-
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... May 2020Osteoarthritis (OA) is a growing health concern that affects approximately 27 million people in the USA and is associated with a $185 billion annual cost burden.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a growing health concern that affects approximately 27 million people in the USA and is associated with a $185 billion annual cost burden. Choosing between open surgery and arthroscopic arthrodesis for ankle arthritis is still controversial. This study compared arthroscopic arthrodesis and open surgery by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
For the systematic review, a literature search was conducted in 4 English databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Library) from inception to February 2020. Three prospective cohort studies and 7 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 507 patients with ankle arthritis, were included.
RESULTS
For fusion rate, the pooled data showed a significantly higher rate of fusion during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (odds ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57, p = 0.0010). Regarding estimated blood loss, the pooled data showed significantly less blood loss during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 52.04, 95% CI 14.14 to 89.94, p = 0.007). For tourniquet time, the pooled data showed a shorter tourniquet time during arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 22.68, 95% CI 1.92 to 43.43, p = 0.03). For length of hospital stay, the pooled data showed less hospitalisation time for patients undergoing arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery (WMD 1.62, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.26, p < 0.00001). The pooled data showed better recovery for the patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrodesis compared with open surgery at 1 year (WMD 14.73, 95% CI 6.66 to 22.80, p = 0.0003).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, arthroscopic arthrodesis was associated with a higher fusion rate, smaller estimated blood loss, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of hospitalisation than open surgery.
Topics: Ankle Joint; Arthrodesis; Arthroscopy; Humans; Length of Stay; Osteoarthritis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 32448398
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01708-4 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery, European... Mar 2022A retrospective study compared outcomes of total wrist arthrodesis as a salvage for total wrist arthroplasty versus primary total wrist arthrodesis. Seventy-one wrists...
A retrospective study compared outcomes of total wrist arthrodesis as a salvage for total wrist arthroplasty versus primary total wrist arthrodesis. Seventy-one wrists were reviewed after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Thirty-two wrists with failed total wrist arthroplasty were converted to a wrist arthrodesis and 39 wrists received a primary wrist arthrodesis. Seven converted wrist arthrodeses and five primary arthrodeses failed to fuse. Mean patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation scores and work-related questionnaire for upper extremity disorders scores were 43 and 39 for converted total wrist arthrodesis and 38 and 33 for the primary total wrist arthrodesis. Overall, there were 25 complications in 15 patients in the converted wrist arthrodesis group and 21 complications in 16 patients after a primary wrist arthrodesis. The results between the two groups were slightly in favour of patients with a primary wrist arthrodesis. Therefore, we conclude that the timing, primary or conversion, of total wrist arthrodesis could influence patient outcomes. III.
Topics: Arthrodesis; Arthroplasty, Replacement; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Wrist; Wrist Joint
PubMed: 34796775
DOI: 10.1177/17531934211057389 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Jul 2024First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is a commonly utilised procedure. In this study, the authors aim to explore functional outcomes of patients undergoing...
BACKGROUND
First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is a commonly utilised procedure. In this study, the authors aim to explore functional outcomes of patients undergoing nonsynchronous bilateral first MTPJ arthrodesis under the care of a single surgeon using a compression screw/locking plate construct.
METHODS
This is a prospectively collected, retrospectively analysed case series of fifty five patients who underwent bilateral nonsynchronous first MTPJ arthrodesis. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum of two years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the Sports Questionnaire version 1 (SQ). Postoperative radiographs were used to assess evidence of union and compare both hallux valgus and intermetatarsal angles. Removal of hardware, revision surgery and correction of deformities were also recorded.
RESULTS
Fifty five patients were included in the study. There was statistically significant improvements in all five facets of the FAOS (p value < 0.05). The mean postoperative SEFAS was 45.1. In total, patients participated in thirteen different sporting activities. This represented 92 patient specific activities preoperatively and 104 postoperatively. The most common activities were walking, cycling and swimming. Overall, 94.5% (N = 52) of the cohort were satisfied with their return to sport while 98.2% (N = 54) would recommend bilateral first MTPJ arthrodesis. Mean reductions in hallux valgus angles and intermetatarsal angles were noted at 18.87 and 4.69 degrees respectively. There was one non-union in the cohort which required revision surgery. One patient required removal of hardware.
CONCLUSIONS
Bilateral first MTPJ arthrodesis is a safe and effective surgical option for patients with bilateral first MTPJ pathology. It has a high union rate, low complication rate and significantly improves clinical outcomes and allows patients reliably return to physical activities.
Topics: Humans; Arthrodesis; Metatarsophalangeal Joint; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Hallux Valgus; Adult; Aged; Treatment Outcome; Radiography; Bone Screws; Bone Plates
PubMed: 38458912
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.02.014 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Dec 2022Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is increasingly used as a treatment for end-stage ankle arthropathy. However, TAA may be more sensitive to complications, failure and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is increasingly used as a treatment for end-stage ankle arthropathy. However, TAA may be more sensitive to complications, failure and subsequent re-operations compared to ankle arthrodesis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to generate an overview of complications of TAA surgery.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched between 2000 and 2020 to identify all papers reporting on complications in TAA surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted based on type of complication in TAA surgery. Pooled estimates of complications were calculated using a random effects model. Risk of bias and quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in estimates was rated and described according to the recommendations of the GRADE working group.
RESULTS
One hundred twenty-seven studies were included in this systematic review. All combined, they reported on 16.964 TAAs with an average follow-up of 47.99 ± 29.18 months. Complications with highest reported pooled incidence were intra-operative fracture 0.06 (95 %CI 0.04-0.08) (GRADE Very low) and impingement 0.06 (95 %CI 0.04-0.08) (GRADE low) respectively.
CONCLUSION
Reported complication incidence of TAA surgery is still high and remains a significant clinical problem that can be severely hampering long-term clinical survival of the prosthesis. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis can help guide surgeons in informing their patient about complication risks. Implementation of more stringent patient selection criteria might contribute to diminishing TAA complication rates.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle; Arthrodesis; Ankle Joint; Reoperation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35872118
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.07.004 -
Foot and Ankle Clinics Dec 2023The cavovarus foot is a complex deformity that can be treated using multiple surgical procedures, ranging from soft tissue surgery to triple arthrodesis. Among these... (Review)
Review
The cavovarus foot is a complex deformity that can be treated using multiple surgical procedures, ranging from soft tissue surgery to triple arthrodesis. Among these options, anterior midfoot tarsectomy is a three-dimensional closed-wedge osteotomy, traditionally performed slowly and progressively in a blind fashion, and remaining a challenge for unexperimented surgeons with variable outcomes. As such, we investigated and discussed the use of patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) in computer-assisted anterior midfoot tarsectomy in terms of accuracy, reproducibility, and safety.
Topics: Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Foot; Arthrodesis; Osteotomy
PubMed: 37863535
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2023.05.003 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Feb 2017"Lisfranc joint injury" is comprised of a tarsometatarsal joint-complex injury. The Lisfranc complex injury is always a challenge for orthopedists, and the optimum... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
"Lisfranc joint injury" is comprised of a tarsometatarsal joint-complex injury. The Lisfranc complex injury is always a challenge for orthopedists, and the optimum treatment is still up for debate. Anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation prove to have no satisfactory outcomes. This research aims to compare the clinical curative effects, complications and radiographic features of arthrodesis and non-fusion of the Lisfranc joint in the follow-up of the patients who suffered Lisfranc injuries.
METHODS
A comparative retrospective study of 25 patients with acute or subacute Lisfranc complex injuries was conducted between September 2013 and March 2015 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. All patients were classified by Myerson classification. Eight patients were treated with arthrodesis, while 17 patients received non-fusion operations. The clinical curative effects, complications and image differences were compared between the two groups. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score were evaluated for each patient during the follow-up. All statistics were analyzed using the SPSS software system.
RESULTS
All fractures healed for both the arthrodesis group and the non-fusion group. Patients in the arthrodesis group had a higher AOFAS score compared with patients in the non-fusion group (94.00 vs. 88.58, P = 0.034). Complications occurred in eight patients (8/17, 47%) in the non-arthrodesis group, including the second and third phalanx abduction (1), talipes cavus (2), eversion deformity of front foot (3), eversion deformity of calcaneus (1), as well as postoperative infection (1). Only two patients (2/8, 25%) in the arthrodesis group suffered complications. One was a limitation of motion of the front foot and pain during walking; the other was an eversion deformity of front foot.
CONCLUSION
Primary arthrodesis has advantages compared to primary open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF): reduced foot deformity rates, sustained biomechanical morphology of the feet, reduced complications, higher level of function recovery, shorter time of surgical procedures, fewer complications, higher AOFAS score and fewer frequency of complications. According to our research, primary arthrodesis may be a better choice for treating Lisfranc injury.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Arthrodesis; Female; Foot Joints; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fracture Healing; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Care; Radiography; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Young Adult
PubMed: 28276650
DOI: 10.1111/os.12316 -
Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and... Jul 2018Hindfoot arthrodesis is a frequently performed procedure by foot and ankle surgeons. The relatively high nonunion rate associated with these procedures has led surgeons... (Review)
Review
Hindfoot arthrodesis is a frequently performed procedure by foot and ankle surgeons. The relatively high nonunion rate associated with these procedures has led surgeons to use adjunctive bone graft to help augment osseous union. Cellular bone allografts are a specific type of graft that incorporates osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties while also eliminating the common disadvantages of autografts and traditional allografts. This article discusses the role of cellular bone allografts in hindfoot arthrodesis procedures, a review of current literature, and a comparison of available products.
Topics: Arthrodesis; Bone Transplantation; Cryopreservation; Foot Joints; Humans
PubMed: 29861013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2018.02.002 -
Foot and Ankle Clinics Mar 2024No differences have been found between total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) with respect to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), although both... (Review)
Review
No differences have been found between total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and ankle arthrodesis (AA) with respect to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), although both interventions were shown to improve PROMs with respect to the preoperative situation. That is, both interventions (AA and TAA) were effective in improving preoperative symptoms. On the other hand, 2-year complication rates were higher after AA (27%) than after TAA (16%); however, infection rates were similar (4%). The published revision rate after AA is 16% versus 11% after TAA. In short, TAA and AA appear to offer the same PROMs, but TAA has a lower rate of complications (except for infection) and revisions.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Joint; Ankle; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle; Arthrodesis; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38309802
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2023.08.010 -
Foot & Ankle Specialist Feb 2023Nonunion is a postoperative complication after ankle arthrodesis (AA), which leads to increased morbidity and revision rates. Previous studies have identified risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Nonunion is a postoperative complication after ankle arthrodesis (AA), which leads to increased morbidity and revision rates. Previous studies have identified risk factors for nonunion following AA, but no meta-analysis has been performed to stratify risk factors based on strength of evidence.
METHODS
Abstracts and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Relevant data were extracted from the included studies. Random effects meta-analyses were summarized as forest plots of individual study and pooled random effect results.
RESULTS
Database search yielded 13 studies involving 987 patients were included, and 37 potential risk factors for nonunion. Meta-analysis found 5 significant risk factors for nonunion post-AA. Strong evidence supports male gender (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.13-3.41), smoking (OR: 2.89; 95% CI: 1.23-6.76), and history of operative site infection prior to arthrodesis (OR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.13-5.09) as predictors for nonunion following AA. There was moderate evidence supporting history of open injury (OR: 5.95; 95% CI: 2.31-15.38) and limited evidence for preoperative avascular necrosis (OR: 13.16; 95% CI: 2.17-79.61) as possible risk factors for nonunion.
CONCLUSION
The results of our meta-analysis suggest that male gender, smoking, and history of operative site infection have strong evidence and that history of open injury and avascular necrosis also have evidence as risk factors for nonunion. Surgeons should be cognizant of these risks when performing AA and closely follow up with patients with the aforementioned risk factors to ensure postoperative success.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
Level V: Systematic review of cohort and case-control studies.
Topics: Humans; Male; Ankle; Ankle Joint; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Arthrodesis; Necrosis
PubMed: 33660542
DOI: 10.1177/1938640021998493 -
Foot & Ankle Specialist Aug 2017We performed a systematic review of the published literature to characterize patient demographic, surgical techniques, and functional outcomes to elucidate the... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
We performed a systematic review of the published literature to characterize patient demographic, surgical techniques, and functional outcomes to elucidate the complication and revision rates following isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis with anatomically contoured anterior plating.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies in English, after 1990, at least 10 patients, and reporting clinical outcomes following contoured anterior plating and with follow-up of at least 80% and 1 year. Primary outcomes were fusion rate, time to fusion, return to activities, satisfaction, and functional outcome scores. Complication rates, reoperation, and revision were also extracted.
RESULTS
Eight primary studies with 164 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average sample size was 21 ± 10.0 patients and average age was 49.2 years with 61.6% male. Posttraumatic arthritis (49.4%) was the most common operative indication, followed by primary osteoarthrosis (18.9%). The average follow-up was 21.1 months. At this time, 97.6% of patients went on to uneventful union at a weighted average time of 18.7 weeks postoperatively. AOFAS scores improved significantly ( P < .05). 25% complication rate was reported with wound complication (7.9%) and hardware irritation (6.7%) most common. Overall, 21.3% of patients underwent reoperation; 4 for revision arthrodesis following nonunion.
CONCLUSION
Isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis utilizing anatomically contoured anterior plating demonstrates excellent clinical and functional outcomes at short-term follow-up. Overall, 97.6% of patients went on to fusion and functional outcomes consistently improved following surgery. Furthermore, while one-quarter of patients experienced complications, wound complications were relatively uncommon and less than one-quarter of these required surgical intervention.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
Level IV: Systematic Review.
Topics: Ankle Joint; Arthrodesis; Bone Plates; Humans; Osseointegration; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation
PubMed: 28345364
DOI: 10.1177/1938640017700974