-
Scars, Burns & Healing 2017Dynamic monitoring of coagulation is important to predict both haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications and to guide blood product administration. Reducing blood loss... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Dynamic monitoring of coagulation is important to predict both haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications and to guide blood product administration. Reducing blood loss and tailoring blood product administration may improve patient outcome and reduce mortality associated with transfusion. The current literature lacks a systematic, critical appraisal of current best evidence on which clinical decisions may be based.
OBJECTIVES
Establishing the role of different coagulation markers in burn patients, diagnosing coagulopathy, tailoring blood product administration and indicating prognosis.
METHODS
Literature during 2004-2017 from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Medline and Embase was reviewed. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, multi-/single-centre study and meta-analyses. Keywords searched were 'burns', 'blood coagulation disorders', 'rotem', 'blood coagulation' and 'thromboelastography'. The PRISMA flow system was used for stratification and the CASP framework for appraisal of the studies retrieved.
RESULTS
In total, 13 articles were included after inclusion/exclusion criteria had been applied to the initial 79 studies retrieved. Hypercoagulation increases in proportion to the severity of thermal injury. Whole blood testing, using thrombelastography (TEG) and rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM), was superior to standard plasma based tests, including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) at detecting burn-related coagulopathies.
CONCLUSIONS
Routine laboratory markers such as PT/APTT are poor indicators of coagulation status in burns patients. Viscoelastic tests, such as TEG and ROTEM, are efficient, fast and have a potential use in the management of burn patients; however, strong evidence is lacking. This review highlights the need for more randomised controlled trials, to guide future practice.
PubMed: 29799542
DOI: 10.1177/2059513117728201 -
Thrombosis Research Feb 2015Thrombophilia is reported to be a candidate etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). No conclusive results on the association between prothrombin G20210A mutation and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Thrombophilia is reported to be a candidate etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). No conclusive results on the association between prothrombin G20210A mutation and RPL have been reported.
METHODS
We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 case-control studies using a comprehensive electronic search on papers published by May 2014. We studied 5400 cases and 4640 controls to investigate the potential association between G20210A and RPL. In this review, we define RPL as more than 2 miscarriages.
RESULTS
A significant association was found between G20210A and RPL, with a combined odds ratio (OR) of 1.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-2.60). However, the risks differed in the subgroup analyses, categorized by study sites, maternal age, and type of miscarriages. The pooled OR remained significant in European studies (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.35-2.41), whereas in the Middle-Eastern studies, it was not significant (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 0.96-5.92). The risk of RPL was significantly higher in women older than 29 years (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.61-6.11), and a positive relationship was only observed between prothrombin G20210A mutation and fetal loss, but not embryonic loss. There was no evidence of publication bias in any of the analyses. The sensitivity analyses showed that the findings were quite stable.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis suggests that the G20210A prothrombin mutation increases the risk of RPL (fetal loss, primary RPL, or secondary RPL), particularly in Europeans and women older than 29 years. We recommend further screening in more specific groups among women.
Topics: Abortion, Habitual; Adult; Female; Humans; Mutation; Pregnancy; Prothrombin; Thrombophilia
PubMed: 25528068
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.12.001 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2020The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection has been predominantly linked to respiratory distress syndrome, but... (Review)
Review
The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection has been predominantly linked to respiratory distress syndrome, but gastrointestinal symptoms and hepatic injury have also been reported. The mechanism of liver injury is poorly understood and may result as a consequence of viral hepatitis, systemic inflammatory response, gut barrier and microbiome alterations, intensive care treatment or drug toxicity. The incidence of hepatopathy among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear, but studies have reported liver injury in patients with SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). We aimed to systematically review data on the prevalence of hepatic impairments and their clinical course in SARS and MERS infections. A systematic literature search (PubMed/Embase/Cinahl/Web of Science) according to preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA) was conducted from database inception until 17/03/2020 for studies that evaluated the incidence of hepatic abnormalities in SARS CoV-1, SARS CoV-2 and MERS infected patients with reported liver-related parameters. A total of forty-three studies were included. Liver anomalies were predominantly mild to moderately elevated transaminases, hypoalbuminemia and prolongation of prothrombin time. Histopathology varied between non-specific inflammation, mild steatosis, congestion and massive necrosis. More studies to elucidate the mechanism and importance of liver injury on the clinical course and prognosis in patients with novel SARS-CoV-2 infection are warranted.
PubMed: 32403255
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051420 -
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Dec 2017Intraosseous (IO) access is an established route of administration in resuscitation situations. Patients with serious poisoning presenting to the emergency department... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Intraosseous (IO) access is an established route of administration in resuscitation situations. Patients with serious poisoning presenting to the emergency department may require urgent antidote therapy. However, intravenous (IV) access is not always readily available.
OBJECTIVE
This study reviews the current evidence for IO administration of antidotes that could be used in poisoning. The primary outcome was mortality as a surrogate of efficacy. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic variables, electrocardiographic variables, neurological status, pharmacokinetics outcomes, and adverse effects as defined by each article.
METHODS
A medical librarian created a systematic search strategy for Medline, subsequently translated to Embase, BIOSIS, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), and the CENTRAL clinical trial register, all of which we searched from inception to 30 June 2016. Interventions included IO administration of selected antidotes. Articles included volunteer studies, poisoning, or other resuscitation contexts such as cardiac arrest, burns, dehydration, seizure, hemorrhagic shock, or undifferentiated shock. We considered all human studies and animal experiments to the exception of in vitro studies. Two reviewers independently selected studies, and a third adjudicated in case of disagreement. Three reviewers extracted all relevant data. Three reviewers evaluated the risk of bias and quality of the articles using specific scales according to each type of study design.
RESULTS
A total of 47 publications (46 articles and one abstract) met our inclusion criteria and described IO administration of 13 different antidotes. These included one case series and 21 case reports describing 26 patients, and 25 animal experiments. Of those, seven human case reports and four animal experiments specifically reported the use of antidotes in poisoning. Human case reports suggested favorable outcomes with IO use of atropine, diazepam, hydroxocobalamin, insulin, lipid emulsion, methylene blue, phentolamine, prothrombin complex concentrate, and sodium bicarbonate. Clinical outcomes varied according to the antidote used. The only reported adverse event was ventricular tachycardia following IO naloxone. Regarding the animal experiments, IO administration of lipid emulsion and of hydroxocobalamin showed improved survival in bupivacaine-poisoned rats and in cyanide-intoxicated swine, respectively. Animal data also suggested an equivalent bio-availability between IO and IV administration for atropine, calcium chloride, dextrose 50%, diazepam, methylene blue, pralidoxime, and sodium bicarbonate. Adverse effect reporting of fat emboli after IO administration of sodium bicarbonate, for example, was conflicting due to the significant heterogeneity in the timing of lung examination across studies.
CONCLUSION
The evidence supporting the use of IO route for the administration of antidotes in a context of poisoning is scarce. The majority of the evidence consists of case reports and animal experiments. Common antidotes such as acetylcysteine, fomepizole, and digoxin-specific antibody fragments have not been studied or reported with the use of the IO route. Despite the low-quality evidence available, IO access is a potential option for antidotal treatments in toxicological resuscitation when IV access is unavailable.
Topics: Animals; Antidotes; Humans; Infusions, Intraosseous; Poisoning; Resuscitation
PubMed: 28644688
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1337122 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Coagulation parameters are important determinants for COVID-19 infection. We conducted meta-analysis to assess the association between early hemostatic parameters and...
INTRODUCTION
Coagulation parameters are important determinants for COVID-19 infection. We conducted meta-analysis to assess the association between early hemostatic parameters and infection severity.
METHODS
Electronic search was made for papers that addressed clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients and disease severity. Results were filtered using exclusion and inclusion criteria and then pooled into a meta-analysis to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for D-dimers, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, platelet count (PLT), activated partial thromboplastin time. To explore the heterogeneity and robustness of our fundings, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Publication bias was assessed with contour-enhanced funnel plots and Egger's test by linear regression. Coagulation parameters data from retrospective cohort study of 451 patients with COVID-19 at National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery were included in meta-analysis of published studies.
RESULTS
Overall, 41 original studies (17,601 patients) on SARS-CoV-2 were included. For the two groups of patients, stratified by severity, we identified that D-dimers, fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time were significantly higher in the severe group [SMD 0.6985 with 95%CI (0.5155; 0.8815); SMD 0.661 with 95%CI (0.3387; 0.9833); SMD 0.2683 with 95%CI (0.1357; 0.4009); SMD 0.284 with 95%CI (0.1472; 0.4208)]. In contrast, PLT was significantly lower in patients with more severe cases of COVID-19 [SMD -0.1684 with 95%CI (-0.2826; -0.0542)]. Neither the analysis by the leave-one-out method nor the influence diagnostic have identified studies that solely cause significant change in the effect size estimates. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between articles originated from different countries but revealed that severity assessment criteria might have influence over estimated effect sizes for platelets and D-dimers. Contour-enhanced funnel plots and the Egger's test for D-dimers and fibrinogen revealed significant asymmetry that might be a sign of publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The hemostatic laboratory parameters, with exception of platelets, are significantly elevated in patients with severe COVID-19. The two variables with strongest association to disease severity were D-dimers and fibrinogen levels. Future research should aim outside conventional coagulation tests and include analysis of clotting formation and platelet/platelet progenitors characteristics.
PubMed: 35360017
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.794092 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jul 2023The measurement and identification of plasma biomarkers can support the estimation of risk and diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with the use of a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The measurement and identification of plasma biomarkers can support the estimation of risk and diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with the use of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the association between the levels of potential biomarkers that reflect the activation of the blood system, long-term vascular complications, inflammatory system, and the occurrence of PICC-related DVT.
METHODS
Seven electronic databases (Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, Cinahl, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ERIC) were searched to identify literature published until December 2022. Studies were required to report: (I) adult and pediatric patients, outpatient or admitted to clinical, surgical, or ICU with PICC; (II) patients with PICC-related DVT and patients without PICC-related DVT as a comparator; and (III) at least one biomarker available. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Study precision was evaluated by using a funnel plot for platelets level. We provided a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis of the findings on the biomarkers' outcomes of the studies. We pooled the results using random effects meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v5.4. This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018108871).
RESULTS
Of the 3564 studies identified (after duplication removal), 28 were included. PICC-related DVT was associated with higher D-dimers (0.37 μg/mL, 95% CI 0.02, 0.72; = 0.04, I = 92%; for heterogeneity < 0.00001) and with higher platelets (8.76 × 10/L, 95% CI 1.62, 15.91; = 0.02, I = 41%; for heterogeneity = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS
High levels of D-dimer and platelet were associated with DVT in patients with PICC. However, biomarkers such as APTT, fibrinogen, FDP, glucose, hemoglobin, glycated hemoglobin, INR, prothrombin time, prothrombin fragment 1.2, the thrombin-antithrombin complex, and WBC were not related to the development of DVT associated with PICC.
PubMed: 37445515
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134480 -
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2019Cephalosporins that contain the N-methylthiotetrazole side chain (NMTT-cephalosporin) have been reported to be associated with coagulation-related adverse events;... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Cephalosporins that contain the N-methylthiotetrazole side chain (NMTT-cephalosporin) have been reported to be associated with coagulation-related adverse events; however, a comprehensive evaluation regarding the association is lacking. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the safety profile of NMTT-cephalosporins with respect to hypoprothrombinemia and bleeding. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and RISS databases were systematically searched for clinical studies up to October 2018. The association between NMTT-cephalosporins and hypoprothrombinemia was estimated using an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 15 studies on cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and moxalactam were identified and included in the meta-analysis. Hypoprothrombinemia (OR 1.676, 95% CI 1.275-2.203) and prothrombin time (PT) prolongation (OR 2.050, 95% CI 1.398-3.005) were significantly associated with NMTT-cephalosporins, whereas bleeding was not (OR 1.359, 95% CI 0.920-2.009). Subgroup analyses revealed that cefoperazone (OR 2.506, 95% CI 1.293-4.860), cefamandole (OR 3.247, 95% CI 1.083-9.733), and moxalactam (OR 3.367, 95% CI 1.725-6.572) were significantly associated with hypoprothrombinemia. An Antimicrobial Stewardship Program led by a multidisciplinary team could play a critical role in monitoring cephalosporin-related hypoprothrombinemia or PT prolongation in patients with underlying clinical conditions at risk for bleeding. The multidisciplinary team could also assist in communicating the potential safety concerns regarding NMTT-cephalosporin use with healthcare professionals to decrease the risk of adverse events.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Humans; Hypoprothrombinemias; Male
PubMed: 31623191
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203937 -
Transfusion Jul 2017Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective and safe for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic phenomena. However, managing DOACs during bleeding emergencies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective and safe for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic phenomena. However, managing DOACs during bleeding emergencies is challenging. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on studies addressing efficacy and safety of the drugs used for reversal of DOACs.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to September 2016. Studies that examined clinical and laboratory effects of drugs used to reverse DOACs were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane Collaboration tool. Primary and secondary outcomes assessed were reversal of clinical bleeding, clotting assays, and safety, respectively. Overall effect estimates were pooled, and clinical and statistical heterogeneity were assessed. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects model.
RESULTS
Four cohort studies in bleeding patients (n = 230) and eight randomized controlled trials in healthy volunteers (n = 381) were included, both with moderate risk of bias. Reversal of clotting assays in healthy volunteers was frequently reported, demonstrating that prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) reversed prothrombin time (PT) and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) substantially. For PT, pooled mean difference was 1.68 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.33 to 3.70 sec; p < 0.01; I = 97%). For ETP, pooled mean difference was 2.16 seconds (95% CI, 0.57 to 3.75 sec; p < 0.01; I = 98%). Andexanet alfa and idarucizumab both reverse clotting assays. No important safety concerns were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Clotting assays are partially reversed by PCC in healthy volunteers. Idarucizumab and andexanet alfa have solid laboratory reversal effect and potential to be clinically efficacious and safe. However, clinical evidence is still lacking for all agents.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Female; Humans; Male; Prothrombin Time; Thrombin
PubMed: 28337750
DOI: 10.1111/trf.14096 -
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and... Aug 2023Various inherited traits contribute to the overall risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In addition, the epidemiology of thrombophilia in the East-Asian VTE population...
BACKGROUND
Various inherited traits contribute to the overall risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In addition, the epidemiology of thrombophilia in the East-Asian VTE population remains unclear; thus, we aimed to assess the proportion of hereditary thrombophilia via a meta-analysis.
METHODS
Publications from PubMed, EMBASE, web of science, and Cochrane before December 30, 2022, were searched. Studies from Japan, Korea, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar, and Cambodia were included. Congenital thrombophilia was described as diseases including protein C (PC) deficiency, protein S (PS) deficiency, antithrombin (AT) deficiency, factor (F)V Leiden (FVL), and prothrombin G20210A mutations. Studies were selected by 2 reviewers for methodological quality analysis. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis, assuming that estimated effects in the different studies are not identical.
RESULTS
Forty-four studies involving 6453 patients from 7 counties/regions were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of PC, PS, and AT deficiencies were 7.1%, 8.3%, and 3.8%, respectively. Among 2924 patients from 22 studies, 5 patients were carriers of FVL mutation. Among 2196 patients from 10 studies, 2 patients were carriers of prothrombin G20210A mutation in a Thailand study.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of PC, PS, and AT deficiencies was relatively high, while a much lower prevalence of FVL and prothrombin G20210A mutations were identified in East-Asian patients with VTE. Our data stress the relative higher prevalence of PC, PS, and AT deficiencies for thrombophilia in the East-Asian VTE population.
PubMed: 37674867
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102157 -
PloS One 2016To compare the prevalence of prothrombin G20210A in patients with objectively confirmed cerebral vein or cortical vein thrombosis against healthy controls, and evaluate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To compare the prevalence of prothrombin G20210A in patients with objectively confirmed cerebral vein or cortical vein thrombosis against healthy controls, and evaluate geographical variations.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of case control studies.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE. The main outcome was the prevalence of prothrombin G20210A in patients with objectively confirmed cerebral vein or cortical vein thrombosis; we also analyzed individual country variations in the prevalence. The random-effects model OR was used as the primary outcome measure.
RESULTS
In total 19 studies evaluated 868 cases of cerebral venous thrombosis and 3981 controls. Prothrombin G20210A was found in 103/868 of the patients with cerebral venous thrombosis and 105/3999 of the healthy controls [random effects pooled OR 5.838, 95% CI 3.96 to 8.58; I217.9%]. The prevalence of prothrombin G20210A was significantly elevated in Italian studies (OR 9.69), in Brazilian studies (OR 7.02), and in German studies (OR 3.77), but not in Iranian studies (OR 0.98).
CONCLUSION
Prothrombin G20210A is significantly associated with cerebral venous thrombosis when compared to healthy controls, although this association is highly dependent on the country of origin.
Topics: Brazil; Case-Control Studies; Cerebral Veins; Gene Frequency; Germany; Humans; Iran; Italy; Linkage Disequilibrium; Odds Ratio; Point Mutation; Prevalence; Prothrombin; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 27031503
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151607