 were at high risk on the D'Amico prostate cancer risk classification system. Follow-ups ranged from 9.0 to 297.6 months. The disease-specific survival rate was 65.5%-100.0%, overall survival was 61.3%-99.1%, the PSA nadir was 0.01-2.63 ng/mL and the overall biochemical recurrence rate was 15.4%-62.0%. The complications included erectile dysfunction (3.7%-88.0%), urinary retention (2.13%-25.30%) and bladder neck stricture/stenosis (3.0%-16.7%). The functional assessment showed a mixture of improved, unchanged or worsened post-procedural outcomes in primary therapy. This systematic review did not find significant differences in the cancer-specific, overall and biochemical-free survival rate between the primary and salvage cryotherapy cohorts. The most common complications encountered in both cohorts were erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, lower urinary tract/bladder neck stricture and infection. More prospective and double-arm studies are critically needed to provide guidance on the careful selection of patient cohorts for cryotherapy, whether for curative or salvage intent.
PubMed: 35911314
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26400 -
Ontario Health Technology Assessment... 2015Prostate cancer (PC) is the most commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer in men and their second or third leading cause of cancer death. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer in men and their second or third leading cause of cancer death. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for PC has been in common practice for more than 20 years.
OBJECTIVES
A systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted to determine the effectiveness of PSA-based population screening programs for PC to inform policy decisions in a publicly funded health care system.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review of bibliographic databases was performed for systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials (RCT) of PSA-based population screening programs for PC.
REVIEW METHODS
A broad search strategy was employed to identify studies reporting on key outcomes of PC mortality and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS
The search identified 5 systematic reviews and 6 RCTs. None of the systematic reviews found a statistically significant reduction in relative risk (RR) of PC mortality or overall mortality with PSA-based screening. PC mortality reductions were found to vary by country, by screening program, and by age of men at study entry. The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer found a statistically significant reduction in RR in PC mortality at 11-year follow-up (0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92), although the absolute risk reduction was small (1.0/10,000 person-years). However, the primary treatment for PCs differed significantly between countries and between trial arms. The American Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) found a statistically non-significant increase in RR for PC mortality with 13-year follow-up (1.09; 95% CI, 0.87-1.36). The degree of opportunistic screening in the control arm of the PLCO trial, however, was high. None of the RCTs found a reduction in all-cause mortality and all found a statistically significant increase in the detection of mainly low-risk, organ-confined PCs in the screening arm.
CONCLUSIONS
There was no evidence of a PC mortality reduction in the American PLCO trial, which investigated a screening program in a setting where opportunistic screening was already common practice. Given that opportunistic PSA screening practices in Canada are similar, it is unlikely that the introduction of a formal PSA screening program would reduce PC mortality.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Canada; Early Detection of Cancer; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Male; Mass Screening; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; United States
PubMed: 26366236
DOI: No ID Found -
Molecular Imaging 2022Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen- (PSMA-) binding tracers has been found incidentally to demonstrate uptake in CNS... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen- (PSMA-) binding tracers has been found incidentally to demonstrate uptake in CNS tumors. Following the encouraging findings of several such case reports, there is a growing interest in the potential application of PSMA-targeted PET imaging for diagnostics, theranostics, and monitoring of CNS tumors. This is a systematic literature review on PSMA-binding tracers in CNS tumors.
METHODS
A PubMed search was conducted, including preclinical and clinical reports. One hundred and twelve records were identified, and after screening, 56 were included in the final report.
RESULTS
Tissue studies demonstrated PSMA expression in tumor vascular endothelial cells, without expression in normal brain tissue, though the extent and intensity of staining varied by anti-PSMA antibody and methodology. Most included studies reported on gliomas, which showed strong PSMA ligand uptake and more favorable tumor to background ratios than other PET tracers. There are also case reports demonstrating PSMA ligand uptake in prostate cancer brain metastases, nonprostate cancer brain metastases, and meningiomas. We also review the properties of the various PSMA-binding radiotracers available. Therapeutic and theranostic applications of PSMA-binding tracers have been studied, including labeled alpha- and beta-ray emitting isotopes, as well as PSMA targeting in directing MRI-guided focused ultrasound.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a potential application for PSMA-targeted PET in neuro-oncology as a combination of diagnostic and therapeutic use, as a theranostic modality for managing CNS tumors. Further research is needed regarding the mechanism(s) of PSMA expression in CNS tumors and its differential performance by tumor type.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Ligands; Male; Neuroimaging; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiopharmaceuticals
PubMed: 35517711
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5358545