-
Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis Oct 2023Divisions at the periphery and midzone of mitochondria are two fission signatures that determine the fate of mitochondria and cells. Pharmacological induction of...
Divisions at the periphery and midzone of mitochondria are two fission signatures that determine the fate of mitochondria and cells. Pharmacological induction of excessively asymmetric mitofission-associated cell death (MFAD) by switching the scission position from the mitochondrial midzone to the periphery represents a promising strategy for anticancer therapy. By screening a series of pan-inhibitors, we identified pracinostat, a pan-histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, as a novel MFAD inducer, that exhibited a significant anticancer effect on colorectal cancer (CRC) in vivo and in vitro. Pracinostat increased the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) and induced its acetylation at residue lysine 33, accelerating the formation of complex CDK5/CDK5 regulatory subunit 1 and dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1)-mediated mitochondrial peripheral fission. CRC cells with high level of CDK5 (CDK5-high) displayed midzone mitochondrial division that was associated with oncogenic phenotype, but treatment with pracinostat led to a lethal increase in the already-elevated level of CDK5 in the CRC cells. Mechanistically, pracinostat switched the scission position from the mitochondrial midzone to the periphery by improving the binding of Drp1 from mitochondrial fission factor (MFF) to mitochondrial fission 1 protein (FIS1). Thus, our results revealed the anticancer mechanism of HDACi pracinostat in CRC via activating CDK5-Drp1 signaling to cause selective MFAD of those CDK5-high tumor cells, which implicates a new paradigm to develop potential therapeutic strategies for CRC treatment.
PubMed: 38024857
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2023.06.005 -
Cancers Nov 2019Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation, differentiation arrest, and accumulation of immature myeloid... (Review)
Review
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy characterized by uncontrolled proliferation, differentiation arrest, and accumulation of immature myeloid progenitors. Although clinical advances in AML have been made, especially in young patients, long-term disease-free survival remains poor, making this disease an unmet therapeutic challenge. Epigenetic alterations and mutations in epigenetic regulators contribute to the pathogenesis of AML, supporting the rationale for the use of epigenetic drugs in patients with AML. While hypomethylating agents have already been approved in AML, the use of other epigenetic inhibitors, such as histone deacetylases (HDAC) inhibitors (HDACi), is under clinical development. HDACi such as Panobinostat, Vorinostat, and Tricostatin A have been shown to promote cell death, autophagy, apoptosis, or growth arrest in preclinical AML models, yet these inhibitors do not seem to be effective as monotherapies, but rather in combination with other drugs. In this review, we discuss the rationale for the use of different HDACi in patients with AML, the results of preclinical studies, and the results obtained in clinical trials. Although so far the results with HDACi in clinical trials in AML have been modest, there are some encouraging data from treatment with the HDACi Pracinostat in combination with DNA demethylating agents.
PubMed: 31739588
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111794 -
Blood Advances Feb 2019Pracinostat, a potent oral pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor with modest single-agent activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), has shown synergistic antitumor activity...
Pracinostat, a potent oral pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor with modest single-agent activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), has shown synergistic antitumor activity when combined with azacitidine. This single-group, multicenter phase 2 study assessed the safety and efficacy of pracinostat combined with azacitidine in patients who were at least 65 years old with newly diagnosed AML and who were ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy. Patients received pracinostat 60 mg/d, 3 d/wk, for 3 consecutive weeks, plus azacitidine 75 mg/m daily for 7 days in a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoints were complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) rates of the combination. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of the regimen. Fifty patients (33 de novo, 12 secondary, and 5 therapy-related AML) were enrolled. Twenty-six patients (52%) achieved the primary endpoint of CR (42%), CRi (4%), and MLFS (6%). Median OS and PFS were 19.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-26.5 months) and 12.6 months (95% CI, 10-17.7 months), respectively, with a 1-year OS rate of 62%. Forty-three patients (86%) experienced at least 1 grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event with the combination, with infections (52%), thrombocytopenia (46%), and febrile neutropenia (44%) reported as the most common toxicities. The 30- and 60-day all-cause mortality rates were 2% and 10%, respectively. DNA sequencing revealed somatic mutations at baseline, and clearance rates correlated with response to treatment. Pracinostat plus azacitidine is a well-tolerated and active regimen in the frontline treatment of older patients with AML unfit for intensive therapy. A larger controlled trial is ongoing. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01912274.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Benzimidazoles; Female; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30760466
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018027409 -
In Silico Pharmacology 2021Pracinostat, an emerging hydroxamate histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor has shown better efficacy than approved inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Apart...
Characterizing binding intensity and energetic features of histone deacetylase inhibitor pracinostat towards class I HDAC isozymes through futuristic drug designing strategy.
Pracinostat, an emerging hydroxamate histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor has shown better efficacy than approved inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Apart from haematological malignancies, this inhibitor has shown promising results in preclinical models of solid tumours. Being pan-inhibitor pracinostat targets various classical HDACs and has demonstrated antiproliferative properties in a series of cancer cell lines. Currently, no energetic and structural studies are available about the pracinostat against four HDAC isozymes of Class I. Taking this into account, the current study involved flexible molecular docking for gaining insights regarding pracinostat-HDAC isozyme interactions, molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM-GBSA) for estimating binding affinity of this inhibitor towards these isozymes and energetically optimized pharmacophores (e-Pharmacophores) technique for delineating the critical e-pharmacophoric features of pracinostat in its least energy state in the binding pocket of these HDACs. The outcome from this study will help in further optimization of pracinostat towards better therapeutic and the e-Pharmacophores generated will serve as queries in e-Pharamcophores guided virtual screening.
PubMed: 33628709
DOI: 10.1007/s40203-021-00077-y -
Leukemia & Lymphoma Jul 2019Although ruxolitinib improves symptoms and splenomegaly in patients with advanced myelofibrosis, whether this agent is truly disease-modifying remains unclear. Histone...
Although ruxolitinib improves symptoms and splenomegaly in patients with advanced myelofibrosis, whether this agent is truly disease-modifying remains unclear. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) downregulate JAK2 via interference with chaperone function. Pracinostat, a pan-HDACi, has modest single-agent activity in myelofibrosis. We conducted a single-institution, phase 2, investigator-initiated trial of ruxolitinib plus pracinostat (begun after 12 weeks of ruxolitinib) in 25 patients with myelofibrosis, of whom 20 received both agents. Sixteen (80%) patients had objective responses (all 'clinical improvement'). The rate of spleen response (by palpation) was 74%, and that of symptom response 80%. Most responses occurred prior to pracinostat initiation. Three patients experienced improvement in bone marrow fibrosis, and one a near-complete molecular response after two years on study treatment. All patients discontinued pracinostat and are currently off-study. Pracinostat interruptions and dose reductions were frequent, often due to worsening anemia. These findings do not support continued development of pracinostat in myelofibrosis.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Survival Rate
PubMed: 30632841
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1543876 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Breast cancer is one of the common malignancies with poor prognosis worldwide. The treatment of breast cancer patients includes surgery, radiation, hormone therapy,... (Review)
Review
Breast cancer is one of the common malignancies with poor prognosis worldwide. The treatment of breast cancer patients includes surgery, radiation, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, targeted drug therapy and immunotherapy. In recent years, immunotherapy has potentiated the survival of certain breast cancer patients; however, primary resistance or acquired resistance attenuate the therapeutic outcomes. Histone acetyltransferases induce histone acetylation on lysine residues, which can be reversed by histone deacetylases (HDACs). Dysregulation of HDACs mutation and abnormal expression contributes to tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Numerous HDAC inhibitors have been developed and exhibited the potent anti-tumor activity in a variety of cancers, including breast cancer. HDAC inhibitors ameliorated immunotherapeutic efficacy in cancer patients. In this review, we discuss the anti-tumor activity of HDAC inhibitors in breast cancer, including dacinostat, belinostat, abexinostat, mocetinotat, panobinostat, romidepsin, entinostat, vorinostat, pracinostat, tubastatin A, trichostatin A, and tucidinostat. Moreover, we uncover the mechanisms of HDAC inhibitors in improving immunotherapy in breast cancer. Furthermore, we highlight that HDAC inhibitors might be potent agents to potentiate immunotherapy in breast cancer.
Topics: Humans; Female; Histone Deacetylases; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Vorinostat; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 36969235
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1164514 -
Blood Advances May 2021Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are antitumor agents with distinct efficacy in hematologic tumors. Pracinostat is a pan-HDACi with promising early clinical...
Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are antitumor agents with distinct efficacy in hematologic tumors. Pracinostat is a pan-HDACi with promising early clinical activity. However, similar to other HDACis, its activity as a single agent is limited. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) includes distinct molecular subsets or metabolically defined subtypes that rely in different ways on the B-cell receptor signaling pathway, oxidative phosphorylation, and glycolysis for their survival. The antitumor activity of pracinostat has not been determined in lymphomas. We performed preclinical in vitro activity screening of 60 lymphoma cell lines that included 25 DLBCLs. DLBCL cells belonging to distinct metabolic subtypes were treated with HDACis for 6 hours or 14 days followed by transcriptional profiling. DLBCL xenograft models enabled assessment of the in vivo antilymphoma activity of pracinostat. Combination treatments with pracinostat plus 10 other antilymphoma agents were performed. Western blot was used to assess acetylation levels of histone and nonhistone proteins after HDACi treatment. Robust antiproliferative activity was observed across all lymphoma histotypes represented. Focusing on DLBCL, we identified a low-sensitivity subset that almost exclusively consists of the oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos)-DLBCL metabolic subtype. OxPhos-DLBCL cells also showed poorer sensitivity to other HDACis, including vorinostat. Transcriptomic analysis revealed fewer modulated transcripts but an enrichment of antioxidant pathway genes after HDACi treatment of OxPhos-DLBCLs compared with high-sensitivity B-cell receptor (BCR)-DLBCLs. Pharmacologic inhibition of antioxidant production rescued sensitivity of OxPhos-DLBCLs to pracinostat whereas BCR-DLBCLs were unaffected. Our study provides novel insights into the antilymphoma activity of pracinostat and identifies a differential response of DLBCL metabolic subtypes to HDACis.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
PubMed: 33999145
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003566 -
Cancer Dec 2017Pracinostat is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity in both solid tumor and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines. Pracinostat is reported to... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Pracinostat is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity in both solid tumor and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines. Pracinostat is reported to have modest clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Given the higher preclinical sensitivity of hematologic malignancies to pracinostat, the authors conducted a phase 1 study to assess the safety, maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pracinostat in patients with advanced hematological malignancies.
METHODS
Pracinostat was administered orally 3 times a week for 3 weeks on a 28-day cycle. Patients were assigned to 7 dose levels using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design.
RESULTS
A total of 44 patients were enrolled, 25 of whom had AML and 14 of whom had myelodysplastic syndrome. The maximum tolerated dose was 120 mg and the recommended phase 2 dose was 60 mg. Two patients with AML achieved a response: 1 complete remission (CR) and 1 complete cytogenetic response. Despite a dose-dependent increase in the plasma concentration of pracinostat, a similar increase in histone acetylation was not observed. As an extension, 10 additional patients with myelodysplastic syndrome were enrolled to assess the safety and efficacy of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine. Six patients achieved a CR and 3 achieved a CR without platelet recovery with no added toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the current study demonstrate that pracinostat is safe, with modest single-agent activity in patients with hematological malignancies. Cancer 2017;123:4851-9. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Azacitidine; Benzimidazoles; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; Patient Safety; Risk Assessment; Sex Factors; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28841236
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30949 -
Blood Advances Mar 2022The transcriptional repressor BCL11A is involved in hematological malignancies, B-cell development, and fetal-to-adult hemoglobin switching. However, the molecular...
The transcriptional repressor BCL11A is involved in hematological malignancies, B-cell development, and fetal-to-adult hemoglobin switching. However, the molecular mechanism by which it promotes the development of myeloid leukemia remains largely unknown. We find that Bcl11a cooperates with the pseudokinase Trib1 in the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Bcl11a promotes the proliferation and engraftment of Trib1-expressing AML cells in vitro and in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis showed that, upon DNA binding, Bcl11a is significantly associated with PU.1, an inducer of myeloid differentiation, and that Bcl11a represses several PU.1 target genes, such as Asb2, Clec5a, and Fcgr3. Asb2, as a Bcl11a target gene that modulates cytoskeleton and cell-cell interaction, plays a key role in Bcl11a-induced malignant progression. The repression of PU.1 target genes by Bcl11a is achieved by sequence-specific DNA-binding activity and recruitment of corepressors by Bcl11a. Suppression of the corepressor components HDAC and LSD1 reverses the repressive activity. Moreover, treatment of AML cells with the HDAC inhibitor pracinostat and the LSD1 inhibitor GSK2879552 resulted in growth inhibition in vitro and in vivo. High BCL11A expression is associated with worse prognosis in humans with AML. Blocking of BCL11A expression upregulates the expression of PU.1 target genes and inhibits the growth of HL-60 cells and their engraftment to the bone marrow, suggesting that BCL11A is involved in human myeloid malignancies via the suppression of PU.1 transcriptional activity.
Topics: Adult; DNA; Fetal Hemoglobin; Histone Demethylases; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lectins, C-Type; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Receptors, Cell Surface; Repressor Proteins
PubMed: 34714913
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004558 -
Biomedicines Jan 2020Novel treatment regimens are required for castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs) that become unresponsive to standard treatments, such as docetaxel and... (Review)
Review
Novel treatment regimens are required for castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPCs) that become unresponsive to standard treatments, such as docetaxel and enzalutamide. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors showed promising results in hematological malignancies, but they failed in solid tumors such as prostate cancer, despite the overexpression of HDACs in CRPC. Four HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat, pracinostat, panobinostat and romidepsin, underwent phase II clinical trials for prostate cancers; however, phase III trials were not recommended due to a majority of patients exhibiting either toxicity or disease progression. In this review, the pharmacodynamic reasons for the failure of HDAC inhibitors were assessed and placed in the context of the advancements in the understanding of CRPCs, HDACs and resistance mechanisms. The review focuses on three themes: evolution of androgen receptor-negative prostate cancers, development of resistance mechanisms and differential effects of HDACs. In conclusion, advancements can be made in this field by characterizing HDACs in prostate tumors more extensively, as this will allow more specific drugs catering to the specific HDAC subtypes to be designed.
PubMed: 32019149
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8020022