-
Nature Reviews. Disease Primers Mar 2017Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) denotes cancer originated from the renal epithelium and accounts for >90% of cancers in the kidney. The disease encompasses >10 histological... (Review)
Review
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) denotes cancer originated from the renal epithelium and accounts for >90% of cancers in the kidney. The disease encompasses >10 histological and molecular subtypes, of which clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is most common and accounts for most cancer-related deaths. Although somatic VHL mutations have been described for some time, more-recent cancer genomic studies have identified mutations in epigenetic regulatory genes and demonstrated marked intra-tumour heterogeneity, which could have prognostic, predictive and therapeutic relevance. Localized RCC can be successfully managed with surgery, whereas metastatic RCC is refractory to conventional chemotherapy. However, over the past decade, marked advances in the treatment of metastatic RCC have been made, with targeted agents including sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab, pazopanib and axitinib, which inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR), and everolimus and temsirolimus, which inhibit mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), being approved. Since 2015, agents with additional targets aside from VEGFR have been approved, such as cabozantinib and lenvatinib; immunotherapies, such as nivolumab, have also been added to the armamentarium for metastatic RCC. Here, we provide an overview of the biology of RCC, with a focus on ccRCC, as well as updates to complement the current clinical guidelines and an outline of potential future directions for RCC research and therapy.
Topics: Axitinib; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Indoles; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 28276433
DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.9 -
Lancet (London, England) May 2012Pazopanib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has single-agent activity in patients with advanced non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcoma. We investigated the effect... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Pazopanib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has single-agent activity in patients with advanced non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcoma. We investigated the effect of pazopanib on progression-free survival in patients with metastatic non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcoma after failure of standard chemotherapy.
METHODS
This phase 3 study was done in 72 institutions, across 13 countries. Patients with angiogenesis inhibitor-naive, metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma, progressing despite previous standard chemotherapy, were randomly assigned by an interactive voice randomisation system in a 2:1 ratio in permuted blocks (with block sizes of six) to receive either pazopanib 800 mg once daily or placebo, with no subsequent cross-over. Patients, investigators who gave the treatment, those assessing outcomes, and those who did the analysis were masked to the allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00753688.
FINDINGS
372 patients were registered and 369 were randomly assigned to receive pazopanib (n=246) or placebo (n=123). Median progression-free survival was 4·6 months (95% CI 3·7-4·8) for pazopanib compared with 1·6 months (0·9-1·8) for placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·31, 95% CI 0·24-0·40; p<0·0001). Overall survival was 12·5 months (10·6-14·8) with pazopanib versus 10·7 months (8·7-12·8) with placebo (HR 0·86, 0·67-1·11; p=0·25). The most common adverse events were fatigue (60 in the placebo group [49%] vs 155 in the pazopanib group [65%]), diarrhoea (20 [16%] vs 138 [58%]), nausea (34 [28%] vs 129 [54%]), weight loss (25 [20%] vs 115 [48%]), and hypertension (8 [7%] vs 99 [41%]). The median relative dose intensity was 100% for placebo and 96% for pazopanib.
INTERPRETATION
Pazopanib is a new treatment option for patients with metastatic non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcoma after previous chemotherapy.
FUNDING
GlaxoSmithKline.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidines; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 22595799
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60651-5 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Aug 2013Pazopanib and sunitinib provided a progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo or interferon, in previous phase 3 studies involving patients with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Pazopanib and sunitinib provided a progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo or interferon, in previous phase 3 studies involving patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. This phase 3, randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of pazopanib and sunitinib as first-line therapy.
METHODS
We randomly assigned 1110 patients with clear-cell, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive a continuous dose of pazopanib (800 mg once daily; 557 patients) or sunitinib in 6-week cycles (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment; 553 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by independent review, and the study was powered to show the noninferiority of pazopanib versus sunitinib. Secondary end points included overall survival, safety, and quality of life.
RESULTS
Pazopanib was noninferior to sunitinib with respect to progression-free survival (hazard ratio for progression of disease or death from any cause, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.22), meeting the predefined noninferiority margin (upper bound of the 95% confidence interval, <1.25). Overall survival was similar (hazard ratio for death with pazopanib, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.08). Patients treated with sunitinib, as compared with those treated with pazopanib, had a higher incidence of fatigue (63% vs. 55%), the hand-foot syndrome (50% vs. 29%), and thrombocytopenia (78% vs. 41%); patients treated with pazopanib had a higher incidence of increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (60%, vs. 43% with sunitinib). The mean change from baseline in 11 of 14 health-related quality-of-life domains, particularly those related to fatigue or soreness in the mouth, throat, hands, or feet, during the first 6 months of treatment favored pazopanib (P<0.05 for all 11 comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS
Pazopanib and sunitinib have similar efficacy, but the safety and quality-of-life profiles favor pazopanib. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals; COMPARZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00720941.).
Topics: Adult; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Indoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quality of Life; Sulfonamides; Sunitinib
PubMed: 23964934
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989 -
The Lancet. Oncology Feb 2023Anaplastic thyroid cancer is a rare and aggressive cancer with no standard radiotherapy-based local treatment. Based on data suggesting synergy between pazopanib and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Radiotherapy and paclitaxel plus pazopanib or placebo in anaplastic thyroid cancer (NRG/RTOG 0912): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 2 trial.
BACKGROUND
Anaplastic thyroid cancer is a rare and aggressive cancer with no standard radiotherapy-based local treatment. Based on data suggesting synergy between pazopanib and paclitaxel in anaplastic thyroid cancer, NRG Oncology did a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 2 clinical trial comparing concurrent paclitaxel and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with the addition of pazopanib or placebo with the aim of improving overall survival in this patient population.
METHODS
Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with a pathological diagnosis of anaplastic thyroid cancer, any TNM stage, Zubrod performance status of 0-2, no recent haemoptysis or bleeding, and no brain metastases. Patients were enrolled from 34 centres in the USA. Initially, a run-in was done to establish safety. In the randomised phase 2 trial, patients in the experimental group (pazopanib) received 2-3 weeks of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m) intravenously and daily pazopanib suspension 400 mg orally followed by concurrent weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m), daily pazopanib (300 mg), and IMRT 66 Gy given in 33 daily fractions (2 Gy fractions). In the control group (placebo), pazopanib was replaced by matching placebo. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the two treatment groups by permuted block randomisation by NRG Oncology with stratification by metastatic disease. All investigators, patients, and funders of the study were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01236547, and is complete.
FINDINGS
The safety run-showed the final dosing regimen to be safe based on two out of nine participants having adverse events of predefined concern. Between June 23, 2014, and Dec 30, 2016, 89 patients were enrolled to the phase 2 trial, of whom 71 were eligible (36 in the pazopanib group and 35 in the placebo group; 34 [48%] males and 37 [52%] females). At the final analysis (data cutoff March 9, 2020), with a median follow-up of 2·9 years (IQR 0·002-4·0), 61 patients had died. Overall survival was not significantly improved with pazopanib versus placebo, with a median overall survival of 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0-12·8) in the pazopanib group versus 7·3 months (4·3-10·6) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·52-1·43; one-sided log-rank p=0·28). 1-year overall survival was 37·1% (95% CI 21·1-53·2) in the pazopanib group and 29·0% (13·2-44·8) in the placebo group. The incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events did not differ significantly between the treatment groups (pazopanib 88·9% [32 of 36 patients] and placebo 85·3% [29 of 34 patients]; p=0·73). The most common clinically significant grade 3-4 adverse events in the 70 eligible treated patients (36 in the pazopanib group and 34 in the placebo group) were dysphagia (13 [36%] vs 10 [29%]), radiation dermatitis (8 [22%] vs 13 [38%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (12 [33%] vs none), increased aspartate aminotransferase (eight [22%] vs none), and oral mucositis (five [14%] vs eight [24%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported for 16 (44%) patients on pazopanib and 12 (35%) patients on placebo. The most common serious adverse events were dehydration and thromboembolic event (three [8%] each) in patients on pazopanib and oral mucositis (three [8%]) in those on placebo. There was one treatment-related death in each group (sepsis in the pazopanib group and pneumonitis in the placebo group).
INTERPRETATION
To our knowledge, this study is the largest randomised anaplastic thyroid cancer study that has completed accrual showing feasibility in a multicenter NCI National Clinical Trials Network setting. Although no significant improvement in overall survival was recorded in the pazopanib group, the treatment combination was shown to be feasible and safe, and hypothesis-generating data that might warrant further investigation were generated.
FUNDING
National Cancer Institute and Novartis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Paclitaxel; Thyroid Carcinoma, Anaplastic; Thyroid Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy
PubMed: 36681089
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00763-X -
The Lancet. Oncology Aug 2020Outcomes for children and adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma are poor with traditional therapy. We investigated whether the addition of pazopanib to preoperative... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Pathological response in children and adults with large unresected intermediate-grade or high-grade soft tissue sarcoma receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy with or without pazopanib (ARST1321): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.
BACKGROUND
Outcomes for children and adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma are poor with traditional therapy. We investigated whether the addition of pazopanib to preoperative chemoradiotherapy would improve pathological near complete response rate compared with chemoradiotherapy alone.
METHODS
In this joint Children's Oncology Group and NRG Oncology multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial, we enrolled eligible adults (aged ≥18 years) and children (aged between 2 and <18 years) from 57 hospitals in the USA and Canada with unresected, newly diagnosed trunk or extremity chemotherapy-sensitive soft tissue sarcoma, which were larger than 5 cm in diameter and of intermediate or high grade. Eligible patients had Lansky (if aged ≤16 years) or Karnofsky (if aged >16 years) performance status score of at least 70. Patients received ifosfamide (2·5 g/m per dose intravenously on days 1-3 with mesna) and doxorubicin (37·5 mg/m per dose intravenously on days 1-2) with 45 Gy preoperative radiotherapy, followed by surgical resection at week 13. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a web-based system, in an unmasked manner, to receive oral pazopanib (if patients <18 years 350 mg/m once daily; if patients ≥18 years 600 mg once daily) or not (control group), with pazopanib not given immediately before or after surgery at week 13. The study projected 100 randomly assigned patients were needed to show an improvement in the number of participants with a 90% or higher pathological response at week 13 from 40% to 60%. Analysis was done per protocol. This study has completed accrual and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02180867.
FINDINGS
Between July 7, 2014, and Oct 1, 2018, 81 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the pazopanib group (n=42) or the control group (n=39). At the planned second interim analysis with 42 evaluable patients and a median follow-up of 0·8 years (IQR 0·3-1·6) in the pazopanib group and 1 year (0·3-1·6) in the control group, the number of patients with a 90% pathological response or higher was 14 (58%) of 24 patients in the pazopanib group and four (22%) of 18 patients in the control group, with a between-group difference in the number of 90% or higher pathological response of 36·1% (83·8% CI 16·5-55·8). On the basis of an interim analysis significance level of 0·081 (overall one-sided significance level of 0·20, power of 0·80, and O'Brien-Fleming-type cumulative error spending function), the 83·8% CI for response difference was between 16·5% and 55·8% and thus excluded 0. The improvement in pathological response rate with the addition of pazopanib crossed the predetermined boundary and enrolment was stopped. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia (16 [43%] of 37 patients), neutropenia (15 [41%]), and febrile neutropenia (15 [41%]) in the pazopanib group, and neutropenia (three [9%] of 35 patients) and febrile neutropenia (three [9%]) in the control group. 22 (59%) of 37 patients in the pazopanib group had a pazopanib-related serious adverse event. Paediatric and adult patients had a similar number of grade 3 and 4 toxicity. There were seven deaths (three in the pazopanib group and four in the control group), none of which were treatment related.
INTERPRETATION
In this presumed first prospective trial of soft tissue sarcoma spanning nearly the entire age spectrum, adding pazopanib to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improved the rate of pathological near complete response, suggesting that this is a highly active and feasible combination in children and adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. The comparison of survival outcomes requires longer follow-up.
FUNDING
National Institutes of Health, St Baldrick's Foundation, Seattle Children's Foundation.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Pyrimidines; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Young Adult
PubMed: 32702309
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30325-9 -
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology... Sep 2018Pazopanib is an approved treatment for renal cell carcinoma and a second-line treatment for nonadipocytic soft-tissue sarcoma. However, its clinical efficacy is limited... (Review)
Review
Pazopanib is an approved treatment for renal cell carcinoma and a second-line treatment for nonadipocytic soft-tissue sarcoma. However, its clinical efficacy is limited by its cardiovascular side effects. Pazopanib and other vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been associated with the development of hypertension, QT interval prolongation, and other cardiovascular events; however, these mechanisms are largely unknown. Gaining a deeper understanding of these mechanisms is essential for the development of appropriate surveillance strategies and possible diagnostic biomarkers to allow us to monitor patients and modulate therapy prior to significant cardiac insult. This approach will be vital in keeping patients on these life-saving therapies and may be applicable to other tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the preclinical and clinical side effects of pazopanib with a focus on the mechanisms responsible for its toxicity to the cardiovascular system.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29706106
DOI: 10.1177/1074248418769612 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Sep 2017Pazopanib is an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor and stem cell... (Review)
Review
Pazopanib is an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor and stem cell receptor c-Kit, and has been approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and soft tissue sarcoma. The pharmacokinetics of pazopanib are complex and are characterized by pH-dependent solubility, large interpatient variability and low, non-linear and time-dependent bioavailability. Exposure to pazopanib is increased by both food and coadministration of ketoconazole, but drastically reduced by proton pump inhibitors. Studies have demonstrated relationships between systemic exposure to pazopanib and toxicity, such as hypertension. Furthermore, a strong relationship between pazopanib trough level ≥20 mg/L and both tumor shrinkage and progression-free survival has been established. At the currently approved daily dose of 800 mg, approximately 20% of patients do not reach this threshold and may be at risk of suboptimal treatment. As a result of this, clinical trials have explored individualized pazopanib dosing, which demonstrate the safety and feasibility of individualized pazopanib dosing based on trough levels. In summary, we provide an overview of the complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of pazopanib and, based on the available data, we propose optimized dosing strategies.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Indazoles; Neoplasms; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor; Receptors, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 28185218
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-017-0510-z -
Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) 2018Necroptosis represents a form of programmed cell death that can be engaged by various upstream signals, for example by ligation of death receptors, by viral sensors or... (Review)
Review
Necroptosis represents a form of programmed cell death that can be engaged by various upstream signals, for example by ligation of death receptors, by viral sensors or by pattern recognition receptors. It depends on several key signaling proteins, including the kinases Receptor-Interacting Protein (RIP)1 and RIP3 and the pseudokinase mixed-lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL). Necroptosis has been implicated in a number of physiological and pathophysiological conditions and is disturbed in many human diseases. Thus, targeted interference with necroptosis signaling may offer new opportunities for the treatment of human diseases. Besides structure-based drug design, in recent years drug repositioning has emerged as a promising alternative to develop drug-like compounds. There is accumulating evidence showing that multi-targeting kinase inhibitors, for example Dabrafenib, Vemurafenib, Sorafenib, Pazopanib and Ponatinib, used for the treatment of cancer also display anti-necroptotic activity. This review summarizes recent evidence indicating that some anticancer kinase inhibitors also negatively affect necroptosis signaling. This implies that some cancer therapeutics may be repurposed for other pathologies, e.g. ischemic or inflammatory diseases.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Antioxidants; Apoptosis; Drug Repositioning; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Necrosis; Oximes; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Reperfusion Injury; Sorafenib; Sulfonamides; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; Vemurafenib
PubMed: 29464983
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1442626 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Oct 2022This study examined the efficacy/effectiveness of pazopanib and trabectedin in previously treated metastatic synovial sarcoma (mSS). A literature search identified... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study examined the efficacy/effectiveness of pazopanib and trabectedin in previously treated metastatic synovial sarcoma (mSS). A literature search identified studies (2002-2019) reporting outcomes of pazopanib and trabectedin in previously treated mSS, including median overall survival (mOS) and overall response rate (ORR). A meta-analysis was conducted and sensitivity analyses examined outcomes by agent (pazopanib/trabectedin), study type (clinical trial [CT] or real-world [RW]) and sample size. Sixteen studies were included (pazopanib: n = 7; trabectedin: n = 9). Pooled mOS was 10.4 months and was consistent across agents and in RW and CT (pazopanib: 10.3; trabectedin: 10.4; CT: 10.8; RW: 9.9). ORR results were more variable (pooled ORR: 14.7%). ORR was consistently higher for RW (17.7%) than for CT (9.5%) and for pazopanib (18.9%) compared with trabectedin (12.3%). Poor outcomes across agents and settings highlight a need for novel treatments with improved efficacy. This study serves as a benchmark for efficacy estimates in this rare disease.
Topics: Humans; Trabectedin; Sarcoma, Synovial; Sarcoma; Pyrimidines; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Tetrahydroisoquinolines; Dioxoles
PubMed: 36399116
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0348 -
The Oncologist 2012Pazopanib and axitinib are both U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved ATP-competitive inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Pazopanib and... (Review)
Review
Pazopanib and axitinib are both U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved ATP-competitive inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Pazopanib and axitinib have been shown to be effective and tolerable treatment options for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer and therefore have enlarged the armamentarium for this disease. This concise drug review discusses the clinical benefits, clinical use, mechanism of action, bioanalysis, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, pharmacodynamics, drug resistance, toxicity, and patient instructions and recommendations for supportive care for these two drugs.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Imidazoles; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pyrimidines; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration
PubMed: 22733795
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0055