-
Biomedicines Jan 2020Novel treatment regimens are required for castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs) that become unresponsive to standard treatments, such as docetaxel and... (Review)
Review
Novel treatment regimens are required for castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs) that become unresponsive to standard treatments, such as docetaxel and enzalutamide. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors showed promising results in hematological malignancies, but they failed in solid tumors such as prostate cancer, despite the overexpression of HDACs in CRPC. Four HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat, pracinostat, panobinostat and romidepsin, underwent phase II clinical trials for prostate cancers; however, phase III trials were not recommended due to a majority of patients exhibiting either toxicity or disease progression. In this review, the pharmacodynamic reasons for the failure of HDAC inhibitors were assessed and placed in the context of the advancements in the understanding of CRPCs, HDACs and resistance mechanisms. The review focuses on three themes: evolution of androgen receptor-negative prostate cancers, development of resistance mechanisms and differential effects of HDACs. In conclusion, advancements can be made in this field by characterizing HDACs in prostate tumors more extensively, as this will allow more specific drugs catering to the specific HDAC subtypes to be designed.
PubMed: 32019149
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8020022 -
Cancers Dec 2021Inactivating germline mutations in the gene (encoding the E-cadherin protein) are the genetic hallmark of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), and somatic...
Inactivating germline mutations in the gene (encoding the E-cadherin protein) are the genetic hallmark of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), and somatic mutations are an early event in the development of sporadic diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) and lobular breast cancer (LBC). In this study, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors were tested for their ability to preferentially inhibit the growth of human cell lines (MCF10A and NCI-N87) and murine organoids lacking expression. breast and gastric cells were more sensitive to the pan-HDAC inhibitors entinostat, pracinostat, mocetinostat and vorinostat than wild-type cells, with an elevated growth inhibition that was, in part, attributable to increased apoptosis. -null cells were also sensitive to more class-specific HDAC inhibitors, but compared to the pan-inhibitors, these effects were less robust to genetic background. Increased sensitivity to entinostat was also observed in gastric organoids with both and deletions. However, the deletion of largely abrogated the sensitivity of the -null organoids to pracinostat and mocetinostat. Finally, entinostat enhanced expression in heterozygous murine organoids. In conclusion, entinostat is a promising drug for the chemoprevention and/or treatment of HDGC and may also be beneficial for the treatment of sporadic -deficient cancers.
PubMed: 35008338
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010175 -
In Silico Pharmacology 2021Pracinostat, an emerging hydroxamate histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor has shown better efficacy than approved inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Apart...
Characterizing binding intensity and energetic features of histone deacetylase inhibitor pracinostat towards class I HDAC isozymes through futuristic drug designing strategy.
Pracinostat, an emerging hydroxamate histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor has shown better efficacy than approved inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Apart from haematological malignancies, this inhibitor has shown promising results in preclinical models of solid tumours. Being pan-inhibitor pracinostat targets various classical HDACs and has demonstrated antiproliferative properties in a series of cancer cell lines. Currently, no energetic and structural studies are available about the pracinostat against four HDAC isozymes of Class I. Taking this into account, the current study involved flexible molecular docking for gaining insights regarding pracinostat-HDAC isozyme interactions, molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM-GBSA) for estimating binding affinity of this inhibitor towards these isozymes and energetically optimized pharmacophores (e-Pharmacophores) technique for delineating the critical e-pharmacophoric features of pracinostat in its least energy state in the binding pocket of these HDACs. The outcome from this study will help in further optimization of pracinostat towards better therapeutic and the e-Pharmacophores generated will serve as queries in e-Pharamcophores guided virtual screening.
PubMed: 33628709
DOI: 10.1007/s40203-021-00077-y -
Cancer Dec 2017Pracinostat is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity in both solid tumor and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines. Pracinostat is reported to... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Pracinostat is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity in both solid tumor and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines. Pracinostat is reported to have modest clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Given the higher preclinical sensitivity of hematologic malignancies to pracinostat, the authors conducted a phase 1 study to assess the safety, maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pracinostat in patients with advanced hematological malignancies.
METHODS
Pracinostat was administered orally 3 times a week for 3 weeks on a 28-day cycle. Patients were assigned to 7 dose levels using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design.
RESULTS
A total of 44 patients were enrolled, 25 of whom had AML and 14 of whom had myelodysplastic syndrome. The maximum tolerated dose was 120 mg and the recommended phase 2 dose was 60 mg. Two patients with AML achieved a response: 1 complete remission (CR) and 1 complete cytogenetic response. Despite a dose-dependent increase in the plasma concentration of pracinostat, a similar increase in histone acetylation was not observed. As an extension, 10 additional patients with myelodysplastic syndrome were enrolled to assess the safety and efficacy of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine. Six patients achieved a CR and 3 achieved a CR without platelet recovery with no added toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the current study demonstrate that pracinostat is safe, with modest single-agent activity in patients with hematological malignancies. Cancer 2017;123:4851-9. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Azacitidine; Benzimidazoles; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; Patient Safety; Risk Assessment; Sex Factors; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28841236
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30949 -
Brain Sciences Sep 2023The relationship between N6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulators and anoikis and their effects on low-grade glioma (LGG) is not clear yet. The TCGA-LGG cohort, mRNAseq 325...
The relationship between N6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulators and anoikis and their effects on low-grade glioma (LGG) is not clear yet. The TCGA-LGG cohort, mRNAseq 325 dataset, and GSE16011 validation set were separately obtained via the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Chinese Glioma Genome Altas (CGGA), and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. In total, 27 m6A-related genes (m6A-RGs) and 508 anoikis-related genes (ANRGs) were extracted from published articles individually. First, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between LGG and normal samples were sifted out by differential expression analysis. DEGs were respectively intersected with m6A-RGs and ANRGs to acquire differentially expressed m6A-RGs (DE-m6A-RGs) and differentially expressed ANRGs (DE-ANRGs). A correlation analysis of DE-m6A-RGs and DE-ANRGs was performed to obtain DE-m6A-ANRGs. Next, univariate Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were performed on DE-m6A-ANRGs to sift out risk model genes, and a risk score was gained according to them. Then, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was implemented based on risk model genes. After that, we constructed an independent prognostic model and performed immune infiltration analysis and drug sensitivity analysis. Finally, an mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA regulatory network was constructed. There were 6901 DEGs between LGG and normal samples. Six DE-m6A-RGs and 214 DE-ANRGs were gained through intersecting DEGs with m6A-RGs and ANRGs, respectively. A total of 149 DE-m6A-ANRGs were derived after correlation analysis. Four genes, namely ANXA5, KIF18A, BRCA1, and HOXA10, composed the risk model, and they were involved in apoptosis, fatty acid metabolism, and glycolysis. The age and risk scores were finally sifted out to construct an independent prognostic model. Activated CD4 T cells, gamma delta T cells, and natural killer T cells had the largest positive correlations with risk model genes, while activated B cells were significantly negatively correlated with KIF18A and BRCA1. AT.9283, EXEL.2280, Gilteritinib, and Pracinostat had the largest correlation (absolute value) with a risk score. Four risk model genes (mRNAs), 12 miRNAs, and 21 lncRNAs formed an mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA network, containing HOXA10-hsa-miR-129-5p-LINC00689 and KIF18A-hsa-miR-221-3p-DANCR. Through bioinformatics, we constructed a prognostic model of m6A-associated anoikis genes in LGG, providing new ideas for research related to the prognosis and treatment of LGG.
PubMed: 37759912
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091311 -
Blood Advances Mar 2022The transcriptional repressor BCL11A is involved in hematological malignancies, B-cell development, and fetal-to-adult hemoglobin switching. However, the molecular...
The transcriptional repressor BCL11A is involved in hematological malignancies, B-cell development, and fetal-to-adult hemoglobin switching. However, the molecular mechanism by which it promotes the development of myeloid leukemia remains largely unknown. We find that Bcl11a cooperates with the pseudokinase Trib1 in the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Bcl11a promotes the proliferation and engraftment of Trib1-expressing AML cells in vitro and in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis showed that, upon DNA binding, Bcl11a is significantly associated with PU.1, an inducer of myeloid differentiation, and that Bcl11a represses several PU.1 target genes, such as Asb2, Clec5a, and Fcgr3. Asb2, as a Bcl11a target gene that modulates cytoskeleton and cell-cell interaction, plays a key role in Bcl11a-induced malignant progression. The repression of PU.1 target genes by Bcl11a is achieved by sequence-specific DNA-binding activity and recruitment of corepressors by Bcl11a. Suppression of the corepressor components HDAC and LSD1 reverses the repressive activity. Moreover, treatment of AML cells with the HDAC inhibitor pracinostat and the LSD1 inhibitor GSK2879552 resulted in growth inhibition in vitro and in vivo. High BCL11A expression is associated with worse prognosis in humans with AML. Blocking of BCL11A expression upregulates the expression of PU.1 target genes and inhibits the growth of HL-60 cells and their engraftment to the bone marrow, suggesting that BCL11A is involved in human myeloid malignancies via the suppression of PU.1 transcriptional activity.
Topics: Adult; DNA; Fetal Hemoglobin; Histone Demethylases; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lectins, C-Type; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Receptors, Cell Surface; Repressor Proteins
PubMed: 34714913
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004558 -
Leukemia Research Dec 2022
Topics: Humans; Gemtuzumab; Benzimidazoles; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
PubMed: 36401944
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106984 -
Annals of Hematology Jun 2020Ruxolitinib is a targeted drug to treat myelofibrosis (MF). Ruxolitinib has significant advantages in spleen reduction and increasing 5-year overall survival (OS), and... (Review)
Review
Ruxolitinib is a targeted drug to treat myelofibrosis (MF). Ruxolitinib has significant advantages in spleen reduction and increasing 5-year overall survival (OS), and ruxolitinib-based combinations might provide more benefits than ruxolitinib monotherapy. In this review, we focus on the data of ruxolitinib-based combinations therapies and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and safety. We analyzed and summarized the data of ruxolitinib-based combinations. Ruxolitinib combined with prednisone + thalidomide + danazol (TPD), panobinostat, pracinostat, azacytidine, or hydroxyurea has well reduced spleen. Ruxolitinib combined with danazol or TPD had well therapies in improvement of hemoglobin (Hgb) and platelets (PLT). Most ruxolitinib-based combinations therapies showed a superior benefit on reduced treatment-related AEs than ruxolitinib monotherapy. Treatment-related AEs and dose modification affect the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib-based combinations. Genetic testing before treatment is recommended. To provide better clinical guidance, comparisons of these randomized controlled trials with the trials of ruxolitinib alone are necessary. This review suggests that the clinical application of ruxolitinib-based combinations is worth waiting for.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Nitriles; Primary Myelofibrosis; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32333155
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04028-z -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Jun 2019Primary Myelofibrosis is a BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasm with a variety of hematological presentations, including thrombosis, bleeding diathesis and... (Review)
Review
Primary Myelofibrosis is a BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasm with a variety of hematological presentations, including thrombosis, bleeding diathesis and marrow fibrosis. It is estimated to have an incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 people each year. Although JAK2 or MPL mutations are seen in PMF, several other mutations have recently been documented, including mutations in CALR, epigenetic regulators like TET, ASXL1, and 13q deletions. The identification of these mutations has improved the ability to develop novel treatment options. These include JAK inhibitors like ruxolitinib, heat shock protein-90 inhibitors like ganetespib, histone deacetylase inhibitors including panobinostat, pracinostat, vorinostat and givinostat, hypomethylating agents like decitabine, hedgehog inhibitors like glasdegib, PI3K, AKT and mTOR inhibitors like everolimus as well as telomerase inhibitors like imtelstat. Research on novel therapeutic options is being actively pursued in order to expand treatment options for primary myelofibrosis however currently, there is no curative therapy other than allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) which is possible in select patients.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Mutation; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 31244289
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.6.1691 -
Leukemia Apr 2015Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the second most common form of leukemia and the most frequent cause of leukemia-related deaths in the United States. The incidence of AML... (Review)
Review
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the second most common form of leukemia and the most frequent cause of leukemia-related deaths in the United States. The incidence of AML increases with advancing age and the prognosis for patients with AML worsens substantially with increasing age. Many older patients are ineligible for intensive treatment and require other therapeutic approaches to optimize clinical outcome. To address this treatment gap, novel agents with varying mechanisms of action targeting different cellular processes are currently in development. Hypomethylating agents (azacitidine, decitabine, SGI-110), histone deacetylase inhibitors (vorinostat, pracinostat, panobinostat), FMS-like tyrosine kinase receptor-3 inhibitors (quizartinib, sorafenib, midostaurin, crenolanib), cytotoxic agents (clofarabine, sapacitabine, vosaroxin), cell cycle inhibitors (barasertib, volasertib, rigosertib) and monoclonal antibodies (gentuzumab ozogamicin, lintuzumab-Ac225) represent some of these promising new treatments. This review provides an overview of novel agents that have either completed or are currently in ongoing phase III trials in patients with previously untreated AML for whom intensive treatment is not an option. Other potential drugs in earlier stages of development will also be addressed in this review.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cytotoxins; Drugs, Investigational; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Patient Selection; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 25142817
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.244