-
BMJ Open Dec 2021This study aimed to assess the accuracy of CT texture analysis (CTTA) for differentiating low-grade and high-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to assess the accuracy of CT texture analysis (CTTA) for differentiating low-grade and high-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, OVID Medline, Science Direct and Springer were searched to identify the included studies.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR INCLUDING STUDIES
Clinical studies that report about the accuracy of CTTA in differentiating low-grade and high-grade RCC.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched to identify studies from their inception to 20 October 2021. Two radiologists independently extracted data from the primary studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic OR (DOR) were calculated to assess CTTA performance. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of CTTA in grading RCC.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 11 studies, with 1603 lesions observed in 1601 patients. Values of the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR were 0.79 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.84), 0.84 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.87), 5.1 (95% CI 4.0 to 6.4), 0.24 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.32) and 21 (95% CI 13 to 33), respectively. The SROC curve showed that the AUC was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.90). Deeks' test found no significant publication bias among the studies (p=0.42).
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that CTTA has a high accuracy in differentiating low-grade and high-grade RCC. A standardised methodology and large sample-based study are necessary to certain the diagnostic accuracy of CTTA in RCC grading for clinical decision making.
Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 34937716
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051470 -
International Journal of Radiation... 2022Brain development during embryogenesis and in early postnatal life is particularly complex and involves the interplay of many cellular processes and molecular...
BACKGROUND
Brain development during embryogenesis and in early postnatal life is particularly complex and involves the interplay of many cellular processes and molecular mechanisms, making it extremely vulnerable to exogenous insults, including ionizing radiation (IR). Microcephaly is one of the most frequent neurodevelopmental abnormalities that is characterized by small brain size, and is often associated with intellectual deficiency. Decades of research span from epidemiological data on exposure of the A-bomb survivors, to studies on animal and cellular models that allowed deciphering the most prominent molecular mechanisms leading to microcephaly. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is used to organize, evaluate and portray the scientific knowledge of toxicological effects spanning different biological levels of organizations, from the initial interaction with molecular targets to the occurrence of a disease or adversity. In the present study, the framework was used in an attempt to organize the current scientific knowledge on microcephaly progression in the context of ionizing radiation (IR) exposure. This work was performed by a group of experts formed during a recent workshop organized jointly by the Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative (MELODI) and the European Radioecology Alliance (ALLIANCE) associations to present the AOP approach and tools. Here we report on the development of a putative AOP for congenital microcephaly resulting from IR exposure based on discussions of the working group and we emphasize the use of a novel machine-learning approach to assist in the screening of the available literature to develop AOPs.
CONCLUSION
The expert consultation led to the identification of crucial biological events for the progression of microcephaly upon exposure to IR, and highlighted current knowledge gaps. The machine learning approach was successfully used to screen the existing knowledge and helped to rapidly screen the body of evidence and in particular the epidemiological data. This systematic review approach also ensured that the analysis was sufficiently comprehensive to identify the most relevant data and facilitate rapid and consistent AOP development. We anticipate that as machine learning approaches become more user-friendly through easy-to-use web interface, this would allow AOP development to become more efficient and less time consuming.
Topics: Animals; Adverse Outcome Pathways; Microcephaly; Risk Assessment; Machine Learning; Referral and Consultation
PubMed: 35947014
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2110312 -
Pharmacological Research Nov 2021A variety of systemic chemotherapy regimens have been used for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, most guidelines have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A variety of systemic chemotherapy regimens have been used for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, most guidelines have been derived from a single clinical trial, and no studies have comprehensively compared their efficacy and safety. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Eligible studies reported overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and ≥ 3 adverse events rate (AEs). Eighteen eligible trials involving 4930 patients and 15 treatment regimens were included. The results suggest that patients with R/M HNSCC exhibit better tumor response with the cetuximab/platinum/5-FU, pembrolizumab/platinum/5-FU or pembrolizumab alone, accompanied by a low AE rate. Nivolumab also showed better efficacy than other single agents. Immunotherapy has achieved better efficacy.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34474103
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105866 -
Tumour Biology : the Journal of the... Jun 2016Twist1 (also known as Twist) is a transcription factor that belongs to the family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. It functions as a negative regulator of... (Review)
Review
Twist1 (also known as Twist) is a transcription factor that belongs to the family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. It functions as a negative regulator of epithelial gene expression and a positive regulator of mesenchymal gene expression, thereby leading to induction of the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process in which epithelial cells acquire the motile and migratory characteristics of mesenchymal cells. In addition to regulating the expression of protein-coding genes, Twist1 regulates the expression of microRNAs (miRNAs), adding a regulatory layer to EMT induction. Interestingly, the mRNA of Twist1 represents a downstream target of miRNAs, indicating an intricate network between miRNAs and Twist1. This network was shown to play multiple roles in cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. The network can induce angiogenesis, protect cells from oncogene-induced apoptosis and senescence, enhance cancer cell resistance to conventional therapies, and increase cancer stem cell (CSC) populations. Recently, miRNAs have attracted considerable attention as potential promising tools in cancer therapies. Thus, this systematic review was conducted to clarify the reciprocal link between Twist1 and miRNAs in order to provide potential candidate miRNAs for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in cancer treatment.
Topics: Animals; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; MicroRNAs; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasms; Nuclear Proteins; Twist-Related Protein 1
PubMed: 26880587
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-4960-y -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) account for the most cases of HNC. Past smoking...
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) account for the most cases of HNC. Past smoking and alcohol consumption are common risk factors of HNSCC; however, an increasing number of cases associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection have been reported in recent years. The treatment of HNSCC is integrated and multimodal including traditional surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Since pembrolizumab was approved in 2016, an increasing number of studies have focused on immunotherapy. However, not all of HNSCC patients have a better outcome on immunotherapy. Immunotherapy has been reported to be more effective in HPV-positive patients, but its molecular mechanism is still unclear. Some researchers have proposed that the high proportion of infiltrating immune cells in HPV-positive tumors and the difference in immune checkpoint expression level may be the reasons for their better response. As a result, a series of individualized immunotherapy trials have also been conducted in HPV-positive patients. This paper summarizes the current status of HNSCC immunotherapy, individualized immunotherapy in HPV-positive patients, and immune differences in HPV-positive tumors to provide new insights into HNSCC immunotherapy and try to identify patients who may benefit from immunotherapy.
Topics: Alphapapillomavirus; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Papillomavirus Infections; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
PubMed: 34305889
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.652054 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2019Cancer patients who have undergone radiotherapy may have an increased risk of subsequent stroke. A clear and detailed understanding of this risk has not been...
Cancer patients who have undergone radiotherapy may have an increased risk of subsequent stroke. A clear and detailed understanding of this risk has not been established. A search for research articles published from January 1990 to November 2017 in the English language was conducted. Subsequent stroke risk in cancer survivors was compared using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to whether or not radiotherapy was given. A total of 12 eligible studies were identified including 57,881 total patients. All studies were retrospective, as no prospective studies were identified. The meta-analysis revealed a higher overall risk of subsequent stroke in cancer survivors/patients given radiotherapy compared to those not given radiotherapy (RR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.45, 3.16). In addition, compared to patients not given radiotherapy, there was an increased risk of subsequent stroke for radiotherapy treated patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR: 2.81, 95% CI: 0.69, 4.93) or head/neck/brain/nasopharyngeal cancer (RR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.16), for patients younger than 40 years (RR: 3.53, 95% CI: 2.51, 4.97) or aged 40-49 years (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.45) and for patients treated in Asia (RR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.48, 2.29), the United States (RR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.23), or in Europe (RR: 4.11, 95% CI 2.62, 6.45). The available literature indicates an approximate overall doubling of the subsequent stroke risk in cancer patients given radiotherapy. The elevated risk was generally statistically significant according to cancer type, baseline patient age and region or country where treatment was given. Caution is required in interpreting these findings due to the heterogeneity of populations represented and lack of standardization and completeness across published studies. Further, if real, we cannot conclude the extent to which patient, treatment and/or investigational factors are responsible for this apparent elevated risk. An objective and more detailed understanding of the risks of radiotherapy, and how to prevent them, is urgently required. It is the responsibility of all who provide cancer services to ensure that the experience of all their patients is documented and analyzed using quality registries.
PubMed: 30930843
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00233 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2020Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of IHC- p16INK4a...
Feasibility of Immunohistochemical p16 Staining in the Diagnosis of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of IHC- p16INK4a (p16) as an alternative modality for diagnosing HPV infection. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of IHC-p16 staining. A total of 30 studies involving 2,963 patients were included from 2007 to 2019. The combined sensitivity was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95); specificity, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89-0.91); positive likelihood ratio (LR), 6.80 (95% CI: 5.63-8.21); negative LR, 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07-0.16); diagnostic odds ratio, 85.98 (95% CI: 55.57-133.03); and area under the curve value, 0.9550. Subgroup analysis showed that the IHC-p16 test was more consistent with the hybridization (ISH) test and has greater diagnostic value for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The diagnostic efficacy of IHC-p16 varied among countries. In conclusion, IHC-p16 has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HPV infection in HNSCC. The consistency of IHC-p16 findings with those of ISH indicate that their combination can be used to improve the specificity of diagnosis.
PubMed: 33324540
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.524928 -
International Journal of Radiation... 2022The concept of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) has recently gained significant attention as to its potential for incorporation of mechanistic biological information...
PURPOSE
The concept of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) has recently gained significant attention as to its potential for incorporation of mechanistic biological information into the assessment of adverse health outcomes following ionizing radiation (IR) exposure. This work is an account of the activities of an international expert group formed specifically to develop an AOP for IR-induced leukemia. Group discussions were held during dedicated sessions at the international AOP workshop jointly organized by the MELODI (Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative) and the ALLIANCE (European Radioecology Alliance) associations to consolidate knowledge into a number of biological key events causally linked by key event relationships and connecting a molecular initiating event with the adverse outcome. Further knowledge review to generate a weight of evidence support for the Key Event Relationships (KERs) was undertaken using a systematic review approach.
CONCLUSIONS
An AOP for IR-induced acute myeloid leukemia was proposed and submitted for review to the OECD-curated AOP-wiki (aopwiki.org). The systematic review identified over 500 studies that link IR, as a stressor, to leukemia, as an adverse outcome. Knowledge gap identification, although requiring a substantial effort via systematic review of literature, appears to be one of the major added values of the AOP concept. Further work, both within this leukemia AOP working group and other similar working groups, is warranted and is anticipated to produce highly demanded products for the radiation protection research community.
Topics: Humans; Adverse Outcome Pathways; Leukemia, Radiation-Induced; Radiation Protection
PubMed: 36040845
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2117873 -
Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt... 2021Since protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is abnormally expressed in various tumors, in this study we aim to assess the association between PRMT5 and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Since protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is abnormally expressed in various tumors, in this study we aim to assess the association between PRMT5 and clinicopathological and prognostic features.
METHODS
Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched until July 25, 2021. The critical appraisal of the eligible studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated to assess the effect. Engauge Digitizer version 12.1, STATA version 15.1, and R version 4.0.5 were used to obtain and analysis the data.
RESULTS
A total of 32 original studies covering 15,583 patients were included. In our data, it indicated that high level of PRMT5 was significantly correlated with advanced tumor stage (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.22-3.70, =.008; = 80.7%) and positively correlated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.46-1.73, < .001; = 50%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.88, < .001; = 0%). In addition, sub-group analysis showed that high level of PRMT5 was associated with poor overall survival for such 5 kinds of cancers as hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer.
CONCLUSION
For the first time we found PRMT5 was pan-cancerous as a prognostic biomarker and high level of PRMT5 was associated with poor prognosis for certain cancers.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasms; Protein-Arginine N-Methyltransferases; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 34758643
DOI: 10.1177/10732748211050583 -
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Apr 2022The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) capture tumor heterogeneity at the gene-expression level. Currently, a restricted number of molecular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) capture tumor heterogeneity at the gene-expression level. Currently, a restricted number of molecular features are used to guide treatment for CRC. We summarize the evidence on the clinical value of the CMSs.
METHODS
We systematically identified studies in Medline and Embase that evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of CMSs in CRC patients. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed on prognostic data. Predictive data were summarized.
RESULTS
In local disease, CMS4 tumors were associated with worse overall survival (OS) compared with CMS1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.27 to 8.47) and CMS2 cancers (HR = 2.60, 95% confidence interval = 1.93 to 3.50). In metastatic disease, CMS1 consistently had worse survival than CMS2-4 (OS HR range = 0.33-0.55; progression-free survival HR range = 0.53-0.89). Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III CRC was most beneficial for OS in CMS2 and CMS3 (HR range = 0.16-0.45) and not effective in CMS4 tumors. In metastatic CMS4 cancers, an irinotecan-based regimen improved outcome compared with oxaliplatin (HR range = 0.31-0.72). The addition of bevacizumab seemed beneficial in CMS1, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy improved outcome for KRAS wild-type CMS2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The CMS classification holds clear potential for clinical use in predicting both prognosis and response to systemic therapy, which seems to be independent of the classifier used. Prospective studies are warranted to support implementation of the CMS taxonomy in clinical practice.
Topics: Bevacizumab; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Oxaliplatin; Prognosis
PubMed: 34077519
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab106