-
Future Oncology (London, England) 2015The incidence and mortality from renal cell cancer (RCC) is increasing. RCC tumors are particularly vascular in nature as a result of disruption of the VHL gene and/or... (Review)
Review
The incidence and mortality from renal cell cancer (RCC) is increasing. RCC tumors are particularly vascular in nature as a result of disruption of the VHL gene and/or its upstream pathway leading to upregulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor transcription factor. The hypoxia-inducible factor pathway drives angiogenesis by upregulating VEGF and bFGF, amongst other proangiogenic downstream target genes. Therapies which target angiogenesis have been successful in treating metastatic RCC (mRCC) and the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, pazopanib, is licensed for first line treatment of mRCC. This review details the past, current and future roles of pazopanib in the treatment of mRCC.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 25832874
DOI: 10.2217/fon.14.274 -
Targeted Oncology Aug 2017Pazopanib (Votrient®), an orally administered multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that predominantly inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, -2 and... (Review)
Review
Pazopanib (Votrient®), an orally administered multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that predominantly inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, -2 and -3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α and -β, and the stem cell factor receptor c-Kit, is approved in the EU, the USA and other countries for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In randomized controlled trials in patients with advanced, predominantly clear-cell RCC, pazopanib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in both treatment-naïve and cytokine-pretreated patients and, as a first-line therapy, was noninferior to intermittent sunitinib with respect to PFS. However, pazopanib had a tolerability profile that was distinguishable from that of sunitinib, based on lower incidences of most adverse events, particularly those associated with discomfort, such as fatigue, hand-foot syndrome and stomatitis. Consistent with this, health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) measures evaluating fatigue, hand/foot soreness and mouth/throat soreness significantly favoured pazopanib over sunitinib. In addition, significantly more patients expressed a preference for pazopanib over sunitinib, primarily because of better overall HR-QOL and less fatigue. Efficacy and tolerability findings from these prospective clinical trials have been substantiated by evidence from a number of retrospective studies evaluating unselected real-world patients with metastatic RCC who received pazopanib (or sunitinib) as a first-line therapy. Thus, data from clinical trials supplemented with that from clinical practice support the use of pazopanib as a standard or alternative first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic RCC.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 28664385
DOI: 10.1007/s11523-017-0511-8 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Jan 2016Over the last few years, the most recent advances of the molecular mechanisms involved in renal cell carcinoma have led to the use of new drugs targeting VEGF, such as... (Review)
Review
Over the last few years, the most recent advances of the molecular mechanisms involved in renal cell carcinoma have led to the use of new drugs targeting VEGF, such as bevacizumab plus interferon, sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, and axitinib, or the mTOR, such as temsirolimus and everolimus. The purpose of this review is to analyze the results of Phase III trial with these targeted agents, and on the management of the treatment and, in particular, when to start and to stop therapy and the use of alternative schedule of sunitinib. Recent developments in immunotherapy are also discussed.
Topics: Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Sirolimus; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 26617188
DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.283 -
JAMA Oncology May 2022Angiosarcoma is a rare sarcoma subtype with a poor outcome. Carotuximab plus pazopanib produced a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.8 months in pazopanib-naive... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Angiosarcoma is a rare sarcoma subtype with a poor outcome. Carotuximab plus pazopanib produced a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.8 months in pazopanib-naive patients with chemotherapy-refractory angiosarcoma in a phase 1/2 trial.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether carotuximab plus pazopanib improves PFS compared with pazopanib alone in patients with advanced angiosarcoma.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
The TAPPAS Trial: An Adaptive Enrichment Phase 3 Trial of TRC105 and Pazopanib vs Pazopanib Alone in Patients With Advanced Angiosarcoma was a multinational, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 randomized clinical trial of 123 patients 18 years or older with advanced angiosarcoma that was conducted between February 16, 2017, and April 12, 2019, at 31 sites in the US and the European Union. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib alone or carotuximab plus pazopanib. The trial incorporated an adaptive enrichment design. Inclusion criteria were no more than 2 prior lines of systemic therapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The efficacy analysis used the intent-to-treat population; the safety analysis included all patients who received a dose of either study drug.
EXPOSURES
Oral pazopanib, 800 mg/d, or intravenous carotuximab, 10 mg/kg, administered weekly, plus oral pazopanib, 800 mg/d, with dose modification allowed per patient tolerance or until disease progression.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary end point was PFS, assessed by blinded independent radiographic and cutaneous photographic review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines, version 1.1. Secondary end points included the objective response rate and overall survival. An interim analysis to determine the final sample size was conducted after enrollment of 123 patients. PFS in the group receiving pazopanib alone was compared with PFS in the group receiving carotuximab plus pazopanib using the log rank test.
RESULTS
Of 114 patients with evaluable data (53 in the pazopanib arm and 61 in the carotuximab plus pazopanib arm), 69 (61%) were female and the median age was 68 years (range, 24-82 years); 57 (50%) had cutaneous disease and 32 (28%) had had no prior treatment. The primary end point (PFS) was not reached (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.52-1.84; P = .95), with a median of 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.9 months to not reached) for pazopanib and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.8-8.3 months) for the combination arm. The most common all-grade adverse events in the single-agent pazopanib arm vs the combination arm were fatigue (29 patients [55%] vs 37 [61%]), headache (12 patients [23%] vs 39 [64%]), diarrhea (27 patients [51%] vs 35 [57%]), nausea (26 patients [49%] vs 29 [48%]), vomiting (12 patients [23%] vs 23 [38%]), anemia (5 patients [9%] vs 27 [44%]), epistaxis (2 patients [4%] vs 34 [56%]), and hypertension (29 patients [55%] vs 22 [36%]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, carotuximab plus pazopanib did not improve PFS compared with pazopanib alone in patients with advanced angiosarcoma.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02979899.
Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Female; Hemangiosarcoma; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 35357396
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3547 -
Musculoskeletal Surgery Mar 2023Approximately 80% of desmoid tumors (DTs) show spontaneous regression or disease stabilization during first-line active surveillance. Medical treatment can be considered... (Review)
Review
Approximately 80% of desmoid tumors (DTs) show spontaneous regression or disease stabilization during first-line active surveillance. Medical treatment can be considered in cases of disease progression. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of each medical treatment by reviewing only the studies that included progressive disease as the inclusion criterion. We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases to identify published studies for progressive DTs. The disease control rates of the medical treatments, such as low-dose chemotherapy with methotrexate plus vinblastine or vinorelbine, imatinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, nilotinib, anlotinib, doxorubicin-based agents, liposomal doxorubicin, hydroxyurea, and oral vinorelbine for progressive DTs were 71-100%, 78-92%, 67-96%, 84%, 88%, 86%, 89-100%, 90-100%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. Low-dose chemotherapy, sorafenib, pazopanib, nilotinib, anlotinib, and liposomal doxorubicin had similar toxicities. Sorafenib and pazopanib were less toxic than imatinib. Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy was associated with the highest toxicity. Hydroxyurea and oral vinorelbine exhibited the lowest toxicity. Stepwise therapy escalation from an initial, less toxic treatment to more toxic agents is recommended for progressive DTs. Sorafenib and pazopanib had limited on-treatment side effects but had the possibility to induce long-term treatment-related side effects. In contrast, low-dose chemotherapy has some on-treatment side effects and is known to have very low long-term toxicity. Thus, for progressive DTs following active surveillance, low-dose chemotherapy is recommended in young patients as long-term side effects are minor, whereas therapies such as sorafenib and pazopanib is recommended for older patients as early side effects are minor.
Topics: Humans; Vinorelbine; Sorafenib; Imatinib Mesylate; Hydroxyurea; Fibromatosis, Aggressive; Watchful Waiting; Methotrexate; Doxorubicin
PubMed: 35150408
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-022-00738-x -
In Vivo (Athens, Greece) 2023The prognosis of metastatic and inoperable sarcomas is extremely poor, and intensive chemotherapy-based treatment is typically administered to prolong survival....
BACKGROUND/AIM
The prognosis of metastatic and inoperable sarcomas is extremely poor, and intensive chemotherapy-based treatment is typically administered to prolong survival. Currently, pazopanib, eribulin, and trabectedin are key drugs used in patients with these sarcomas. The aim of the study was to identify prognostic factors for metastatic and inoperable bone and soft tissue sarcomas.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Clinicopathological data of 46 patients with metastatic and inoperable sarcomas treated with pazopanib, eribulin, and trabectedin between January 2013 and February 2022 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Age, sex, primary tumor location, adverse effects, history of doxorubicin and radiation therapy, performance status scores, maximum tumor response, and survival duration were evaluated. The significant prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. Moreover, the 5-year survival rate was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
The median survival duration after treatment was 13.3 months, where the 5-year overall survival rate was estimated to be 9.85%. Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed significant relationships among patient prognosis, performance status, and tumor response.
CONCLUSION
Performance status scores and tumor response were significantly associated with patient prognosis. Therefore, regardless of age, sex, primary tumor location, adverse effects, and history of doxorubicin and radiation therapy, use of cutting-edge drugs, such as pazopanib, eribulin, and trabectedin, may be advantageous in patients with advanced sarcomas, if their drug response and performance status scores are good.
Topics: Humans; Trabectedin; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Doxorubicin
PubMed: 37905627
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13371 -
Clinical Cancer Research : An Official... Dec 2016
Topics: Humans; Indazoles; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 27980022
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2104 -
Journal of Pharmaceutical and... May 2018Pazopanib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and as second-line...
Pazopanib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and as second-line treatment for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) previously treated with chemotherapy. The most common adverse events, observed during the RCC and STS trials, were gastrointestinal disorders, hypertension, fatigue, elevated ALAT and ASAT, but the molecular mechanisms explaining pazopanib toxicity remain unclear. Therapeutic activity is considered to be mainly dependent on pazopanib exposure as the primary metabolites are inactive or display low plasma concentrations, but metabolites may be involved in toxicity as relationships between metabolite profiles and toxicity have not been evaluated. We report here, for the first time, the validation of a method for the simultaneous quantification of pazopanib and semi-quantification of its metabolites (relative determination). As there are no standards available, pazopanib metabolites were generated with human liver microsomes (HLM) to provide controls in the development of an UPLC-MS/MS method for monitoring both pazopanib and metabolites. The optimised method was validated for specificity, linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, matrix effect and stability. The coefficient of variation (CV%) for intra-day and inter-day precision varied from 2.1% to 7.9% and 5.6% to 13.1% respectively. The biases varied from -12% to 2.3% (intra-day) and 3.8% to 13.1% (inter-day) for accuracy evaluation. Intra-day and inter-day precision CV were respectively 20.1% and 19.6% and accuracy biases were between 20.7% (intra-day) and 3.8% (inter-day) at the limit of quantification. The recoveries from matrix samples spiked with pazopanib were respectively 102.6 ± 12.9% and 102.5 ± 1.2% at low and high levels of calibration range. No matrix effect was evidenced as demonstrated by the normalised matrix factor values: 1.3 ± 0.1 and 1.2 ± 0.2 respectively measured at low and high part of calibration range. A good stability of pazopanib was observed during short term, long term and in process storage conditions and after three freeze/thaw cycles. The method was applied to clinical samples from three patients treated with pazopanib to establish the metabolite profiles (semi-quantitative data) during treatment. The assessment of metabolite profiles could be useful to improve our understanding of the occurrence of adverse events and to improve pazopanib pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships.
Topics: Aged; Calibration; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Humans; Indazoles; Limit of Detection; Microsomes, Liver; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrimidines; Reference Standards; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sulfonamides; Tandem Mass Spectrometry
PubMed: 29571135
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.013 -
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... Jul 2024Sorafenib and pazopanib, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), are widely used in patients with progressive symptomatic desmoid tumors (DT). Limited real-word data is...
BACKGROUND
Sorafenib and pazopanib, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), are widely used in patients with progressive symptomatic desmoid tumors (DT). Limited real-word data is available on long-term outcomes of patients who progressed on, stopped, or continued TKIs.
METHODS
Patients diagnosed with DTs and treated with sorafenib or pazopanib between 2011 and 2022 at 11 institutions were reviewed. Patient history, response to therapy and toxicity were recorded. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.
RESULTS
142 patients with DT treated with sorafenib (n = 126, 88.7 %) or pazopanib (n = 16, 11.3 %) were analyzed. The median treatment duration was 10.8 months (range: 0.07- 73.9). The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 26.0 % and 95.1 %, respectively. The median tumor shrinkage was - 8.5 % (range -100.0 %- +72.5 %). Among responders, the median time to an objective response was 15.2 months (range: 1.1 to 33.1). The 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 82 % and 80 %. Dose reductions were necessary in 34 (23.9 %) patients. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 36 (25.4 %) patients. On the last follow-up, 55 (38.7 %) patients continued treatment. Treatment discontinuation (n = 85, 59.9 %) was mainly for toxicity (n = 35, 45.9 %) or radiological or clinical progression (n = 30, 35.3 %). For the entire cohort, 36 (25.4 %) patients required subsequent treatment. In the 32 responders, only 1 (3.1 %) patient required a subsequent treatment. In patients who discontinued TKI, 25 (44.6 %) with stable disease received subsequent treatment compared to 0 (0.0 %) of responders.
CONCLUSION
This retrospective study represents the largest cohort of DT patients treated with sorafenib or pazopanib to date. Discontinuation of treatment in responders is safe. The optimal treatment duration in patients with stable disease remains to be defined.
Topics: Humans; Indazoles; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Male; Female; Pyrimidines; Middle Aged; Adult; Aged; Young Adult; Fibromatosis, Aggressive; Adolescent; Retrospective Studies; Aged, 80 and over; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38759389
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114119 -
Prescrire International Jan 2015
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Humans; Indazoles; Patient Safety; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrimidines; Retinal Detachment; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 25729830
DOI: No ID Found